INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Your name Your institute Date, place.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 The Second European Climate Change Programme Working Group III Carbon Capture and Geological.

Advertisements

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Dear user, Thank you for the outreach you are undertaking for the IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide.

CO 2 Sequestration Catherine Peters Princeton University Deep Carbon Cycle Workshop May 15-17, 2008 Carnegie Institution Geophysical Laboratory.

CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.

Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.

Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund

CO 2 balances and mitigation costs of CHP systems with CO 2 capture in pulp and paper mills Kenneth Möllersten International Institute for Applied Systems.

Health and Safety Executive Carbon capture and storage: HSE perceptions Dr Gordon Newsholme Process safety corporate topic group.

IPCC Synthesis Report Part IV Costs of mitigation measures Jayant Sathaye.

Carbon Management for Sustainable Development: An Examination of Potential Technological Transition Paths of the Saudi Arabian System of Innovation to.

CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.

Environmental Sustainability in the Extractive Industry: The Case for Climate Change Mitigation Dr Uwem E. Ite.

THE NATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE POLICY Mitigation System National Climate Change Response Policy 26 May 2015.

1 Carbon Capture and Storage, CCS CCS is various methods for capturing and permanently storing anthropogenic CO 2 that would otherwise contribute to global.

Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:

Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:

Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.

Advances in Energy Studies Porto Venere, September 2002 CO 2 capture and storage (with emphasis on PEACS project of UCE for the IEA Greenhouse Gas.

Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) Michael Nicoletta Chemical Engineering Undergraduate University of Texas at Austin Energy Technology and Policy.

Alexander Voice 24 November  Motivation for the development of CCS technology  Climate change  Energy profile and outlook  Public perception.

The Future of Coal: Carbon Capture and Storage Dmitri Malinin Fall 2006 CBE 555 Dmitri Malinin Fall 2006 CBE 555.

An Introduction to the Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in Ukraine Keith Whiriskey.

Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.

Carbon Capture and Storage: What Does Integrated Assessment Modelling Analysis Tell Us? Dr Vaibhav Chaturvedi Research Fellow Council on Energy, Environment.

Carbon capture and geological sequestration:. Some numbers 40 % carbon emissions from power plants 90 % emission reduction proven operationally Eg. Geological.

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE 1 Dr. Robert K. Dixon Head, Energy Technology Policy Division International Energy Agency.

Reviewing the Results of Carbon Market Forecasting Dr. Mark C. Trexler Director, EcoSecurities Consulting Limited September 5, 2015.

PROSPECTS FOR CO 2 CAPTURE AND STORAGE Energy Technology Scenarios Technologies and Costs of CO 2 Sequestration Jacek Podkanski, Dolf Gielen International.

1 CO 2 from capture to storage Gérard FRIES Executive Vice-President Institut Français du Pétrole.

Can CCS Help Protect the Climate?. Key Points Climate Protection requires a budget limit on cumulative GHG emissions. Efficiency, Renewable Electric,

© OECD/IEA 2010 Cecilia Tam International Energy Agency Martin Taylor Nuclear Energy Agency The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Energy Future Paris,

1 On the Potential Large-Scale Commercial Deployment of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Technologies: Findings from Phase 2 of the Global Energy Technology.

Technology options under consideration for reducing GHG emissions SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ROUNDTABLE SERIES: Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options January 13,

1 Co-operation for the development of large scale CO 2 transport and storage infrastructure in the North Sea Rotterdam, 1 st July 2010 Harsh Pershad Shane.

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.

1 DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Vincent Mages Climate Change Initiatives VP Lafarge Greenhouse gas mitigation in the cement.

EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.

Offsets and Climate Policy: EPA Perspectives Dina Kruger Director, Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 30, 2008.

Technologies of Climate Change Mitigation Climate Parliament Forum, May 26, 2011 Prof. Dr. Thomas Bruckner Institute for Infrastructure and Resources Management.

1 Issues and Options for the BLM Geologic Carbon Dioxide Capture and Sequestration Angela Zahniser Air Resource Specialist, Soil, Water, and Air Group.

Guidelines for Carbon Dioxide Capture, Transport, and Storage Weyburn. Source: PCOR.

-EU Climate and Energy Package- Mihai Tomescu Policy Officer, Unit ‘Energy and Environment’ Directorate-General Environment European Commission Enabling.

1 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION MITIGATION THROUGH AMINE BASED CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE IN COAL FIRED ELECTRICITY GENERATION PLANTS Tanuja Bhattacharjee st

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage: Contributing to Climate Change Solutions Luke Warren, IPIECA.

1 Economics of CO 2 Storage and Sink Enhancement Options: A Utility Perspective Research Funded by DOE, TVA, and EPRI Collaborators: EPRI, MIT, Parsons,

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.

A combustion system capable of self-sustaining, unpiloted coal burning at thermal outputs as low as 500 W and as high as 50 kW has been designed and constructed.

R K Jain. CO 2 emission responsible for global warming Development process to go unhalted. Ways and means to be found for controlling and abating CO 2.

ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.

Member Reports on CO 2 Capture and Storage Related Activities China.

CO 2 Capture and Geological Storage Demonstration at In Salah, Algeria Iain Wright (CO2 Project Manager, BP Group Technology) UNCTAD Africa Oil & Gas Conference.

Delhi CCS R&D prorities CO 2 geological storage: Road Map, EOR, aquifers, mineral Stuart Haszeldine School of GeoSciences.

Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.

USA AK Capture, Storage & Membranes Alaska CO 2 Capture and Storage Options Charles Christopher BP Houston.

T HE RELEVANCE OF CCS AS A CLIMATE POLICY INSTRUMENT IN VIETNAM Presented by: Nhan T. Nguyen * (co-authors: Minh Ha-Duong and Didier Bonijoly) * Centre.

Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.

The role of gas in developing Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)

LM-01L Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage Larry R. Myer Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Physics of Sustainable Energy March.

CO 2 capture and storage Presented by Heleen de Coninck Energy research Centre of the Netherlands.

2002 European Commission - Directorate-General for Research CO2 Strategy.ppt 1 An EU Research Strategy for the Mitigation of CO 2 Emissions An EU Research.

Integrated Assessment and IPCC: Links between climate change and sub-global environmental issues presentation at Task Force Integrated Assessment Modelling,

Combining BECCS and Enhanced Weathering

Deploying Carbon Reduction Technologies In Time Daniel A. Lashof February 2007.

M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,

Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.

Carbon Capture and Storage Potentials and Barriers to Deployment.

Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.

IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Edward S. Rubin Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA Presentation to the U.S. Climate Change.

Challenges in Global CCS Projects

The Economics of Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS)

Presentation transcript:

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Your name Your institute Date, place

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Key issues addressed in this presentation What is CO 2 capture and storage? How could CCS play a role in mitigating climate change? Maturity of the technology Sources of CO 2 and potential reservoirs Cost and potential Health safety and environment risks Legal and regulatory issues

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) CO 2 capture and storage system Fuels Processes Storage options

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) How could CCS play a role in mitigating climate change? Part of a portfolio of mitigation options Reduce overall mitigation costs by incresing flexibility in achieving greenhouse gas emission reductions Application in developing countries important Energy requirements point of attention

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Energy requirements Additional energy use of % (for same output) Capture efficiency: % Net CO 2 reduction: % Assuming safe storage

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Research phase Demonstration phase Economically feasible under specific conditions Mature market Maturity of CCS technology Ocean storage Mineral carbonation Industrial utilization Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Saline formations Gas and oil fields Enhanced Oil Recovery Transport Post-combustion Pre-combustion Oxyfuel combustion Industrial separation

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Qualifying CO 2 sources Large stationary point sources High CO 2 concentration in the waste, flue gas or by-product stream (purity) Pressure of CO 2 stream Distance from suitable storage sites

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Global large stationary CO 2 sources with emissions of more than 0.1 MtCO 2 /year

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Planned and current locations of geological storage

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Current locations of geological storage Project name CountryInjection start Daily injection (tCO 2 /day) Total planned storage (tCO 2 ) Reservoir type WeyburnCanada20003, ,00020,000,000EOR In SalahAlgeria20043, ,00017,000,000Gas field SleipnerNorway19963,00020,000,000Saline formation K12BNetherlands ,000,000EGR FrioUnited States ,600Saline formation

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Geological storage

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Ocean storage

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Mineral carbonation

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Geographical relationship between sources and storage opportunities Global distribution of large stationary sources of CO 2 (Based on a compilation of publicly available information on global emission sources, IEA GHG 2002)

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Geographical relationship between sources and storage opportunities Storage prospectivity Highly prospective sedimentary basins Prospective sedimentary basins Non-prospective sedimentary basins, metamorphic and igneous rock Data quality and availability vary among regions Prospective areas in sedimentary basins where suitable saline formations, oil or gas fields, or coal beds may be found. Locations for storage in coal beds are only partly included. Prospectivity is a qualitative assessment of the likelihood that a suitable storage location is present in a given area based on the available information. This figure should be taken as a guide only, because it is based on partial data, the quality of which may vary from region to region, and which may change over time and with new information (Courtesy of Geoscience Australia).

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Costs Two ways of expressing costs: Additional electricity costs –Energy policymaking community CO 2 avoidance costs –Climate policymaking community Different outcomes: US$/kWh 20* US$/tCO 2 avoided (with EOR: 0*– 240 US$/tCO 2 avoided) * low-end: capture-ready, low transport cost, revenues from storage: 360 MtCO 2 /yr

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) CCS component costs CCS componentCost range Capture from a power plant US$/tCO 2 net captured Capture from gas processing or ammonia production US$/tCO 2 net captured Capture from other industrial sources US$/tCO 2 net captured Transportation US$/tCO 2 transported per 250km Geological storage US$/tCO 2 injected Ocean storage US$/tCO 2 injected Mineral carbonation US$/tCO 2 net mineralized

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Economic potential

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Economic potential Cost reduction of climate change stabilisation: 30% or more Most scenario studies: role of CCS increases over the course of the century Substantial application above CO 2 price of US$/tCO 2 15 to 55% of the cumulative mitigation effort worldwide until ,200 GtCO 2 cumulatively up to 2100, depending on the baseline scenario, stabilisation level ( ppmv), cost assumptions

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Health, safety, environment risks In general: lack of real data, so comparison with current operations CO 2 pipelines: similar to or lower than those posed by hydrocarbon pipelines Geological storage: –appropriate site selection, a monitoring program to detect problems, a regulatory system, remediation methods to stop or control CO 2 releases if they arise: –comparable to risks of current activities (natural gas storage, EOR, disposal of acid gas)

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Health, safety, environment risks: potential leakage from geological reservoirs and remediation

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Health, safety, environment risks Ocean storage: –pH change –Mortality of ocean organisms –Ecosystem consequences –Chronic effects unknown Mineral carbonation: –Mining and disposal of resulting products –Some of it may be re-used

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Impacts –pH change –Mortality of ocean organisms –Ecosystem consequences –Chronic effects unknown Ocean Storage Change of bacteria, nanobenthos and meiobenthos abundace after exposure to 20,000 and 5,000 ppm for hrs during experiments carried out at 2000 m depth in NW Pacific 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% -60% -80% -100% <10  m10-30  m MeibenthosNanobenthosBacteria Change population 20,000 ppm 5000 ppm

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Will leakage compromise CCS as a climate change mitigation option? Fraction retained in appropriately selected and managed geological reservoirs is –very likely to exceed 99% over 100 years, and –is likely to exceed 99% over 1,000 years. "Likely" is a probability between 66 and 90%, "very likely" of 90 to 99% Release of CO 2 from ocean storage would be gradual over hundreds of years Sufficient?

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) What are the legal and regulatory issues for implementing CO 2 storage? Onshore: national regulation –Few legal or regulatory frameworks for long-term CO 2 storage liabilities Offshore: international treaties –OSPAR (regional), London Convention –Ocean storage and sub-seabed geological storage –Unclear whether or under what conditions CO 2 injection is compatible with international law

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) Thank you Report published by Cambridge University Press Order at Documents available on More information: