Light Source Reviews The BES Perspective July 23, 2002 Pedro A. Montano Materials Sciences and Engineering Basic Energy Sciences BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
November 16, 2002 Greetings to CLSI Users A Time of Transition W. Thomlinson CLSI Executive Director.
Advertisements

Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre April 1, 2010.
Structural Genomics – an example of transdisciplinary research at Stanford Goal of structural and functional genomics is to determine and analyze all possible.
Environmental Remediation Sciences (SC – 23.4) Spring 2005.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond Orbach February 25, 2003 Briefing for the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee FY04 Budget.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.
The Strategic Role of Information in Sales Management
The general strategic plan for deanship of libraries affairs The strategic goal: Providing academic service at the highest level of quality according to.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting February 2011 Jefferson Lab Our 30’th Collaboration Meeting.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting March 3, 2010 Overview of the DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program Julie Carruthers, Ph.D.
Education and training for optimum use of
Systems Studies Program Peer Review Meeting Albert L. Opdenaker III DOE Program Manager Holiday Inn Express Germantown, Maryland August 29, 2013.
Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 by David Reichle 1 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s.
1 Kenneth Osborne, 9/14/07 Inter Group communications at the Advanced Light Source. Overview of the different methods of communication between different.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Scientific Facility User Access Policy - Synchrotron & Neutron Facilities Chi-Chang Kao Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource March 17, 2011, BESAC.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy RHIC Users Meeting BNL; June 8, 2006 Gulshan Rai RHIC/AGS Users Meeting Gulshan Rai Program Manager for Heavy.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
Keith O. Hodgson SSRL Director Brief Update on the Linac Coherent Light Source - LCLS February 26, 2002 Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Undulator.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #4 June 23, 2015  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES User Access and Beamline Development John Hill Director, NSLS-II Experimental Facilities Division NSLS-II User Workshop.
Year# of visits Number of visits per year South African synchrotron useage:
The Library The HEP Databases & The Changing Science at SLAC.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Experimental Facilities J.P. Hill Experimental Facilities Division Director PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Mapping New Strategies: National Science Foundation J. HicksNew York Academy of Sciences4 April 2006 Examples from our daily life at NSF Vision Opportunities.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Raymond L. Orbach Director Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Presentation to BESAC December 6, 2004.
Writing a Research Proposal 1.Label Notes: Research Proposal 2.Copy Notes In Your Notebooks 3.Come to class prepared to discuss and ask questions.
11 Welcome to All! October 26-28, 2009 Washington, D.C. Welcome to All! Accelerators for America’s Future Symposium and Workshop October 26-28, 2009 Washington,
FALC Technology Benefits study P. Grannis Beijing GDE meeting Feb. 7, 2007 FALC = Funding Agencies for Large Colliders is composed of representatives from.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting FY 2009 Budget.
The Roles of Users in Enhancing Utility of Evaluation With Special Reference to the International Evaluation on the Funding and Management Performance.
7/23/99 NIH/NIGMS Support of Structural Biology NIH individual research grants with crystallography projects (FY 98) –primary: 225 grants, $51M total costs.
Department of Energy—Office of Biological & Environmental Research U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Office of Biological & Environmental Research.
BESAC Workshop on Opportunities for Catalysis/Nanoscience May 14-16, 2002 William S. Millman Basic Energy Sciences May 14, 2002 Catalysis and Nanoscience.
COMPRES Facilities Agenda 9:30 Mark Rivers—Introduction to COMPRES Community Facilities 9:40 Mark Rivers—GSECARS Update 9:45 Simon Clark—West Coast Synchrotrons.
DOE Stanford Site Office Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Office of Science Review of the LCLS.
Synchrotron Radiation for Macromolecular Crystallography Report of the Office of Science and Technology Policy Working Group on Structural Biology at Synchrotron.
1 Report of PAC for Particle Physics T. Hallman Presented by P. Spillantini JINR Scientific Council Meeting June 3-4, 2004 Dubna, Russia.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Director, Office of Science April 29, 2004 PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
Workshop Overview, Charge and Deliverables Joachim Stöhr.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Strategic Planning John Hill Experimental Facilities Division Director NSLS-II EFAC May 5 th 2008.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Beamline Development John Hill NSLS-II Experimental Facilities Division Director PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
G. R. Neil, FLS 2012 March 5, 2012 George R. Neil ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Report of the Committee of Visitors of the Scientific User Facilities Division to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Review of FY 2007, 2008,
Santa Clara Valley PACE Professional Activities Committees for Engineers.
MORE INVESTMENT in an Incomparable National Resource: Science at the DOE-BES Light Sources Our Message: Support Proposed FY03 Budget The President’s FY03.
Computing at SSRL: Experimental User Support Timothy M. McPhillips Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.
Committee to Assess the Current Status and Future Direction of High Magnetic Field Science in the United States 18 May 2012 Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Deputy.
How to gain access to European synchrotron facilities Liisa Porra, University of Helsinki / HUS.
OSTP and Neutron Science OSTP is authorized to (under PL , National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976): Advise.
Project X Collaboration Plan Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee Meeting May 6-8, 2008.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Status Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director for Light Sources NSLS-II Project Director Accelerator.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Powder Discussion Session Summary 1)What are the key scientific drivers? What experiments will NSLS-II enable that are.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
International Institute of Christian Discipleship CS 05d Technical Aspects of Community Services Ministry: Grant Proposal Writing General Conference of.
CIS 170 MART Teaching Effectively/cis170mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT HCA 497 MART Inspiring Minds/hca497mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES.
LCLS 2009 NSLS-II 2015 APS 1995 BES Light & Neutron Sources SPEAR ALS 1993 HFIR 2008 SNS
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Presentation to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director November.
1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16.
LCLS User Access Policy
On September 15th, 2000, Vice Provost for Research, Professor Robert R
for the EURISOL Steering Committee
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Preparations for a Lehman Review
Information Session January 18, :00-1:45 pm
Experimental Program and Endstations System (WBS ) J
Presentation transcript:

Light Source Reviews The BES Perspective July 23, 2002 Pedro A. Montano Materials Sciences and Engineering Basic Energy Sciences BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future

The light source reviews are performed every three years. The BES objective is to produce the best science possible at our facilities.The BES objective is to produce the best science possible at our facilities. The user community should have access to the light sources using aThe user community should have access to the light sources using a proposal evaluation system that is fair and stimulate the performance of high quality research. The resources provided to the facilities should be used to optimize its utilization as well as the development of new and better techniques for synchrotron radiation applications.The resources provided to the facilities should be used to optimize its utilization as well as the development of new and better techniques for synchrotron radiation applications. BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future

Topics covered in the review:  Facility performance (schedules, users participation, etc)  Selected presentations of the most outstanding research performed at the Facility during the last two years (by field of research)  R&D plans and future scientific directions  Laboratory plans that may affect the Facility The schedule should include time for the reviewers to meet individually with the facility scientific staff in their focus areas and additional areas of interest. We would like to have a focus session with representatives of the users community (i.e. User Executive Committee) and PRT spokespersons (not affiliated to the Facility), without the laboratory management presence. The agenda and logistics for the review should be coordinated with BES. BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future

Information Requested from the Facility: Information Requested from the Facility: 1) Facility i.Brief description of the facility ( one paragraph). ii.Provide a breakdown of all staff (permanent and temporary) and their assignments (personnel and budget allocation to each specific assignment): accelerator staff, facility beamline scientists, facility beamline operational staff, technicians and operators assign to users support, computing, clerical and administration. iii.Brief description of on going R&D activities at the facility: accelerator improvements, beamlines improvements, etc… 2) Beamlines 1.i.Drawing of the floor plan, with a brief description of each beamline. 2.ii.Describe the facility beamlines available to users and percentage time allocated to outside users. 3.iii.How many beamlines (facility, PRT) are operational and what percentage of operational time is allocated to outside users. 4.iv.Describe the communities served by each beamline (i.e. Biology, Materials Science, etc…). 3) Support facilities- sample preparation, computing capabilities, etc… 1.i.What is available? 2.ii.What is planned? BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future

Information Requested from the Facility (continued): Information Requested from the Facility (continued): Users i.How is beam time allocated to outside user? ii.Reviewing process: A plot of the beam time allocations per year vs. the number of groups receiving this time allotment (i.e. Materials Science, Biology, etc…). Also: user experiments per year, and proposals per year. Percentage of beam time per year allocated to facility scientists. Impact 1.i. List all publications in the last two years in refereed journals only. This list should separate papers according to work performed by outside users or facility staff. Separate out conference proceedings. 2.ii. List invited lectures and major awards for facility staff and outside users. 3.iii. List the twenty most important publications of work performed at the facility over the past two years, include Citation index. 3) Cost Indicator 1.i. Cost per paper (total cost of beamlines operation/ number of papers per year). 2.ii. Cost per delivered beam day (delivered beam days/ number of papers per year). 4) BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future

Future 1.i. Describe in a brief statement the plans for future beamlines and facility upgrade. 2.ii. Describe the potential impact on the facility of the phasing out of some or all PRTs due to financial or scientific difficulties, provide a budget estimate of what will be needed to keep such beam lines operating. 3.iii. Identify potential problems- such as power shortages, environmental contamination, etc… 4.iv. Provide a budget estimate required to upgrade the beamlines scientific instrumentation, motor controls, detectors and associated electronics. 5.v. What are the expected trends in user demand: internal, external and scientific area they represent (materials, chemistry, biology etc…). BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future

The reviewer should provide an individual evaluation addressing the following issues:  Quality of the research performed at the facility in terms of number and impact of published research.  Appropriateness and quality of the facility staff research and development (R&D) program.  Satisfaction of the user community with the facility support and staff.  Overall availability of quality beam time to the user community.  What is the user demand at the facility?  Evaluate the proposal review process for beam time allocation, effectiveness and fairness.  Evaluate the fairness in the distribution of beam time among users, i.e. facility staff vs. outside users.  Evaluate the appropriateness of the beamline instrumentation to satisfy the present and future needs of the user community.  Evaluate the cost effectiveness of beamline operation, i.e. cost of operating a specific beamline in relation to its demand by users.  Evaluate what is an appropriate level of research and development funding for efforts related to improving operations, accelerator, insertion devices, advanced instrumentation, etc…  What will be the most effective way to improve the scientific productivity in number and quality, support for facility R&D and/or direct support to the users?  Cost effectiveness of the facility, publications, and scientific impact vs. cost of operation.  How the facility sees its role in the synchrotron radiation community at large?  What is the expected future capability of the facility and specifically of the PRT operational structure? BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future

The Reviews of the Four BES Synchrotron Radiation Facilities were completed by February Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL) April 3-5, 2001 National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) July 11-13, 2001 Advanced Photon Source (APS) October 16-18, 2001 Advanced Light Source (ALS) February 4-6, 2002 BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future

Some Interesting Statistics for the Four Synchrotron Radiation Facilities in FY 2001 Total Number of Users6568 Total Number of General Users 4412 Total Number of Publications2061 Total Number of Beamlines166 BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future