November 12, 2009 Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REMEDIATION IN COLORADO Dr. Scott Mendelsberg Executive Director, Colorado GEAR UP.
Advertisements

Peralta 2011 ARCC Report Mike Orkin, Ph.D. Office of Educational Services Peralta Community College District.
LACCD Strategic Plan Internal Scan A. Enrollment Trends and Student Characteristics.
Achieving the Dream: Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment December 2007 Research Report No
CSRDE and the National Symposium on Student Retention Kirsten A. Rowe, SUNY New Paltz Annual Conference of the Association for Institutional Research and.
SCC BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE Using Data to Support the Initiative Nga Pham May 22, 2009.
Appearing at a Community College Near You!!! The SDICCCA FACULTY INTERN PROGRAM Don’t Miss It! …And now,a word from our Sponsors.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
P449. p450 Figure 15-1 p451 Figure 15-2 p453 Figure 15-2a p453.
Chabot College Students Fall 2007 Demographic, Educational & Psychographic Characteristics Dr. Carolyn Arnold Chabot College Institutional Research Office.
Pass Rates in Paired and Unpaired Courses Fall 1998 Office of Institutional Research LaGuardia Community College.
Facts about First-Year Students at Central Connecticut State University Presented by Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Analysis Of Spring 09 Enrollment. Percent Enrolled / All Students Spring CSU Channel Islands.
Achieving the Dream: Developmental Courses and Student Retention Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report.
Table of Contents Linear Functions: Application The fall enrollment figures at a community college are shown
A Demographic Profile of Current EVC Students Spring 2007 EXHIBIT_10-K.
Colorado’s Preschool to Postsecondary Alignment Act, SB (CAP4K) Co-convened Meeting Gunnison, CO – Western State College November 10, 2008 Dept of.
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION & REAL ESTATE WEST VALLEY COLLEGE SARATOGA, CA MAY 14, 2010 Business Advisory Board Presentation.
1 Foothill College Basic Skills College Hour Rob Johnstone, Ph.D. 10/8/03.
Distance Education Report, 2014 Presentation to the Board of Trustees Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District Janet Gelb Kerry Kilber Rebman Christopher.
Fall/Spring Enrollment GROSSMONT COLLEGE Number of Students* (Based on End-of-Term Data) Fall and Spring Semesters: * Excludes students taking.
Fall/Spring Enrollment GROSSMONT-CUYAMACA DISTRICT Number of Students* (Based on End-of-Term Data) Fall and Spring Semesters: * Excludes students.
A first-year early matriculation, student retention, and success program Developed and Coordinated by Jennifer Braidwood & Jesus Miranda.
MSJC Assessment Scores FA’06 as Baseline and includes SP’07/FA’07/SP’08 Updated 7/22/08 Compiled by MSJC R&D Dept.- C. Hawkins / IT MIS WO# XBRO.BSI.
Fall/Spring Enrollment CUYAMACA COLLEGE Number of Students* (Based on End-of-Term Data) Fall and Spring Semesters: * Excludes students taking.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
Graduate Student Survey Fall Respondent characteristics  423 responses – 15% of graduate population  Distribution by gender, ethnicity and age.
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, 2012 Report Riverside Community College District Riverside Community College District Teaching & Learning.
The Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) AUGUST 2005.
Peralta Community College District Open Forum 2015 Strategic Plan January 21, 2015.
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
Accountability Reporting The “Scorecard” Presentation to Academic Senate November 1, 2012 Rosaleen Ryan.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
Fact Book Fall 2010 Outcomes *Unless otherwise specified, charts exclude students taking only non-credit courses.
Complete College OCCC Fall 2012 AtD Cohort Retention September 18,
Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning.
De Anza Math Pilot Results, Evaluating a NonRandomized Trial: A Case Study of a Pilot to Increase Pre- Collegiate Math Course Success Rates Andrew.
REMEDIATION IN COLORADO. COLORADO GEAR UP SUCCESS.
+ General Education Assessment Spring 2014 Quantitative Literacy.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
MSJC BSI Baseline Measures using FA’06 as Baseline and includes SP’07/FA’07/SP’08 Prepared for Instructional Services Updated 7/22/08 Compiled by MSJC.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
College Students Age 21 And Older College Students Under Age 21 The Majority Of College Students (69%) Are 21 Years Of Age Or Older Source: U.S. Census.
CONTINUOUS ENROLLMENT BY THE NUMBERS. A 4-year Data Profile THE STUDENTS ENROLLMENT STATUS PERFORMANCE RESULTS BEST PRACTICES ENGAGEMENT.
Linear Functions: Application Example 1: The fall enrollment figures at a community college are shown
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004.
PRESENTED TO BASIC SKILLS COMMITTEE PRESENTED ON MAY 29, 2008 PRESENTED BY NATHAN R. DURDELLA, Ph.D. CAROLINE Q. SHELDON, Ph.D. OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
The Accelerated Learning Program The Community College of Baltimore County.
Robert Franco, Ph.D. Director, Office for Institutional Effectiveness Professor of Anthropology
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee Draft - 5/12/2010.
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
1 READY BY 21 TASKFORCE Harford County Department of Community Services Local Management Board Education Benchmark October 5, 2010.
Fall Enrollment by Ethnic Group and Year Grant Campus Year ETHNIC GROUP Nonresident alien Hispanic/Latino American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black.
Meaningful Federal Community College Success Rate --A POP QUIZ Utility A.19.8%Federal 150% completion B.38.5%Federal 150% completion + Transfer C.25.1%Federal.
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Fall/Spring Enrollment
Data that will be presented at the Trustees (TACTC) workshop
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
Remediation in Colorado
To FYE… and Beyond Butte College.
Undergraduate Retention
שילוב קורסים לפיתוח מיומנויות למידה במכללה להנדסה
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
Governance Institute for Student Success (GISS) Wed
“Percent of total fall enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by select age groups: data, 2024 projections” by OCLC Research.
Achieving the Dream: Loudoun Campus Baseline Data
Presentation transcript:

November 12, 2009 Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District

Table 1. Total number of students in the cohort: Table 1. Total number of students in the cohort:

Table 2. Number of cohort students enrolled full-time vs. part-time: Table 2. Number of cohort students enrolled full-time vs. part-time:

Table 3. Number of cohort students by race/ethnicity: Table 3. Number of cohort students by race/ethnicity:

Figure 1. Students by Race/Ethnicity: Figure 1. Students by Race/Ethnicity:

Table 4. Number of cohort students by gender: Table 4. Number of cohort students by gender:

Figure 2. Gender (Percent) Figure 2. Gender (Percent)

Table 5a. Number of students participating in assessment* Table 5a. Number of students participating in assessment* *Note: Not drawn from cohort data; local data substituted…

Table 5b. Number of students taking one or more recommended pre-collegiate course in Fall 2006 by gender*: Table 5b. Number of students taking one or more recommended pre-collegiate course in Fall 2006 by gender*: *Note: Not drawn from cohort data; local data substituted…

Table 5c. Number of students taking one or more recommended pre- collegiate course in Fall 2006 by race/ethnicity: Table 5c. Number of students taking one or more recommended pre- collegiate course in Fall 2006 by race/ethnicity: *Note: Not drawn from cohort data; local data substituted…

Table 6. Number of cohort students by category: Table 6. Number of cohort students by category:

Table 7. Number of cohort students enrolled in at least one basic skills course during the first term (Fall 2006): Table 7. Number of cohort students enrolled in at least one basic skills course during the first term (Fall 2006):

Table 8. Success in at least one pre- collegiate course by gender: Table 8. Success in at least one pre- collegiate course by gender:

Table 9. Success in at least one pre- collegiate course by ethnicity: Table 9. Success in at least one pre- collegiate course by ethnicity:

Table 10. Success in at least one pre- collegiate course by gender and ethnicity: Table 10. Success in at least one pre- collegiate course by gender and ethnicity:

Table 11. Success in all pre-collegiate courses (Fall 2006 – Spring 2009) by gender: Table 11. Success in all pre-collegiate courses (Fall 2006 – Spring 2009) by gender:

Table 12. Success in all pre-collegiate courses (Fall 2006 – Spring 2009) by race/ethnicity: Table 12. Success in all pre-collegiate courses (Fall 2006 – Spring 2009) by race/ethnicity:

Table 13. Success in all pre-collegiate courses (Fall 2006 – Spring 2009) by gender and ethnicity: Table 13. Success in all pre-collegiate courses (Fall 2006 – Spring 2009) by gender and ethnicity:

Table 14. Overall success for all cohort students in first term (Fall 2006) by gender: Table 14. Overall success for all cohort students in first term (Fall 2006) by gender:

Figure 3. “How did all cohort students do in their first term?” Figure 3. “How did all cohort students do in their first term?”

Table 15. Overall success for all cohort students in first term (Fall 2006) by race/ethnicity: Table 15. Overall success for all cohort students in first term (Fall 2006) by race/ethnicity:

Figure 4. “How did all cohort students do in their first term?” Figure 4. “How did all cohort students do in their first term?”

Table 16. Success for all cohort students in the first term (Fall 2006) by gender and ethnicity: Table 16. Success for all cohort students in the first term (Fall 2006) by gender and ethnicity:

Figure 5. Success for all cohort students in the first term (Fall 2006) by gender and ethnicity: Figure 5. Success for all cohort students in the first term (Fall 2006) by gender and ethnicity:

Table 17. Subsequent success rates for all cohort students after Fall 2006: Table 17. Subsequent success rates for all cohort students after Fall 2006:

Table 18. Subsequent success rates for all cohort students after Fall 2006 by gender: Table 18. Subsequent success rates for all cohort students after Fall 2006 by gender:

Table 19. Subsequent success rates for all cohort students after Fall 2006 by ethnicity: Table 19. Subsequent success rates for all cohort students after Fall 2006 by ethnicity:

Table 20. Subsequent success rates for all cohort students after Fall 2006 by gender and ethnicity: Table 20. Subsequent success rates for all cohort students after Fall 2006 by gender and ethnicity: