Clarification “The Objective is measurable” – Any starting statement – And the Benchmark, Indicator, and Target are- part of the objective. – You don’t.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MDC Academic Advisement
Advertisements

Accreditation: Alignment and Assessment of Outcomes for a Learning College OPCOM PRESENTATION October ACCREDITATION ALIGNMENT ASSESSMENT.
Retention and Graduation of Degree Partnership Students Preliminary Results Master’s Thesis Barbara Cormack May 19, 2006.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Using MAP for College and Career Readiness
CIC Key Indicators for Hollins University Jamie Redwine Office of Institutional Research June 2005.
Power of YOU First year progress report Irene Kovala, Ed.D. Beth Yeh, Ph.D. Minneapolis Community and Technical College.
Ian Bunting and Charles Sheppard 23February 2012.
Welfare to Careers Medger Evers College Metropolitan College of New York Pace University December 2, 2008.
Why students leave From the Non-Returner Survey to the Retention Survey Part I. W. Allen Richman, Ph.D. Laura Ariovich, Ph.D. Nicole Long, Ph.D.
Summary of SILS Grading Practices April 28, 2010.
Together, our analyses answer a number of important questions: Which High Schools do California’s Latino Students Attend? Do Gaps in School Resources.
Alignment, Action & Achievement Institutional Goals and Performance Measures.
Monitoring Student Outcomes in California Partnership Academies David Stern Graduate School of Education University of California, Berkeley College & Career.
Key Performance Indicators
Institutional Effectiveness 2010/2011 Core Indicators Institutional Research Wendy Dove – October 2011 COMMON GROUND “Progress towards a decade of student.
Goal 2025: To increase the proportion of Americans with high-quality degrees and credentials to 60 percent by the year 2025.
Region VII College and Career Readiness Data AVATAR Initiatives.
1 Graduation Requirements At [SCHOOL NAME] Date, 2009Location or Subtitle Placed here.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
Remedial Placement and Enrollment Report For Presentation to the Legislative Committee on Education July 15, 2014.
BIGOT. But First, A day in the life of an Institutional Researcher :- An overview of the job, in one Act…
The Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) AUGUST 2005.
School Improvement Technical Assistance Days May 12, 9:00-11:00 and 1:00-4:00 May 18, 8:00-11:00 and 1:00-4:00 May 31, 8:00-11:00 and 1:00-4:00 Skype:
NCAA Progress Towards Degree Current & Future Legislation February 2014 WSC Rules Presentation 1 Wayne State College Athletic Compliance.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Program Collaboration and Transfer Update
When Thinking About Your Career and Future. “The reason most people never reach their goals is that they don't define them, learn about them, or even.
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall 2012 Enrollment & Completion Update Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall Quarterly Meeting November 15,
Chapter 20 Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis
What You Need To Know. Introduction to Semester Conversion Berkeley College will convert its academic calendar from a quarter system to a semester system.
Lesson #. Catalyst Write down today’s topic in your T.O.C. Place your homework (Dream job binder cover) on the desk. I’ll be collecting it Take out your.
SCC Office of Institutional Research Fall 2006 Enrollment Update Where we’re coming from and where we’re headed.
Ethnicity CategoryFall 2009 Cohort (2 Years) Fall 2008 Cohort (3 Years) Fall 2007 Cohort (4 Years) Fall 2006 Cohort (5 Years) Fall 2005 Cohort (6 Years)
Dashboard Design Drafts Possible desktop delivery modalities To key NSCC stakeholders October 2008.
Educational Planning at MJC. Graduation Catalog YOU are responsible for your educational planning Everything you need to know about MJC –Calendar –History/Mission.
Goals. What are Goals?  Statement of intention  Goals are wants  Desires  Things we’d like to see in ourselves and our lives  Statement of intention.
Goal-Setting The Bay Method Bay Tutoring. In this lesson  Why set goals?  SMART goals  Using our method  Set yourself some goals!
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Goal Statement: Questions Are we graduating enough students to meet our future economic and societal needs? Are we graduating enough students and, especially,
Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis
Lesson 4: Setting Goals and Objectives. Lesson 4 Objectives Gain the understanding that marketing strategy and planning needs to set clear, measurable,
Mecklenburg County Index of Readiness and Literacy Harrison S. Campbell Department of Geography and Earth Science UNC-Charlotte Terri M. Manning Planning.
Brookville High School School Year. What is College Credit Plus?  A State Funded Opportunity to Earn College and High School Credit Simultaneously.
The University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College “Student Employment Initiative” The UTB/TSC Student Employment Initiative is part of.
Summer Data Conference – June 6, (2008) National Completion Goals (Lumina’s Big Goal: 60% of those will have an Associate Degree or above.
The education indicators concerning completion
The Registrar’s Office The Registrar’s Office RO–103 Grades
The Coalition Result & Goal Statements
KCTCS Strategic Plan Update
Mark P Chisholm September 5, 2018
AASFAA Financial Aid Legislative Update
IB Friday.
Table 3: P-values for 2016 Data Table 1: Mean Percentages
SVC Students: Who are they
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
April 11, 2014.
Student Success Data.
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
Athens Technical College
It’s about more than just tracking numbers
SCHEV Strategic Plan Priorities
SMART Objectives This is SMART! Specific
NCAA Division I Introduction to Progress Toward Degree
Student Success Vision
Spring 2014 Results Focus: Subgroups All Grades Measure:
Disproportionate Impact Study
HS Credit for Middle School Courses
EOF Appropriations History, FY1968 – 2006
Presentation transcript:

Clarification “The Objective is measurable” – Any starting statement – And the Benchmark, Indicator, and Target are- part of the objective. – You don’t need to have one honking great sentence cover everything in one go…

Sample Rewording University Transfer Students: The college will strive to increase the proportion of students attaining a transfer degree within 3 years of starting SCC. Further, we will determine the ratio of the transfer degree graduates who successfully transfer to a 4 yr institution within 4 years of starting at SCC.* – Note: We have no direct control over how a student does, once they get into a 4 yr institution. If student successfully transfers, the 4yr has made a determination that the student is ‘good enough for them’. Recommendation is to stop the objective at ‘when they leave here’.

Benchmark: Cohort: Headcount of new (to SCC) students enrolling in Fall 2006(x), identified as having a transfer intent. Measure1 – Number of Transfer degree Graduates from the Fall cohort as of (end of) Spring 2008(y), Divided by the headcount of the starting cohort. Expressed as a percentage. i.e. x/y % Measure2 – Number of transfers to a 4 yr institution as of Spring 2009(z), from the cohort Divided by y, and expressed as a percentage. z/y % Note: Spring 2008 = A894

Target: Cohort: Headcount of new (to SCC) students enrolling in Fall 2010(x), identified as having a transfer intent. Measure1 – Number of Transfer degree Graduates from the Fall cohort as of (end of) Spring2012(y) Divided by the headcount of the starting cohort. Expressed as a percentage. This will be 2% higher than benchmark. i.e. x/y% +2%. Measure2 – Number of transfers to a 4 yr institution as of Summer 2013(z) Divided by y, and expressed as a percentage z/y% + 3%. (i.e. 3% higher than benchmark)

Indicators: Measures taken in quarters between the Benchmark and Target start-end points. Indicator1: Quarterly measure of remaining students. Headcount of currently enrolled (sub)set of cohort (x) expressed as a percentage of the original starting headcount. Indicator 2: Quarterly calculation of average GPA of remaining students.

How I think! Yes, it’s true…I think! (Despite any empirical evidence you may have to the contrary…) How I got there

The Practical Application of “Cosmic Zoom” Or Drill Baby! Drill ! Or Going down the rabbit hole Or Playing with Russian dolls Take one Big problem challenge – Break it into two smaller pieces – Take each of the smaller pieces and break it into two smaller pieces… – Repeat as necessary. – For example. University Transfer Students. PseudoCoding

University Transfer Students Graduate SCCNot Graduate SCC Graduate <3Yrs Not Graduate <3 Yrs Transfer in <4 Yrs Not Xfer in 4 Yrs Xfer < 4 Yrs Not Xfer < 4 Yrs Xfer <4 Yrs Not Xfer <4 yrs JobNo Job Done

Not Transfer in 4 yrs JobNo Job Job Related to Study Job Unrelated to Study Studying elsewhere Not studying Done ?

University Transfer Students Graduate SCC Graduate <3Yrs !Graduate < 3 Yrs Xfer < 4 Yrs !Xfer < 4yrs Xfer <4 Yrs Done The ‘Final’ cut

Sample Rewording University Transfer Students: The college will strive to increase the proportion of students attaining a transfer degree within 3 years of starting SCC. Further, we will determine the ratio of the transfer degree graduates who successfully transfer to a 4 yr institution within 4 years of starting. – Note: We have no direct control over how a student does, once they get into a 4 yr institution. If student successfully transfers, the 4yr has made a determination that the student is ‘good enough for them’. Recommendation is to stop the objective at ‘when they leave here’.

Summary Goals are fuzzy Objectives are measurable. – They should be SMART – And have Benchmarks, Targets, and probably Indicators. S.M.A.R.T. – Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound.

Definitions! Goals are ‘Big Picture’ statements that are generally not measurable Objectives are SMART Indicators are driven by the Objectives and are measurable They are signposts toward the objective. Note: Indicators may look like benchmarks. Benchmarks are driven by the Objectives and are measurable A Benchmark defines your starting point. Targets are what you want the next benchmark to show and are measurable. It should mirror the Benchmark in format.