“July Package” & South Asian Agriculture Prof. J. George Faculty of Economics & Development Planning (FEDP), Haryana Institute of Public Administration,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Agricultural Market Access Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
Advertisements

State of WTO Agricultural Negotiations Meeting on the Integrated Assessment of Trade Liberalization in the Agriculture Sector February 2003 Note:
The Multilateral Trading System: Opportunities and Challenges for the East African Community (EAC) Countries Anne Kamau Ministry of Trade Department of.
Non Agricultural Market Access Prabhash Ranjan National University of Juridical Sciences (NUJS), Kolkata, India. E mail –
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
REGIONAL LIBERALIZATION ON SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MULTILATERAL DISCIPLINES Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTAD.
Agriculture Negotiations in the WTO Dr Biswajit Dhar Professor and Head Centre for WTO Studies Indian Institute of Foreign Trade New Delhi WTO Cell, IIFT.
Origins of WTO General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) –Established in 1947 as a forum to reduce trade barriers WTO replaced GATT in 1995 as legal.
WTO AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS Portfolio Committee Agriculture and Land Affairs April 2003 Günter Müller Directorate: International Trade National Department.
WTO Agriculture Negotiations Outstanding Issues for Developing Countries Tim Ruffer Oxford Policy Management
Building on the July Framework Agreement: Advice and Cautions International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council International Agricultural.
EU-LDC NETWORK CONFERENCE Trade and Poverty Reduction ISSUES FACING DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN THE ONGOING WTO NEGOTIATIONS IN AGRICULTURE ’ ‘A POVERTY REDUCTION.
1 [Giovanni Anania, IAAE Congress, Durban, August 2003] The Fischler reform of the CAP and the WTO negotiations Giovanni Anania Department of Economics.
The Doha Endgame SS Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Doha Negotiations – current state of play Lecture 22 Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
The Doha Round Lecture 21 The Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
CAP/WTO Success: A Global Perspective Alan Matthews Trinity College Dublin Presentation to the Agricultural Science Association National Conference, 23.
Developing Countries and the Doha Round Agricultural Negotiations Lecture 29 Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
The Doha Round – background and issues Lecture 25 The Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement Lecture 20. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
The EU’s CAP and the likely impact of a Doha Agreement Lecture 24. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
AGRICULTURAL POLICY REFORM IN THE WTO The Road Ahead.
Liberalizing Trade in Agriculture and Food Security Vanderbilt Symposium on Food Security Prof. Christine Kaufmann, University of Zurich Nashville, 16.
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENT and EXPORT CREDITS UPDATE
The U.S. and World Sugar Industries under the EU and DOHA Trade Liberalization Won W. Koo   Chamber of Commerce Distinguished Professor and Director  
Impact of WTO on Indian Agriculture
Negotiations on Agriculture State of Play by Surabhi Mittal WTO &The Doha Round : The Way Forward 6-7 April, 2006.
Training session - Vietnamese agriculture and WTO - Hanoi - sept The on-going negotiations.
Overview and Current Status of the Doha Work Program and Negotiations Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings Orlando, FL, February.
1 Agriculture in July Package: Nepal Presentation by South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment (SAWTEE), Kathmandu.
Options for Modalities and Treatment of Special Products.
1 Nepal’s WTO Membership and the Agriculture Sector Navin Dahal South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment.
IPC Seminar Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Update on The Doha Development Round MARCELO REGUNAGA Hanoi – October 2005.
The Doha Development Agenda, Taking Stock A European Perspective Rolf Moehler former Deputy Director-General for Agriculture of the European Commission.
The Impact of the World Trade Organization on Food Aid Policies USDA and USAID EXPORT FOOD AID CONFERENCE Kansas, City, Missouri April 25, 2006 Floyd Gaibler,
UNCTAD 1 OVERVIEW OF THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED BY DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTAD
1 Overview of the Doha Work Programme Implications for the Developing Countries Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTADWWW.UNCTAD.ORG/COMMDIP December 2001.
The Doha Development Agenda: Progress Or Process? Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics.
ACHIEVING AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH AGRICULTURAL TRADE What do Developing Countries Need From Trade Negotiations? By Percy W. Misika 29 February.
WORKSHOP ON MARKET ACCESS IN THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME Ministry of Foreign Trade & International Cooperation and UNCTAD Guyana, September 2002 WTO NEGOTIATIONS.
Global Agriculture Policy Institute WTO/DDA Negotiations on Agriculture Global Agriculture Policy Institue CHOI, Yong Kyu.
Agriculture Negotiations: Moving Forward Ashok Gulati IFPRI Director in Asia WTO and The Doha Round: The Way forward ICRIER-SRTT Conference 6-7 April,
AG -1 © WTO – OMC 2012 The WTO Agreement on Agriculture Serafino Marchese, Chief, Training and Capacity Building Section WTO Institute for Training and.
1 DOHA WORK PROGRAMME CURRENT SITUATION AND ISSUES FOR PAKISTAN Presentation at the EC-Pakistan TRTA Seminar at Islamabad By Dr. Manzoor Ahmad Ambassador.
The Potential Impacts of Changes in Export Competition Policies.
Brown Bag Seminar The Current State of the Agricultural Trade Negotiations in the WTO Tuesday, September 16, 2003.
Brazil’s Challenge to the U.S. Cotton Subsidies
Budgetary, Political, and WTO Forces on the Next Farm Bill July 7, 2005 Agricultural Policy Summit “New Directions in Federal Farm Policy: Issues for the.
1 Development Dimension in July Package : Concerns of South Asia Posh Raj Pandey CUTS, New Delhi 17 September 2005.
WTO – EU, US and DC’s Suspension of the Negotiations Søren E. Frandsen.
The Doha Round of WTO Negotiations: The U.S. Perspective Robert L. Thompson Chairman International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council and Gardner.
“The Domestic Politics of Trade: A U.S. Farmers View” Ron Heck, President American Soybean Association “Agricultural Trade Negotiations: Politics and Prospects”
WTO Status of Negotiation, July 2004 Framework... and Beyond Debra Henke USDA/ Foreign Agricultural Service.
WTO: Where do we go from Hong Kong Lecture by: Shri G. K. Pillai, Additional Secretary, Department of Commerce Jointly organised by HCM RIPA & CUTS International.
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
WTO Hong Kong Ministerial Gains & Losses for India Pradeep S. Mehta CUTS International Jaipur, India
Update on Multilateral Trade Negotiations “The July Package” PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE 09 November 2004.
ORGANIZED SYMPOSIUM The Impacts of U.S. Trade Policies on Southern Agriculture The Impacts of the World Trade Organization on U.S. Agricultural Policy.
Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Update on The Doha Development Round A European Perspective Dr Rolf Moehler.
WTO’s Doha Development Agenda and South Asian Agriculture
The EU’s CAP and the likely impact of a Doha Agreement
The Potential Impact of the Doha Round on Grains
WTO Support Commitments and U.S. Farm Policies
The WTO-Ministerial Decisions at Nairobi (MC 10)
European agriculture, the future of the CAP and the WTO negotiations
The WTO-Agreement on Agriculture
The EU-US Agricultural Framework Agreement
The WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)
Agriculture in the July Framework
Presentation transcript:

“July Package” & South Asian Agriculture Prof. J. George Faculty of Economics & Development Planning (FEDP), Haryana Institute of Public Administration, 76, Sector 18, Gurgaon (Haryana) JG Strategic Economic Management Initiative Group (SEMIG)

Doha Development Mandate July 2004 Package: Annex A Post-July Package developments Coalition of Member countries: G20, G33, G90, etc.

Action Trade In agriculture products Structure and processes of agriculture development in 5 South Asian Countries: Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka; Primacy to Livelihood security

Net Trade In Agriculture products ($mn) Country B’Desh India Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka Source:CUTS-CITEE Research Report # 0423 based on FAOSTAT Database

Simple Average and Range of Uruguay Round Final Bound Rates for Select Countries Country Final Bound Average (%) Range of Bindings (%) USA9.50 – Australia3.80 – 29 Brazil36.60 – 55 Korea63.80 – India – 300 B’ Desh Source: CUTS-CITEE Research Report # 0417 based on dataset at

July 2004 Package “Framework” Thrust Mandate set out in Paragraph 13 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration 3.The reforms in all three pillars form an interconnected whole and must be approached in a balanced and equitable manner. Special & Differential treatment integral to all elements –Domestic Support: "substantial reductions in trade-distorting domestic support" –Export Competition: "reduction of, with a view to phasing out, all forms of export subsidies" –Market Access: "substantial improvements in market access".

Domestic Support There will be a strong element of harmonisation in the reductions made by developed Members. Specifically, higher levels of permitted trade-distorting domestic support will be subject to deeper cuts. Each such Member will make a substantial reduction in the overall level of its trade-distorting support from bound levels. As well as this overall commitment, Final Bound Total AMS and permitted de minimis levels will be subject to substantial reductions and, in the case of the Blue Box, will be capped as specified in paragraph 15 in order to ensure results that are coherent with the long-term reform objective. Any clarification or development of rules and conditions to govern trade distorting support will take this into account.

Domestic Support Contd. Overall Reduction: based on A Tiered Formula As the first instalment of the overall cut, in the first year and throughout the implementation period, the sum of all trade- distorting support will not exceed 80 per cent of the sum of Final Bound Total AMS plus permitted de minimis plus the Blue Box at the level determined in paragraph 15. as a minimum overall commitment The base for measuring the Blue Box component will be the higher of existing Blue Box payments during a recent representative period to be agreed and the cap established in paragraph 15 below.

Para 15 In July Package 15.Blue Box support will not exceed 5% of a Member’s average total value of agricultural production during an historical period. The historical period will be established in the negotiations. This ceiling will apply to any actual or potential Blue Box user from the beginning of the implementation period. In cases where a Member has placed an exceptionally large percentage of its trade-distorting support in the Blue Box, some flexibility will be provided on a basis to be agreed to ensure that such a Member is not called upon to make a wholly disproportionate cut.

Green Box Green Box criteria will be reviewed and clarified with a view to ensuring that Green Box measures have no, or at most minimal, trade- distorting effects or effects on production. basic concepts, principles and effectiveness of the Green Box remain and take due account of non-trade concerns The improved obligations for monitoring and surveillance of all new disciplines foreshadowed in paragraph 48 below will be particularly important with respect to the Green Box.

Glossary De minimis: The level of domestic support below which subsidies are exempt from reduction commitments, quantified in monetary terms on a product-specific basis and, for sector-wide measures, a non-product- specific basis. De minimis levels are 5 per cent of the value of production for specific products (or the total value of agricultural production for non-product-specific measures) for industrial country members and 10 per cent for developing country members ‘Counter Cyclical payments pay farmers the difference between the target price for a commodity set by the U.S. Congress (which is today below farmers’ ’ cost of production) and the national average market price or the loan rate price set by Congress, whichever is higher. I.e., compensate qualified farmers for the failures of the Farm Bill commodity scheme to ensure market- based price.’ -- IATP

Export Competition 1/2 The following will be eliminated by the end date to be agreed: –Export subsidies as scheduled. –Export credits, export credit guarantees or insurance programmes with repayment periods beyond 180 days; –Terms and conditions relating to export credits, export credit guarantees or insurance programmes with repayment periods of 180 days and below which are not in accordance with disciplines to be agreed. These disciplines will cover, inter alia, payment of interest, minimum interest rates, minimum premium requirements, and other elements which can constitute subsidies or otherwise distort trade.

Export Competition contd. 2/2 –Trade distorting practices with respect to exporting STEs including eliminating export subsidies provided to or by them, government financing, and the underwriting of losses. The issue of the future use of monopoly powers will be subject to further negotiation. –Provision of food aid that is not in conformity with operationally effective disciplines to be agreed. The objective of such disciplines will be to prevent commercial displacement. The role of international organizations as regards the provision of food aid by Members, including related humanitarian and developmental issues, will be addressed in the negotiations. The question of providing food aid exclusively in fully grant form will also be addressed in the negotiations.

Market Access Tariff reductions will be made from bound rates. Substantial overall tariff reductions will be achieved as a final result from negotiations. Each Member (other than LDCs) will make a contribution. Operationally effective special and differential provisions for developing country Members will be an integral part of all elements. Progressivity in tariff reductions will be achieved through deeper cuts in higher tariffs with flexibilities for sensitive products. Substantial improvements in market access will be achieved for all products.

South Asian Agriculture JP Matrix