Federal Aviation Administration Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day Terrence Johnson - Project Lead September 30, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAAC TEDC WAM/MLAT And ADS-B Security
Advertisements

Airside Capacity Enhancement
Air Traffic Management
1. 2 New Flight Inspection System Next Generation flight inspection system Multiprocessor Navigation Computer Unit (NCU) Full Windows/XP Graphical Workstation.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory RWSL OpEval PilotTraining, page 1 Aug 2006 MPK Pilot Training for Continued Operational Evaluation of Runway Status Lights (RWSL)
Imbedded SSR Mode-S Logic Control Unit University of Stellenbosch Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering K. Gastrow 4 December 2009.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Enabling technologies Pierre GAYRAUD THALES Avionics ASAS-TN Seminar Brighton October 2004.
Applications from packages I to III
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Implementation/Acceptance Testing CSE Week 8 / 1 CSE9020 Case Study Week 8 Implementation and Acceptance Testing.
Delivering NextGen June 5, 2015 Maryland Airport Managers Association Presented by Carmine Gallo, Eastern Regional Administrator Federal Aviation Administration.
Implementation/Acceptance Testing / 1 Implementation and Acceptance Testing Physical Implementation Criteria: 1. Data availability 2. Data reliability.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
EDEP as Tool for ADS-B Validation eDEP User Group, 9 June 2008 Leo van der Hoorn, CASCADE Programme.
Distance measuring equipment (DME)
Transponder Basics Phil King, Herefordshire Gliding Club.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Vincent Chu and Peter Hwoschinsky, FAA Maria Picardi Kuffner, MIT/LL
Alternative Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Initiative
Air traffic controllers (ATC) consideration and ATC solutions Session 5 Presentation 4.
Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day
Joint University Program 5 April 2001 Steven Aab, Graduate Research Associate Avionics Engineering Center Ohio University Advisor: Dr. Michael F. DiBenedetto,
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Presented to: Instructors and Pilot Examiners By: The FAASTeam Date: July 1 to September 30, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from
Radio Detection And Ranging (RADAR). Exercises Describe the basic principles of RADAR. What are the bands of frequencies for ATC Radars? What are the.
Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the National Airspace System Coming soon to airspace near you…..UAS-101 Presented At: Pecora.
St Louis Flying Club I 2008 Annual Meeting 2008 Annual Meeting.
Outcome: Zero fatalities resulting from runway incursions.
0 Downloaded from FAA Runway Safety Briefing Sun ‘n Fun EAA Fly-In April 2002.
Radar Video Surveillance
Page 1 Aircraft Surveillance Applications (Extracts from ASA MASPS, DO-289) Presented to ASAS-TN 3 rd Workshop Steve Koczo - Rockwell Collins Inc. Jonathan.
October 5, 2007 By: Richard L. Day, Vice President En Route and Oceanic Services (ATO-E) Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services.
Prof. dr. sc. Ivan Markežić
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
By: FAASTeam Federal Aviation Administration Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO)
Emerging Issues for Air Navigation Service Providers Rudy Kellar Vice President, Operations NAV CANADA September 2007.
International Data Link Symposium st October 2003, Newbury, UK FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CIVIL AVIATION DATA LINK FOR ADS-B BASED ON MIDS / LINK16 Bob.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-84 Initial Capability for Ground-based Cooperative Surveillance SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi.
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program Operational Trials in Domestic Airspace Presented to:Data Comm Implementation Team (DCIT) By:Jerry.
Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Federal Aviation Administration System Airport.
What Is Multilateration Triangulation System Uses Aircraft Transponder Multiple Ground Receivers Central Computer Calculates & Displays Aircraft Position.
By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Runway Status Lights BOS Operational Evaluation Training for Air Traffic Controllers Bruce Kinsler,
Lecture 9: Ecological Factors & Aircraft Performance AIRCRAFT WEIGHT & PERFORMANCE.
Air Systems Division GROUND ASAS EQUIPMENT Michel Procoudine Gorsky ASAS TN2 – Workshop 5 Toulouse 17th-20th September 2007.
UAV See & Avoid Employing Vision Sensors
Communications, Airspace and a bunch of other stuff ! Rick L. Crose Orlando International Tower.
182a_N00FEB23_DG 1 Local Area Augmentation System CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS Alaska Regional Briefing Anchorage October 1, 2002.
Presented to: Demonstrations and Prototypes TIM By: Steve Hodges Date: 05/04/2011 Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Access to SWIM (AAtS) FY11 planned.
ADS-B Technology Overview
Scenario on airport works Session 5 Presentation 1.
DIRECTION TECHNIQUE CERTIFICATION Paris, April 2008 SL ASAS TN2 Workshop ppt ASAS & Business.
Wes Timmons, Director of Runway Safety, FAA April 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety: Sun ‘N Fun Update.
Integrated Project of the Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 1.4: Aeronautics and Space, sponsored by EC, DG TREN Contract FP Internet:
© 2015 Noblis, Inc. Jonathan Hammer Modeling for Verification and Validation Workshop, FAA WJHTC Monte Carlo Modeling Techniques in FAA Systems Development.
Radar.
Air Traffic Control. There are different types of air traffic controllers who communicate with pilots from the time the pilot calls for a clearance to.
AIXM 5 Concepts This presentation is based on the first part of the “AICM and AIXM 5 - Exchange Model goals, requirements and design” document. The purpose.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Navigation Technology
Avidyne ADS-B Solutions – The Interfaces – and How They Work The first piece of the puzzle is understanding what ADS-B is. You will often hear people refer.
400328_M_1Y.ppt Thompson MIT Lincoln Laboratory Analysis of Terminal Separation Standards and Radar Performance Dr. Steven D. Thompson Dr. Steven.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Diagram 1. Trig 1090ES ADS-B Out System
Bringing Large Commercial Airport Capabilities to Your Local Community
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Presentation transcript:

Federal Aviation Administration Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day Terrence Johnson - Project Lead September 30, 2010

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 2 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 The ASSC system shall fuse multilateration ground sensor data with Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) equipped aircraft information for display on an FAA certified airport tower controller display (included as part of the ASSC configuration). The ASSC system shall have the capability of providing data to other external FAA systems (i.e. Surveillance Broadcast Services (SBS), Runway Status Lights (RWSL), and Terminal Data Distribution System (TDDS)). The ASSC system shall track surface vehicles/aircraft providing information for Air Traffic Control (ATC) services, and to provide pilot/vehicle operator improved situational awareness through ADS- B Traffic Information System Broadcast (TIS-B) services. Using the TIS-B data, pilots/vehicle operators with ADS-B equipped receivers will be able to locate the position of other non ADS-B equipped aircraft or vehicles. What is the Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System?

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 3 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 MLAT B – Required B – Required DP RMS CS TP Display RADIO 260A – Current A – Current B – Required 282B – Required TIS-B = MLAT 1090/978  ASSC System Infrastructure (Conceptual)  FAA SBS (Surface/Terminal/En Route) Infrastructure  FAA RWSL Infrastructure  FAA TDDS Infrastructure  FAA Terminal/En Route Automation Infrastructure SDP FAA Automation DD B B ADS-B GSSREFTGS ASSC System Interfaces RWSLP TDDS

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 4 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 ASSC System Acronym Definitions RMS: TP: DP: GS: SREFT: DD: SDP: CS: RWSLP: TDDS: Remote Maintenance Subsystem Target Processor Display Processor Ground Sensor System Reference Transmitter Data Distribution Service Delivery Point Control Station Runway Status Light Processor Terminal Data Distribution System

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 5 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 These critical requirements are not intended as all-inclusive nor listed in order of importance: –Must be able to receive, multilaterate, and process target data on 1090 MHz (ATCRBS/Mode S) and 978 MHz (UAT) frequencies. – The 1090 MHz processing shall be in accordance with Minimum Operational Performance Standard (MOPS) DO 260B. –The 978 MHz processing shall be in accordance with MOPS DO 282B. –Must have a GPS independent time reference for multilateration calculations. –Must be able to interrogate target transponders (ATCRBS/Mode S) on 1030 MHz. –Must be able to interface with SBS to receive and process FAA provided ADS-B source data. –Must be capable of receiving multiple inputs in ASTERIX formats (e.g. cat023 status messages and cat033 target messages). –Must have the capability to output data in ASTERIX format through a secure interface to external users (e.g. cat011 system track data, cat010/cat033 ADS-B reports, and cat010 multilateration track data). ASSC System Critical Requirements (from the Market Survey)

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 6 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 Key ASSC System Requirements Target Capacity –Shall be capable of tracking 200 combined real surface and approach (arrival) targets. Probability of Detection –Shall be at least 93% for Mode S, 74% for ATCRBS, and 93% for UAT within the coverage volume. Position Accuracy –Shall calculate a 3D or a 2D-multilateration position. –Shall be less than or equal to 20 feet RMS error for every 100 contiguous feet of taxiway and runway. –Shall be less than or equal to 296 feet (0.05 nautical miles) RMS from the threshold out to 1.7 nautical miles in the approach corridors. –The time difference of arrival (TDOA ) RMS error shall be less than 13.4 nanoseconds for TDOA values used in calculating a plot’s position. Identification accuracy –ID swapping for Mode S, Mode A, manually entered data tags, and system track numbers shall occur in less than 0.01% of track updates. –The number of tracks for which the system incorrectly identifies automatically (either the Mode S code, Mode A code or Flight ID) for more than 5 seconds shall be less than 1 in 1000 tracks. Processing Legacy ATCRBS & Mode S –Shall be backward compatible with RTCA MOPS DO-260/260A transponders.

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 7 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 Key ASSC System Requirements (cont.) Spectrum –Shall conform to Section “Receiver Characteristics”; Section “Compatibility with Other Systems”; Section “Transmit Pulse Characteristics”; and Section “Reply Detection and Decoding” of RTCA/DO-185B. –Shall operate in accordance with the Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Radio Frequency Management (47 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 300). –Shall ensure electromagnetic compatibility with other licensed radio frequency systems. –ASSC data or electromagnetic compatibility studies required to obtain spectrum certification shall be prepared and provided to the FAA. –Total “off time” due to suppression or interrogation caused to a victim transponder shall NOT exceed sec/sec. –The total replies that the Multilateration subsystem elicits from a victim ATCRBS transponder shall NOT exceed 10 in 0.25 sec.

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 8 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 False Track Rate –Dual and duplicate tracks shall NOT occur more than once per 12 hour period. –Shall employ use of resolution minimums of supporting sensors to avoid the merging of separate targets. –Shall identify the merging of separate targets and automatically separate tracks upon two successive determinations of 150 foot positional separation on the surface of plot reports or upon receipt of conflicting aircraft ID, Mode 3/A, or Mode S information. –Shall detect track swap conditions based on velocity and identification data and corrected within 3 seconds for moving targets, if a track is supported by more than one sensor,. –The false system track rate due to ADS-B false tracks shall be no more than 1 per 30 days. –The false track rate for MLAT tracks shall be: ATCRBS-supported tracks - less than 1 percent of ATCRBS-initiated tracks. Mode S-supported tracks - less than 1 in 1000 Mode S-initiated tracks. UAT- supported tracks - less than 1 in 1000 UAT initiated tracks. Key ASSC System Requirements (cont.)

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 9 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 False Track Rate (cont.) –Shall report when an aircraft’s reported ADS-B position is: on the surface - greater than 100 feet away from the system track position derived from multilateration within 1.7 nautical miles of the runway threshold - greater than 500 feet from the system track position derived from multilateration. Update Rate –Shall provide target/track updates at a minimum of a once per second basis. Reliability –Shall have an MTBF of more than 2190 hours. –Shall have an MTTR of less than 30 minutes. –Shall include backup of all system setup, optimization and calibration files as well as software and firmware. –Shall provide a means of recovery in case of a system failure. Data Fusion (Inputs are MLAT and SBS/ADSB) –Shall initiate and update system tracks on the basis of incoming plots from any sensor. Key ASSC System Requirements (cont.)

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 10 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 ASSC System Significant Issues Explain Safety Logic Philosophy –Identify landers / departures accessing a closed runway –Identify how potential collisions are determined. How is “time till impact” calculated for arrivals/departures/aircraft on the surface. –How / What can be Adapted? Problems Encountered and Their Resolution –Describe typical potential collision scenario(s) and how they are handled. –Identify issues with Land & Hold Short operations, angle of intersection between intersecting runways or runway and taxiway. –With respect to the track’s position, where is the plane’s nose? Where is its tail?

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 11 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 Other ASSC System Issues of Interest How will MLAT and SBS positions be validated? What is your installation philosophy? –(What happens / When / Describe optimization process) What happens when the movement area changes? Test / Integration / Lab Facilities Philosophy –(How are deficiencies or enhancements handled?) What sort of maintenance is expected? What sort of cyber security is provided? Describe wireless technology that may be used for temporary or permanent Multilateration Subsystem Sensors (MSS). What sort of data logging and playback is provided? Government retains rights to source code (maintenance/ownership) Government is open to tailoring the specification to support the application of COTS to meeting the key site dates.

Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) System Industry Day (DRAFT) 12 Federal Aviation Administration September 30, 2010 Must be deployed to 9 sites, including all necessary FAA verification and operational testing, according to the following schedule: –1) Co-Key Sites 18 Months after award. CLE - Cleveland-Hopkins International Airport SFO - San Francisco International Airport –2) Seven (7) remaining sites by CY ADW - Andrews Air Force Base ANC - Anchorage International Airport CVG - Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport MCI - Kansas City International Airport MSY - New Orleans International Airport PDX - Portland International Airport PIT - Pittsburgh International Airport The ASSC System Schedule