Xeloda ® monotherapy in pancreatic cancer: phase II study  42 patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer received intermittent Xeloda 1,250mg/m.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Xeloda X-panding options in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer
Advertisements

Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
Drug Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Xeloda and Xeloda-based combinations in the treatment of MBC Steffan Kahlert Insert affiliation.
Chemotherapy of Colorectal Cancer
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Xeloda ® plus oxaliplatin: rationale in colorectal cancer (CRC)  Oxaliplatin is active in CRC, especially when combined with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)  Superior.
Frontline Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin Combined with ABVD or AVD in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Younes A et al. Proc.
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) upregulation Dose- and time-dependent upregulation of TP in human colon cancer xenografts PaclitaxelDocetaxel.
Shanghai, China March 24 th 2001 Xeloda Future Developments Mr. John Collins.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
Herceptin ® : leading the way in metastatic breast cancer care Steffen Kahlert.
Rationale for the development of Xeloda®
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Cetuximab + Cisplatin in Estrogen Receptor-Negative, Progesterone Receptor-Negative, HER2-Negative (Triple-Negative) Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Faculty National GI Tumor Board Clinical Investigators Provide Their Perspectives on Current.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of PD , a Cyclin ‐ Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Letrozole vs Letrozole Alone.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
CALYPSO Trial: Carboplatin & Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) versus Carboplatin & Paclitaxel in Relapsed, Platinum- Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Pujade-Lauraine.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
Phase III Study of First-Line XELOX Plus Bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 Cycles Followed by XELOX Plus BEV or Single Agent (s/a) BEV as Maintenance Therapy in.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
PHASE II RANDOMIZED STUDY OF TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE VERSUS TRASTUZUMAB PLUS DOCETAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH HUMAN EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2 – POSITIVE.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Phase II Trial of 5-Day Decitabine as Front-Line Therapy for Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Cashen.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Phase II Study of Docetaxel (D) and Oxaliplatin (O) in Recurrent Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Davar D1, Appleman LA1, Friedland.
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Outcomes of patients in the North Trent region with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with maintenance pemetrexed following induction with platinum.
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Ibrutinib plus Rituximab in Treatment-Naive Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: Results from a Multicenter, Phase 2 Study1 Phase I Study of Rituximab,
DR VANDERPUYE CONSULTANT RADIATION AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGIST GHANA
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
Figure 2 Underreporting by physicians of specific treatment-associated symptoms by physicians in the TORCH trial Figure 2 | Underreporting by physicians.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Ferrajoli A et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 1395.
UK ABC-02 trial: Gemcitabine with or without cisplatin in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (ABC): Results of a multicenter,
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.
Ansell SM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 798.
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
ONCOLOGYEDUCATION.COM ARTICLE SUMMARIES
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Presentation transcript:

Xeloda ® monotherapy in pancreatic cancer: phase II study  42 patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer received intermittent Xeloda 1,250mg/m 2 twice daily  Three patients (7%) achieved confirmed partial responses  17 patients (40%) achieved disease stabilisation (lasting  12 weeks in 11 patients)  Xeloda provided additional clinical benefit and symptomatic relief –CBR scores were positive in 24%, stable in 38% –pain intensity scores were positive in 29%, stable in 60%  Adverse events included diarrhoea, hand-foot syndrome and nausea Cartwright T. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000;19:264a (Abst 1026) CBR = Clinical Benefit Response

Xeloda ® plus gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer: phase I study  Xeloda and gemcitabine demonstrated synergistic activity in preclinical studies  Phase I study in 27 patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer  The dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and mucositis  Recommended regimen is a 21-day cycle of –Xeloda 650mg/m 2 twice daily, days 1–14 –i.v. gemcitabine 1,000mg/m 2, days 1 and 8  Objective responses occurred in six (29%) of 21 patients evaluable to date  The regimen will be compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in a phase III trial Herrmann R et al. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000;19:267a (Abst 1038)

Xeloda ® in pancreatic cancer: summary  Impressive tumour response rates are achieved especially in combination with gemcitabine  Additional clinical benefits include –symptomatic relief (positive CBR score) –reduction in pain intensity  Xeloda is well tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine and warrants further evaluation in patients with pancreatic cancer

Xeloda ® in ovarian cancer: phase II study  Open label phase II trial of intermittent Xeloda 1,250 mg/m 2 twice daily in 21 patients with platinum- and taxane-pretreated ovarian cancer  CA-125 response (according to Rustin criteria) in six (32%) of 19 evaluable patients  Radiologically confirmed tumour responses in two (22%) of 9 patients with measurable disease  No grade 4 adverse events  Further studies are warranted –first-line combination regimens (e.g., platinum, taxanes) –as an alternative to more toxic, i.v. regimens in the palliative setting Vasey PA et al. Ann Oncol 2000;11 (Suppl. 4):84 (Abst 373)

Xeloda ® in renal cell cancer: phase II summary  Overall response rate of 34% –complete response in two patients (7%) –partial response in eight patients (27%)  Stable disease in an additional 12 patients (40%)  No grade 4 adverse events; grade 3 in only two patients (malaise, malaise/nausea/vomiting)  No patients required Xeloda dose modification  A randomised trial has been initiated to further investigate Xeloda in renal cell carcinoma Övermann K et al. Br J Cancer 2000;83:583–7

Xeloda ® monotherapy in renal cell cancer: phase II study  Pilot study of intermittent Xeloda 1,250mg/m 2 twice daily in 22 patients with metastatic renal cell cancer progressing following immunotherapy  At ASCO 2000, response and efficacy data were reported for 12 patients receiving a median of six cycles –one partial response and disease stabilisation in 10 patients for a median >3 months –no grade 4 adverse events –only two grade 3 adverse events (hand-foot syndrome)  Xeloda is clinically active and well tolerated in this setting Wenzel C et al. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000;19:368a (Abst 1457)

Xeloda ® in other tumour types  Colorectal  Breast  Gastric  Pancreatic  Endocrine  Oesophageal  Head and neck  Ovarian  Cervical  Renal  Prostate  Mesothelioma  Hepatocellular  Biliary tract Worldwide Xeloda monotherapy and combination clinical trials are planned or ongoing in the following tumour types