1 System Level Accountability Measures Sept. 17, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Advertisements

Higher Education: A Presentation to the Budget Trends Commission May 27, 2008 Mark Misukanis Director of Fiscal Policy and Research Office of Higher Education.
A Guide to Analyzing PrOF Instructional Data Packets CRC Research Office 2009.
The State, DHE, and CCHE Context. Colorado Context Colorado is a growth state- 8 th in the nation 47% of population (25-64) have at least an Associate.
Highlights: First-Time Student Enrollment Board of Higher Education Meeting | October 6, 2009.
How College Shapes LivesFor detailed data, see: trends.collegeboard.org. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, 2013, Tables 222, 306, and.
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) Interrelated surveys conducted annually by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
1 New York State Trends in Student Financial Aid and Cost of Attendance Presented to the Higher Education Committee of the New York State Board of Regents.
The Benefits of Independent Higher Education to Pennsylvania Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Pennsylvania (AICUP) 101 North Front.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado The Public Agenda 5 Years Later Illinois.
Demographic Trends and the Education Pipeline: Implications for Educating Latinos for the Future of America.
Texas: Demographic Characteristics and Trends Texas Association of Healthcare Interpreters and Translators August 19, 2011 Dallas, TX.
Demographic Trends from the 2000 Census Presented by Janet Harrah, Director Center for Economic Development and Business Research Wichita State University.
Demographic Trends and Missouri’s Children Missouri State Board of Education April 21, 2005 Dr. Bill Elder University of Missouri-Columbia Office of Social.
Trends in Higher Education Series Trends in Higher Education Series 2005, October 18, Distribution of Full-Time Undergraduates.
Diversity Demographics United States and University of Washington Compiled by UW Department of Anthropology Diversity Committee.
AACN Financial Benchmarking Survey and Other Data Initiatives Di Fang, PhD - Director of Research and Data Services.
The Changing Population of Texas Government Finance Officers Association of Texas October 25, 2012 San Marcos, TX.
2013 NACME Data Book Deck 3: Enrollment and Persistence in Engineering.
Goal 2025: To increase the proportion of Americans with high-quality degrees and credentials to 60 percent by the year 2025.
New York State’s Labor Force Drivers Presented by Kevin Jack, Statewide Labor Market Analyst August 2008.
Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.
Academic Attainment in California Community Colleges: Racial And Ethnic Disparities in the ARCC 2.0/Scorecard Metrics Tom Leigh Alice van Ommeren.
Population Change in The United States: Implications for Human and Socioeconomic Resources in the 21st Century by Steve H. Murdock Institute for Demographic.
Understanding Health Disparities in Texas Maureen Rubin, Ph.D., MSW Assistant Professor Department of Social Work University of Texas at San Antonio Nazrul.
Connecticut Data: Implications for Higher Education Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Connecticut Board of Regents for Higher Education (August 13, 2013)
A Comprehensive Analysis of a PrOF Instructional Data Packet To illustrate the data analysis process CRC Research Office 2009.
Dr. Christina Whitfield April 29, 2013 Big E Symposium KCTCS PERFORMANCE METRICS WHERE’S THE DATA?
Goal 2025: To increase the proportion of Americans with high-quality degrees and credentials to 60 percent by the year 2025.
“Building an Inclusive Community” Presented by Dr. Mordean Taylor-Archer Vice Provost for Diversity and International Affairs 1 University of Louisville.
North Dakota State University, IACC Room 424, P.O. Box 6050, Dept. 8000,Fargo, ND Phone: (701) : The Impact.
PrOF Training Brad Brazil Kathy McLain Norv Wellsfry.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
Texas Electric Cooperatives Annual Meeting August 5, 2014 Galveston, Texas Texas Population Characteristics, Trends, and Projections.
Extracting Useful and Targeted State-Level Data from IPEDS Experiences from the Land of 10,000 Lakes.
Statewide Unit Record Databases in Higher Education: Growth and Application Peter Ewell National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS)
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Program Collaboration and Transfer Update
Texas Demographic Data Users Conference May 22, 2014 Austin, Texas.
UWG’s Enrollment Profile Who are our students? Fall 2006 snapshot.
Brand Review SP’09 “Get to Know MSJC Students from the Perspective of the Facts and the Stats” Key Focus Areas: Headcount Key Focus Areas: Headcount MSJC.
College Students Age 21 And Older College Students Under Age 21 The Majority Of College Students (69%) Are 21 Years Of Age Or Older Source: U.S. Census.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
Low-income Adults in Profile: Low-income Adults in Profile: Improving Lives Through Higher Education Bryan Cook ACE Center for Policy Analysis.
Valencia College District Board of Trustees September 17, 2013.
Draft Draft Recommendations for Measuring Completion: Success is earning the credential sought by the student Completion should be measured both when students.
Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Accountability Committee.
1 System Level Accountability Measures Dec. 16, 2003.
Minnesota Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
STRATEGIC PLAN Kentucky Community and Technical College.
Chief Financial Officers of Public Universities in Texas November 5, 2013 Galveston, Texas Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends and Higher Education.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends and Education
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004.
California State University, Sacramento Nancy Shulock Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy Presentation to Conference: Policy Challenges.
MnSCU Audit Committee May 20, Update on System-level Accountability Framework May 20, 2003.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado State Profile: Arkansas Fayetteville,
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures June 14, 2005.
Virginia Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Faculty Salary Report (CBM008) Uses Average Budgeted Faculty Salaries Salaries reported on fall reports are: doubled, converted to full-time equivalent.
WOODY L. HUNT, CHAIRMAN HIGHER EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS July 23,
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
The Profile of the New American University October 2006.
1 The Disparity Story by the Numbers Shaun Williams-Wyche, Ph.D. Minnesota Office of Higher Education April 28, 2016.
Fall Enrollment by Ethnic Group and Year Grant Campus Year ETHNIC GROUP Nonresident alien Hispanic/Latino American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black.
The U.S. Higher Education Landscape: Equity Lens Applied
Deans’ Briefing Book
IPEDS COMPARISON FALL 2010 – FALL 2014
Access and Equity in Oregon Community Colleges
KCTCS Performance Measures
WHERE ARE WE? THE STATE OF DUAL CREDIT/ENROLLMENT IN MISSOURI
The Public Agenda 5 Years Later
Presentation transcript:

1 System Level Accountability Measures Sept. 17, 2003

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 2 STRATEGIC DIRECTION: ACCESS AND OPPORTUNITY  Indicator: Access to Programs & Courses Core Measures :  System Overall Participation Rate  System Underserved Students Participation Rate Contextual Measures  State Overall Participation Rate  State Underserved Students Participation Rate  Minnesota Compared to Other States

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 3 DATA SOURCES: SYSTEM STUDENT DATA  Population: MN residents taking courses at System colleges and universities  Source: Integrated Statewide Record System  Content: Enrollment in credit and non-credit courses Student Demographic Characteristics  Data of birth  Racial-ethnic status  State of origin  Timeframe: Fiscal Year 2000

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 4 DATA SOURCES: SYSTEM STUDENT DATA  Caveats Unknown characteristic data  Racial-ethnic status: 16.4% unknown  Date of birth: 6.5% unknown Students reported a single racial-ethnic category Non-credit enrollment understates actual enrollment because several institutions were not using ISRS

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 5 DATA SOURCES: SYSTEM STUDENT DATA  Analysis Students reported in four age categories  15 to 17 years  18 to 24 years  25 to 49 years  50 to 84 years Students with unknown date of birth were distributed to age categories based on the known distribution

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 6 DATA SOURCES: SYSTEM STUDENT DATA  Analysis Students reported in five racial-ethnic categories  African American/Black  American Indian  Asian/Pacific Islander  Hispanic  White  U.S. Non-residents and non-citizens are excluded Students with unknown race-ethnicity were distributed based on known distribution

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 7 DATA SOURCES: U.S. CENSUS POPULATION DATA  Maintained by: US Bureau of the Census  Source: Decennial survey of the population  Content: Population by age Population by race-ethnicity Population by age and race-ethnicity

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 8 DATA SOURCES: U.S. CENSUS POPULATION DATA  Population: Minnesota resident population in April 2000  Residents: Established a household  Data Availability: Actual population counts for 2000 Estimated population counts for years between census are typically published the following year Figures for 2001 and 2002 have not yet been published

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 9 DATA SOURCES: U.S. CENSUS POPULATION DATA  Issues with race-ethnicity data: Respondents reported multiple categories Data are reported for all combinations Census used “other race” category  Analysis “Other race” was 97% Hispanic & classified as Hispanic Population in combined categories were distributed to single categories

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 10 DATA SOURCES: MINNESOTA STUDENT DATA  Population: MN residents taking courses at colleges and universities in Minnesota  Source: Higher Education Services Office  Content: Enrollment in credit courses Student Demographic Characteristics  Data of birth  Racial-ethnic status  State of origin  Timeframe: Fall Term 1999

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 11 DATA SOURCES: MINNESOTA STUDENT DATA  Caveats Unknown characteristic data  Racial-ethnic status: 12.2% unknown  Date of birth: 4.0% unknown Students reported a single racial-ethnic category Excludes non-credit enrollment

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 12 DATA SOURCES: MINNESOTA STUDENT DATA  Analysis Students with unknown date of birth were distributed to age categories based on the known distribution Students with unknown race-ethnicity were distributed based on known distribution

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 13 SYSTEM OVERALL PARTICIPATION RATE  Definition: Minnesota resident students enrolled in System institutions as a percent of state population  Numerator: MN resident students enrolled in FY aged 15 to 84  Denominator: MN population in aged 15 to 84

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 14 SYSTEM UNDERSERVED PARTICIPATION RATE  Definition: Breakout of overall System rate  Race-ethnicity  Other breakouts not reported due to lack of data: First generation college student Limited English speaking students Low income students

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 15 SYSTEM OVERALL PARTICIPATION RATE 7.1%

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 16 CREDIT PARTICIPATION RATE BY AGE Fiscal Year 2000

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 17 SYSTEM ENROLLMENT & STATE POPULATION BY RACE-ETHNICITY Total Headcount = 193,729 FY 2000 ENROLLMENT2000 POPULATION

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 18 CREDIT PARTICIPATION RATE BY RACE-ETHNICITY: AGE Fiscal Year 2000

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 19 CREDIT PARTICIPATION RATE BY RACE-ETHNICITY: AGE Fiscal Year 2000

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 20 CREDIT PARTICIPATION RATE BY RACE-ETHNICITY: AGE Fiscal Year 2000

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 21 CREDIT PARTICIPATION RATE BY RACE-ETHNICITY : AGE Fiscal Year 2000

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 22 CREDIT PARTICIPATION RATE BY RACE-ETHNICITY : AGE Fiscal Year 2000

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 23 CONTEXT: MINNESOTA PARTICIPATION RATE  Fiscal year enrollment data not available for other institutions  Definition: Minnesota resident students enrolled in all postsecondary institutions as a % of state population  Numerator: MN resident students enrolled in Fall aged 15 to 84  Denominator: MN population in aged 15 to 84

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 24 MN RESIDENT ENROLLMENT & POPULATION BY AGE Total Headcount = 224, POPULATIONFALL 1999 ENROLLMENT

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 25 MINNESOTA RESIDENT ENROLLMENT AGED BY SECTOR Total Headcount = 224,205 Source: Higher Education Services Office FALL 1999

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 26 SYSTEM SHARE OF RESIDENT ENROLLMENT BY AGE Fall 1999

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 27 CREDIT PARTICIPATION RATE BY INSTITUTION SECTOR & AGE 3.2% 28.5% 4.1% 0.5% 5.9% FALL 1999

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 28 MN RESIDENT ENROLLMENT & POPULATION BY RACE-ETHNICITY Total Headcount = 224,205 FALL 1999 ENROLLMENT2000 POPULATION

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 29 SYSTEM SHARE OF RESIDENT ENROLLMENT BY RACE-ETHNICITY Fiscal Year 2000

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 30 CREDIT PARTICIPATION RATE BY SECTOR & RACE-ETHNICITY 6.5% 8.4% 5.2% 3.2% 5.9% FALL %

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 31 CREDIT PARTICIPATION RATE BY SECTOR & RACE-ETHNICITY: % 25.3% 13.1% 7.4% 31.1% FALL %

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 32 CONTEXT: MINNESOTA AND OTHER STATES  Source: National Information Center for Higher Education  Developed by the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS)  Purpose: Provide higher education policymakers and analysts with the data and information needed to make sound policy decisions. 

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 33 NINTH GRADERS CHANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION BY AGE 19 Definition: 9 th graders divided by first-time freshmen 4 years later. Minnesota: Ranks 2 nd – 42% above the national average.

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 34 COLLEGE GOING RATES OF HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES Definition: High school grads divided by first-time freshmen who graduated the year before. Minnesota: Ranks 9th – 13% above the national average.

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 35 IMPORT – EXPORT RATIO OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS Definition: First-time freshmen from other states divided by those who left the state. Minnesota: Ranks 35 th – 33% below the national average.

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 36 % POPULATION ENROLLED IN HIGHER EDUCATION AGE Definition: Total fall enrollment divided by population aged 18 to 64. Minnesota: Ranks 11 th – 10% above the national average.

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 37 PART-TIME UNDERGRADUATE ENROLLMENT AS % OF POPULATION AGE Definition: Part-time fall enrollment divided by population aged 25 to 44. Minnesota: Ranks 16 th – 3% below the national average.

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 38 NEXT STEPS ON ACCESS AND OPPORTUNITY MEASURES  Population estimates for 2001 and 2002 will be released this month.  Population estimates for 2003 are scheduled for release in Summer 2004  Population estimates for subsequent years will typically be released in the summer following the year.

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 39 STRATEGIC DIRECTION: FULLY INTEGRATE THE SYSTEM  Indicator: Fiscal & Physical Capital Utilization Fiscal Core Measures :  Expenditures per full-year equivalent  Distribution of expenditures by function Facility Core Measures  Facility Condition Index  Resources to address deferred maintenance

THE STUDENTS’ CHOICE: EDUCATION FOR DEMANDING TIMESMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 40 STRATEGIC DIRECTION: FULLY INTEGRATE THE SYSTEM  Indicator: Fiscal & Physical Capital Utilization Technology Core Measures :  Several measures of the use of information technology in instruction and support services such as, on-line courses and web registration  Customer satisfaction with information technology services. Contextual Measures  Expenditures per full-time equivalent student for peer institutions  National standard for facilities condition