Introduction to High-Precision GPS Data Analysis: Towards a common language for the workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
Advertisements

EPOS GAMIT/GLOBK/Track Workshop Introduction
Global Positioning System: what it is and how we use it for measuring the earth’s movement. April 21, 2011.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Extraction of atmospheric parameters M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
Estimating Atmospheric Water Vapor with Ground-based GPS Lecture 12
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Fundamentals of GPS for geodesy M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University of Bristol,
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
03/18/05OSU GAMIT/GLOBK1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
Estimating Atmospheric Water Vapor with Ground-based GPS.
Izmir GAMIT/GLOBK Workshop Introduction Thomas Herring, MIT
Concepts in High-Precision GPS Data Analysis GPS observables Modeling the observations Limits of GPS accuracy Time series analysis.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Estimating Heights and Atmospheric Delays “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical more sensitive.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 20 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
1 SVY 207: Lecture 11 GPS Error Sources: Review Where can errors occur? –Satellite: ephemeris, clock, S/A (history) A/S –Propagation: ionosphere, troposphere,
SVY 207: Lecture 13 Ambiguity Resolution
GGOS User Requirements and Functional Specifications Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA Global.
1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.
01/0000 HEO and Daylight Ranging “Reality and Wishes” Ramesh Govind ILRS Fall Workshop, 4 th October 2005.
Katmandu GAMIT/GLOBK Short Course Introduction Thomas Herring, MIT
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
G51C-0694 Development of the Estimation Service of the Earth‘s Surface Fluid Load Effects for Space Geodetic Techniques for Space Geodetic Techniques Hiroshi.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 GPS Error Sources: Part 2 –Satellite: ephemeris, clock, S/A, and A/S –Propagation: ionosphere, troposphere, multipath –Receiver:antenna,
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Chapter 2 GPS Crop Science 6 Fall 2004 October 22, 2004.
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal (~3:1) so longer.
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Are thermal effects responsible for micron-level motions recorded at deep- and shallow-braced monuments in a short-baseline network at Yucca Mountain,
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical.
Modeling Errors in GPS Vertical Estimates Signal propagation effects –Signal scattering ( antenna phase center/multipath ) –Atmospheric delay ( parameterization,
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
GNSS Tropospheric Products
How Does GPS Work ?. The Global Positioning System 24+ satellites 20,200 km altitude 55 degrees inclination 12 hour orbital period 5 ground control stations.
Errors in Positioning Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module R King overview from longer T Herring.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Concepts in High Precision Data Analysis
Fundamentals of GPS for geodesy
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Fundamentals of GPS for high-precision geodesy
Fundamentals of GPS for geodesy
WGS-84 Seminar and Workshop
Understanding what sh_gamit does
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Track Output Interpretation
Track Output Interpretation
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to High-Precision GPS Data Analysis: Towards a common language for the workshop

Topics to be Covered in the Workshop Wednesday Morning Introduction to GPS Data Analysis Automatic Processing using sh_gamit and sh_glred What’s New in GAMIT/GLOBK Wednesday Afternoon Reference Frames and Spatial Filtering Effective Use of GLOBK Thursday Morning Estimating Heights and Atmospheric Parameters An Approach to Error Analysis Thursday Afternoon Overview of Kinematic Processing with Track A Short Introduction to Block Modeling GAMIT/GLOBK Utilities

Instantaneous positioning with GPS Receiver solution or sh_rx2apr  Point position ( svpos ) m  Differential ( svdiff ) 3-10 m Your location is: 37 o ’ N 122 o ’ W Instantaneous Positioning with Pseudoranges

High-precision positioning uses the phase observations Long-session static: change in phase over time carries most of the information Repairing cycle slips is therefore essential The shorter the occupation, the more important is overall ambiguity resolution Each Satellite (and station) has a different signature

Agreement in mm of single session with average of h sessions for three different reference stations at 30, 200, and 500 km Horizontal Vertical Firuzabadi & King [2009] Accuracy of Single-baseline Observations as a Function of Session Length

Accuracy of Network Observations as a Function of Session Length Bottom labels are different reference networks (3-20 sites) with maximum extent in km Horizonal (mm) Vertical (mm) Firuzabadi & King [2009]

Observables in Data Processing Fundamental observations L1 phase = f1 x range (19 cm) L2 phase = f2 x range (24 cm) C1 or P1 pseudorange used separately to get receiver clock offset (time) To estimate parameters use doubly differenced LC = 2.5 L L2 “Ionosphere-free combination” Double differencing removes clock fluctuations; LC removes almost all of ionosphere Both DD and LC amplify noise (use L1, L2 directly for baselines < 1 km) Auxiliary combinations for data editing and ambiguity resolution “Geometry-free combination” or “Extra wide-lane” (EX-WL) (86 cm) LG = L2 - f2/f1 L1 Removes all frequency-independent effects (geometric & atmosphere) but not multipath or ionosphere N2 - N1 “Widelane ambiguities” (86 cm); if phase only, includes ionosphere Melbourne-Wubbena wide-Lane (86 cm): phase/pseudorange combination that removes geometry and ionosphere; dominated by pseudorange noise

Modeling the Observations I. Conceptual/Quantitative  Motion of the satellites Earth’s gravity field ( flattening 10 km; higher harmonics 100 m ) Attraction of Moon and Sun ( 100 m ) Solar radiation pressure ( 20 m )  Motion of the Earth Irregular rotation of the Earth ( 5 m ) Luni-solar solid-Earth tides ( 30 cm ) Loading due to the oceans, atmosphere, and surface water and ice ( 10 mm)  Propagation of the signal Neutral atmosphere ( dry 6 m; wet 1 m ) Ionosphere ( 10 m but cancels to few mm most of the time ) Variations in the phase centers of the ground and satellite antennas ( 10 cm) * incompletely modeled

Modeling the Observations II. Software Structure  Satellite orbit IGS tabulated ephemeris (Earth-fixed SP3 file) [ track ] GAMIT tabulated ephemeris ( t-file ): numerical integration by arc in inertial space, fit to SP3 file, may be represented by its initial conditions (ICs) and radiation-pressure parameters; requires tabulated positions of Sun and Moon  Motion of the Earth in inertial space [ model or track ] Analytical models for precession and nutation (tabulated); IERS observed values for pole position (wobble), and axial rotation (UT1) Analytical model of solid-Earth tides; global grids of ocean and atmospheric tidal loading  Propagation of the signal [ model or track ] Zenith hydrostatic (dry) delay (ZHD) from pressure ( met-file, VMF1, or GPT ) Zenith wet delay (ZWD) [crudely modeled and estimated in solve or track ] ZHD and ZWD mapped to line-of-sight with mapping functions (VMF1 grid or GMT) Variations in the phase centers of the ground and satetellite antennas (ANTEX file)

Parameter Estimation  Phase observations [ solve or track ] Form double difference LC combination of L1 and L2 to cancel clocks & ionosphere Apply a priori constraints Estimate the coordinates, ZTD, and real-valued ambiguities Form M-W WL and/or phase WL with ionospheric constraints to estimate and resolve the WL (L2-L1) integer ambiguities [ autcln, solve, track ] Estimate and resolve the narrow-lane (NL) ambiguities Estimate the coordinates and ZTD with WL and NL ambiguities fixed --- Estimation can be batch least squares [ solve ] or sequential (Kalman filter [ track ]  Quasi-observations from phase solution (h-file) [ globk ] Sequential (Kalman filter) Epoch-by-epoch test of compatibility (chi2 increment) but batch output

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

Mitigating Multipath Errors Avoid Reflective Surfaces Use a Ground Plane Antenna Use Multipath Rejection Receiver Observe for many hours Remove with average from many days Direct Signal Reflected Signal

Multipath and Water Vapor Effects in the Observations One-way (undifferenced) LC phase residuals projected onto the sky in 4-hr snapshots. Spatially repeatable noise is multipath; time-varying noise is water vapor. Red is satellite track. Yellow and green positive and negative residuals purely for visual effect. Red bar is scale (10 mm).

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

Monuments Anchored to Bedrock are Critical for Tectonic Studies (not so much for atmospheric studies) Good anchoring: Pin in solid rock Drill-braced (left) in fractured rock Low building with deep foundation Not-so-good anchoring: Vertical rods Buildings with shallow foundation Towers or tall building (thermal effects)

From Dong et al. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 2075, 2002 Atmosphere (purple) 2-5 mm Snow/water (blue) 2-10 mm Nontidal ocean (red) 2-3 mm Annual Component of Vertical Loading

24-hr position estimates over 3 months for station in semi-arid eastern Oregon Random noise is ~1 mm horizontal, 3 mm vertical, but the vertical has ~10- level systematics lasting days which are likely a combination of monument instability and atmospheric and hydrologic loading

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

GPS Satellite Limits to model are non-gravitational accelerations due to solar and albedo radiation, unbalanced thrusts, and outgassing; and non- spherical antenna pattern

Quality of IGS Final Orbits mm = 1 ppb Source:

Quality of real-time predictions from IGS Ultra-Rapid orbits mm = 1 ppb Source:

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

Reference Frames Global Center of Mass ~ 30 mm ITRF ~ 2 mm, < 1 mm/yr Continental < 1 mm/yr horiz., 2 mm/yr vert. Local -- may be self-defined

Effect of Orbital and Geocentric Position Error/Uncertainty High-precision GPS is essentially relative ! Baseline error/uncertainty ~ Baseline distance x geocentric SV or position error SV altitude SV errors reduced by averaging: Baseline errors are ~ 0.2 orbital error / 20,000 km e.g. 20 mm orbital error = 0.2 ppb or 0.2 mm on 1000 km baseline Network position errors magnified for short sessions e.g. 5 mm position error ~ 1 ppb or 1 mm on 1000 km baseline 10 cm position error ~ 20 ppb or 1 mm on 50 km baseline