The Roadmap to REDD Implementation in Tanzania: Potential Challenges and Opportunities Pius Z. Yanda, Emma T. Liwenga & Claude G. Mung’ong’o Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Poverty-Conservation Programming in CARE A global programme: More than 130 agriculture and natural resource management projects world-wide 30 of these.
Advertisements

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
Payment for Environmental Services Extracted from work by Ffemke Griffoen FAO-APO TZ.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Program of Payments for Forest Environmental Services in Costa Rica Edgar Ortiz Malavasi Instituto Tecnologico de Costa Rica Symposium: "Direct Payments.
Co-benefits Initiative Zambian Experience
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – multilateral REDD-plus financing program GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
1 The African Bio-Carbon Initiative Dr Charlotte Streck.
REDD PLUS -- What is that?. 1. REDD PLUS – in brief Background: Deforestation has become a problem that the world cannot ignore.  Deforestation results.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Co-management of Forest Resources in Malawi. High incidence of poverty and food insecurity: – Increasing demand for land and forest resources – High dependence.
Uma Tenure and Regulatory Reforms: Lessons and Future Steps in Asia September
REDD + AND SAFEGUARDS - Human Rights - Environmental Integrity - Governance Victoria Tauli Corpuz Executive Director, Tebtebba Chair, UN Permanent Forum.
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
The REDD Agenda in Tanzania – Lessons
Wednesday 2and September 2009REDD Workshop - Oasis, Morogoro 31st-3rd Sept'09 1 Payment for Environmental Services (PES) and REDD Prof Kassim Kulindwa.
REDD in Climate Change Negotiation
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – multilateral REDD-plus financing program GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 25 – 27 October 2011 Nairobi, Kenya.
Regional highlights of R-PINs Asia Region FCPF Steering Committee Meeting Paris, July 9 and 10, 2008 By FCPF Technical Advisory Panel Forest Carbon Partnership.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
Presentation by Alfred N. Gichu Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness.
CONTENTS Introduction Introduction Changes in Forest Cover Changes in Forest Cover Reforestation Reforestation Community Forestry Community Forestry Forest.
SIERRA LEONE ACHIEMENTS AND PROSPECTS IN MAINSTREAMING CLIMATE CHANGE INTO DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IN SIERRA LEONE.
Cameroon’s Wood-Energy NAMA Project Cameroon’s Wood-Energy NAMA Project KAGONBE Timothée Point Focal NAMA et GIEC Sous-Directeur de l’Encadrement et du.
SESSION 3: Climate Change Financing Opportunities.
REDD+ Code of Conduct How it works and what we do Eneco.
Disaster Risk Reduction Experiences and Lessons Learned from MERET Arega Yirga 13 October 2014 Addis Ababa.
Possible collaboration with Pacific countries on REDD Plus
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 19 – 21, 2011 Monrovia, Liberia.
Global Climate Change Alliance: Informing the International Climate Debate From forests to sustainable land management: creating synergies between adaptation.
facebook.com/DahariComores Comoros case study: using landscape approaches to manage sustainable outcomes amidst competing land- uses.
CCIAM Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation in Tanzania Maliondo, S.M.S. Programme Coordinator CCIAM Programme SUA, Tanzania
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review.
National Forest Monitoring Systems: M & MRV in the context of REDD+ Activities MJ Sanz, FAO REDD MRV Workshop for developing a roadmap to establish an.
20 February 2009 Tanzania Natural Resource Forum Carbon-Forestry Working Group 1 Conceptual and Practical Challenges in the Operationalization of REDD.
© 2007 theIDLgroup Ltd Will the Rural Poor Benefit from REDD? OPERATIONALISING CARBON FINANCE IN GHANA OPERATIONALISING CARBON FINANCE IN GHANA Roundtable.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
Assessing the livelihood impacts of incentive payments: implications for REDD Luca Tacconi Sango Mahanty Helen Suich Research funded by: Australian Agency.
FARM Africa/SOS Sahel Ethiopia Strengthening Sustainable livelihoods and Forest Management Over view of the program April 6, 2013 Bahir dar.
REDD+ Guiana Plateau project First Steering Committee Meeting Paramaribo, 6 August 2013 Rene Somopawiro SBB, Suriname.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
GEF-Assisted Integrated Ecosystem Management Project In The Trans- Boundary Areas Between Nigeria and Niger Republic.
Propose Strategic Objective and Strategy in the National REDD+ Strategy Version 4.
AU/UNIDO/Brazil High-Level Seminar on Biofuel.  Policies are required to reflect the country’s development vision for the sector  Required to establish.
Where and how can REDD+ deliver most benefits? Lera Miles, UNEP-WCMC 7 December 2015.
Towards a comprehensive Monitoring Framework for REDD+ Peter Holmgren FAO 5 December 2010.
Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) European Commission expert group on forest fires Antalya, 26 April 2012 Ernst Schulte, DG ENV on behalf.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 6 – 9, 2011 Dakar, Senegal.
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.
1.5 USAID Climate Change/REDD+ Policy Overview Evan Notman Climate Change Office Bureau of Economic Growth, Education and Environment, USAID FEBRUARY 2015.
GOVERNMENT’S CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE INITIATIVES By Tibaire Emmanuel UNV/CCFU 1.
Emerging Science Priorities: Human Well-being Demonstrate the multiple effects/relationships of human well-being, biodiversity, and ecosystem services,
A Brief History of REDD + Regional REDD+ Coordination Unit Tigray Regional State,Mekelle Sep 3 & 4/2015 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST NATIONAL REDD+
NATIONAL FORESTRY AUTHORITY
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Introduction to Malawi REDD+ Process and Outlook
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness Activities
REDD+ ZONAL STAKEHOLDERS AWARENESS CREATION WORKSHOP
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
DEVELOPMENT OF MRV-SYSTEM & REL/RL IN TANZANIA
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
GEF-5 Focal Area Strategies
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Presentation transcript:

The Roadmap to REDD Implementation in Tanzania: Potential Challenges and Opportunities Pius Z. Yanda, Emma T. Liwenga & Claude G. Mung’ong’o Institute of Resource Assessment, University of Dar es Salaam P.O. Box Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

WHAT IS REDD ? Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation REDD is based on the idea of rewarding individuals, communities, projects and countries that reduce green house gas (GHG) emissions from forests. REDD is seen as a significant, cheap, quick and win-win way to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. 2

REDD is based on the idea of reward: – individuals, – communities, – projects and – countries – that reduce green house gas (GHG) emissions from forests.

Why REDD? – Has the potential to deliver large cuts in emissions at a low cost within a short time frame – Enhances biodiversity conservation – Enhances ecosystem management – Contributes to reducing poverty Hence: Enhance sustainable development

Can REDD payment alone be an incentive ? Not sure Consider – Opportunity costs – Ecosystem management costs – Monitoring and evaluation

How can sustainable development be achieved through REDD initiative? Enhancement of ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation – Effective conservation of ecosystems – Provision of alternative livelihoods e.g. beekeeping - – Provision of alternative sources of fuel wood through establishment of woodlots

How can it be achieved? Contribution to reducing poverty – Supporting rural development activities with funding from REDD Fund – Promotion of environmentally friendly livelihood activities like beekeeping – Through incomes from carbon market

Which forests would be appropriate for REDD? Catchment forests Forests high in biodiversity resources Forests in fragile landscapes

Issues for Consideration during REDD Implementation

Who Qualifies for Rewards Who owns forests at different levels? Who deserves payments at the national, sub-national, community and household levels? How do we deal with legal and illegal deforestation? E.g. deforestation for livelihoods? How do we graduate rewarding packages at the individual levels on the basis of compliance?

Who Qualifies for Rewards Are forests in the public land also public? Do villagers know which forests belong to their village? Do individual households in the villages own forests ? How do we reverse the REDD philosophy so as to reward stewardship at the community level ?

What is the Appropriate Timing for the Reward When will an individual begin to be paid? If it is as per the present REDD concept, what happens to individuals during the realization phase? Should we use holistic approach with combined adaptation and mitigation by emphasizing on ecosystem services? In this regard then should we see benefits to be cumulative and gradual, payment for REDD being one of the medium and long-term ecosystem benefits?

Rewarding Approach What will be the rewarding arrangement? Should the out-grower approach be applied? What will be the basis for payment under such arrangement? Alternatively, are the rewarding package under PFM adequate for REDD? Can we improvise PFM packages to suit REDD rewarding scheme?

Rewarding Approach Should we consider rewarding arrangements through improvement of landscape management with the aim of promoting land productivity? But then how does one discriminate those individuals that have not complied? How does one reward individuals on the basis of compliance?

Social Issues How do we control land grabbing and marginalization of the poor anticipating commercialization of trees through REDD? How do we discourage shifting cultivation and enhance productivity per unit area? How do we reduce dependence on fuel wood and charcoal as major sources of energy? What are the implications to gender relations of transforming trees as a cash crop to the household livelihoods

How Are We Addressing these Issues

Stakeholders Consultations Zonal Stakeholders consultation are underway in eight zones Two have been conducted Issues covered during consultations are: – Lessons learned from PFM and WMA – Incentive schemes – Benefit sharing mechanisms – Participatory monitoring – Drivers of deforestation – Governance and tenure

Next Steps National Stakeholders workshop – Results from zonal stakeholders consultations – In-depth studies reports Expert groups meetings to review thematic areas Drafting of National REDD Strategy Sharing draft with stakeholders for further improvement 19

Thank you for listening