Mid-Year Report 2009-2010 Dibble Elementary Jackson Public Schools Pamela Perlos, Principal Math Focus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ellen Seguin Jackson Public Schools Sharp Park Academy Math Goal Mid-Year Report
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
The New Improved School Professional Development Plan Proposal.
Theory of Action If teachers…. Curriculum: Teach targeted guided Math lessons based on reading data. Ensure student with disabilities are in the general.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Beyond the Classroom: The Use of Essential Skills for Remediation and Extension Christine Koch November 2008.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
Mary Jo Racz-Shannon Jackson Public Schools Hunt Elementary Principal’s Mid-Year Report.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Campus Based Istation Implementation Principal Presentation
Richfield Elementary School Improvement Plan Amber Lawrence, Chairperson Brian K. Barrett, Principal.
Blandy Hills Elementary School State of the School Mrs. C. Thorpe, Principal Blandy Hills Elementary will be an exemplary school where students.
School Board Update Creating a Balanced Elementary Math Program.
WHAT IS MAP? AMES Lunch and Learn.
Dreambox Introduction Math Adaptive Learning August 23, 2012.
Buckeye Elementary School District’s Curriculum Mapping Initiative
DATA RETREAT PRINCIPAL’S MID-YEAR REPORT Vandercook Lake Schools Townsend Elementary Principal: Diane McQuillan Subject Area: Reading &Writing.
George Long Elementary Math Mid-Year Report Grass Lake Community Schools Team Members: Lindsay Gaddy, Lisa Stark, Paul Dwyer, Barb Palmer, Jane.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
(High/Middle School) HSTW/MMGW Site Presentation ( Month Date, 2006) Promising Practices Next Steps Major Challenges Technical Review Visit (TRV)
Template for the Principal’s Mid-Year Report Grass Lake High School Mathematics.
Data Retreat Process Principal’s Mid-Year Report Pat Dillon, Co-principal Napoleon Community Schools Napoleon High School MATH Goal area.
Principal’s Forecast Tangipahoa Parish School System Leadership Focus Strategy June 2015 Gary T. Porter.
DATA PRESENTATION February 5, 2008 ARE WE IMPROVING? WAS 2007 BETTER THAN 2006?
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
Running Creek Elementary School School Improvement Plan Damon L. Rhodes, Principal Mandy Dry, SIT Chair.
HILLPOINT ELEMENTARY Dr. Ron M. Leigh Principal “Every Child, Every Chance, Every Day” 2.
Rod Hardy Hanover-Horton High School Math Data Retreat Results: Beginning the Process.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Frances L. Reeves, Jackson Public Schools, McCulloch Academy Math.
Governing Board Meeting September 29, 2011 Annual State of the School Address Mr. R. Hackler, Principal.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
DATA RETREAT PRINCIPAL’S MID-YEAR REPORT Vandercook Lake Middle School Principal: Renee Rudloff Subject Area: Writing.
A Mission of Restoration
Steve Lieder TA Wilson Academy Mathematics Goal. All students will improve mathematical skills.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Math and Algebra 1 CST Proficiency Scores Panorama High School Eddy Mata, Mathematics Instructional Coach.
DATA RETREAT PRINCIPAL’S MID-YEAR REPORT Vandercook Lake Schools Townsend Elementary Principal: Diane McQuillan Subject Area: Writing.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Principal’s Mid-Year Writing Report Johanna Pscodna Keicher Elementary Michigan Center.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
FLIPPED LEARNING. HOMEWORK EXPECTATIONS ➤ Students are expected to watch video examples (found on the SFE 6 th Grade Math Page) while following along.
Mobile County School District SPED 6-9 End of Year Consultative Session
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
ABC School Data Wall Our priorities for District Goals – 1) Ensure individual students continuously exhibit academic and personal.
Technology Help or Hinderance? DOMINIQUE JOHNSON EDU671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: FREDERICK ANSOFF 2 JUNE 2014.
SCHOOL PROGRESS. Goal: TCMS will increase the average combined reading and math proficiency ratings for all students from 43.4% to 71.7% by 2017.
2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
APS SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS August, District Goal By June 2015, APS district and schools will cut the achievement gap in one-half for all students.
Morris School District Grade 4 and 5 Math Grouping Alternative BOE Approved June 2015.
IGNACIO ZARAGOZA ELEMENTARY CAMPUS ACTION PLAN PRINCIPAL- CARLOTTA HOOKS INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM- COLLEEN LOWRY AND CESAR REYES “EXEMPLARY.
Mobile County School District At-Risk/SPED 2-5
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
January 17, 2017 Board Workshop
Reports for Data & Progress Monitoring
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
Split-Block Class Schedule at Yorktown High School
Presentation transcript:

Mid-Year Report Dibble Elementary Jackson Public Schools Pamela Perlos, Principal Math Focus

Math Goal – Part I We the staff at Dibble Elementary will improve all students’ measurement skills in mathematics as measured by the fall 2009 MEAP Math Assessment for grades 3-6 th and CCC FOR K-2 so that our non- economically disadvantaged students show proficiency at 90%.

Math Goal – Part II The performance of students who are economically disadvantaged will show a 5% increase per grade to proficient or advanced levels.

Math Goal – Part III Additionally, all Dibble third through sixth grade students will achieve or maintain 90% overall on the MEAP Target: All Students  Subgroup: Students who are socioeconomically disadvantaged.

Objective I – Teaching for Learning Teachers in collaboration with previous and successive grade level teachers will plan a series of meetings to discuss and become familiar with the continuum of the GLCE’s.

Objective I – Action Steps Teachers will meet 3-4 times this year with peers to look at GLCE’s and begin to identify and fill gaps in Everyday Math. Discussion will take place regarding GLCE’S across grade levels in small groups, initially looking at measurement. Teachers will identify and teach GLCE’s that show the greatest need for improvement as identified on MEAP and CWCA.

Evidence of Action Achievement Data with Analysis – pre,mid, post-tests, unit tests, Successmaker scores, CWCA, MEAP, student grades.

Is It Working? Is the objective implemented to the expected level based on the plan? How many teachers are currently participating in the physical implementation of the objective out of the “total expected”? 100% Is the objective implemented to the expected level based on the plan? What is the average amount of time each teacher is utilizing the objective based on the expected amount? 1 strand = 5-10% of the math instruction time On going assessment, improvement made from Sept.-Nov.

Is It Working? Are the students making progress based on the original goal? What shifts have occurred in the students’ perceptions based on survey results ? N/A Are the students making progress based on the original goal? What shifts have occurred in the students’ achievement based on the specific skills outlined in your goal? Students exhibit more math thinking and reasoning. Beginning to see improvement based on fall performance.

Objective II – Leadership Teachers will use support staff for math when possible to facilitate small group instruction.

Objective II – Action Steps Support staff will work directly with students in small group instruction on mathematics. Principal will provide scheduling for support staff. Staff will provide small group instruction to K-6, identified at risk.

Evidence of Action Other Tangible Products – Principal completed Para Schedule to each classroom, Lesson Plans exhibit differentiation for small group as well as whole group. Para’s work is determined by the teacher and needs of the students.

Is It Working? Is the objective implemented to the expected level based on the plan? How many teachers are currently participating in the physical implementation of the objective out of the “total expected”? 100% Is the objective implemented to the expected level based on the plan? What is the average amount of time each teacher is utilizing the objective based on the expected amount? 1 hour dedicated to math instruction daily, student time as needed ( approx 50%) Due to limited Para allotment, less time is available than desired.

Is It Working? Are the students making progress based on the original goal? What shifts have occurred in the students’ perceptions based on survey results? Due to the short amount of time lapsed, growth has occurred in the first trimester. Are the students making progress based on the original goal? What shifts have occurred in the students’ achievement based on the specific skills outlined in your goal? Not enough time to assess We will need to look at a full year’s data.

Objective III – Teaching for Learning K-6 teachers will use CCC times per week consistently and analyze strand reports monthly to track student progress, use as a pre, mid and-post test, and adjust instruction

Objective III – Action Steps Teachers will complete schedule for the use of the computer lab. The schedule will begin with First Grade. Teacher will take classes to the computer lab to utilize the CCC program 3 or more times per week. They will acquire data for pre, mid, and post tests. Strand Reports will be printed monthly.

Evidence of Action Achievement Data with Analysis – Computer lab schedule designates 2-3 times per week with their classroom teacher and 1 time per week with the Computer teacher. Weekly Reports are printed by Para Pros for teachers, Strand Reports are printed as needed.

Is It Working? Is the objective implemented to the expected level based on the plan? How many teachers are currently participating in the physical implementation of the objective out of the “total expected”? 100% use the lab Is the objective implemented to the expected level based on the plan? What is the average amount of time each teacher is utilizing the objective based on the expected amount? Each session is 30 min Due to conflicts/events occasionally teachers are not able to make all visits

Is It Working? Are the students making progress based on the original goal? What shifts have occurred in the students’ perceptions based on survey results ? Yes, according to our first Progress Assessment Are the students making progress based on the original goal? What shifts have occurred in the students’ achievement based on the specific skills outlined in your goal? Using the lab was not a new practice Most classrooms see an improvement based on the lab scores.

What’s Next for Dibble Elementary? What specific Action Steps from your plan still need to occur to implement EACH objective to the original expectations designed in the plan? Schedule more time to collaborate in grade levels and for data review, separate out our economically disadvantaged students for data comparisons. What ADDITIONAL Action Steps need to be added to your plan and occur so that EACH objective is implemented to ensure the success of the student goal? Develop a common Pre-test What revisions or expansions may need to occur to the objectives? Look at all strands for Math