Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 15 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Linear Model L ύ cia Garrido and Marieke Schölvinck ICN.
Advertisements

General Linear Model Beatriz Calvo Davina Bristow.
Group analysis Kherif Ferath Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, Oct 2010.
General Linear Model With correlated error terms  =  2 V ≠  2 I.
Perfusion-Based fMRI Thomas T. Liu Center for Functional MRI University of California San Diego May 19, 2007.
The General Linear Model Or, What the Hell’s Going on During Estimation?
Dimension reduction (1)
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 12 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Multiple testing Justin Chumbley Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich With.
Linear Regression Models Based on Chapter 3 of Hastie, Tibshirani and Friedman Slides by David Madigan.
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Intro History Basic mechanism Neurohemodynamic coupling.
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 4 History Basic mechanism Outstanding questions.
1st level analysis: basis functions and correlated regressors
Lorelei Howard and Nick Wright MfD 2008
Review of Lecture Two Linear Regression Normal Equation
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 1 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 8 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Brain Mapping Unit The General Linear Model A Basic Introduction Roger Tait
SPM Course Zurich, February 2015 Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 3 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
FINSIG'05 25/8/2005 1Eini Niskanen, Dept. of Applied Physics, University of Kuopio Principal Component Regression Approach for Functional Connectivity.
FMRI Methods Lecture7 – Review: analyses & statistics.
Corinne Introduction/Overview & Examples (behavioral) Giorgia functional Brain Imaging Examples, Fixed Effects Analysis vs. Random Effects Analysis Models.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 4
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 7 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 13
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 17 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 10 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 5 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Learning Theory Reza Shadmehr LMS with Newton-Raphson, weighted least squares, choice of loss function.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 18 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 9 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 14
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 11 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston 18.
Methods for Dummies Second level Analysis (for fMRI) Chris Hardy, Alex Fellows Expert: Guillaume Flandin.
General Linear Model and fMRI Rachel Denison & Marsha Quallo Methods for Dummies 2007.
Statistical Parametric Mapping Lecture 2 - Chapter 8 Quantitative Measurements Using fMRI BOLD, CBF, CMRO 2 Textbook: Functional MRI an introduction to.
Stats & Summary. The Woodbury Theorem where the inverses.
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, May 2012.
Week 21 Order Statistics The order statistics of a set of random variables X 1, X 2,…, X n are the same random variables arranged in increasing order.
5 5.1 © 2016 Pearson Education, Ltd. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors EIGENVECTORS AND EIGENVALUES.
Week 21 Statistical Model A statistical model for some data is a set of distributions, one of which corresponds to the true unknown distribution that produced.
Depth and Surface EEG: Generation and Propagation
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, October 2012.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Statistical Interpretation of Least Squares ASEN.
Lecture 16: Image alignment
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course London, October 2016
Scalp EEG Separation During RSVP Tasks
Brain Electrophysiological Signal Processing: Preprocessing
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model (GLM): the marriage between linear systems and stats FFA.
Group analyses Thanks to Will Penny for slides and content
Linear Regression.
Methods for Dummies Second-level Analysis (for fMRI)
The General Linear Model
Linear Hierarchical Modelling
Rachel Denison & Marsha Quallo
Group analyses Thanks to Will Penny for slides and content
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
The General Linear Model
Linear Algebra Lecture 32.
Lecture 8: Image alignment
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Chapter 3 General Linear Model
Principal Component Analysis
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model
Presentation transcript:

Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 15 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech. (CS), Semester III, Course B50

Group Statistics: An Example Poldrack et al., 2011, Section 6.1

Fixed Effect vs. Mixed Effect Model is fixed effect variance in average hair length in a gender group. is within group variance, which is assumed to be 1 here. is the average mixed effect variance, where is the between the groups variance.

Mixed Effect Model in fMRI Poldrack et al., 2011 Here β = a.

Linear Regression Analysis

Multilevel GLM for Group Analysis Y k is a vector of T time points. k є {1,…..,N}, where N is the number of subjects in the group. M k is the design matrix of model functions and e k is the error vector (for the kth subject with one element in the vector for each time point.

Two Level Model Level 1: individual analysis Level 2: group analysis M G is the group level design matrix, a G is a vector of group level parameters d is the residual vector of group level parameters. Beckmann et al., 2003 (1)

Two Level Model as A Single Level Model This is equivalent to the two level model described in the previous slide.

Parameter Estimation at Two Levels Linear spaces generated by the columns of M and M T M are the same (Rao, 1974, p. 222). Proof: Let λ be an eigenvalue of M. Then there is an eigenvector v such that Mv = λv or M = λI M T = λI. So, M T Mv = M T λv = λ 2 v. In other words M and M T M have same eigenvectors and therefore generate the same eigen space.

Parameter Estimation (cont) In general Y = Ma may be inconsistent (may not have unique solution), but M T Ma = M T Y always has a unique solution in a, because M T Y is in the space generated by columns of M T M. Let â be a solution of M T Ma = M T Y, then (Y – Ma) T (Y – Ma) = [Y – Mâ + M(â – a)] T [Y – Mâ + M(â – a)] = (Y – Mâ) T (Y – Mâ) + (â – a) T M T M(â – a) ≥ (Y – Mâ) T (Y – Mâ). This shows that the minimum of (Y – Ma) T (Y – Ma) is (Y – Mâ) T (Y – Mâ) and is attained for

Parameter Estimation (cont) a = â, which is unique for all solutions â of M T Ma = M T Y.

Solution for Two Level GL Model For individual. For group. This together with (1) gives the second level estimation of the parameters.

Inference of BOLD Activation Poldrack et al., 2011

Nature of BOLD Signal Buxton, 2009 CBF = Cerebral blood flow. CMRO 2 = Cerebral metabolic rate of O 2. CBV = Cerebral blood volume.

BOLD Components BOLD response is primarily driven by CBF, but also strongly modulated by two other factors:, and M, which reflects level of deoxyhemoglobin at the baseline.

BOLD is Best Captured in Gradient Recall Echo (GRE) Imaging Buxton, 2009

References R. A. Poldrack, J. A. Mumford and T. E. Nichols, Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Chapter 6. C. F. Beckmann, M. Jenkinson and S. M. Smith, General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in fMRI, NeuroImage, 20: 1052 – 1063, 2003.

References (cont) C. R. Rao, Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, 2e, Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, 1974, Chapter 4 (Theory of least squares and analysis of variance).

THANK YOU This lecture is available at