Zhongbo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory QCD structure of the nucleon and spin physics Lecture 5 & 6: TMD factorization and phenomenology HUGS 2015,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
December 17, 2004 JLab Hall A Upgrade 1 Semi-Inclusive DIS --opportunities at JLab upgrade Feng Yuan RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Advertisements

June 20, Back-to-Back Correlations in p+p, p+A and A+A Reactions 2005 Annual AGS-RHIC User's Meeting June 20, BNL, Upton, NY Ivan Vitev, LANL Ivan.
Transversity and Transverse-Momentum-Dependent Partonic Functions Alessandro Bacchetta.
June 21, 2005 RHIC & AGS USER MEETING-SPIN 1 (Single) Transverse Spin Physics -- from DIS to hadron collider Feng Yuan, RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
QCD N06 - Monte Porzio Catone - 15/06/ SIDIS Cross Sections and Spin Asymmetries Predictions for Ongoing and Future Experiments M.Elena Boglione.
Mauro Anselmino, Prague, August 1, 2005 Hadron Structure and Hadron Spectroscopy Transversity (transverse spin and transverse motion) Transversity distributions.
Cold nuclear matter effects on dilepton and photon production Zhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory Thermal Radiation Workshop RBRC, Brookhaven.
Ahmad Idilbi Uni. Regensburg TUM November 30, 2011 M. G. Echevarria, A. Idilbi, I. Scimemi, arXive: : [hep-ph] M. G. Echevarria, A. Idilbi, I.
9/19/20151 Nucleon Spin: Final Solution at the EIC Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
9/19/20151 Semi-inclusive DIS: factorization Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Zhongbo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory Transverse single spin asymmetry of the W production at RHIC RHIC-AGS Annual Users’ Meeting 2015 June 9-12,
1 Transverse weighting for quark correlators QCD workshop, JLAB, May 2012 Maarten Buffing & Piet Mulders
Theory Introduction to Semi-Inclusive Physics
Spin Azimuthal Asymmetries in Semi-Inclusive DIS at JLAB  Nucleon spin & transverse momentum of partons  Transverse-momentum dependent distributions.
6/1/20161 TMD Evolution Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Single (transverse) Spin Asymmetry & QCD Factorization Single (transverse) Spin Asymmetry & QCD Factorization Xiangdong Ji University of Maryland — Workshop.
May 18-20, 2005 SIR05 JLab 1 P ? Dependence of SSA -- from nonpert. to pert. Feng Yuan, RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory References: Ji, Ma, Yuan,
11/5/20151 Energy Evolution of Sivers asymmetry in Hard Processes Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
PANIC05 M. Liu1 Probing the Gluon Polarization with A LL of J/  at RHIC Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (PHENIX Collaboration)
Future Physics at JLab Andrew Puckett LANL medium energy physics internal review 12/14/
E.C. Aschenauer Why run top-energy p+p in run-16 2 Transverse momentum dependent parton distribution functions  initial state effects  important in.
Transverse Spin Physics: Recent Developments
Single-Spin Asymmetries at CLAS  Transverse momentum of quarks and spin-azimuthal asymmetries  Target single-spin asymmetries  Beam single-spin asymmetries.
PQCD mechanisms for single (transverse) spin asymmetry in Drell-Yan production PQCD mechanisms for single (transverse) spin asymmetry in Drell-Yan production.
12/13/20151 Transverse Spin Overview: Theory Perspective Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Strangeness and Spin in Fundamental Physics Mauro Anselmino: The transverse spin structure of the nucleon Delia Hasch: The transverse spin structure of.
June 25, 2004 Jianwei Qiu, ISU 1 Introduction to Heavy Quark Production Jianwei Qiu Iowa State University CTEQ Summer School on QCD Analysis and Phenomenology.
1 Frascati, June 14, 2006 Aram Kotzinian Double spin azimuthal asymmetries A LT and A LL in semi-inclusive DIS Aram Kotzinian Torino University & INFN.
1 SPIN 2006, Kyoto, October 6, 2006 Aram Kotzinian Double spin azimuthal asymmetries A LT and A LL in semi-inclusive DIS Aram Kotzinian YerPhI, Armenia.
1 Probing Spin and Flavor Structures of the Nucleon with Hadron Beams Flavor and spin structures of the nucleons –Overview and recent results Future prospects.
JPARC DY Workshop, April 7 Ralf Seidl (RBRC) R.Seidl: Transverse Spin 1RIKEN, April 7 In JPARC Drell Yan accessible with: UU(unpolarized beam, unpolarized.
Twist-3 predictions for single spin asymmetry for light-hadron productions at RHIC Koichi Kanazawa (Niigata Univ) ・ KK and Y. Koike, PRD 83, (2011)
Collins effect in the collinear factorization approach Jian Zhou (ShanDong University, China & LBNL, US) Collaborators: Feng Yuan (LBNL, US) Based on the.
International Workshop on Transversity: New Developments in Nucleon Spin Structure June 2004 Color Gauge Invariance in Hard Processes Vrije Universiteit.
2/10/20161 What can we learn with Drell-Yan in p(d)-nucleus collisions Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
TMD flavor decomposition at CLAS12 Patrizia Rossi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN  Introduction  Spin-orbit correlations in kaon production.
Single Transverse-Spin Asymmetries and Twist-3 Factorization J.P. Ma, ITP, Beijing Weihai,
1 Dubna, September, 2005 Aram Kotzinian Spin effects in MC generators The spin and azimuthal asymmetries in the current and target fragmentation regions.
Single spin asymmetries in pp scattering Piet Mulders Trento July 2-6, 2006 _.
Tensor and Flavor-singlet Axial Charges and Their Scale Dependencies Hanxin He China Institute of Atomic Energy.
3/8/20161 Nucleon Tomography --Parton Imaging in 3D Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Azimuthal Asymmetry In The Unpolarized Drell-Yan Process Zhou Jian ShanDong University, China & LBNL, US Collaborators: Feng Yuan (LBNL, US) Zuo-tang Liang.
Transverse Momentum Dependent Evolution in Proton-Proton Collisions Oleg Eyser RIKEN/BNL Research Center Workshop Emerging Spin and Transverse Momentum.
Zhongbo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory Opportunities in hadron distribution inside the jet Emerging Spin and Transverse Momentum Effects in p+p and.
Perturbative QCD in Nuclear Environment Jianwei Qiu Iowa State University Student Lecture at Quark Matter 2004 Oakland – January 11, 2004 Table of Contents:
Studies of the transverse structure of the nucleon at JLab Marco Mirazita INFN – Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati INPC2013 – Firenze, 2-7 June
Zhongbo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory Recent progress on TMD study and future perspective at the EIC Baryons 2016 Tallahassee, Florida May 16–20,
A sideways look into the proton Transverse momentum and transverse spin in QCD Alessandro Bacchetta.
11/19/20161 Transverse Momentum Dependent Factorization Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Single-Transverse Spin Asymmetries in Hadronic Scattering
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics
Physics of the EIC Cyrille Marquet Theory Division - CERN.
3/19/20181 Nucleon Spin: Final Solution at the EIC Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Christine A. Aidala University of Michigan
Can We Learn Quark Orbital Motion from SSAs?
Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distributions
Unique Description for SSAs in DIS and Hadronic Collisions
Selected Physics Topics at the Electron-Ion-Collider
Large-X PDFs in the Drell-Yan Process
Daniel A. Pitonyak Department of Physics, Temple University
Searching for intrinsic motion effects in SIDIS
TMDs in nuclei Jian Zhou Temple University
Unique Description for Single Transverse Spin Asymmetries
Energy Evolution for the Sivers Asymmetries in Hard Processes
Spin effects and partonic intrinsic k┴
Unifying the Mechanisms for SSAs in Hard Process
Universality of single spin asymmetries in hard processes
Single spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive DIS
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics Lecture 2: perturbative QCD (II)
3D structure of the nucleon and Transverse single-spin asymmetries
Presentation transcript:

Zhongbo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory QCD structure of the nucleon and spin physics Lecture 5 & 6: TMD factorization and phenomenology HUGS 2015, Jefferson Lab June 4, 2015

Operator analysis  In the first part of this lecture, I continue the discussion about operator analysis to figure out how many distributions are needed to characterize the nucleon structure  I provide a detailed study for spin-0 particle  I briefly discuss the case for spin-1/2 particle  For details, see  Mulders, Tangerman hep-ph/  Mulders, Tangerman hep-ph/  The next slide continues after I mentioned gauge link  NOTE: all the lecture notes are here  m_usl8a?dl=0 m_usl8a?dl=0 2

Gauge link: where does it come from?  Existence of the Sivers function (also Boer-Mulders) relies on the interaction between the active parton and the remnant of the hadron  SIDIS: final-state interaction  Drell-Yan: initial-state interaction 3

Non-universality of the Sivers function  Different gauge link for gauge invariant TMDs in SIDIS and DY  Sivers function and its sign change 4

TMD work domain and experimental access  TMD factorization works in the domain where there are two observed momenta in the process, such as SIDIS, DY, e+e-  Q >> qt: Q is large to ensure the use of pQCD, qt is much smaller such that it is sensitive to parton’s transverse momentum 5

Access TMDs from SIDIS: see notes for calculations  Separation of different TMD contributions, e.g., Sivers vs Collins  Sivres effect (simple parton model): TMDs are independent of Q 6

Extraction of Sivers functions  Extraction of Sivers function from SIDIS: JLab, HERMES, COMPASS 7 Gamberg, Kang, Prokudin, PRL 2013

Understanding the outcome: d quark  Distortion from Sivers effect: positive = left preference 8

Understanding the outcome: u quark  Distortion for u quark: negative = right preference 9

Example prediction: Drell-Yan  Sivers effect: still need Drell-Yan to verify the sign change, thus fully understand the mechanism of the SSAs  Reverse the sign of Sivers function from SIDIS and make predictions for Drell-Yan production 10 Q = Lepton pair with invariant mass 4 – 9 GeV Kang, Qiu, 2010

Energy dependence of TMDs  So far the predictions are based on leading order parton model  Experiments operate in very different kinematic ranges  Typical hard scale Q is different: Q ~ 1 – 3 GeV in SIDIS, Q ~ 4 – 90 GeV in pp  Also center-of-mass energy is different  Such energy dependence (evolution) has to be taken into account for any reliable QCD description/prediction  Both collinear PDFs and TMDs depend on the energy scale Q at which they are measured, such dependences are governed by QCD evolution equations 11 Collinear PDFsTMDs

QCD evolution: meaning  Evolution = include important perturbative corrections  DGLAP evolution of collinear PDFs: what it does is to resum the so-called single logarithms in the higher order perturbative calculations  TMD factorization works in the situation where there are two observed momenta in the process, Q>>qt: what it does is to resum the so-called double logarithms in the higher order perturbative corrections 12

QCD evolution of collinear PDFs  Collinear parton distribution depends on the resolution scale: described very well by DGLAP evolution equations 13

Main difference between collinear and TMD evolution  Collinear evolution (DGLAP): the evolution kernel is purely perturbative  TMD evolution: the evolution kernels are not. They contain non- perturbative component, which makes the evolution much more complicated but one can learn more  Kt can run into non-perturbative region 14

TMD evolution  We have a TMD above measured at a scale Q. It is easier to deal in the Fourier transformed space (convolution → product)  QCD evolution of TMDs 15 Evolution of longitudinal/collin ear part Evolution of transverse part Non-perturbative part has to be fitted to experimental data

TMD evolution works: multiplicity distribution in SIDIS  Comparison to COMPASS data 16 Echevarria, Idilbi, Kang, Vitev, 14

TMD evolution works: Drell-Yan and W/Z production  Comparison with DY, W/Z pt distribution 17  Works for SIDIS, DY, and W/Z in all the energy ranges  Make predictions for future JLab 12, COMPASS, Fermilab, RHIC experiments

Extract Sivers function with energy evolution  Example of the fit: JLab, HERMES, COMPASS 18 Echevarria, Idilbi, Kang, Vitev, 14

Effect of QCD evolution  What evolution does  Spread out the distribution to much larger kt  At low kt, the distribution decreases due to this spread 19 Based on Echevarria, Idilbi, Kang, Vitev, 14

Effect of the evolution  Visualization of the Sivers effect for d quark  d quark Sivers is positive, and thus leads to more d quark moves to the left  Let us visualize how this shift changes as energy scale Q 2 changes: from 2 to 100 GeV 2 20 All visualizations are based on the results from Echevarria, Idilbi, Kang, Vitev, 14

Visualization for u-quark  U quark is negative = prefer to the right 21

3D view: d quark 22

3D view: u quark 23

DY Sivers asymmetry with energy evolution  Predictions for future DY experiments 24 COMPASS FermilabRHIC

Phenomenology of transversity and Collins function  Collins asymmetry in SIDIS  Collins asymmetry in dihadron production in e+e- collisions 25 Prokudin, Kang, Sun, Yuan, 14, 15

Extraction of Collins function  Collins function extracted from experiments 26

Lots of data from RHIC  Spin asymmetry is also observed for processes in p+p collisions 27

Another formalism  To understand these asymmetries, one needs a formalism called collinear twist-3 factorization  It applies in different kinematic domain, but is consistent with the TMD factorization approach in the overlap region 28 Ji, Qiu, Vogelsang, Yuan, PRL, 06

50% Experiments are on spin structure 29 McKeown, talk at QCD evolution 2014

JLab 12 and EIC  JLab 12 will mainly deliver the nucleon structure in the valence region (relatively large x)  EIC will study the nucleon structure for sea quark and gluons (relatively small x) 30

Summary  QCD perturbation theory has been very successful in interpreting and predicting high energy scattering process  It provides a solid framework to extract information about hadron structure  JLab 12 has exciting experimental program on nucleon spin structure, with 10+ years program; after that, EIC is the highest recommendation for the new construction in nuclear physics – bright future  Bright future: make up your own mind 31