Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
Advertisements

Measuring Performance within School Climate Transformation Grants
Computer Applications for Monitoring Student Outcomes: Behavior Rob Horner University of Oregon
Current Status and Emerging Directions for PBIS
Aligning Educational Initiatives
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
Implementation Action Planning
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
PBIS Coaches Institute Placer County Office of Education
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
Coming June 30,  Purpose of PBIS Assessment  Implications of the move from PBIS Surveys  Overview of available Tools and Surveys  Criteria for.
Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems, and Data-Based Decision Making Version 3.0, Rev  This is a presentation of the Illinois PBIS Network. All.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
Creative ways to use data: A toolkit for schools Susan Barrett
Designing and Implementing Evaluation of School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob HornerHolly Lewandowski University of Oregon Illinois State Board of.
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
V 2.1 Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems and Action Planning.
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Team Initiated Problem Solving Workbook Cabarrus County 2013.
Brockton PBIS: Tier 2 Coaches Meeting March 2014 Adam Feinberg
Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
2015 WI PBIS Conference A5. Benchmark of Quality – Implementation Plan Dave Kunelius - WI RtI Center Regional Coordinator-PBIS.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Data Systems Northwest AEA September 7, 2010.
V 2.1 TFI Wordle. V 2.1 Objectives of Session: 1.Not bore you to sleep 2.Types of PBIS Data 3.pbisapps.org 4.PBIS Evaluation Tools 5.Action Planning.
D. Data Entry & Analysis Plan Established. Critical Element PBIS Implementation Goal D. Data Entry & Analysis Plan Established 13. Data system is used.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
“Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner
OSEP Project Director’s Meeting: Establishing, Sustaining and Scaling Effective Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on PBIS
Notes for Trainers (Day Training)
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Data Entry and Analysis Plan Established Day 2.
State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Aligning PBIS to Achieve Educational Excellence Rob Horner University of Oregon Acknowledge: George Sugai, Lucille Eber, Susan Barrett, Justyn Poulos,
PAPBS Network Coaches Day January 28, Team-Initiated Problem Solving II (TIPS II) Model.
Data Driven Decisions: Using the Tools Susan Barrett, Jerry Bloom PBIS Maryland Coaches Meeting October 2007
Edit the text with your own short phrases. The animation is already done for you; just copy and paste the slide into your existing presentation.
Module 2 : Using Data to Problem-Solve Implementation Issues Session 3 Phase I Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
PBIS Coaches Training Day 3. OUR NORMS Confidentiality * Active participation * Professional use of technology * Assume best intentions Agenda Welcome.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
School Climate Transformation Grant. SSAISD Learner Profile ▪Reflects to set personal goals ▪Is an accomplished reader ▪Employs digital skills ▪Is an.
PBIS DATA. Critical Features of PBIS SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior Supporting Culturally Relevant Evidence-based.
Creative ways to use data: A toolkit for schools Melissa Leahy, Ph.D. Kimberly Muniz, M.A./CAS, NCSP Carroll County Public Schools Maryland.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
Annual Evaluation (TFI 1.15 )
Current Issues Related to MTSS for Academic and Behavior Difficulties: Building Capacity to Implement PBIS District Wide at All Three Tiers OSEP conference.
PBIS: Using the PBIS Framework to Implement Effective Practices
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Applying Data to TIPS Data Scenarios
NC DPI Exemplar Recognition Criteria
Applying Data to TIPS Data Scenarios
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Presentation transcript:

Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut, University of Missouri University of Oregon

Enhancing Decision Systems Collecting and Using Data for Decision-making

Goals Define Data Collection and Use for Schools Using Multi- tiered Systems of Behavior Support. Four Key Data Systems

Main Message Providing the right information, in the right format, at the right time is among the single most effective ways of improving the problem solving effectiveness of school teams.

Decision-Systems for MTSS Accountability System o Used by district decision-makers to meet state and federal requirements. o Assess district improvement Decision System o Used by school teams to improve academic and behavior support in schools Fidelity System o Used to determine if selected interventions are being implemented as planned Data Use Capacity o Training in how to use data for decision-making and problem solving.

1. Accountability System Examples: ARIES, Synergy, Skyward, PowerSchool Content o Demographics o Grade progression o Standardized Assessment Data o Attendance Uses o Federal and state reporting o Assessment against district improvement plan

2. Multi-tiered Decision System Tier III Individualized Plans Specific academic and social behavior targets Tier II Targeted group Daily point card Tier I Whole school ODR, Attendance, Suspension, Expulsion

Tier I Decision System Identifying that a problem exists Defining a problem with the precision Start with how often problem behaviors occur then use the data base to determine: What behaviors are a barrier and how often are they performed? Where they most and least likely Who is engaging in the behaviors When the problem behaviors are most and least likely Why do the behaviors keep occurring? Disproportionality patterns Ability to drill down for detailed data summary :

Elementary School with 150 Students 9 Questions to Ask of the Data What is happening? What is typical? What is possible? What is needed? Questions to Ask of the Data What is happening? What is typical? What is possible? What is needed?

Example Do we have a problem?

Defiance What Behavior(s) Questions: 1. Are most common behavior problems (a) Student- Student, or (b) Adult-Student related? 2. Are problem behaviors MAJOR or MINOR or BOTH?

What Behavior(s)

Classroom Playground Where? Questions: 1.What location(s) are associated with the most ODRs? 2.Sort by “structured” settings and “non-structured” settings (Classroom & Gym vs. Commons, Cafeteria, Hall, Playground)

Where

Who Questions: 1.Are there many, a few, or one student associated with the problem? 2.Are there more students emerging?

Who

11:45-12:00 When?When? Questions: 1.Are problem behaviors more likely at some times of the day? 2.What is happening during periods when problems are most likely?

When

When

Why?

Why ?

Ethnicity

Risk Ratio = Risk Index/ Risk Index Risk Ratio of 1.25 or larger is cause for concern

Drill Down for Precision

Only in Classroom Only on Playground Only in Classroom Defiance Physical Aggression

Classroom Playground Hallway Commons Area Drill Down Capacity

Classroom Unstructured Settings

Tier I Decision-making Effective decision-making requires o The right data o In the right form o At the right time

Tier II Decision System Identification Intervention Development Intervention Implementation and Adaptation

Tier II - Identification

Tier II Decision System

Tier II Decision-System

Tier III Decision System

The Impact of Effective Data Systems Dr. Sarah Pinkelman, George Mason University.

3. Fidelity Measures Are the strategies that are selected actually being implemented?

PBIS Fidelity Measures SET TIC BoQ SAS ISSET BAT MATT Phases of Implementation (POI) Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI)

1.1 Team Composition FeatureData Sources Scoring Criteria 0 = Not implemented 1 = Partially implemented 2 = Fully implemented 1.1 Team Composition: Team Composition: Tier I team includes a Tier I systems coordinator, a school administrator, a family member, and individuals able to provide (a) applied behavioral expertise, (b) coaching expertise, (c) knowledge of student academic and behavior patterns, (d) knowledge about the operations of the school across grade levels and programs, and for high schools, (e) student representation.  School organizational chart  Tier I team meeting minutes 0 = Tier I team does not exist or does not include coordinator, school administrator, or individuals with applied behavioral expertise 1 = Tier I team exists, but does not include all identified roles or attendance of these members is below 80% 2 = Tier I team exists with coordinator, administrator, and all identified roles represented, AND attendance of all roles is at or above 80% Main Idea: Teams need people with multiple skills and perspectives to implement PBIS well.

Total score (TFI)

Sub-scale report

PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory

Sub-subscale report Tier I Teams Implementation Evaluation Tier II Teams Interventions Evaluation Tier III Teams Resources Assessment Support plan Monitoring and adaptation

Item Report

Action Planning 01. Team to propose teaching template and Fall teaching schedule at Feb 16 Faculty meeting. AlanFeb 16

4. Using Data for Decision-Making Meeting Foundations o Team Roles o Public Meeting Minutes o Meeting protocol Problem Solving o Define problem with precision o Define goal o Build comprehensive support based on function o Establish action plan Implementation o Assess quality of implementation o Assess impact toward goal o Adapt based on implementation data

Implement Solution with High Integrity Implement Solution with High Integrity Identify Goal for Change Identify Goal for Change Identify Problem with Precision Identify Problem with Precision Monitor Impact of Solution and Compare against Goal Monitor Impact of Solution and Compare against Goal Make Summative Evaluation Decision Make Summative Evaluation Decision Meeting Foundations Team-Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS II) Model Identify Solution and Create Implementation Plan with Contextual Fit Identify Solution and Create Implementation Plan with Contextual Fit Collect and Use Data What, Who, When, Where, and Why? How do we want the problem to change? What are we going to do to bring about desired change? Did we implement with fidelity? Has the problem been solved? What next?

Findings Teams can improve quickly Use of data is critical both for initial problem solving and on-going adaptation

Summary Having the right data in the right form at the right time is among the single most efficient ways of improving the decision-making of a team Four Data Systems o Accountability System o Decision System o Fidelity System o Data Use System