CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PLP Circle of Support: A prevention/intervention model December 12, 2003 Rhode Island Department of Education.
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Reading First Professional Development: Purposes and Plan Oregon Reading First Content Prepared By Deborah Simmons College of Education University.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Deborah Simmons, Hank Fien and Nicole Sherman Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs:
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading Day 4: Instruction: Time, Scheduling & Grouping / Reading.
Supplemental and Intervention Programs
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D Coordinator, Oregon Reading First Center
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort B.
Scott Baker, Ph.D. Michael Rebar, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading (IBR) Leadership Session for New District Team Members Principals and Mentor Coaches August 24, 2004.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Overview of Advanced DIBELS Applications Institute on Beginning Reading II.
Instruction Goals Assessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading II Planning Core/Benchmark, Strategic, & Intensive Interventions.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
1 Optimizing School & District Variables for a Successful Reading First Implementation ORF Leadership Session October 20-21, 2005 Dr. Stan Paine, Interim.
Beth Harn & Rachell Katz Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential Component.
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
RtI 101 Part A: The Basics of Assessment and Tiered Instruction.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-based Reading Instruction Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
D62 Response to Intervention
FloridaRtI.usf.edu A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Intervention Mapping.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Ingham ISD RtI District Leadership Team March 8, 2010.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Organizing Schools and Classrooms to Teach Every Child to Read: The Big Ideas Stuart Greenberg Deputy Director, Eastern Regional Reading First Technical.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Academic Program Survey Kern County Superintendent of Schools Office RSDSS Region 8.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
1 Linking DIBELS Data to Differentiated Instructional Support Plans 32 nd Annual COSA Seaside Conference June 23, 2006 Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Which critical component (or guiding principle) of MTSS does the following statement belong with? A district-wide commitment and focus on student achievement.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
All readers by 3rd grade Guidance for the Use of Diagnostic
Presentation transcript:

CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research

1.Goals: What outcomes do we want for our students in our state, district, and schools? 2.Knowledge: What do we know and what guidance can we gain from scientifically based reading research? 3.Progress Monitoring Assessment: How are we doing? What is our current level of performance as a school? As a grade? As a class? As an individual student? 4.Outcome Assessment: How far do we need to go to reach our goals and outcomes? 5.Core Instruction: What are the critical components that need to be in place to reach our goals? 6.Differentiated Instruction: What more do we need to do and what instructional adjustments need to be made? Guiding Questions

Implementation of Research-Based Reading Programs That Support the Full Range of Learners Instruction A core instructional program of validated efficacy adopted and implemented schoolwide Supplemental and intervention programs to support core program Programs and materials emphasize big ideas Programs implemented with high fidelity

Core Program A core program is the “base” reading program designed to provide instruction on the essential areas of reading for the majority of students schoolwide. In general, the core program should enable 80% or more of students to attain schoolwide reading goals. A Core Instructional Program of Validated Efficacy Adopted and Implemented Schoolwide

Supplemental and Intervention Programs to Support the Core A School’s Continuum of Programs and Materials Core: Programs and materials designed to enable 80% or more of students to attain schoolwide reading goals. Supplemental: Programs and materials designed to support the core program by addressing specific skill areas such as phonemic awareness or reading fluency. Intervention: Programs and materials designed to provide intensive support for students performing below grade level.

Understanding the Purpose of Different Programs Classifying Reading Programs: What is the purpose of the program? 1. Core 2. Supplemental 3. Intervention Core Reading Program Supplemental Reading Program Core Supplemental Intervention Reading Program Meeting the needs for most Supporting the CoreMeeting the needs for each Programs are tools that are implemented by teachers to ensure that children learn enough on time. (Vaughn et al. 2001)

Thinking About What We Are Teaching Instructional Curriculum Thinking Maps

If we want to think about instruction, where do we start?

Curriculum Maps (Simmons & Kame’enui, 1999) Organized by “big ideas” for each grade level Provide curriculum-based 180-day pacing maps Provide specific goals and outcomes for each grade (i.e., what to teach and when) Based on research in beginning reading

“Big Idea” Skill Outcomes Instructional Emphasis Measurable Benchmark How to Read Curriculum Maps Months

A Set of Strategic, Research-Based, and Measurable Goals to Guide Instruction, Assessment, and Learning Curriculum Maps Sample Curriculum Maps k-3 “BIG IDEAS” Share what you are thinking as you review these sample maps?

A Set of Strategic, Research-Based, and Measurable Goals to Guide Instruction, Assessment, and Learning Goals The Curriculum Maps are only one example of schoolwide reading goals Other examples include state or local reading standards or frameworks How do your state and/or local standards or frameworks compare to the Curriculum Maps? How are they similar – different?

Differentiated Instruction Based On Data Using The Results of Assessment To Plan Instruction

Assessment Results Instructional Implication One Benchmark/Low Risk/Established Core Reading Two Strategic/Some Risk/Emergent Core Program + Additional Teaching Three Intensive/At Risk/ Deficit Core Reading + iii

Benchmark 1 Nonsense Word Fluency ] 25

Benchmark 1 Nonsense Word Fluency ] 25

Benchmark 1 Nonsense Word Fluency ] 25

Adequate, Prioritized, and Protected Time for Reading Instruction and Practice Instruction: Time Schoolwide plan established to allocate sufficient reading time and coordinate resources Additional time allocated for students not making adequate progress (supplemental & intervention programs) Reading time prioritized and protected from interruption

Instruction, Grouping, and Scheduling That Optimizes Learning Instruction: Grouping Differentiated instruction aligned with student needs Creative and flexible grouping used to maximize performance

Differentiated Instruction Aligned With Student Needs Examples Students are grouped based on assessment results Specified supplemental and intervention programs are implemented depending on student needs and profiles Groups are constantly reorganized based on progress monitoring data

Early identification and frequent monitoring of students experiencing reading difficulties Progress Monitoring Performance monitored frequently for all students who are at risk of reading difficulty Data used to make instructional decisions Example of a progress monitoring schedule Students at low risk:Monitor progress four times a year Students at some risk:Monitor progress every month Students at high risk:Monitor progress every other week

Ongoing Instructional Adjustments Based on Assessment Data to Meet the Needs of Each Student Instructional Adjustments Instructional programs, grouping, and time are adjusted and intensified according to learner performance and needs. Making instruction more responsive to learner performance

Using Data To Plan Instruction Core/Benchmark, Strategic, & Intensive Curriculum Maps

Content Development Content developed by: Edward J. Kame’enui, Ph. D.Deborah C. Simmons, Ph. D.Professor, College of EducationUniversity of Oregon Beth Harn, Ph.D.Michael D. Coyne, Ph. D. University of OregonUniversity of Connecticut David Chard, Ph. D. University of Oregon Additional support: Patrick Kennedy-Paine Katie TateNicole Sherman-Brewer University of OregonOregon Reading First

How Do We Enhance Instruction & Learning? Remember the focus must be on factors over which you have jurisdiction: Program & program emphasis Time (opportunities to learn) Grouping structures Quality of instruction & program implementation Alter the fewest number of factors possible that provide the greatest return.

Planning Core/Benchmark Instruction: CSI Maps Goals: Each big idea and high priority skills for months 1-5 and months 5-9 Instructional Need: DIBELS recommendation Instructional Details Program/materials Time/day Grouping Assessment: Progressive benchmark for fall and winter

CSI Map: Grade 1 Student Name Sequence of Instruction Big Ideas

CSI Map: Grade 1 Big Ideas Sequence of Instruction Student Name

CSI Map: Grade 1 Big Ideas Sequence of Instruction Student Name

Application Activity

At School: Application Activity Plan instruction for your core/benchmark students. Meet with your grade-level team. Document in each column: programs, time, grouping, and assessment the specific information that communicates your plan to teach all children to attain critical benchmarks by January/June. If time permits, proceed to your plan for strategic & intensive intervention.

Websites Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement (IDEA) IDEA Beginning Reading Florida Center for Reading Research

Professional Development Effective PD practices for reading results include: providing training that is: focused, high quality, on-going providing training for all (teachers, specialists) principal,coach, district, assistants, parents providing training follow-up (coaching and supervision) that is differentiated & empowering The best leaders bring out the best in the people around them.

Operationalizing What Works: Creating a Culture of Success A culture of success for reading results includes: belief in the possibility commitment to priorities & results awareness of urgency visibility of the focus culture of collaboration tone of empowerment It’s not about getting the money. It’s about getting the results.

The ultimate goal of reading instruction is to enable children to read fluently with good comprehension!

Questions?