Unit 1 – Foundations of Logic Reasoning and Arguments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
-- in other words, logic is
Advertisements

The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
1 Teacher Notes Supplies Needed: Class set of sudoku puzzles. 4 sets squares with the digits 1 – 4. 6 sets squares with the digits 1 – 6. Vocabulary deductive.
DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS Fundamentals of Logic Unit – 1 Chapter – 4 Fundamentals of Logic Unit – 1 Chapter – 4.
Part 2 Module 3 Arguments and deductive reasoning Logic is a formal study of the process of reasoning, or using common sense. Deductive reasoning involves.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Other Info on Making Arguments
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Logos Formal Logic.
Deduction and Induction
Deduction CIS308 Dr Harry Erwin. Syllogism A syllogism consists of three parts: the major premise, the minor premise, and the conclusion. In Aristotle,
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Artificial Intelligence Reasoning. Reasoning is the process of deriving logical conclusions from given facts. Durkin defines reasoning as ‘the process.
Basic Argumentation.
The ubiquity of logic One common example of reasoning  If I take an umbrella, I can prevent getting wet by rain  I don’t want to get myself wet by rain.
Causality, Reasoning in Research, and Why Science is Hard
RATIONALISM OR EMPIRICISM? PURE LOGIC OR A REALLY, REALLY GOOD GUESS?
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.
CT (critical thinking) in Economics When economists reason, they make arguments, they deduce from hypotheses, they create models, and they offer explanations.
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
©Evergreen Public Schools Teacher Notes 10/30/2015 Supplies Needed: Class set of sudoku puzzles. 4 sets squares with the digits 1 – 4. 6 sets squares.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
REASONING AS PROBLEM SOLVING DEDUCTIVE REASONING: –what, if any, conclusions necessarily follow? INDUCTIVE REASONING: –what is the probability that those.
Review from Yesterday…. Rhetoric vs. Dialectic Deduction : conclusion is necessitated by, or reached from the previously stated facts (premises). Remember.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
LECTURE 17 THE MODAL ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (A VARIANT OF HARTSHORNE’S VERSION)
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
The construction of a formal argument
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. REASONING.
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 2 Arguments are among us…
Reasoning deduction, induction, abduction Problem solving.
Logic and Reasoning.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Part One: Assessing the Inference, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive reasoning.
Argumentation and Persuasion
The second Meeting Basic Terms in Logic.
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Philosophy.
Reasoning about Reasoning
Philosophy Test #1 Revision
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Arguments.
New Rhetoric Journal PDN: read the sentence below and identify what techniques the authors used to support their claim. Come up with as many techniques.
Inductive and Deductive Logic
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Argumentation.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Unit 1 – Foundations of Logic Reasoning and Arguments

When someone is trying to convince you to act a certain way of believe a particular idea, it is likely that he or she is using an argument ◦Giving a reason(s) to support a particular conclusion

Argument: consists of a propositions that the arguer takes as true, with one particular proposition, the conclusion, argued for by using the other proposition, the premises ◦Arguments are built out of propositions

Example : Capital Punishment Debate Capital punishment should not be used because wrongly convicted people will be executed by mistake and that is total unacceptable.  Premise 1: if capital punishment is used, then wrongly convicted people will be executed by mistake  P2: the execution of wrongly convicted is totally unacceptable  Conclusion: capital punishment should not be used.

Conclusion-indicators & Premise-indicators Certain words or phrases that typically serve to introduce the conclusion of an argument ◦Conclusion-indicators Certain words that typically indicate the premise of an argument ◦Premise-indicators

Common indicators ConclusionPremise ThereforeSince HenceBecause ThusGiven that SoAssuming that ConsequentlyInsomuch as We may conclude that…For the reason that…

Not all arguments includes one of these indicators Example ◦There is no such thing as free will. The mind is induced to wish this or that by some cause, and that cause is determined by another cause, an so on back to infinity. Spinoza

The presence of an indicator is no guarantee that there is an argument ◦Dinosaurs are extinct because of the impact of a large asteroid  The proposition is not being argued it is being taken as true and given an explanation for why it is true

Deductive, Inductive & Abductive Deductive Logic: The sudoku puzzle is currently a very popular form of logic game. The strategy for solving a sudoku uses a reasoning process. Sudoku puzzles use a form of reasoning called deductive logic.

In deductive logic, you draw inferences (identify relationships) between information you know for certain and information you need to know. You attempt to work towards the point where, if the original information you know-- 'premises'--is true, then the conclusion must be true as well. In a sudoku puzzle, for example, if you know that a specific square could contain the number 4, 5, 6, or 9, and that on another level the same square is part of a vertical line that cannot contain any of the numbers 4, 5, or 9, then you can conclude that it must contain a 6. If your original information about what the box cannot contain is correct, the conclusion must be correct. Deductive logic allows for absolute certainty.

Deductive argument is either valid or invalid ◦Valid deductive argument is one in which the conclusion is logically followed by the premises ◦Invalid deductive argument is one in which the argument is offered as valid, but the conclusion turns out not to be logically entailed in the premise

Deductive arguments are a form of syllogisms: 3 line argument in which the first two line are premises and the third line is the conclusion ◦All men are mortal ◦Socrates is a man ◦Socrates is mortal

Invalid deductive argument ◦A stone is a substance ◦Your are a substance ◦You are a stone ◦Why is this invalid?  A stone is a substance (does not say all/every substance is a stone) – flawed argument

Inductive arguments Is an argument in which the conclusion is probably true, given that the premises are true. Consider the following: ◦In a survey of all 1839students at Hegal high school approx 95%responeded that they believe in the existence of an absolute spirit ◦Gottfried is a student at Hegel high school ◦Gottfried believes in the existence of an absolute spitit

Abductive Argument Is one in which the conclusion is a ‘best guess’ that is judged to be the most plausible explanation among competing alternatives, given that the premises are true. ◦If it was raining last night, then the street will be wet. ◦The street is wet ◦It was raining last night  Can be true or false but that is the best guess