Ash3d: A new USGS tephra fall model Hans Schwaiger 1 Larry Mastin 2 Roger Denlinger 2 1 Alaska Volcano Observatory 2 Cascade Volcano Observatory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.
Advertisements

Steady-state heat conduction on triangulated planar domain May, 2002
ASME-PVP Conference - July
Parameterizing a Geometry using the COMSOL Moving Mesh Feature
Discretizing the Sphere for Multi-Scale Air Quality Simulations using Variable-Resolution Finite-Volume Techniques Martin J. Otte U.S. EPA Robert Walko.
A modified Lagrangian-volumes method to simulate nonlinearly and kinetically adsorbing solute transport in heterogeneous media J.-R. de Dreuzy, Ph. Davy,
Fluidyn FLOWCOAST FLOOIL 3D Fluid Dynamics Model to Simulate Oil slick movement in coastal waters or rivers FLOOIL.
Numerical Uncertainty Assessment Reference: P.J. Roache, Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Press, Albuquerque.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
Derivation of the Gaussian plume model Distribution of pollutant concentration c in the flow field (velocity vector u ≡ u x, u y, u z ) in PBL can be generally.
Application of the CSLR on the “Yin-Yang” Grid in Spherical Geometry X. Peng (Earth Simulator Center) F. Xiao (Tokyo Institute of Technology) K. Takahashi.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
Suspended Load Above certain critical shear stress conditions, sediment particles are maintained in suspension by the exchange of momentum from the fluid.
Tianfeng Chai 1,2, Alice Crawford 1,2, Barbara Stunder 1, Roland Draxler 1, Michael J. Pavolonis 3, Ariel Stein 1 1.NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College.
1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.
Natalie Harvey | Helen Dacre Figure 1 Future Work Conduct sensitivity experiments to understand the relative importance.
3D multi-fluid model Erika Harnett University of Washington.
NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION K. Lagouvardos-V. Kotroni Institute of Environmental Research National Observatory of Athens NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION.
1 Calorimeter Thermal Analysis with Increased Heat Loads September 28, 2009.
A Look at High-Order Finite- Volume Schemes for Simulating Atmospheric Flows Paul Ullrich University of Michigan.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
Hans Burchard Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde How to make a three-dimensional numerical model that.
R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.
Model Construction: interpolation techniques 1392.
A cell-integrated semi-Lagrangian dynamical scheme based on a step-function representation Eigil Kaas, Bennert Machenhauer and Peter Hjort Lauritzen Danish.
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
WRF Volcano modelling studies, NCAS Leeds Ralph Burton, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian, Barbara Brooks.
7. Introduction to the numerical integration of PDE. As an example, we consider the following PDE with one variable; Finite difference method is one of.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
Sensitivity Analysis of Mesoscale Forecasts from Large Ensembles of Randomly and Non-Randomly Perturbed Model Runs William Martin November 10, 2005.
Georgia Institute of Technology Initial Application of the Adaptive Grid Air Quality Model Dr. M. Talat Odman, Maudood N. Khan Georgia Institute of Technology.
J.-Ph. Braeunig CEA DAM Ile-de-FrancePage 1 Jean-Philippe Braeunig CEA DAM Île-de-France, Bruyères-le-Châtel, LRC CEA-ENS Cachan
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
Ash3d: A new USGS tephra fall model
Ale with Mixed Elements 10 – 14 September 2007 Ale with Mixed Elements Ale with Mixed Elements C. Aymard, J. Flament, J.P. Perlat.
New Techniques for Modeling Air Quality Impacts of DoD Activities Talat Odman and Ted Russell Environmental Engineering Department Georgia Institute of.
CFX-10 Introduction Lecture 1.
Using the Segregated and Coupled Solvers
TEMPLATE DESIGN © A high-order accurate and monotonic advection scheme is used as a local interpolator to redistribute.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Eyjafjallajökull eruption: How well were the volcanic ash clouds predicted? Helen Dacre and Alan Grant Robin.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Introduction to MT3DMS All equations & illustrations taken
1 Séminaire AIM (20/06/06)Romain Teyssier Modélisation numérique multi-échelle des écoulements MHD en astrophysique Romain Teyssier (CEA Saclay) Sébastien.
November 3 IDR To do: What we have, what we’d like to do Modeling Mathematical/numerical approaches What we need inside the codes Tasks.
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
Mass Coordinate WRF Dynamical Core - Eulerian geometric height coordinate (z) core (in framework, parallel, tested in idealized, NWP applications) - Eulerian.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Flux form semi-Lagrangian transport in ICON: construction and results of idealised test cases Daniel Reinert Deutscher Wetterdienst.
Towards Future Navier-Stokes Schemes Uniform Accuracy, O(h) Time Step, Accurate Viscous/Heat Fluxes Hiroaki Nishikawa National Institute of Aerospace.
A Fully Conservative 2D Model over Evolving Geometries Ricardo Canelas Master degree student IST Teton Dam 1976.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
Lecture Objectives: - Numerics. Finite Volume Method - Conservation of  for the finite volume w e w e l h n s P E W xx xx xx - Finite volume.
Numerical Analysis Yu Jieun.
Animating smoke with dynamic balance Jin-Kyung Hong Chang-Hun Kim 발표 윤종철.
1 Tutorial. 2 Solution Process 1.Gather Information 2.Create the Computational Grid 3.Set the Boundary Conditions 4.Set the Initial Conditions 5.Set the.
Interfacing Model Components CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
1 Case 2: URANS Application with CFL3D Christopher L. Rumsey NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA CFDVAL2004 Workshop, March 29-31, 2004.
TransAT Tutorial Backward Step May 2015 ASCOMP
Michele Prestifilippo
National Taiwan University, Taiwan
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts
Assessing Volcanic Ash Hazard by Using the CALPUFF System
Ensemble variance loss in transport models:
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Objective Numerical methods Finite volume.
Presentation transcript:

Ash3d: A new USGS tephra fall model Hans Schwaiger 1 Larry Mastin 2 Roger Denlinger 2 1 Alaska Volcano Observatory 2 Cascade Volcano Observatory

Why do we need a tephra fall model?  Forecasting ash distribution during unrest  Constraining eruption parameters through observation & modeling  Research into the physics & hazards of ash eruptions

What we were using  Ashfall: A 2-D model Developed by Tony Hurst

For Redoubt, Evan Thoms & Rob Wardwell wrote a Python script to automatically run Ashfall & plot these maps. Main disadvantages: We don’t have the source code It’s limited to 2-D runs in a 1-D wind field.

What the model does  Calculated advection-diffusion of multiple grain sizes for 4-D wind field  Calculates deposit thickness and its variation with time.  Calculates time of arrival of ash at airports.  Writes out 3-D ash-cloud migration at time steps, for animation.

Model overview  The equation for advection of ash by wind and diffusion of ash by turbulent eddies is solved by method of fractional steps, treating advection and diffusion independently.  Advection step: Solve advection equation to get concentration at intermediate time step (q*):  Diffusion step: Solve diffusion equation, integrating the remaining fractional step:  Where q is ash concentration in kg/km 3, u is velocity in km/hr, and K is an eddy diffusivity in units of km 2 /hr

Methods of Solution  A domain of cells is constructed either in a spherical (lat./lon.) or Cartesian coordinates  Wind fields must be provided and are used to transport ash as it settles.  The numerical schemes used are:  Finite volume methods with Riemann solvers, in which ash flux occurs at cell boundaries.  Semi-Lagrangian methods that backtrack ash transport along wind streamlines in a fixed Eulerian framework.  Turbulent diffusion is treated either explicitly (Forward Euler) or implicitly (Crank-Nicolson)

Illustration of advection schemes Donor Cell Upwind with Dimension Splitting Corner Transport Upwind Semi- Lagrangian t t+t

Illustration of advection schemes Donor Cell Upwind with Dimension Splitting Corner Transport Upwind Semi- Lagrangian Conserves mass Moderately fast Uses most 2 nd order terms t = x/u Increased numerical diffusion Conserves mass Slow Uses all 2 nd order terms t = x/u Low numerical diffusion Conserves mass only approximately Fast t = c x/u Low numerical diffusion Accuracy depends on order of interpolation

Why so many options?  Fast, but non-conservative, calculations can be automated for ensemble forecast runs  Fully conservative calculations (slower) might be necessary for greater confidence in particular results  Full mass conservation might also be required when including additional physics (aggregation)

Types of calculation that Ash3d can do Calculation on a sphereCalculation on a plane Uses lower-resolution Global Forecast System winds But, it can model an eruption from any volcano on Earth. Uses high-resolution winds from projected models (e.g. NAM, WRF) But, it can only model eruptions in certain geographic locations. <12-50 km deg. ( km))

Projected Meteorological models used NAM 11 km NAM AK 45 km

Model inputs  Wind files (1-D, 3-D, 4-D)  Grid parameters: dx,dy,dz  Grain size distribution, fall velocities  Eruption source parameters:  Number of eruptions  Time, duration, plume height, erupted volume, Suzuki constant

Model outputs  Deposit thickness (final, at specified times)  Ash cloud elevation & concentration  Ash arrival times & thickness at airports & other points of interest  3-D data in various formats:  ESRI ASCII (For import to Arc products)  Kml/kmz (Google Earth)  NetCDF  Raw binary

Example: Iceland ( ) 24-hours after start of simulation Resolution = 0.33 degrees

Example: Iceland ( ) 24-hours after start of simulation Resolution = 0.20 degrees

Example: Iceland ( ) 24-hours after start of simulation Resolution = 0.10 degrees

Example: Iceland ( ) 42-hours after start of simulation Resolution = 0.10 degrees Pavolonis

Example: Ensemble simulations Redoubt: March 24, 2009 (event 6) dx,dy=5 km dz = 1 km nx,ny,nz = 140,140,22 nt = ~600 K = 0 km 2 /hr grain sizes (1,2,4 m/s) ESP: Duration = 15 min Erup. Vol = km 3 Plume H = random uniform (6-20 km) 50 realizations (~90 min)

Example: Ensemble simulations Redoubt 2009 event 6 ESP: Plume H uniform 6-20 km Erup. Vol. 7x10 -4 km 3 Duration 15 min Probability of ash deposit > 1mm Contours at 5%, 50%, 95%

Example: Ensemble simulations Redoubt: March 24, 2009 (event 6) dx,dy=5 km dz = 1 km nx,ny,nz = 140,140,22 nt = ~600 K = 0 km 2 /hr grain sizes (1,2,4 m/s) ESP: Duration = uniform min Erup. Vol = uniform km 3 Plume H = normal = 14 km, =3 km 50 realizations (~90 min)

Example: Ensemble simulations Redoubt 2009 event 6 ESP: Plume H normal = 14 km =3 km Erup. Vol. uniform 5-9x10 -4 km 3 Duration uniform min Probability of ash deposit > 1mm Contours at 5%, 50%, 95%

Next steps  Finish verification  Start validation: compare with field data  Automate operational runs for volcanoes in unrest  Sensitivity analysis  Adaptive mesh refinement  Include Aggregation  Topography

Summary  New USGS tephra fall model nearly complete  Automated simulations for volcanoes in unrest coming soon  Feedback appreciated on output formats  Simulation output  Ensemble output

Illustration of diffusion schemes Explicit Forward Euler Easily implemented First-order accurate t = (x) 2 /K t t+t Implicit Crank-Nicolson Assumes linearity Requires solving Ax=b Second-order accurate t limited only by accuracy t t+t

Verification and Validation Verification – Is your code solving the equations correctly? Construct suite of test cases to check behavior in idealized conditions o Linear advection in x,y o Linear advection in z o Diffusion in x,y,z o Circular advection Method of manufactured solutions Validation – Are you even solving the right equations? Comparison with experimental data Comparison with field data

Convergence for different schemes

Execution time for different schemes

Circular advection test case Smooth boundaries are modeled well Sharp boundaries are smoothed by numerical diffusion