1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 3 Karl Smith Civil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lia Conklin Olson. Objectives of the Session Upon conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to: Articulate the processes needed to design.
Advertisements

Session Outcomes Explain how assessment contributes to the learning process Use a model of feedback to enhance student learning Identify a range of feedback.
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota.
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota University.
Experiential Learning Level III: Developing and Adapting Curricula to Integrate Experiential Learning Advanced Training Power Point by: Martin H. Smith.
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering.
University of Missouri – Rolla Center for Educational Research & Teaching Innovation January 5, 2006 Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering.
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 4 Karl Smith Civil.
An Approach to Creating and Facilitating Workshops Library Instructor College Fall 2010 Charles Dershimer Erping Zhu Center For Research on Learning and.

Introduction to Cooperative Learning and Foundations of Course Design Karl A. Smith STEM Education Center / Technological Leadership Institute / Civil.
Creating Significant Learning Experiences L. Dee Fink.
Click to edit Master title style 2009 Workshop for The Committee for the Formation of Engineers Puebla-Tlaxcala Content, Assessment and Pedagogy (CAP):
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning (Challenge-Based/Problem-Based Example) Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering
Design Down Curriculum Planning & Cooperative Learning Douglas Gosse, PhD Nipissing University, Office H120 TEL: ,
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 3: Quality Instructional Design.
Stages 1 and 2 Wednesday, August 4th, Stage 1: Step 5 National and State Standards.
Backward Design Learning with a purpose. Today’s Essential Question How do teachers create student-centered standards-based thematic units that engage.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
1 Fall 2009 New Teacher Development Program. 2 Brown Bag Questions.
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering.
1 Straightforward Backward Course Design Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Science and.
Design Down Curriculum Planning & Cooperative Learning Douglas Gosse, PhD Assistant Professor, Faculty of Education Office A145 Nipissing University 100.
Designing Cooperative Learning Applications Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota  Felder & Brent B Course Design  Wiggins & McTighe B Understanding.
Design and Implementation of Active and Cooperative Learning in Large Classes Michigan State University 12th Annual Spring Institute Karl Smith University.
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Math Leadership Teams October, 2014.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Indiana Room Math Leadership Teams December 8, 2014.
Content Enhancement Series Lesson design. Teacher Leadership quote “Failure to plan is planning to fail”
Instructor Development 1 Instructor Notes Review this presentation in advance and make adjustments to the slides as you see needed. Consult Appendix B.
Chapter 7- Thinking Like an Assessor Amy Broadbent and Mary Beck EDU 5103.
Understanding by Design Stage 2: Determining Acceptable Evidence Summer UBD Workshop, Day 2 August 13, 2014.
Engaging Learners in Small and Large Classes Dr. Vanneise Collins, Kun Huang Quality Enhancement Plan Faculty Workshop Center for Learning & Development.
What Is Backward Design? “To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you are going.
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith University of Minnesota May 2004.
Designing Your Course and Syllabus Center for Teaching Excellence Duquesne University August 2014.
Essential Question How does Understanding by Design provide a framework and a language to help educators promote all students’ understanding? How does.
REDESIGNING TEACHING & LEARNING AND SOMETHING ABOUT TECHNOLOGY Brian Smentkowski, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Advancement of Faculty Excellence Queens.
Learning Assessment Techniques
A community of learners improving our world
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
The Art of Teaching and the Science of Learning
University of Minnesota – Duluth
Virginia Tech CEUT Teaching Enhancement Workshop November 2006
Drake University Designing Courses that Help Students Learn
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
University of Wisconsin - Platteville
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
Utah State University Designing Courses that Help Students Learn
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning
3 Stages of Backward Design
Designing Courses that Help Students Learn Louisiana State University
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Brigham Young University
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Designing Courses that Help Students Learn Michigan State University
Presentation transcript:

1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 3 Karl Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Kathleen O’Donovan Connie Tzenis Center for Teaching and Learning University of Minnesota Agricultural Exports and Rural Income (AERI) Midwest University Consortium for International Activities Faculty Workshop – July 2004

2 Backward Design Stage 1. Identify Desired Results/Goals Stage 2. Determine Acceptable Evidence/ Assessment Stage 3. Plan Learning Activities and Instruction

3 A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning L. Dee Fink Creating significant learning experiences. Jossey-Bass.

4 Worksheet 1 Worksheet for Designing a Course Ways of Assessing Actual Teaching-Learning Helpful Resources: Learning Goals for Course: This Kind of Learning: Activities: (e.g., people, things)

5

6 Backward Design Stage 2. Determine Acceptable Evidence Types of Assessment Quiz and Test Items: Simple, content-focused test items Academic Prompts: Open-ended questions or problems that require the student to think critically Performance Tasks or Projects: Complex challenges that mirror the issues or problems faced by graduates, they are authentic

7 Worksheet 1 Worksheet for Designing a Course Ways of Assessing Actual Teaching-Learning Helpful Resources: Learning Goals for Course: This Kind of Learning: Activities: (e.g., people, things)

8 Tool Kit Reflect on the active learning strategies Summarize their purpose List applications in your classes THE TOOL ITS PURPOSE ITS APPLICATION IN MY TEACHING ADVANCED ORGANIZER FORMULATE- SHARE- LISTEN- CREATE (THINK/PAIR/S HARE) KNOWLEDGE PROBE CASE STUDY ONE MINUTE PAPER

9 Session Summary (MINUTE PAPER) DIRECTIONS: Think about the content that facilitators presented in this session and the activities you experienced. What is one question you have about either the content or the activities?