Shiann-Jong Lee 1, Dimitri Komatitsch 2,3, Yu-Chang Chan 1, Bor-Shouh Huang 1 and Jeroen Tromp 4 1 Institute of Earth Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lessons we have learned from seismological observations in the Taiwan region Jer-Ming Chiu CERI/Dept. of Earth Sciences University of Memphis March 19,
Advertisements

10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)
Ground motion simulations and site effect estimation for Istanbul, Turkey Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Sylvette Bonnefoy-Claudet 3, Kuvvet.
Tsao-Ling rockslides, Taiwan 1 Ju-Jiang Hung Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan Chyi-Tyi Lee Ming-Lang Lin Institute.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.
Numerical simulation of seismic cycles at a subduction zone with a laboratory-derived friction law Naoyuki Kato (1), Kazuro Hirahara (2), and Mikio Iizuka.
A nearfield Tsunami warning system in Taiwan by unit tsunami method Po-Fei Chen 1, Yun-Ru Chen 2, Bor-Yaw Lin 1,3, Wu-Ting Tsai 2 1. Institute of Geophysics,
March 7, 2008NGA-East 2nd Workshop1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STRONG MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR CEUS Paul Somerville and Robert Graves URS Pasadena MOTIVATION:
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
5: EARTHQUAKES WAVEFORM MODELING S&W SOMETIMES FIRST MOTIONS DON’T CONSTRAIN FOCAL MECHANISM Especially likely when - Few nearby stations, as.
Double-difference earthquake relocation of Charlevoix Seismicity, Eastern Canada implication for regional geological structures Meng Pang.
Earthquakes.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Comparison of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Presented by: Emel Seyhan, PhD Student University of California, Los Angeles Collaborators: Lisa M.
Remote Sensing and Active Tectonics Barry Parsons and Richard Walker Michaelmas Term 2011 Lecture 4.
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
1 Automated Processing of Earthquake Swarm Records at Very Short Epicentral Distances José M. Cepeda Universidad Centroamericana, (UCA) San Salvador, El.
Crust and upper mantle structure of Tien Shan Orogen and its surroundings by ambient noise tomography and earthquake tomography Yong Zheng a, Yingjie Yang.
The global seismic energy to moment ratio: a tool for basic research and real-time identification of “Tsunami Earthquakes” Jaime Andres Convers Dr. Andrew.
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
Tsunami Hazard Assessment along the Coast of Lingayen Gulf, Pangasinan, Philippines Julius M. GALDIANO PHIVOLCS Julius M. GALDIANO PHIVOLCS 4 th International.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Limited, P.O. Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand Ph: Russell Robinson & Rafael Benites Synthetic.
Complex earthquake directivity during the 2009 L’ Aquila mainshock Tinti E., Scognamiglio L., Cirella A., Cocco M., and A. Piatanesi Istituto Nazionale.
ANALYSIS ON SLIDING MECHANISM OF TSAOLING ROCKSLIDE IN CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE EVENT Tien Chien Chen National Pingtung University of Science & Technology Meei.
SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European.
The Rupture Process of the August 23, 2011 Virginia Earthquake Martin Chapman Virginia Tech.
Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.
Validation of physics-based ground motion earthquake simulations using a velocity model improved by tomographic inversion results 1 Ricardo Taborda, 1.
High Resolution Finite Fault Inversions for M>4.8 Earthquakes in the 2012 Brawley Swarm Shengji Wei Acknowledgement Don Helmberger (Caltech) Rob Graves.
NS/V noise NS/H noise NS/H earthquakes The use of a very dense seismic array to characterize the Cavola, Northern Italy, active landslide body. By P. Bordoni.
A1 A2 Standard scenario Ground motions are calculated for a standard scenario earthquake. Afterwards, source parameters are varied one by one, and the.
MAGNITUDE 6.3 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES TAIWAN (7:02 pm, October 31, 2013) Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
An Assessment of the High-Gain Streckheisen STS2 Seismometer for Routine Earthquake Monitoring in the US ISSUE: Is the high-gain STS2 too sensitive to.
GROUND MOTION VARIABILITY: COMPARISON OF SURFACE AND DOWNHOLE GROUND MOTIONS Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, Washington State University, USA Fabrice Cotton, LGIT,
Ground motion simulations in the Pollino region (Southern Italy) for Mw 6.4 scenario events.
Department of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University National Taiwan University Generation of Uniform Hazard Accelerogram Representing from “Dominant.
THE DECREASE OF UNCERTAINTY IN GROUND MOTION ESTIMATION BASED ON THE EMPIRICAL CORRECTION MODEL THE DECREASE OF UNCERTAINTY IN GROUND MOTION ESTIMATION.
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS AT RAPID RESPONSE SITES IN ISTANBUL, TURKEY Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Anibal Ojeda 3, Kuvvet Atakan 1, Mustafa.
M 7.0, M L M 6.9, M L 6.99.
Near Fault Ground Motions and Fault Rupture Directivity Pulse Norm Abrahamson Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
The Next Generation of Research on Earthquake-induced Landslides: An International Conference in Commemoration of 10th Anniversary of the Chi-Chi Earthquake,
Earthquake source modelling by second degree moment tensors Petra Adamová Jan Šílený Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Repeatable Path Effects on The Standard Deviation for Empirical Ground Motion Models Po-Shen Lin (Institute of geophysics, NCU) Chyi-Tyi Lee (Institute.
Chih-Yu Kuo Chih-Yu Kuo Division of Mechanics,Research Center for Applied Sciences,Academia Sinica, Taiwan Rou-Fei Chen Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia.
Probabilistic hazard analysis of earthquake-induced landslides – an example from Kuohsing, Taiwan Liao, Chi-Wen Industrial Technology Research Institute.
GeoFEM Kinematic Earthquake Cycle Modeling in the Japanese Islands Hirahara, K. (1), H. Suito (1), M. Hyodo (1) M. Iizuka (2) and H. Okuda (3) (1) Nagoya.
Seismic phases and earthquake location
Novel Approach to Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Modeling Vladimir Graizer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Erol Kalkan California Geological Survey.
Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.
Site effect characterization of the Ulaanbaatar basin
Images courtesy of Google Earth (top), and USGS (bottom).
Yelena Kropivnitskaya, Kristy F. Tiampo,
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
The Hungtsaiping landslides- from a rock slide to a colluvial slide
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
CERI/Dept. of Earth Sciences
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Slip pulse and resonance of Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Mw 7
by J. Galetzka, D. Melgar, J. F. Genrich, J. Geng, S. Owen, E. O
March 21-22, University of Washington, Seattle
by Satoshi Ide, Annemarie Baltay, and Gregory C. Beroza
Presentation transcript:

Shiann-Jong Lee 1, Dimitri Komatitsch 2,3, Yu-Chang Chan 1, Bor-Shouh Huang 1 and Jeroen Tromp 4 1 Institute of Earth Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 2 CNRS and INRIA Magique-3-D, Laboratoire de Mod é lisation et d'Imagerie en G é osciences UMR 5212, Universit é de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, France 3 Institut universitaire de France, 103 boulevard Saint-Michel, Paris, France 4 Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA Effects of realistic topography on seismic wave propagation: Small- and large-scale topography effects in northern Taiwan The Next Generation of Research on Earthquake-induced Landslides: An International Conference in Commemoration of the 10th Anniversary of the Chi-Chi Earthquake September 21~26, 2009

Outlines Introduction Introduction topography effect Small-scale topography effect topography effect Large-scale topography effect Topography effect vs. source complexity Topography effect vs. source complexity Discussions and Summary Discussions and Summary

Introduction Topography influences ground motion as is observed from data recorded during and after real earthquakes and from numerical simulations. However, the effects of realistic topography on ground motion have not been clearly characterized in numerical simulations. Topography influences ground motion as is observed from data recorded during and after real earthquakes and from numerical simulations. However, the effects of realistic topography on ground motion have not been clearly characterized in numerical simulations. To accommodate high-resolution realistic topography data from the LiDAR Digital Terrain Model (DTM), which has a resolution close to 2 m, we use the SEM to simulate seismic wave propagation for frequencies up to 10 Hz in the Shamao Mountain area. To accommodate high-resolution realistic topography data from the LiDAR Digital Terrain Model (DTM), which has a resolution close to 2 m, we use the SEM to simulate seismic wave propagation for frequencies up to 10 Hz in the Shamao Mountain area. Furthermore, recent publications have mainly focused on implications for ground motion in the mountainous regions themselves, whereas the impact on surrounding low-lying areas has received less attention. Furthermore, recent publications have mainly focused on implications for ground motion in the mountainous regions themselves, whereas the impact on surrounding low-lying areas has received less attention. In order to investigate the detailed interaction between large-scale topography and nearby areas, we study on an example of Taipei basin and the Central Mountain Range (CMR) which are located in northern Taiwan. In order to investigate the detailed interaction between large-scale topography and nearby areas, we study on an example of Taipei basin and the Central Mountain Range (CMR) which are located in northern Taiwan.

Small-scale topography effects Shamao Mountain area LiDAR DTM data (1m) 40-m DEM LiDAR DTM (1m) LiDAR DSM (1m) Aerial topographic map

The Spectral-Element Method (SEM) Pseudospectral MethodAccuracy of a Pseudospectral Method Flexibility of a Finite-element Method Finite-element Method Develop more then 20 years ago in Computational Fluid Dynamics 27 nodes element

Spectral-element meshes Lee et al., 2009

Snapshots P wave S wave Shamao mountain North component, frequency up to 10hz Positive velocity Negative velocity Hypothetical source: Magnitude: M L 5.0 Double-couple source Strike 40°; dip 80°; rake -90° Located at 4.92 km depth

Synthetic waveform comparison Vertical component Velocity waveforms

Peak Ground Acceleration (a) LiDAR DTM (2 m) (b) 40 m DEM * The PGA values are calculated from the norm of the three components of the acceleration vector.

Realistic topography effects on ground motion PGA amplification factor: subtract the PGA value for the model without topography from the value for the model with topography, dividing the result by the PGA value for the model without topography, and multiplying it by 100 to obtain a percentage Relative change in PGA Source frequency Wavefield type Source depth Subsurface model

Summary of small-scale topography effects LiDAR DTM spectral-element mesh Yangminshan region For small-scale topography study, we combined LiDAR DTM data and an improved spectral-element mesh implementation to accommodate high- resolution topography in the Yangminshan region in northern Taipei. The average distance between points at the top of the SEM mesh was approximately 2 m, which enabled us to calculate the response of seismic waves up to a maximum frequency of approximately 10 Hz. PGA increases at mountain tops and ridges, whereas valleys usually have a reduced PGA. In some locations the PGA value decreases rapidly just beneath the tops of mountain ridges. Increased PGA values are also found in parts of valleys where brooks have eroded the ground surface, resulting in steep topography. Topographic effects also strongly depend on the source frequency and wavefield type. These results demonstrate that high-resolution, realistic surface topography needs to be taken into account for seismic hazard analysis, especially in dense population mountainous areas.

Large-scale topography effects Lee et al., 2009 Taipei basin SEM mesh Realistic topography

Snapshot and PGV distribution 3-D wave-speed model + topography + basin (b) – (a) = Residual Snapshot (T = 14 sec) PGV PGV amplification factor: subtract the PGA value for model (b) from the value for the model (a), dividing the result by the PGA value for the model (a), and multiplying it by 100 to obtain a percentage.

Synthetic waveforms along A-A’ profile

Topography effect vs. source depth 15 km depth 40 km depth2 km depth

Topography effect vs. source complexity Large subduction zone earthquake scenarios For finite-fault rupture scenarios (b), (c) and (d): The fault plane is 51 x 31km, divided into 1581 subfaults (of size 1 km x 1 km) The slip on the fault plane is considered uniform (84 cm) with a constant rake angle of 121°. The rupture velocity is assumed to be constant and equal to 2.5 km/s. For each subfault we use a Gaussian source time function with a half-duration of 1 second. Central mountain range (CMR)

Snapshots Vertical component, Velocity wavefield Frequency up to 1Hz in acceleration Positive velocity Negative velocity Rupture area of finite-fault source fictitious seismic station located in CMR

Synthetic waveforms Vertical component of velocity waveforms Point source Bilateral rupture Eastward rupture Westward rupture Synthetic waveformsFrequency spectra PSV

Topography effect vs. source complexity Point sourceBilateral ruptureEastward ruptureWestward rupture

Summary We investigated the effects of large-scale topography associated with the Central Mountain Range (CMR) in northern Taiwan on strong ground motion in the Taipei basin. Results show that variations in source depth modulate the influence of topography on ground motion in neighboring low-lying areas. If a shallow earthquake occurs in the I- Lan region, we find that the CMR significantly scatters the surface waves and therefore reduces ground motion in the Taipei basin. However, when we move the hypocenter deeper, topography scatters the body waves, which subsequently propagate as surface waves and spread into the Taipei basin. We also investigated several hypothetical rupture scenarios of subduction zone earthquakes occurring off the northeast coast of Taiwan. Results shown that the effects of topography on ground motion vary depending on the source rupture process. Our simulations show that topography has different effects depending on the scenario: it may or may not reduce ground motion in Taipei depending on the directivity, location, and depth of the event. These results illustrate the fact that topography should be taken into account when assessing seismic hazard.

Thank you for your attention~

22

23 Cumulative kinetic energy (E k )

24 Influence of attenuation