EXPERIMENTS WITH LARGE GAMMA DETECTOR ARRAYS Lecture IV Ranjan Bhowmik Inter University Accelerator Centre New Delhi -110067.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIGS2 Workshop June 3-4, 2013 Nuclear Structure Studies at HI  S Henry R. Weller The HI  S Nuclear Physics Program.
Advertisements

Cohen & Fano (CF) Model CF-I: Monoelectronic Process CF-II: LCAO for the bound molecular state CF-III: Free Wave for the ejected electron H H Interferences.
Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy.
Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams
Geant4 Low Energy Polarized Compton Processes Gerardo Depaola * Francesco Longo + Francesco Longo + * National University of Córdoba (Argentina) + University.
The Sum Over States model, although exact, requires a detailed knowledge of many parameters which are not generally available. Experience has shown that.
Atomic Physics Atoms with dipoles – surface effects.
Nuclear Instability.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Evan Walsh Mentors: Ivan Bazarov and David Sagan August 13, 2010.
1 EE 542 Antennas and Propagation for Wireless Communications Array Antennas.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Week 11 Lecture 27 Monday, Oct 30, 2006 NO CLASS : DPF06 conference Lecture 28 Wednesday, Nov 1, 2006 GammaDecaysGammaDecays Lecture 29 Friday, Nov 3,
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011 Karine Chesnel.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.

Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
Lesson 9 Gamma Ray Decay. Electromagnetic decay There are two types of electromagnetic decay,  -ray emission and internal conversion (IC). In both of.
Electromagnetic Waves Physics 202 Professor Vogel (Professor Carkner’s notes, ed) Lecture 11.
Nuclear de-excitation Outline of approach… Source of radiation Propagation of radiation field Detection of radiation ?? nucleus.
25 9. Direct reactions - for example direct capture: Direct transition from initial state |a+A> to final state B +  geometrical.
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
March 2, 2011 Fill in derivation from last lecture Polarization of Thomson Scattering No class Friday, March 11.
PHYS 580 Nuclear Structure Chapter5-Lecture1 GAMMA DECAY
6-1 RFSS: Lecture 6 Gamma Decay Part 1 Readings: Modern Nuclear Chemistry, Chap. 9; Nuclear and Radiochemistry, Chapter 3 Energetics Decay Types Transition.
The Development of Particle Physics
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
EXPERIMENTS WITH LARGE GAMMA DETECTOR ARRAYS Lecture VI Ranjan Bhowmik Inter University Accelerator Centre New Delhi
States, operators and matrices Starting with the most basic form of the Schrödinger equation, and the wave function (  ): The state of a quantum mechanical.
Vibrational and Rotational Spectroscopy
EXPERIMENTS WITH LARGE GAMMA DETECTOR ARRAYS Lecture V Ranjan Bhowmik Inter University Accelerator Centre New Delhi
1 ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 3 Propagation and Modulation of RF Waves.
Gamma and Beta Decay Basics
The Elementary Particles. e−e− e−e− γγ u u γ d d The Basic Interactions of Particles g u, d W+W+ u d Z0Z0 ν ν Z0Z0 e−e− e−e− Z0Z0 e−e− νeνe W+W+ Electromagnetic.
Lecture 19: The deuteron 13/11/2003 Basic properties: mass: mc 2 = MeV binding energy: (measured via  -ray energy in n + p  d +  ) RMS.
FermiGasy. W. Udo Schröder, 2005 Angular Momentum Coupling 2 Addition of Angular Momenta    

Chapter 10 Gamma Decay ● Introduction ◎ Energetics of γ Decay ● Decay Constant for γ Decay ◎ Classical Electromagnetic Radiation ● Quantum Description.
Lecture 20: More on the deuteron 18/11/ Analysis so far: (N.B., see Krane, Chapter 4) Quantum numbers: (J , T) = (1 +, 0) favor a 3 S 1 configuration.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law. Let’s return to the field lines and consider the flux through a surface. The number of lines per unit area is proportional to.
Applications of polarized neutrons V.R. Skoy Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
Inelastic scattering When the scattering is not elastic (new particles are produced) the energy and direction of the scattered electron are independent.
Dott. Antonio Botrugno Ph.D. course UNIVERSITY OF LECCE (ITALY) DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS.
Calorimeters Chapter 21 Chapter 2 Interactions of Charged Particles - With Focus on Electrons and Positrons -
 Nature of nuclear forces, cont.  Nuclear Models lecture 3&4.
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Lecture 12: The neutron 14/10/ Particle Data Group entry: slightly heavier than the proton by 1.29 MeV (otherwise very similar) electrically.
1 PHY Lecture 5 Interaction of solar radiation and the atmosphere.
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
A. Bondarevskaya Highly charged ion beam polarization and its application to the search for the parity nonconservation effects in ions
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
Electromagnetism Around 1800 classical physics knew: - 1/r 2 Force law of attraction between positive & negative charges. - v ×B Force law for a moving.
ANGULAR CORRELATION OF NEUTRONS EMITTED FROM DECAY OF GIANT DIPOLE RESONANCE IN ULTRA-PERIPHERAL COLLISIONS AT RHIC In an ultra peripheral collision the.
Monday, Oct. 9, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #9 Monday, Oct. 9, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Nuclear Radiation Beta Decay & Weak Interactions.
Dipole radiation during collisions LL2 Section 68.
W. Udo Schröder, 2005 Gamma Decay 1. W. Udo Schröder, 2005 Gamma Decay 2 Photons Photons: generated by moving charge distributions. Distributions can.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Motion in an Undulator Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN Accelerator School.
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Dimitar Tonev, Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Lifetime measurements in mass regions A=100 and A=130 as.
Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Theory of Scattering Lecture 3. Free Particle: Energy, In Cartesian and spherical Coordinates. Wave function: (plane waves in Cartesian system) (spherical.
Electromagnetic (gamma) decay
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
Seminar on Microwave and Optical Communication
PHL424: γ-decay γ-decay is an electromagnetic process where the nucleus decreases in excitation energy, but does not change proton or neutron numbers This.
Theory of Scattering Lecture 3.
Interactions of Elm. Radiation: Extended Task
 No measurement on a single decay reveals its angular momentum
PHYS 3446, Spring 2012 Andrew Brandt
Presentation transcript:

EXPERIMENTS WITH LARGE GAMMA DETECTOR ARRAYS Lecture IV Ranjan Bhowmik Inter University Accelerator Centre New Delhi

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ASSIGNMENT OF SPIN & PARITY

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, General Properties of Electromagnetic Radiation Individual nuclear states have unique spin and parity. For decay from (E i J i M i  i ) to (E f J f M f  f ), the electromagnetic radiation must satisfy the following relations: EnergyE  = E i - E f Multipolarity|J i - J f |  L  (J i + J f ) M-stateM = M i - M f Parity  =  i  f For time varying field, the vector potential A should satisfy the vector Helmholtz equation : The scalar Helmholtz equation has the following solution with states of good angular momentum L and parity (-1) L

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ELECTRIC & MAGNETIC TRANSITIONS The corresponding Vector solutions are : Parity (-1) L+1 Parity (-1) L At large distances (kr » 1), Electric and magnetic fields complimentary : E(r ; E) = H(r ; M) H(r ; E) = -E(r ; M) At short distances (kr « 1) |E(r ; E)| >> |H(r ; E)| |H(r ; M)| >> |E(r ; M)| This justifies the names 'Electric' and 'Magnetic' for the two types of fields. Electric field interacts with charges  Electric multipole excitation Magnetic field interacts with currents (magnets)  Magnetic multipole excitation

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ELECTRIC DIPOLE RADIATION The classical radiation field from an oscillating dipole is given by P ~ E  H ~ sin 2  r 2 which is maximum in a plane  to dipole direction [ zero at 0  ] The electric field is in the plane containing the dipole. Quantum mechanically, this correspond to a dipole field with L=1 M=0 with linear polarization along  P For an axially symmetric oscillating quadrupole field (Q 20 ) the radiation pattern P ~ E  H ~ sin 2  cos 2  r 2 [ zero at 0  & 90  ] Quadrupole field with L=2 M=0 with linear polarization along 

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION OF MULTIPOLE RADIATION Angular distribution Z(  ) =| A(r, ,  ) | 2 is a function of  only For magnetic radiation, role of E & H are interchanged Similar angular distribution for electric and magnetic multipoles would differ in plane of polarization Adding all the M components incoherently would result in isotropic unpolarized radiation Electric dipole radiation at 90  Polarization M = 0 || to axis M = 1  to axis Electric Quadrupole radiation at 90  Polarization M = 1 || to axis M =2  to axis

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ELECTROMAGNETIC TRANSITION PROBABILITY Since we are not interested in the orientation of either the initial or the final nucleus, we sum over all M f and average over all M i. Angular distribution of the photon would involve contributions from different allowed values of L & M. Since kR « 1, the transition probability  T fi decrease rapidly with L and the lowest allowed L is important. The transition probability for the nucleus decaying from a state |J i M i > to state |J f M f > by an interaction R is given by

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, MULTIPOLARITY OF TRANSITION For a change in angular momentum  L = |J i - J f | the dominant multipolarities are : JJ Same Parity  i =  f Opposite parity  i   f 0M1,E2 mixed radiation E1 1M1,E2 mixed radiation E1 2E2(M2,E3) M1 & E2 often have comparable strength

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, RADIATION FROM ORIENTED NUCLEI  Random orientation of nuclei : radiation is isotropic as all M i substates are to be added incoherently: radioactive decay  Nuclei oriented perpendicular to z-axis: fusion Populates large spins with M i ~ 0 by heavy ion fusion M i  0 nuclei decaying predominantly to M f  0 For L=1 M = 0  Emitted radiation maximum at  ~ 90   Polarization || to z-axis for Electric transition For L=2 M = 0,  1  Emitted radiation minimum at  ~ 90   Polarization || to z-axis for Electric transition L=  J for stretched transition  Nuclei oriented along z-axis : polarized nuclei M = L Angular distribution opposite; polarization reversed in sign

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ALIGNMENT IN NUCLEAR REACTION In fusion reaction between even-even nuclei, compound nucleus is populated with high spin at M=0 state. Successive particle emission would broaden the M-distribution. Since the  -decay along the cascade is mostly stretched in nature (  J =L) the M- distribution of the decaying state J i would be centered around M=0 If the spin distribution is symmetric i.e. P(-M) = P(M) NUCLEAR ALIGNMENT Asymmetric spin distribution P(M) > P(-M) leads to NUCLEAR POLARIZATION Gaussian parameterization for oriented nuclei: P(M i ) ~ exp(-M i 2 /  2 ) /  i exp(-M i 2 /  2 )with  J i ~ 0.3

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION IN FUSION Angular distribution of  -transitions can be measured by moving the detector to a different  and normalising the counting rate w.r.t. a fixed detector Shows pronounced anisotropy : W(  ) = 1 +a 2 P 2 (cos  ) +a 4 P 4 (cos  ) Symmetric about 90  W(  ) = W(  ) Only even orders allowed with N max  2L 'Beam in' & 'Beam out' directions equivalent Nucl. Phys. A95(1967)357

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Theoretical angular Distribution The theoretical angular distribution from a state J i to a state J f by multipole radiation of order L, L' can be written as : where  K Statistical Tensor describing initial state population. Only even K allowed for symmetric M distribution Depends on the population width  Normalize to transitions with known multipolarity A K Geometrical factor depending on 3j, 6j, 9j symbols Sensitive to L-change in the high spin limit A K (J i LL'J f ) ~ A K (  J,L)

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ANUGULAR DISTRIBUTION FOR PURE MULTIPOLES Angular distribution coeffs for pure multipoles in high spin limit for ideal initial M-distribution P(M) =1 for M=0 or  ½ JJ La2a2 a4a

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, SYSTEMATICS OF L=2 TRANSITIONS Angular distributions for  J =2 very similar with a minimum at 90  For most transitions a 2 =  0.09 a 4 =   0 transitions show large deviation due to external perturbation Large anisotropy consistent with a narrow M-distribution  ~ 0.3 J PRL16(1966)1205

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, SYSTEMATICS OF DIPOLE TRANSITIONS Dipole transitions have a maximum at 90  a 2 -ve -a 2 ~ If there is no change in parity, M1 can be mixed with E2 transitions Angular distribution sensitive to the mixing ratio  As the transitions are weak L=1 mostly seen in coincidence measurements E2 M1,E2 PRL16(1966)1205

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, MIXING RATIO  If for transition between states J i  J f two multipolarities L, L' are allowed,  is the ratio of the reduced nuclear matrix elements  a real number -      Sign of  depends on the relative phase of the nuclear matrix elements Angular distribution To extract  from measured W(  ),  K must be estimated from a model of P(M) or extracted from pure E2 angular distribution

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, DETERMINATION OF MIXING RATIO  Angular distribution of  -rays sensitive to  J and mixing ratio Solid curve : pure L=2 Dotted curve : pure L=1 Dashed & dot-dashed curve: mixed transition  = -1 & +1 Large interference effects for  J =1 Knowledge of both a 2 & a 4 important to identify the spin change  J

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ANGULAR CORRELATION Weak transitions in a  -cascade can only be identified in  coincidence measurements Angular correlation W(  1,  2,  ) can be calculated theoretically if M-state population is known with sum over all variables K, K1, K2, q1, q2 For decay from symmetric M-distribution all K are even

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ANGULAR CORRELATION As a special case, we consider radioactive decay of a cascade of  - transitions. Because of the random orientation of the 4 + state populated by  -decay, all  K zero. By summing over all other indices the angular correlation is obtained as : where A K (1), A K (2) are the coefficients characterising the two transitions and  is the angle between the detectors.

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, ANGLAR CORRELATION : SYMMETRY PROPERTIES Symmetric M distribution, 'beam in' & 'beam out' equivalent W(  1,  2,  ) = W(  -  1,  -  2,  ) Additional symmetries involving   -  and   +  NIMA313(1992)421 Integration over out-of-plane angle  product of angular distributions NPA563(1993)301  Integration over angle of one detector Integration over all detectors gives the angular distribution Angular distribution from angular correlations using large array

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Similarity between angular distribution & angular correlation

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Anisotropy in angular distribution 'Gated angular distribution' extracted from the angular correlation W(  1,  2) by summing over all  2 Anisotropy defined as where  A ~ 0  or 180   B ~ 90  Sensitive to  J &  Gating with unknown L possible Mixing Angle PRC53(1996)2682 E2 E1 M1/E2 E2/M1 Three possible solutions !! need linear polarization data

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Directional Correlation from Oriented Nuclei Useful information about  J can be obtained by measuring coincidences between two detectors, one near 90  and the other near 0  with respect to beam direction If the detectors are sensitive to both radiations  1 &  2 we can distinguish between (i)  1 in detector 1  2 in detector 2 (ii)  2 in detector 1  1 in detector 2 DCO = W(  1,  1 ;  2,  2 )/W(  1,  2 ;  2,  1 )

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, DCO Ratio Ignoring  dependence we get DCO ratio ~ [W(  1 ;  1 )*W(  2 ;  2 )] / [W(  1 ;  2 )*W     )] = [W(  1 ;  1 )/ W(  1 ;  2 )] * [W(  2 ;  2 )/W     )] If both radiations  1 and  2 have the same multipolarity, they have similar angular distribution and DCO ratio =1 If they have different multipolarity i.e. L=1 for  1 and L=2 for  2 both terms greater than 1 and DCO ~ 2 Exchange of angles or exchange of gating multipolarity would invert the ratio Generalization valid only for Stretched transitions ! Some papers have inverted definition i.e. NIMA275(1989)333

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, EXPERIMENTAL DCO RATIO Gate on E2 transition 607 keV transition E2 484, 506, 516, 568, 617 keV transitions dipole PRC47(1993)87 E2 gate 93 Tc

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, DCO Ratio : advantages Can be used for weak transitions More sensitive to angular distribution i.e. W(  ) 2 Ideal for small arrays with limited number of angle combinations Not overly sensitive to choice of angles 75  <   < 105    DCO similar for both M1 & E2 transitions if  J =1 Large interference effect for mixed transitions DCO ambiguity for  J=0, 1  1=90   =0  gate on L=2

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Sensitivity of DCO Ratio to mixing parameter EPJA17(2003)153 Two solutions, need polarization data !!

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, POLARIZATION MEASUREMENTS Angular distribution for both E1 and M1 similar; maximum at 90  Can be distinguished by polarization measurement Stretched E1 transition has polarization vector in-plane stretched M1 transition has polarization vector perpendicular to plane Maximum polarization at  = 90  Can be studied in (i) singles (ii) in coincidence with another detector (PDCO) (iii) measuring polarization of both detectors (PPCO) RMP31(1959)711 NIM163(1979)377 NIMA362(1995)556 NIMA378(1996)516 NIMA430(1999)260

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, POLARIZATION FORMALISM P olarization in a nuclear reaction : where J 0, J 90 are the average intensities of the Electric vector in plane with the beam direction & perp. to the plane. Angular distribution : Polarization : Maximum at 90  with a value for pure E1, M1 or E2:  = +1 (E1,E2) ;-1 (M1)

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Measurement of Polarization Compton Scattering is sensitive to the polarization direction Vertically polarized photons would be preferentially scattered in the horizontal plane Klein-Nishina formula Maximum sensitivity at  ~ 90 

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Detection of Compton-scattered radiation Two Ge detectors : one as scatterer and other as detector of scattered radiation Need large efficiency for coincident detection Identified as E  = E 1 + E 2 Experimental Asymmetry a(E  ) corrects for any instrumental effect between horizontal & vertical plane

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Different Designs of Polarimeter GAMMASPHERE CLOVER

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, CLOVER as a Polarimeter Polarization sensitivity Q = A/P where P is polarization of the incident radiation Large polarization sensitivity Q ~ 13% at 1 MeV Large Compton detection efficiency ~ 40% at 1 MeV Measurement in singles or in coincidence NIMA362(1995)556

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Measurement of Polarization Electric Magnetic

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Polarization Measurement in 163 Lu PRL86(2001)5866 NPA703(2002)3

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Polarization measurement in 163 Lu Confirmation of the wobbling mode in 163 Lu through combined angular distribution and linear polarization measurement

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2, Polarization-Direction Correlation PDCO Polarization-Polarization Correlation PPCO With the availability of a large array of Clover detectors, we can measure the polarization of one or both  -rays in coincidence. This results in additional information in the form of PDCO (where one polarization is measured) or PPCO where both polarizations are measured. Combined with DCO this provides a powerful tool for spin assignment. I  4 +  2 + NIMA430(1999)260

Lecture IV SERC-6 School March 13-April 2,