Doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 1 Action Frame Protection Notice: This document has been prepared to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0866r1 Submission September 2005 Michael Montemurro, Chantry NetworksSlide 1 Mobility Domain Definition and Description Notice: This.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0121r0 Submission January 2006 S. Bezzateev, A. Fomin, M. WongSlide 1 Broadcast Management Frame Protection Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /1807r2 Submission November 2006 Matthew Fischer (Broadcom)Slide 1 TGN adhoc MAC subgroup report for November 2006 Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /1528r0 Submission 22 September 2006 Naveen Kakani, Nokia, IncSlide 1 TGn PSMP adhoc Group September Closing Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0220r0 Submission March 2005 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide Liaison Report Atlanta Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0197r0 Submission March 2005 Nancy Cam-Winget et alSlide 1 TAP & JIT Merge Process Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0460r1 Submission March 2006 Fujio Watanabe, DoCoMo USA LabsSlide 1 Japanese Emergency Call Regulation Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0215r1 Submission January 2006 Jesse Walker, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGw Closing Report Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Doc.: IEEE /0186r0 Submission January 2007 Guenael Strutt, MotorolaSlide 1 RFI London Update Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /2112r1 Submission Peter Loc, MarvellSlide 1 TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc San Francisco, July 2007 Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Submission on comments to +HTC frames
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE WG Status Report – July 2005
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
London TGu Motions Authors: January 2007 Date: Month Year
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
Protected SSIDs Date: Authors: March 2005 March 2005
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Descriptive Language Usage in TGv
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 1 Action Frame Protection Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 2 Protection of Action Frames w D6.0 currently restricts protection of Action Frames to all Action Categories with the exception of a Public Action Frame

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 3 Management Frame Formats Non-Management Frame Protection Capable Frame Management Frame Protection Capable Unicast Frame Management Frame Protection Capable Broadcast/Multicast Frame

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 4 Action Frame Type defined in Action IE If Management Frame Protection is successfully negotiated, encrypted unicast Action Frames can not be distinguished!

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 5 Action Frame Category Values CategoryTG Spectrum management QoS DLS Block Ack Public802.11k Radio Measurement802.11k Fast BSS Transition802.11r

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide D6.0 Allows for protection of Robust Action Frames: e.g. all categories except for Public Action Frames However: –Some of these frames are not meant to be encrypted (11y)? –Distinction of Action Frames by category can not occur until after decryption Pseudo-code in a and a.

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 7 Some issues in a pseudo-code

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide a “decryption” looks OK

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide a Broadcast treatment needs work Public Action Frames need to be excluded Public Action Frames need to be processed.

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 10 Issues with Unicast “Action” in a

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 11 Issues with Unicast “Action”

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 12 Proposal A: include unicast-only Public Action Frames Updates to P802.11w D6.0: 3.125a Robust Action Frame: A unicast Action frame or a broadcast/multicast Action frame that is not a Public Action frame last sentence would read as “The Robust Management frames are Robust Action, excluding Public Action frames, Disassociation and Deauthentication frames.” Transmit and Receive pseudo-code must be updated: –see slides 13 and 14 for receive updates – a pg. 47 line 5: else // MMPDU has a multicast broadcast RA if (IGTK exists && MMPDU is not a Public Action frame) then //if we find a suitable IGTK Transmit the MMPDU with protection // See a else if (MMPDU is Disassociate || Deauthenticate || Public Action frame) then Transmit the MMPDU without protection else Discard the MMPDU and generate an MLME.confirm primitive to notify the SME…. – a pg. 47 line 47 else // MMPDU has a multicast broadcast RA if (IGTK exists && MMPDU is not a Public Action frame) then //if we find a suitable IGTK Transmit the MMPDU with protection // See a else if (MMPDU is Disassociate || Deauthenticate || Public Action frame) then Transmit the MMPDU without protection else Discard the MMPDU and generate an MLME.confirm primitive to notify the SME….

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 13 Proposal A: Receive Pseudo-code update for Action Frames

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 14 Proposal A: Receive pseudo-code update for Broadcast

doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco) February 2006 Slide 15 Proposal B: protect both unicast and broadcast Public Action frames Updates to P802.11w D6.0: –Remove definition: 3.125a Robust Action Frame – last sentence would read as “The Robust Management frames are Robust Action, excluding Public Action frames, Disassociation and Deauthentication frames.” Updates needed independent of Proposal B: –Receive pseudo-code for unicast needs to be fixed per Slide 13 (independent of this proposal). – a pg. 47 line 9, add: else if (MMPDU is Disassociate || Deauthenticate) then Transmit the MMPDU without protection else Discard the MMPDU and generate an MLME.confirm primitive to notify the SME…. – a pg. 47 line 51, add: else if (MMPDU is Disassociate || Deauthenticate) then Transmit the MMPDU without protection else Discard the MMPDU and generate an MLME.confirm primitive to notify the SME….