Freiburg 7/07/20001 laser beam lens CCD (long arm) screen + grid CCD (short arm) glass plates at  45° STAMP : Saclay Telescope for the Alignment of Many.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geometry of Aerial Photographs
Advertisements

Laser Speckle Extensometer ME 53
VARISPOT FS BEHAVIOR IN COLLIMATED AND DIVERGING BEAMS: THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS Liviu Neagu, Laser Department, NILPRP, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
SXC meeting SRON, July 19-20, SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Alignment Positioning of mirror with respect to detector (internal). Positioning of total.
Laser ​ Distance measurement ​ by Aleksi Väisänen ​ Pauli Korhonen.
REFRACTION OF LIGHT. REFRACTION THE BENDING OF LIGHT DUE TO A CHANGE IN ITS SPEED.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses. Notation for Mirrors and Lenses The object distance is the distance from the object to the mirror or lens Denoted by p.
1 Laser Beam Coherence Purpose: To determine the frequency separation between the axial modes of a He-Ne Laser All sources of light, including lasers,
II From “Beam Paths” to the “Microscope” October 2008 Rudi Rottenfusser – Carl Zeiss MicroImaging.
S.H.H.S Building Construction
Multi video camera calibration and synchronization.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 32 Light: Reflection and Refraction.
Use of a commercial laser tracker for optical alignment James H. Burge, Peng Su, Chunyu Zhao, Tom Zobrist College of Optical Sciences Steward Observatory.
CS485/685 Computer Vision Prof. George Bebis
Camera model Relation between pixels and rays in space ?
Conceptual Design Review Senior Design
High index glass spherical targets for laser interferometry Miroslav Sulc 1st PACMAN worshop 1.
Announcements HW set 9 due this week; covers Ch 23 and Ch Office hours: My office hours Th 2 -3 pm or make an appointment Come to class April 19.
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
Lecture 14 Images Chapter 34 Geometrical Optics Fermats Principle -Law of reflection -Law of Refraction Plane Mirrors and Spherical Mirrors Spherical refracting.
Module 1-4 Basic Geometrical Optics. Image Formation with Lenses Lenses are at the heart of many optical devices, not the least of which are cameras,
Matching and Synchrotron Light Diagnostics F.Roncarolo, E.Bravin, S.Burger, A.Goldblatt, G.Trad.
Platform positioning during MDT construction Tool for the platform positioning Ph. Schune J.-Ch. Barrière P RAXIAL A LIGNMENT S YSTEM (barrel) positioning.
The wave nature of light Interference Diffraction Polarization
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
Advanced Optics Lab at San Jose State University Ramen Bahuguna Department of Physics.
The barrel reference system1 THE BARREL REFERENCE SYSTEM C.Guyot (Saclay) Goal: Provide a geometrical survey of the whole barrel muon spectrometer.
The RASNIK Alignment System. Particle Physics CERN, Geneva, Swiss.
1 CS6825: Image Formation How are images created. How are images created.
Status Report on Mk.II Pepperpot Simon Jolly Imperial College 13 th June 2007.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 FPFPU Alignment1 D. Kampf KAYSER-THREDE.
Chapter 23 Properties of Light. Section 1: Objectives Use ray diagrams to show how light is reflected or refracted. Compare plane mirrors, concave mirrors,
Introduction to the Principles of Aerial Photography
PFI Cobra/MC simulator Peter Mao. purpose develop algorithms for fiducial (FF) and science (SF) fiber identification under representative operating conditions.
Eusoballoon optics test Baptiste Mot, Gilles Roudil, Camille Catalano, Peter von Ballmoos Test configuration Calibration of the light beam Exploration.
D. Missiaen Summaries of the discussion. 2 H. Mainaud Durand The iris diaphragm laser alignment system for Spring 8 storage ring magnets Align multipoes.
Status of the Alignment 17/12/04 Dario Autiero. Measurements taken so far: 13/9 TT8 On the mounting arch 12/11 TT7 Standalone in the target 19/11 TT7.
BARREL ALIGNMENT PLATFORM POSITIONING Goal: Positioning of the platforms at their nominal position on the MDT chambers (No position measurement in a database).
Current Status of Pepperpot Emittance Measurement System Simon Jolly Imperial College FETS Meeting, 22/02/06.
The Microscope and Forensic Identification. Magnification of Images A microscope is an optical instrument that uses a lens or a combination of lenses.
IFS prototype – PM3 LAM, 13/06/2003 Prototype testing at CRAL Tests at room temperature in the visible.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
Calibration and production of PRAXIAL (*) sensors for the ATLAS muon spectrometer Optical Metrology - SPIE Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial Inspection.
IPBSM Operation 11th ATF2 Project Meeting Jan. 14, 2011 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California Y. Yamaguchi, M.Oroku, Jacqueline Yan.
RICH MEETING - CERN - April 21 st 2004 Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca Variation of Refractive Index inside an Aerogel Block Davide Perego.
Mr. Jackson  Light is an EM wave (not requiring a medium)  EM waves are produced by radiation which is the transfer of energy in the form of.
1 ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alignment LHC Days in Split, 5-9 Oct J.Krstic, M.Milosavljevic Institute of Physics, Belgrade D.Fassouliotis,C.Kourkoumelis,
BSRT UPDATE LMC 02-OCT-2012 F.Roncarolo on behalf of the BSRT team W.Andreazza, E.Bravin, A.Boccardi, J-J.Gras, A.Goldblatt, M.Hamani, T.Lefevre, R.Jones,
1) News on the long scale length calibration 2) Results of the two surveys performed on plane 7 Set 1: morning of 12/11/2004 Set 2: morning of 19/11/2004.
1 James N. Bellinger Robert Handler University of Wisconsin-Madison 11-Monday-2009 Laser fan non-linearity James N. Bellinger 20-March-2009.
Basics Reflection Mirrors Plane mirrors Spherical mirrors Concave mirrors Convex mirrors Refraction Lenses Concave lenses Convex lenses.
Mirrors and Lenses How do eyeglasses correct your vision? When you look in a mirror, where is the face you see? In which ways is a cell phone camera similar.
NCSLI 2007 In House Capability of an Optical CMM Calibration for any Company Shawn Mason Boston Scientific.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Horizontal noncontact FMT imaging system. (a) The FMT setup is illustrated, where.
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module Peter Kluit, Jan Timmermans Prepared 16 May 2016.
FETS Ion Source Diagnostics: The Pepperpot
Laser beam trajectory measurement with a CCD camera Georg Gassner.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses © 2014 A. Dzyubenko.
Visit for more Learning Resources
Lenses & Optical Instruments
What would this image look like if you were a fly?!
A. WAVE OPTICS B. GEOMETRIC OPTICS Light Rays
Overview Pin-hole model From 3D to 2D Camera projection
T. J. Okamoto (NAOJ/Kyoto Univ.)
Diffraction Grating And Emission Spectra
Leveling By : Parveen Kumar.
Science of Crime Scenes
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Freiburg 7/07/20001 laser beam lens CCD (long arm) screen + grid CCD (short arm) glass plates at  45° STAMP : Saclay Telescope for the Alignment of Many Points STAMP characteristics (Freiburg/Saclay DATCHA version) : 2 arms (long & short) for the measurement of the laser beam position ( y, z) and direction (  y,  z) Absolute positioning (using fiducial grids) Precision on laser position in the STAMP local coordinate system:  y,z ~ 10  m ;   y,  z ~ 50  rad Dynamical range (mm) : 30*38 with peripheral grids (screen size: 40*45) Transparency ~ 92%  laser = 685 nm (  0.2 mW) Dimensions (mm) : 290 * 100 * 50 z y x

Freiburg 7/07/20002 pixel unit laser spot on CCD (demagnification: g ~ 1/10) reconstructed spot position reconstruction precision on the screen,  = 10  m  on the CCD (  g): 1  m (  13 % of a pixel). reference laser beam (TEM 00 from pigtail) x screen + fiducial grid LEDs for calibration with the grid lens 290 mm 40 mm 100 mm CCD laser spot on screen STAMP top view STAMP PRINCIPLE:

Freiburg 7/07/20003 STAMP CALIBRATION (1) (mechanical reference, spheres - -, not shown ) external camera looking at the grid of the 2 nd arm (long arm) or at the reference grid support cube of the reference grid at the mirrored position of the 2 nd grid (with respect to the reflecting face of the 2 nd glass plate) 2 nd grid (from the long arm) Goal: Correct for the unprecise mechanical positioning of the glass plates and the fiducial grids. Principle: Build a reference STAMP out of 2 precisely known positions of a reference grid (using CMM + optical control) With the same camera, compare the STAMP grid seen by reflection on the glass plate with the reference grid.

Freiburg 7/07/20004 The positions of the reference grids w.r.t. the STAMP support balls of the calibration bench (measured with a CMM and an optical bench) define the reference STAMP (calistamp) with its transfer matrix T : y z yy zz T x y s s x y l l Laser coordinates Spot coordinates on the 2 screens (short and long arms) 2 set of calibration constants (for each arm): Calistamp grid to STAMP grid :  x,  y,  z, scale(x), scale(y) + 5 parameters to account for STAMP screen distortions (photo paper) 4 deviation constants:  x,  y,  x,  y STAMP CALIBRATION (2) T is calculated with a software simulation program. The calibration constants are used for the corrections of the measured spot coordinates. uLong term calibration constants, derived from the ‘ CALISTAMP ’ calibration (done only once).

Freiburg 7/07/20005 mm STAMP deviations Reconstructed grids: Stamp grid (peripheral) Calistamp grid (full) Stamp/calistamp grid fit quality: xx yy 22 Arm nb

Freiburg 7/07/20006 Stability of ‘ CALISTAMP’ calibration constants: Comparison of calibration constants from two calibration runs taken at 2 monthes interval (25/01/2000 and 22/03/2000): The vertical scale shows the maximum effect of the difference (i.e. at the grid edges). The horizontal scale refers to the 12 short arms and the 12 long arms for the 12 DATCHA STAMPs Stamp/calistamp grid position  x,  y Stamp/calistamp grid rotation and x-y scales Stamp deviations  y,  z mm

Freiburg 7/07/20007 STAMP grid to CCD pixels :  x,  y, , demagnifications (x, y) + 5 parameters to account for lens aberrations (identical for all arms) uShort term calibration constants, derived from illuminated screen images STAMP CALIBRATION (3) Present difficulties: Permanent illumination system (red LEDs) not yet installed Calibration done after removal of STAMP from their supports and after removal of a light protection cover made out of scotch tapes: CCDs may have moved during this operation (stability < 1  m required). 22 Stamp grid fit quality: xx yy

Freiburg 7/07/20008 xxx laser ~ 1.7 m fixed Stamp Stamp on a movable platform FREIBURG 4m TEST: Run conditions: No shielding tubes All fans on All light off

Freiburg 7/07/20009 y3y3 y1y1 x1x1 o1o1 y o1 y2y2 x2x2 o2o2 x3x3 o3o3 sag y y o3 Measured quantities in the 4m test: Support 1 Support 3 Support 2 The local support coordinate systems are defined from the 3 balls (cone/slot/flat) positions.  y1  y3 Quantities measured by the STAMP and the CMM: Sagittas : sag y, sag z Coordinates of the external frames in the local coordinate frame of the central support: y o1, z o1, y o3, z o3,  y1,  z1,  y3,  z3 ( For the STAMP: assume that the axis o 1 y 1 and o 3 y 3 are parallel to the x 2 o 2 y 2 plane) cone slot flat

Freiburg 7/07/ Results of the 4m test: 9 data sets: 7 different positions of support 2, 2 runs per data set pos 0_1 : Reference positions pos 0_2 : STAMP 2 removed and remounted pos 1 : 12 mm shift in z (laser moved) pos 2 : add a 10 mrad tilt around y axis (images mixed up > missing) pos 3 : remove the 12 mm z shift pos 4 : add a 10 mm shift in y (laser moved) pos 5 : remove the tilt around y pos 6_1 : back to the reference position pos 6_2 : laser moved

Freiburg 7/07/ Measured quantities in the 14m test: STAMP 1 STAMP 3 STAMP 2 Quantities measured by the STAMP : Coordinates of the external frames in the local coordinate frame of the STAMP 2 support: y o1, z o1, y o3, z o3, y o4, z o4,  y1,  z1,  y3,  z3,  y4,  z4 ( assuming that the axis o 1 y 1, o 3 y 3 and o 4 y 4 are parallel to the x 2 o 2 y 2 plane) y2y2 x2x2 x y1y1 x1x1 x y3y3 x3x3 x y4y4 x4x4 x STAMP 4 mirrors 3390 mm 5630 mm 4260 mm Quantities measured by the CMM : Coordinates of the balls which defines the local coordinate frame of the STAMP 2 support. Spot at 14 m

Freiburg 7/07/ Present problems: Nices features: Use commercial products (CCD, glass plates, lenses). No precision mechanics required. Can easily be improved with new CCDs ( larger CCD => shorter device). Large range (from 30x38 mm to 40x40mm with the LED scheme shown below). Can work with visible laser light. Fast and simple calibration (1 week for 180 STAMPs). Radiation hardness (same technology as the TC255 tested at Prospero). High transparency : 56% of intensity left after 7 STAMPs (intermediate  ray with 4 MDT and 3 TGC layers). The DATCHA/Freiburg STAMP has been built with a too soft aluminium alloy with ball inprints larger than 10  m. When working with visible laser, some light protection (short tubes ) may be needed to protect from parasitic light. May be solved by using a pulsed laser and background image subtraction (not done in the Freiburg test). Bad laser optics used for the Freiburg test (problem at 14 m). Size (length = 290mm). With a twice as large CCD (presently 4 x 3.5 mm for the TC237), the demagnification can be reduced to 1/5 and the length decreased down to 200 mm. The thick glass plate (5mm) can possibly be replaced by a thin mylar foil (10  m) canceling the secondary reflection and the beam deviation. The LED system for illumination of the grid during the runs for the control of the lens-CCD positions w.r.t. the screen has not yet been tested). Simulation shows that the grid can be replaced by 4 LEDs at the screen corners (see figure). and potential improvements:

Freiburg 7/07/ Integration inside the ATLAS spectrometer : The principle of the STAMP implementation in the End Cap spectrometer is shown on the sketch on the right. The laser can be placed either at the EI or at the EO layer. No STAMP size problem is expected st the EM and EO layers. At EI, it is possible to replace the STAMP by the laser itself. This may even simplify the system implementation with the intermediate polar beam (large distance between the bar and the beam, which requires a periscope system when optical sensors are used. EI bar platform Laser head Piezo aiming system ( mm, remote control) Laser fiber

Freiburg 7/07/ STAMP cost table : Mechanics 2000 FF glass plates 300 x FF CCD TC x FF lenses 50 x FF TOTAL 3300 FF (500 Euros)