MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
Advertisements

On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
4/18 6:08 UT 4/17 6:09 UT Average polar cap flux North cap South cap… South cap South enter (need to modify search so we are here) South exit SAA Kress,
THE ROLE OF MAGNETOSPHERIC LOBES IN SOLAR WIND – MAGNETOSPHERE - IONOSPHERE RELATIONS Koleva R. 1, Grigorenko E. 2 (1) Solar-Terrestrial Influences Laboratory,
General Findings Concerning the Magnetospheric Realm ILWS - 11 Science Workshop, Beijing, China, Aug-Sep 2011.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
The role of solar wind energy flux for transpolar arc luminosity A.Kullen 1, J. A. Cumnock 2,3, and T. Karlsson 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics,
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Identification and Analysis of Magnetic Substorms Patricia Gavin 1, Sandra Brogl 1, Ramon Lopez 2, Hamid Rassoul 1 1. Florida Institute of Technology,
Peter Boakes 1, Steve Milan 2, Adrian Grocott 2, Mervyn Freeman 3, Gareth Chisham 3, Gary Abel 3, Benoit Hubert 4, Victor Sergeev 5 Rumi Nakamura 1, Wolfgang.
Monitoring of auroral oval location and geomagnetic activity based on magnetic measurements from satellites in low Earth orbit. S. Vennerstrom Technical.
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling Magnetic reconnection In most solar system environments magnetic fields are “frozen” to the plasma - different plasmas.
Lecture 3 Introduction to Magnetic Storms. An isolated substorm is caused by a brief (30-60 min) pulse of southward IMF. Magnetospheric storms are large,
1 Geomagnetic/Ionospheric Models NASA/GSFC, Code 692 During the early part of April 6, 2000 a large coronal “ejecta” event compressed and interacted with.
EFFECTS of the TERRESTRIAL MAGNETOSPHERE on RADIATION HAZARD on MOON MISSIONS R. Koleva, B. Tomov, T. Dachev, Yu. Matviichuk, Pl. Dimitrov, Space and Solar-Terrestrial.
MAGNETOTAIL LOBE POPULATION AS MEASURED BY INTERBALL-1 SATELLITE Koleva R. 1, Grigorenko E. 2, Sauvaud J.-A. 3 (1) Solar-Terrestrial Influences Laboratory,
M. Menvielle and A. Marchaudon ESWW2 M. Menvielle (1) and A. Marchaudon (2) (1) Centre d’études des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires UMR 8615 IPL/CNRS/UVSQ.
Your text would go here. Introduction References Current in geomagnetic storms By: J. Martínez 1 Faculty Advisors: J. Raeder 2, H. Vo 1, D. Cramer 2 University.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Solar wind-magnetosphere- atmosphere coupling: effects of magnetic storms and substorms in atmospheric electric field variations Kleimenova N., Kozyreva.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
Magnetospheric ULF wave activity monitoring based on the ULF-index OLGA KOZYREVA and N. Kleimenova Institute of the Earth Physics, RAS.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling processes reflected in
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
A. Kullen (1), L. Rosenqvist (1), and G. Marklund (2) (1) Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden (2) Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
Global Simulation of Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth's Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Tatsuki Ogino Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory.
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
1 The Geo-Response to Extreme Solar Events: How Bad Can it Get? Leif Svalgaard Stanford University, California, USA AOGS,
Large electric fields near the nightside plasmapause observed by the Polar spacecraft K.-H. Kim 1, F. Mozer 2, and D.-H. Lee 1 1 Department of Astronomy.
Is the Terrestrial Magnetosphere a Natural Radiation Shield on Moon Space Missions ? R. Koleva, B. Tomov, T. Dachev, Yu. Matviichuk, Pl. Dimitrov, Space.
2009 ILWS Workshop, Ubatuba, October 4-9, 2009 Transverse magnetospheric currents and great geomagnetic storms E.E.Antonova (1,2), M. V. Stepanova (3),
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Mapping high-latitude TEC fluctuations using GNSS I.I. SHAGIMURATOV (1), A. KRANKOWSKI (2), R. SIERADZKI (2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA (1,2), Yu.V. CHERNIAK (1),
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Adjustable magnetospheric event- oriented magnetic field models N. Yu. Ganushkina (1), M. V. Kubyshkina (2), T. I. Pulkkinen (1) (1) Finnish Meteorological.
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
CME Propagation CSI 769 / ASTR 769 Lect. 11, April 10 Spring 2008.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Elena Saiz, C. Cid, A. Guerrero, J. Palacios, Y. Cerrato Space Research Group - Space Weather University of Alcalá (Spain)
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - November Page 1 SS It is well known that intense auroral disturbances occur in association with substorms and are.
ABSTRACT Disturbances in the magnetosphere caused by the input of energy from the solar wind enhance the magnetospheric currents and it carries a variation.
© Research Section for Plasma and Space Physics UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Daytime Aurora Jøran Moen.
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
1 CSSAR Center for Space science and Applied Research Chinese academy of Sciences FAC in magnetotail observed by Cluster J. K. Shi (1), Z. W. Cheng (1),
Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes A. N. Jaynes1, D. N. Baker1, H. J. Singer2, J. V. Rodriguez3,4.
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Extremely Intense (SML ≤ nT) Supersubstorms (SSS)
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Environmental conditions during the charging anomaly of the two geosynchronous satellites reported: TELSTAR 401 and Galaxy 15 Elena Saiz, A. Guerrero,
Yama's works Using geomagnetic data
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Quantification of solar wind parameters from measurments by SOHO and DSCOVR spacecrafts during series of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections in the.
Magnetosphere response to impulse space weather events: relationships between PC, AE and SymH indices O. Troshichev and D.Sormakov Arctic and Antarcrtic.
Introduction to Space Weather
Subauroral heliosphere-geosphere coupling during November 2004 ionospheric storms: F2-region, North-East Asia Chelpanov M. A., Zolotukhina N.A. Institute.
High-Speed Plasma Flows Observed in the Magnetotail during Geomagemtically Quiet Times: Relationship between Magnetic Reconnection, Substorm and High-Speed.
Magnetosphere: Bow Shock Substorm and Storm
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data
Presentation transcript:

MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial Research Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

INTERPLANETARY CONDITIONS and GLOBAL CHARACTERISTICS - 22 December at ~ 9:50 an interplanetary shock ahead of ejecta (CME). The shock produced a SC and a storm began to develop. ( - the sheath region - prolonged intervals of IMF Bz south, north and again south; SW rampressure with spikes of at least 20 nPa and IMF of at least 35 nT, and induced E fields of more than 10 mV/m. Two overlaid substorms developed with AL reaching down to –1123 nT and Dst reached of –75 nT. - cloud - the next about 5 hours - IMF Bz turned north, though another substorm took place, the magnetosphere began slowly to recover. - ~ 19:20 UT another interplanetary shock stroke the magnetosphere. It was caused by ejecta, possibly a magnetic cloud [1]. During the next ~ 18 hours IMF Bz stayed south, in the first 8 hours IMF sustained 25 nT or more. Many substorms developed, the largest with AL=-1400 nT. A second storm took place, with minimum Dst=-108 nT, but a prolonged – more than 13 hour interval of Dst < -90 nT November WIND, being at GSM =[183.47, 6.8, 31.15], at 12:50 – 13:05 registered interplanetary sector boundary crossings, pressure change and other variations, the interval showing the possible signature of a magnetic hole. By/Bz By/Bx OMNI 1 AU IP Data

AIM: Study the reaction of the magnetosphere during this complex event using data from both satellites of the INTERBALL pair - the high apogee INTERBALL-Tail and the lower apogee INTERBALL-Auroral; Compare the observations with the results from Tsyganenko'96 and Tsyganenko'2005 storm models.

Position of the satellites INTERBALL - Tail position on model field lines INTERBALL - Auroral footprints Models: Ts’05 and Ts’96

REACTION OF THE OUTER MAGNETOSPHERE: INTERBALL-1 (Tail)

REACTION OF THE INNER MAGNETOSPHERE: INTERBALL-2 (Auroral)

Field aligned currents  auroral arcs

COMPARISON of MEASURED MAGNETIC FIELD With TSyganenko’96 and Tsyganenko’05 MODELS

SUMMARY We have examined the behavior of the high-latitude magnetosphere during the intense geomagnetic storm November 1997, in the minimum of the 23-th solar cycle, using data from the pair of INTERBALL satellites. The storm had complicated interplanetary driver as the action of two ejecta overlaid. During the period of the sheath region after the first interplanetary shock: At the high apogee IB-1 typical loading was registered. No unusual behavior of the magnetotail plasma was observed. At the low apogee IB-2 (footprints at auroral latitudes) the shock triggered slight disturbances in the magnetic field though the auroral activity was very high After the second interplanetary shock: d At the high apogee IB-1 during Dst minimum a thick mantle was observed; Mantle plasma was accompanied by highly anisotropic SW polar rain electrons; during the recovery phase - highly anisotropic SW electrons + accelerated nearer the Earth tailward flowing electrons. At the low apogee IB-2 during Dst minimum and especially in the first hours of the recovery phase intense FAC developed. Comparison of observations with Ts’96 and Ts’05 models showed that Ts’05 is an adequate approximation of the field in the auroral magnetosphere during disturbances with direct interplanetary driving. For disturbances due to stored in the tail energy both models fail. At higher altitudes the By component is not adequately modeled.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !