Participatory Evaluation Presented by: : Lauren Kofchak EPS 654- Program Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Moving the process forward Sálvano Briceño UN/ISDR.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
Johns Hopkins University School of Education Johns Hopkins University Evaluation Overview.
The CGEN Project: Development, Implementation and Testing of Genetics Education Materials for Use in Community and Clinical Settings National Coalition.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Evaluating Collaboration National Extension Family Life Specialists Conference April 28, 2005 Ellen Taylor-Powell, Ph.D. Evaluation Specialist University.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
Practicing Community-engaged Research Mary Anne McDonald, MA, Dr PH Duke Center for Community Research Duke Translational Medicine Institute Division of.
CBR Faculty Fellows Program Presented by: Brenda Marsteller Kowalewski September 16, 2009.
FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF SHARED DECISION MAKING AND THE PRINCIPAL'S LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN A LARGE URBAN DISTRICT by Don Leech & Charles.
Enterprise Organizations - a new breed? The costs and benefits of this emerging organizational archetype in the disability field. Pamela Spall.
Tailoring Evaluations
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Evaluation of Community Interventions Running programs and finding out if they work.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Virginia Li - Photovoice - 10 Nov 2008 Photovoice: Beyond Visual Anthropology Caroline Wang, DrPH, Program Director Public Health Institute, Berkley, California.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Goal 3, Volunteer Development and Systems to Support Youth: Logic Model and Communications Plan Situation Statement During 2005, over 11,218 adult volunteers.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
HANDOUT FOR THE POSTER P PRESENTATION FOR WORLD CONFERENCE ON HEALTH PROMOTION BY SUPATTRA SRIVANICHAKORN, TASSANEE YANA, ET AL. Analyzing of selective.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
A Guide for Navigators 1National Disability Institute.
Service Delivery & Sustainability Plan B.R. Shamanna 2 nd COSI Symposium VEIRC, New Delhi.
Samantha A. Marks, PharmD June 19, 2015 An Introduction to Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
Develop your Leadership skills
Community Action for Development Dr. C. Krishna Mohan Rao, Ph.D Centre Head, Research &Training AMR-APARD.
Community Issues And Needs Associated With Microbicides Clinical Trials Presenter: John M. Mutsambi, Community Liaison Officer with University of Zimbabwe.
WG-USA Road Map for Advocacy AGM Advocacy Facts Advocacy is the deliberate process of influencing decision makers, stakeholders and other relevant.
Participatory Evaluation With Youth July 15, 2009 Ongoing website:
Gender and the Forest Investment Program Stacy Alboher Linda Mossop-Rousseau FIP Pilot Countries Meeting Cape Town, June 22, 2011.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Adult Education Programmes Module 1 © 2013 PRIA International Academy | Appreciation Courses Monitoring and Evaluation for.
COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH & EVALUATION. Primary Authors:  Jessica V. Barnes-Najor  Ann Belleau  Rick Burnett Contributing Authors:  Robert Brown 
PSYCHOEDUCATION: APPLICATIONS FOR CROSS- SYSTEMS PRACTICE IN INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT Mainstreaming Mental Health in Public Health Paradigms: Global Advances.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
OMHARN Multicultural Health Conference: Community perspective – how to advance multicultural research.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Leadership in Organizations 4-1 Chapter 4 Participative Leadership, Delegation, and Empowerment.
Service Learning The Community Pediatrics Training Program Committed to partnering with families and communities.
ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Dr. Lesley Farmer California State University Long Beach
Support to Disabled People Organisations Priscille Geiser, Head of Technical Unit on « Support to Civil Society » DRT Seminar, Madagascar 31st October-4th.
Pedagogy for the 21 st Century LSS Retreat, November, 2010.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Monica Fedeli Edward Taylor.  When you think of action research what comes to mind?  Examples?  Based on your experience what makes for a successful.
Facilitating UFE step-by-step: a process guide for evaluators Joaquín Navas & Ricardo Ramírez December, 2009 Module 1: Steps 1-3 of UFE checklist.
1 PP 7.2 CORE COMPETENCIES FOR RIVER BASIN PLANNERS.
Sharon Anderson David Kay Rod Howe. “pressing and emerging matters that involve multiple, often conflicting interests and have widespread consequences”
Chapter 8: Participant-Oriented Evaluation Approaches
Protocol on Water and Health: added value and challenges for public participation Tsvietkova Anna MAMA-86’s Water and Sanitation Program Workshop on Water.
ANDREW FURCO UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 2, 2009 Building the Civically Engaged University through Service-Learning.
A Relational Model of Leadership. Process Oriented InclusiveEmpowering Purposeful Ethical.
The Pro-Skills’ background theory & philosophy. Pro-Skills’ background philosophy World rapid change requiring more special competences + Global financial.
Sharmake Hassan Osman  MEANING OF HRM AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT  Personnel management can be defined as obtaining, using and maintaining a satisfied.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Conducting Professional Development Programme LEADING TO LEARN, LEARNING TO LEAD.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Standards & Competencies MA in Social Work Nevenka Zegarac, Full professor, FPN, BU.
THE HIPPY MODEL. Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters Home-based, parent involved early learning Provides solutions that strengthen.
.  Evaluators are not only faced with methodological challenges but also ethical challenges on a daily basis.
Evaluation for Social Justice AMY HILGENDORF, PHD KATE WESTABY, MS VICTORIA FAUST, MPA UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON American Evaluation Association.
MICHAEL A. HARNAR DOCTORAL CANDIDATE, CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY AMERICAN EVALUATION ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE NOV 5, 2011; SESSION 842 ANAHEIM,
KRISTA COLLINS CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY NOVEMBER 3, 2011 Is Empowerment Evaluation Empowering?
Participatory Analysis
Developing Effective International Partnerships
Review of Selected Evaluation Approaches
Chapter VII Introduction to community organizing
Promotion of vulnerable groups participation in PB process
By: Andi Indahwaty Sidin A Critical Review of The Role of Clinical Governance in Health Care and its Potential Application in Indonesia.
Presentation transcript:

Participatory Evaluation Presented by: : Lauren Kofchak EPS 654- Program Evaluation

What is Participatory Evaluation? “ Applied social research that involves a partnership between trained evaluation personnel and practice-based decision makers, organization members with program responsibilities, or individuals with a vital interest in the program.” (Cousins & Whitmore, 1998).

Historical Context In the 1960s: Growing concern about the mechanistic and insensitive approaches of evaluation. Mid-1970s : The National Institute of Education developed the practice of stakeholder evaluation. This model stressed the importance of involving stakeholders with first hand experience with the evaluand in the evaluation process. Participatory Evaluation is viewed as an extension to the conventional stakeholder evaluation model.

Two Forms of Participatory Evaluation Two forms of Participatory Evaluation which are differentiated by the rationale behind them. Practical Participatory Evaluation Transformative Participatory Evaluation

Practical Participatory Evaluation Engages stakeholders in the “Nuts and Bolts” Relatively small number of primary users Evaluator’s role: technical support, training, and quality control Ideally, organizations develop technical knowledge and skills to take on coordinating role in the future. Evaluator serves strictly as a consultant.

Characteristics of Methods (Cousins & Whitmore, 1998) StakeholderPracticalTransformative Principal Authors Bryk, Mark & Shotland Ayers, Cousins & EarlTardon & Fernandes, Fals- Borda, Gaventa Primary GoalsEvaluation utilization; some emphasis on political aspects Program decision making and problem solving, evaluation utilization Empowerment, emancipation, social justice Decision MakersEvaluator: coordinator of activities and technical aspects Partnership between evaluator and participants Partnership but ultimately participants control decisions ParticipantsAll legitimate groups Primary Users: sponsors, managers, developers All legitimate groups especially beneficiaries Depth of Participation Limited- consulted for planning and interpretation Extensive– involved in all phases of evaluation Extensive- involved in all phases of evaluation

Transformative Participatory Evaluation Emerged primarily in the developing world in the 1970s Philosophical foundations derived from Paolo Freire Empowers staff through participation Encourages continuous collective critical thinking Evaluator guards against self-serving interests Challenge: risk of lack of consensus on program goals

When Should Participatory Evaluation Be Used? Best suited for formative evaluation To build internal evaluation capacity To increase utility of evaluation findings To obtain “buy-in” and involvement of stakeholders

Organizational Requirements for Participatory Evaluation Value evaluation Provide the necessary time and resources Organizational learning as a route to improvement Motivated to engage in the evaluation Ability to learn given the appropriate training

Evaluator Requirements for Participatory Evaluation Training and expertise concerning technical skills Accessible to organizations Provide resources for the research process Pedagogical role Motivated to participate in the evaluation Tolerance for imperfection

Benefits of Stakeholder Involvement Enhances social discourse Individual and group reflection Enhances organizational learning Better informed decision-making Builds confidence and pride in organization

Challenges to Participatory Evaluation Power struggle Who is in charge? How do individuals with varying degrees of authority/power collaborate on an “even playing field” in the evaluation process? How much should the evaluator mediate these situations? Ethics Who owns findings? Who decides what data will be included and to what extent? Is the data being manipulated? Participation Who identifies primary stakeholders and determines who will participate?

References Cousins, J. B. & Earl, L. M. (1992, Winter). The Case for Participatory Evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), doi: / Cousins, J. B. & Earl, L. M. (1995). Participatory evaluation: enhancing evaluation use and organizational learning capacity. The Evaluation Exchange. 1(3/4). Harvard Family Research Project. Cousins, J. B. & Whitmore, E. (1998, Winter). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), doi: /ev Russ-Eft, D.(2009). Evaluation in organizations: A systematic approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change (2 nd Ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Upshur, C. C. & Barreto-Cortez, E. (1995). What is participatory evaluation? What are its roots?. The Evaluation Exchange. 1(3/4). Harvard Family Research Project. Zukoski, A. & Luluquisen, M. (2002, Apr.). Participatory evaluation. What is it? Why do it? What are the challenges? Community based public health policy & practice., 5, The California Endowment and Public Health Institute.