Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Understanding of Global and Regional Carbon Dioxide Flux Variability through Assimilation of in Situ and Remote Sensing Data in a Geostatistical.
Advertisements

Niall P. Hanan 1, Christopher A. Williams 1, Joseph Berry 2, Robert Scholes 3 A. Scott Denning 1, Jason Neff 4, and Jeffrey Privette 5 1. Colorado State.
Virtual Tall Towers and Inversions or How to Make Productive Use of Continental CO 2 Measurements in Global Inversions Martha Butler The Pennsylvania State.
SENSITIVITY OF OBSERVATIONAL DATA TO TIME DEPENDANT INVERSION Takashi Maki Senior Coordinator for Chemical Transport Modeling Atmospheric Environment Division.
Simulations of carbon transport in CCM3: uncertainties in C sinks due to interannual variability and model resolution James Orr (LSCE/CEA-CNRS and IPSL,
Prabir K. Patra Acknowledgments: S. Maksyutov, K. Gurney and TransCom-3 modellers TransCom Meeting, Paris; June 2005 Sensitivity CO2 sources and.
TransCom 3 Level 2 Base Case Inter-annual CO 2 Flux Inversion Results Current Status David Baker, Rachel Law, Kevin Gurney, Peter Rayner, TransCom3 L2.
Compatibility of surface and aircraft station networks for inferring carbon fluxes TransCom Meeting, 2005 Nir Krakauer California Institute of Technology.
Evaluating the Impact of the Atmospheric “ Chemical Pump ” on CO 2 Inverse Analyses P. Suntharalingam GEOS-CHEM Meeting, April 4-6, 2005 Acknowledgements.
OBSERVATIONAL DATA SCREENING TECHNIQUE USING TRANSPORT MODEL AND INVERSE MODEL IN ESTIMATING CO2 FLUX HISTORY Takashi MAKI,Kazumi KAMIDE and Yukitomo TSUTSUMI.
Carbon Flux Bias Estimation at Regional Scale using Coupled MLEF-PCTM model Ravindra Lokupitiya Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University.
NOCES meeting Plymouth, 2005 June Top-down v.s. bottom-up estimates of air-sea CO 2 fluxes : No winner so far … P. Bousquet, A. Idelkadi, C. Carouge,
Modeling approach to regional flux inversions at WLEF Modeling approach to regional flux inversions at WLEF Marek Uliasz Department of Atmospheric Science.
Constraining global isoprene emissions with GOME formaldehyde column measurements Changsub Shim, Yuhang Wang, Yunsoo Choi Georgia Institute of Technology.
Evaluating the Role of the CO 2 Source from CO Oxidation P. Suntharalingam Harvard University TRANSCOM Meeting, Tsukuba June 14-18, 2004 Collaborators.
Assimilating observed seasonal cycles of CO2 to CASA model parameters
Application of Geostatistical Inverse Modeling for Data-driven Atmospheric Trace Gas Flux Estimation Anna M. Michalak UCAR VSP Visiting Scientist NOAA.
Modeling framework for estimation of regional CO2 fluxes using concentration measurements from a ring of towers Modeling framework for estimation of regional.
Impact of Reduced Carbon Oxidation on Atmospheric CO 2 : Implications for Inversions P. Suntharalingam TransCom Meeting, June 13-16, 2005 N. Krakauer,
Interannual inversions with continuous data and recent inversions with the CSIRO CC model Rachel Law, CSIRO Atmospheric Research Another set of pseudodata.
1 Oceanic sources and sinks for atmospheric CO 2 The Ocean Inversion Contribution Nicolas Gruber 1, Sara Mikaloff Fletcher 2, and Kay Steinkamp 1 1 Environmental.
Grid for Coupled Ensemble Prediction (GCEP) Keith Haines, William Connolley, Rowan Sutton, Alan Iwi University of Reading, British Antarctic Survey, CCLRC.
Optimising ORCHIDEE simulations at tropical sites Hans Verbeeck LSM/FLUXNET meeting June 2008, Edinburgh LSCE, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
Climate modeling: where are we headed? Interactive biogeochemistry Large ensemble simulations (multi-century) Seasonal-interannual forecasts High resolution.
Cloud algorithms and applications for TEMPO Joanna Joiner, Alexander Vasilkov, Nick Krotkov, Sergey Marchenko, Eun-Su Yang, Sunny Choi (NASA GSFC)
Estimating Terrestrial Wood Biomass from Observed Concentrations of Atmospheric CO 2 Kevin Schaefer 1, Wouter Peters 2, Nuno Carvalhais 3, Guido van der.
The seasonal and interannual variability in atmospheric CO 2 is simulated using best available estimates of surface carbon fluxes and the MATCH atmospheric.
Data assimilation in land surface schemes Mathew Williams University of Edinburgh.
Page 1© Crown copyright WP4 Development of a System for Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation Richard Betts.
Results from the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) 3 FastOpt 4 2 Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1 Heinrich Widmann 3, Thomas.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Data Assimilation Working Group Dylan Jones (U. Toronto) Kevin Bowman (JPL) Daven Henze (CU Boulder) 1 IGC7 4 May 2015.
Operational assimilation of dust optical depth Bruce Ingleby, Yaswant Pradhan and Malcolm Brooks © Crown copyright 08/2013 Met Office and the Met Office.
Validating the GHG production chain at multiple levels Julia Marshall (MPI-BGC), Richard Engelen (ECMWF), Cyril Crevoisier (LMD), Peter Bergamaschi (JRC),
Using FLUXNET data to evaluate land surface models Ray Leuning and Gab Abramowitz 4 – 6 June 2008.
P. K. Patra*, R. M. Law, W. Peters, C. Rodenbeck et al. *Frontier Research Center for Global Change/JAMSTEC Yokohama, Japan.
Development of an EnKF to estimate CO 2 fluxes from realistic distributions of X CO2 Liang Feng, Paul Palmer
Toward a mesoscale flux inversion in the 2005 CarboEurope Regional Experiment T.Lauvaux, C. Sarrat, F. Chevallier, P. Ciais, M. Uliasz, A. S. Denning,
Flux observation: Integrating fluxes derived from ground station and satellite remote sensing 王鹤松 Hesong Wang Institute of atmospheric physics, Chinese.
# # # # An Application of Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter (MLEF) to Carbon Problems Ravindra Lokupitiya 1, Scott Denning 1, Dusanka Zupanski 2, Kevin.
Measurements of atmospheric O 2 in relation to the ocean carbon cycle Ralph Keeling Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
International workshop on Asian Greenhouse Gases Budgets Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India September 2011 Pep Canadell*, Prabir Patra.
Regional CO 2 Flux Estimates for North America through data assimilation of NOAA CMDL trace gas observations Wouter Peters Lori Bruhwiler John B. Miller.
FastOpt Quantitative Design of Observational Networks M. Scholze, R. Giering, T. Kaminski, E. Koffi P. Rayner, and M. Voßbeck Future GHG observation WS,
The evolution of climate modeling Kevin Hennessy on behalf of CSIRO & the Bureau of Meteorology Tuesday 30 th September 2003 Canberra Short course & Climate.
Biases in land surface models Yingping Wang CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
ICDC7, Boulder September 2005 Estimation of atmospheric CO 2 from AIRS infrared satellite radiances in the ECMWF data assimilation system Richard.
Observing and Modeling Requirements for the BARCA Project Scott Denning 1, Marek Uliasz 1, Saulo Freitas 2, Marcos Longo 2, Ian Baker 1, Maria Assunçao.
Cheas 2006 Meeting Marek Uliasz: Estimation of regional fluxes of CO 2 … Cheas 2006 Meeting Marek Uliasz: Estimation of regional fluxes of CO 2 …
Error correlation between CO 2 and CO as a constraint for CO 2 flux inversion using satellite data from different instrument configurations Helen Wang.
FastOpt CAMELS A prototype Global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Wolfgang Knorr 1, Marko Scholze 2, Peter Rayner 3,Thomas Kaminski 4, Ralf.
Inverse Modeling of Surface Carbon Fluxes Please read Peters et al (2007) and Explore the CarbonTracker website.
Geogg124: Data assimilation P. Lewis. What is Data Assimilation? Optimal merging of models and data Models Expression of current understanding about process.
Earth Observation Data and Carbon Cycle Modelling Marko Scholze QUEST, Department of Earth Sciences University of Bristol GAIM/AIMES Task Force Meeting,
FastOpt A prototype Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Inferring interannual variations of vegetation- atmosphere CO 2 fluxes Marko Scholze.
Comparison of adjoint and analytical approaches for solving atmospheric chemistry inverse problems Monika Kopacz 1, Daniel J. Jacob 1, Daven Henze 2, Colette.
Potential of 14 CO 2 to constrain emissions at country scale Y. Wang, G. Broquet, P. Ciais, F. Vogel, F. Chevallier, N. Kadygrov, L. Wu, R. Wang, S. Tao.
Role of ECVs in climate-carbon feedback assessment Claire Magand Patricia Cadule, Jean-Louis Dufresne Institut Pierre Simon Laplace CMUG Integration Meeting,
The Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS)
Calibration of land surface models
CO2 sources and sinks in China as seen from the global atmosphere
(Towards) anthropogenic CO2 emissions through inverse modelling
Carbon Cycle Observations and Instrumentation
Effects of drought and fire on interannual variability in CO2 as derived using atmospheric-CO2 inversion Prabir K. Patra Acknowledgements to: M. Ishizawa,
CarboEurope Open Science Conference
Carbon Model-Data Fusion
Directions of Inquiry Given a fixed atmospheric CO2 concentration assimilation scheme, what is the optimal network expansion? Given the wide array of available.
Hartmut Bösch and Sarah Dance
Presentation transcript:

Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting 2 1 CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research 2 University of Melbourne

Objective Land surface model (LSM) as a key component in models for climate or weather predictions; In LSM, we represent land biosphere by biome types, and assume that vegetation in each biome type has a set of parameters. Values of most parameters are commonly provided by a lookup table. The objective: obtain the best estimate of those parameters in the lookup table using multiple types of data, eg atmospheric concentration and eddy fluxes.

The Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation Scheme (Rayner et al. 2005) A biosphere model calculates C flux for a given set of parameters at 2 o by 2 o ; Transport model maps the flux to concentration; Adjoints of both model are available and used in the optimization; Cost is calculated as the squared mismatch in concentration 57 parameters are optimized with 500 concentration obs per year for 20 years Estimates of all 57 parameters were estimated using least square

The Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation Scheme (Rayner et al. 2005) Key findings: Only the ratio of NEP/NPP is well constrained Model errors important. Vcmax ranges from 160  mol m -2 s -1 for deciduous shrub to 8 mmol m-2 s-1 for C4 grassland!!

Some errors can not be accounted for by parameter tuning Use the improved CBM (CABLE) Eight parameters varied within their reasonable ranges Grey region shows PDF of ensemble predictions From Abramowitz et al. 2008

Model and model errors e parm : parameter error, model calibration e rep : representation error, increasing model resolution e sys : systematic error (statistical model)

How big are those errors? Abramowitz et al Averaging window size (day) Parameter error Systematic error Random error

But we need estimates of all parameters for global vegetations Flux tower and most ecological measurements (except remote sensing) has small spatial coverage; Parameter values at similar spatial scales of global climate models should be estimated from fluxes at that scale; Atmospheric inversion can provide flux estimates at that spatial scales and a good diagnosing tool.

TRANSCOM III Results (Gurney et al. 2004) Obs: monthly mean [CO2] at 75 sites; and uncorrelated; Prior uncertainties based on CASA fluxes and uncorrelated 94 land regions in CSIRO transport model, and were aggregated to 11 regions; 11 transport models, > 2 o by 2 o.

TRANSCOM III Results (Gurney et al. 2004) Month

Map of covariance/CCAM grid Correlation matrix 1-16: Australia south America 57-62: Europe 85-95: North America

Combining top down and bottom up Top down Coarse resolution Globally consistent Results sensitive to priors Concentration to flux Bottom up Fine resolution, Potentially large error Results sensitive to parameters Parameter to flux Rayner et al. submitted Wang et al. unpublished

To estimate key parameters in biosphere model 1.Use eddy flux, remote sensing and other ecological measurements to calibrate a process model, and use a statistical model to account for systematic and random errors; 2.Use a biophysical model to provide prior estimates of fluxes and covariance; 3.Use the atmospheric data and other data to retrieve land surface fluxes; 4.Concentration-> global flux -> global parameters and use other estimates at regional scale if possible.

Recent developments CO2 satellites will be launched in 2009; New technique is being develop to estimate surface fluxes at finer resolution (ca 4 o by 8 o monthly); But the estimates are sensitive to background covariance of fluxes, data error covariance and other assumptions; If only fluxes are estimated, we always have more unknown than number of measurements, and lack of predictive capability We need estimates of parameters

Using atmospheric data as a diagnosis tool: Southern Hemisphere South Pole Blue: obs, green: model, red: CASA Contribution of source from each semi-hemisphere Data: GLOBALVIEW-CO2 (2003) From: Law et al 2006

Southern tropical fluxes Saleska et al., Science, 302, , 2003 Tapajos, Brazil 0-30 o S Tapajos, Brazil Seasonality in model opposite to observed. Model seasonality dominated by photosynthesis, observed by respiration From: Law et al 2006 Model results

Use atmospheric data as a diagnosis tool: Northern Hemisphere site Blue: obs Green: CABLE Red: CASA Data: GLOBALVIEW-CO2 (2003) BarrowUlaan Uul Mauna LoaCape Rama Figure 1. Comparison of the modelled monthly mean concentration by CCAM with CABLE (green) or CCAM using the carbon fluxes as calculated using CASA model (red) with the observed (blue) at four land stations at different latitudes. The latitudes are: o N for Barrow; o N for Ulaan Uul, 19.5 o N for Mauna Loa and o S for Cape Rama.

Integration: top down and bottom up Concentration and isotopes Atmospheric inversion LSM (parameter) + stat model Eco data Prior flux and varianceGlobal flux LSM +stat model Global parameters Other regional estimates