TRANSP Needs for Physics Modules R. J. Hawryluk TRANSP Users Group Meeting March 24, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department
Advertisements

H-mode characterization for dominant ECR heating and comparison to dominant NBI or ICR heating F. Sommer PhD thesis advisor: Dr. Jörg Stober Academic advisor:
Where are we in Integrated modeling? S. Jardin Mature 1½ D evolution code packages exist with reduced modules for most processes –Japan: BPSI: (TASK, TOPICS)
Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.
ARIES-Advanced Tokamak Power Plant Study Physics Analysis and Issues Charles Kessel, for the ARIES Physics Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan.
Korean Modeling Effort : C2 Code J.M. Park NFRC/ORNL In collaboration with Sun Hee Kim, Ki Min Kim, Hyun-Sun Han, Sang Hee Hong Seoul National University.
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
TAE-EP Interaction in ARIES ACT-I K. Ghantous, N.N Gorelenkov PPPL ARIES Project Meeting,, 26 Sept
SUGGESTED DIII-D RESEARCH FOCUS ON PEDESTAL/BOUNDARY PHYSICS Bill Stacey Georgia Tech Presented at DIII-D Planning Meeting
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
Standard and Advanced Tokamak Operation Scenarios for ITER
Cyclic MHD Instabilities Hartmut Zohm MPI für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Seminar talk at the ‚Advanced Course‘ of EU PhD Network, Garching, September.
Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster 1 M.R. de Baar, Workshop Control for Nuclear Fusion, the Netherlands, In the control room:
IAEA - FEC2004 // Vilamoura // // EX/4-5 // A. Staebler – 1 – A. Staebler, A.C.C Sips, M. Brambilla, R. Bilato, R. Dux, O. Gruber, J. Hobirk,
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
D. McCune 1 Plasma State Representation XPLASMA – Tool for Representation of Equilibrium, Fields and Profiles Available at:
Analysis and Simulations of the ITER Hybrid Scenario C. Kessel, R. Budny, K. Indireshkumar Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, USA ITPA Topical Group.
1 Integrated Simulation Code for Burning Plasma Analysis T.Ozeki, N.Aiba, N.Hayashi, T.Takizuka, M.Sugihara 2, N.Oyama JAERI 、 ITER-IT 2 IEA Large Tokamak.
Integrated Modeling and Simulations of ITER Burning Plasma Scenarios C. E. Kessel, R. V. Budny, K. Indireshkumar, D. Meade Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
O. Sauter Effects of plasma shaping on MHD and electron heat conductivity; impact on alpha electron heating O. Sauter for the TCV team Ecole Polytechnique.
Chalmers University of Technology Szczecin, 23 March 2006 Meeting with Dr. B. Green Dr. B. Green (Euratom) and Prof. A. Gałkowski (Association Euratom-IPPLM)
1 ITPA St Petersburg April 2009G.Gorini JET results on the determination of thermal/non-thermal fusion yield from neutron emission spectroscopy.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
ITER Standard H-mode, Hybrid and Steady State WDB Submissions R. Budny, C. Kessel PPPL ITPA Modeling Topical Working Group Session on ITER Simulations.
1 Fast Ion D-Alpha (FIDA) measurements at ASDEX Upgrade B. Geiger, M. Garcia Munoz, W. W. Heidbrink, G. Tardini, V. Igochine, R. Fischer, R. Mc Dermott.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
G.Huysmansworkshop : Principles of MHD 21-24/3/2005 MHD in Tokamak Plasmas Guido Huysmans Association Euratom/CEA Cadarache, France with contributions.
ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, y1999: two core and two SOL transport codes with about 15 users, who worked locally at JET; y2000: Secondees from.
Simulation and Analysis of the Hybrid Operating Mode in ITER C. Kessel, R. Budny, and K. Indireshkumar Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Symposium On.
Implications of TFTR D-T Experiments for ITER R.J. Hawryluk May 23, 2014.
Integration and Plasma Control D.A. Gates, M.G. Bell NSTX 5-Year Plan June 30-July 2, 2003.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
D. Tskhakaya et al. 1 (13) PSI 18, Toledo July 2008 Kinetic simulations of the parallel transport in the JET Scrape-off Layer D. Tskhakaya, R.
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
Status of Integrated Tokamak Modeling activity in RUSSIA (Since May 2007)
Sept. 19, 2007D. McCune1 TRANSP and PTRANSP: Status and Plans Presented at JET/MAST TRANSP Users’ Meeting, Sept. 19, 2007.
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
D. McCune 1 PTRANSP Predictive Upgrades for TRANSP.
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
Comprehensive ITER Approach to Burn L. P. Ku, S. Jardin, C. Kessel, D. McCune Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory SWIM Project Meeting Oct , 2007.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
Heating and current drive requirements towards Steady State operation in ITER Francesca Poli C. Kessel, P. Bonoli, D. Batchelor, B. Harvey Work supported.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
MCZ MCZ NCSX Mission Acquire the physics data needed to assess the attractiveness of compact stellarators; advance understanding.
NSTX Team Meeting - Physics Analysis September 25, 2003 C.K. Phillips and S. Kaye.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
Integrated Operation Scenarios ITPA NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting, February 8, 2016 Yong-Su Na 1 Core Plasma Particle Transport Benchmark Activities in.
1PAC-37, Plasma control algorithm development on NSTX-U using TRANSP, M.D. Boyer, 1/26/2016 Dan Boyer for the Integrated Scenarios science group Plasma.
Nonlinear Simulations of Energetic Particle-driven Modes in Tokamaks Guoyong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ, USA In collaboration.
NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,
Integrated Plasma Simulations C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop Toward an Integrated Plasma Simulation Oak Ridge, TN November 7-9,
NSTX-U Waves & Energetic Particles Theory/Experiment Joint Research Topics Supported by Gary Taylor Mario Podestà Nikolai Gorelenkov NSTX-U NSTX-U Theory.
6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Summary Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement chaired.
12/15/04Team Meeting Physics Analysis NSTX Team Meeting S.M. Kaye 12/15/04 Publications –Some IAEA papers submitted to Nuc. Fusion –T. Biewer article submitted.
Fast Ion Transport Options in TRANSP Presented at Energetic Particle SFG Meeting, PPPL June – D. McCune.
Major aims of IPP-NIFS collaboration on divertor physics
Recent work on the control of MHD instabilities at
Reduction of ELM energy loss by pellet injection for ELM pacing
J.R. Wilson, R.J. Goldston, J.C. Hosea ReNew Theme III Workshop
(EX/P1-4) Type I ELMy H-mode in hydrogen and deuterium:
Simulations of energetic particle driven instabilities and fast particle redistribution in EAST tokamak Fishbone simulation by M3D-K: The simulation results.
Presentation transcript:

TRANSP Needs for Physics Modules R. J. Hawryluk TRANSP Users Group Meeting March 24, 2015

RF Physics Modules Inclusion of non-Maxwellian distribution function –correct treatment of minority heating –treatment of alpha particles Replace LSC with GENRAY+CQL3D –Can handle two frequencies with GENRAY+CQL3D TORBEAM TORIC6? –Has a Fokker Planck operator for minority heating and interaction with NB particles. 2

Core Transport Core impurity transport –Impurity radiation Particle transport –Pellet model update –Particle transport in the pedestal –Neutral penetration – not a 1D process! Needed for fast ion studies as well Speed up PTSOLVER for stiff transport models (TGLF) 3

Pedestal - Edge Reduced pedestal model and consistent core-pedestal coupling –ELMs –EPED lookup SOL and Divertor –PMI 4

Reduced MHD Models Sawteeth –Fast Ion stabilization –“Flux pumping” for hybrid simulations NTMs –NTCC Island model is not installed in TRANSP ELMs RWMs –NTV effects due to non-axisymmetric fields and MHD instabilities 5

Fast Ion Physics Going beyond anomalous diffusion coefficients –Critical gradient models? –Fishbone models upgrade? –Coupling to Nova-K and orbit simulations (post-processing) Faster NUBEAM SXR synthetic diagnostics Built-in FIDAsim –Fast ion birth profile in scrapeoff –Beam-stopping and excitation cross-sections more easily available 6

Control Simulations Real time control of actuators –Stored energy –q(0) and current profile –Rotation profile control –Shape control Socket connections to Mathlab and Simulink Confinement and Greenwald density constraints 7

Between Shot Analysis Effort underway to develop a “fast” version of TRANSP to do between and among shot TRANSP analysis for NSTX-U –Less accurate than full TRANSP run but provide operators and diagnosticians input during the run. 8

Thank You for Your Participation and Support for TRANSP 9