Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE SMALL ISOCHRONOUS RING PROJECT AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY J. Alberto Rodriguez.
Advertisements

Cairo University Electrical Engineering – Faculty of Engineering Cyclotrons Yasser Nour El-Din Mohammed Group 2 - Accelerators and Applications Supervisors.
ECPM 2006, Nice, France, 2-4 November DESIGN STUDIES OF THE 300AMEV SUPERCONDUCTING CYCLOTRON FOR HADRONTHERAPY Mario Maggiore Laboratori Nazionali.
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 1 DESIGN STUDY OF MEDICAL CYCLOTRON SCENT300 Mario Maggiore on behalf of R&D Accelerator team Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
Proposed injection of polarized He3+ ions into EBIS trap with slanted electrostatic mirror* A.Pikin, A. Zelenski, A. Kponou, J. Alessi, E. Beebe, K. Prelec,
Carbon Injector for FFAG
Beam Dynamic Calculation by NVIDIA® CUDA Technology E. Perepelkin, V. Smirnov, and S. Vorozhtsov JINR, Dubna 7 July 2009.
MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson.
1 Tracking code development for FFAGs S. Machida ASTeC/RAL 21 October, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Determination of R – matrix Supervisors: Prof. Nikos Tsoupas Prof. Manolis Benis Sándor Kovács Murat Yavuz Alkmini-Vasiliki Dagli.
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
JINR PAC, Dubna, G. Gulbekian Status of the DRIBs III Project cyclotron DC280 new experimental hall (SHE factory) cyclotron U400R reconstruction.
SPECIALISED CYCLOTRON FOR BEAM THERAPY APPLICATION Yu. G. Alenitsky, A
FETS H - Ion Source Experiments and Installation Scott Lawrie, Dan Faircloth, Alan Letchford, Christoph Gabor, Phil Wise, Mark Whitehead, Trevor Wood,
2007/2/111 A Report to the Advisory Committee of CNS The Accelerator Group Outline Progress in April – December 2006 Schedule in Jan – March 2008.
LBNL 88'' cyclotron operations Status of the 88-Inch Cyclotron High-Voltage upgrade project December 14, 2009 Ken Yoshiki Franzen.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In terms of total charge and current  In terms of free charge an current USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2013 Lecture 2 - Basic.
The Mathematical Modeling of New Operation Modes of Multi–purpose Isochronous Cyclotrons Authors: I.V.Amirhanov, G.A.Karamysheva, I.N. Kiyan Joint Institute.
Heavy Ion Accelerators for RIKEN RI Beam Factory and Upgrade Plans H. Okuno, et. al. (RIKEN Nishina Center) and P. Ostroumov (ANL) Upgrade Injector Low.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Muon cooling with Li lenses and high field solenoids V. Balbekov, MAP Winter Meeting 02/28-03/04, 2011 OUTLINE  Introduction: why the combination of Li.
ICIS2015 in NY Y.HIGURASHI Y. Higurashi (RIKEN Nishina center) 1.Introduction RIKEN RIBF and RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS 2.Emittance measurements 1.4D.
A mass-purification method for REX beams
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
RF source, volume and caesiated extraction simulations (e-dump)
Simulations of ILC electron gun and bunching system Diagram of bunching system (from TESLA paper by Curtoni and Jablonka) -Electron gun generates electrons.
Cyclotrons Chapter 2 Basic Longitunal dynamics Acceleration Injection Extraction 1.
Cyclotrons Chapter 3 RF modelisation and computation B modelisation and computation Beam transport computation 1.
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
Simulating the RFOFO Ring with Geant Amit Klier University of California, Riverside Muon Collaboration Meeting Riverside, January 2004.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Progress of Bunched Beam Electron Cooling Demo L.J.Mao (IMP), H.Zhang (Jlab) On behalf of colleagues from Jlab, BINP and IMP.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Recent progress of RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS for RIBF T. Nakagawa (RIKEN) 1.Introduction RIKEN Radio isotope factory project 2.RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS Structure(Sc-coils,
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
…or a compact cyclotron to accelerate
6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“
The 12th Symposium on Accelerator Physics, Yuzhong, Gansu, China1 Study of Beam Properties at SECRAL and The Solenoid Pre-focusing LEBT Youjin.
Simulation of Particle Trajectories for RIKEN Rare-RI Ring Nishina Center, RIKEN SUZUKI Hiroshi Nov. / 11 / 2011.
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Study of Beam Properties at SECRAL and The Solenoid Pre-focusing LEBT
Preliminary results for electron lens with beam current of 20 A
with operating voltage
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Beam dynamics of RAON accelerator system
PANDA Collaboration Meeting
THE NEW DC-280 CYCLOTRON. STATUS AND ROAD MAP
Cross-Check for 14N5+ ion acceleration regime
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
11 MeV/u 16O7+ ion acceleration
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Extraction for 14N5+ ion acceleration regime
Summary & Concluding remarks
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Calibration simulation for 14N5+ ion acceleration regime
Physics Design on Injector I
Cut inflector electrodes for 14N5+ ion
11 MeV/u 16O7+ ion acceleration
E.Perepelkin and S.Vorozhtsov
ICAP 2006, Chamonix Mont-Blanc
Simon Jolly UKNFIC Meeting 25th April 2008
Presentation transcript:

Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008

General view of the AVF cyclotron Injection line ESD Dee Magnet sectors

Injection line LEBT

LEBT dimensions Initial emittance Superbunch ~ 4000°RF. 10,000 ions α x = α y = 0, β x = β y = 0.8 mm/mrad ε x = 115 π.mm.mrad, ε y = 98 π.mm.mrad Buncher Glazer lens G2 Glazer lens G1 Inflector

Buncher

Buncher parameters Buncher voltage V max is 150 Volt, (beam energy 52 keV, ECRIS potential is 10.4 kV) Gap = 5 mm

Buncher model 0.1 mm 2 mm

E z along OZ axis Ground electrode RF electrode Calculation was performed for the RF potential 1 volt

Z = -2.4 mm from buncher center

Z = -2 mm from buncher center

Z = 0 mm ( buncher center )

Z = 2 mm from buncher center

Z = 2.4 mm from buncher center

Glazer lens G1

G1 geometry Maximum excitation 42.9 kA· t

Model and mesh Symmetry 1/12 More than 4 million finite elements Maximum excitation 42.9 kA· t

B mod distribution at the XOZ plane

B mod on the OZ axis B c = kGs

Glazer lens G2

G2 geometry Maximum excitation 26 kA· t

B mod distribution at the XOZ plane

B mod on the OZ axis B c = kGs

Axial channel

Remarks Measured axial magnetic field, main coil current = 650A The current in the Glazer lens G1 and G2 was maximal JW(G1) = 42.9 kA t JW(G2) = 26 kA t Calculation of the magnetic field for the G1 and G2 was produced without taken into account the main coil field.

Field in the axial channel Glazer lens G1 Glazer lens G2

Inflector

Inflector parameters Particle 14 N 5+ with energy 52 keV Gap 8 mm Cutting 4 mm No tilt Electric radius A = 26 mm Magnetic radius ρ = mm K = 0.8

Opera 3D model and mesh Cut 4 mm at the inflector entrance and exit Mesh step is about 1 mm

Inflector entrance

Inflector exit

Magnetic and electric maps area LEBT

Fields map area G2 Magnetic field G1 Magnetic field Buncher Electric field

Fields map area Inflector Electric field Axial channel Magnetic field G1 Magnetic field

Low beam intensity Test particle 14 N 5+ Space Charge effects are negligible

Parameters LEBT G1 lens: B c = kG G2 lens: B c = kG ( 20% up from nominal ) Injection energy = 45 keV ( 52 keV nominal ) Buncher voltage = 80 Volt ( 150 V nominal )

Buncher focusing animation

Lenses effect animation

Buncher losses Ground RF

Buncher losses Total buncher losses are 15 %

Monitoring planes Plane 1 Buncher entrance Plane 2 Exit buncher Plane 3 Begin G2 Plane 4 Exit G2 Plane 5 Begin G1 Plane 6 Exit G1 Plane 7 26 mm from the median plane

Plane 1

Plane 2

Plane 3

Plane 4

Plane 5

Plane 6

Plane 7

Nominal regime

Cross - check

Central trajectories Calculated E-map Analytical E-map

Parameters Radius, mm21.6 Θ - azimuth, deg53.34 Z C - axial position, mm0 Pr C, deg Pz C, deg0 Energy, keV50.9 Gaps φ RF, [deg] Analytical E-map φ RF, [deg] Calculated E-map Starting parameters for central trajectory RF phase at the center of acceleration gaps 1 st turn U Dee = 46.7 kV, B-map – is measured, f RF = 16.3 MHz, Z=5, Mass = 14.

Inflector

Central trajectories

Compare trajectories ParametersTheoryCalculated Adjusted calculated * Radius, mm Θ - azimuth, deg Z C - axial position, mm Pr C, deg Pz C, deg Energy, keV * Shift 0.8 mm, slope 4.5 deg

Emittance at the inflector entrance

Beam parameters Parameters Coordinates αβ mm/mrad γ mrad/mm ε π∙mm∙mrad X Y Z 02.1 mm/keV1 keV/mm1 π mm ∙keV Parameters Coordinates Average- position mm 2σ- deviation mm Average- angle mrad 2σ-angle mrad X Y Z keV1 keV Twiss Statistics

Emittance at the inflector exit

Beam parameters Parameters Coordinates αβ mm/mrad γ mrad/mm ε π∙mm∙mrad R Z φ RF °RF/keV0.07 keV/°RF56 π °RF∙keV Parameters Coordinates Average- position mm 2σ- deviation mm Average- angle mrad 2σ-angle mrad R Z φ RF °RF51.3 keV2 keV Twiss Statistics

Cyclotron

Bunches

Central region axial losses Losses 57%

Radial amplitude Symmetric B-map Real B-map

B-map harmonics R = 72 cm, Bm 2 = 15 Gs

Emittance for real B-map Center Dee 1 – position, final radius

Symmetric B-map Center Dee 1 – position, final radius

Flat - Top

Model features B-map – measurements E-map – analytical map Flat-top system Voltage radial dependencies

Central trajectory parameters φ RF, deg-65 Radius, mm23.3 Θ - azimuth, deg64.1 Z C - axial position, mm0 Pr C, deg38.74 Pz C, deg0 Energy, keV55.1 Operational frequency MHz, harmonic = 2 U Dee = 50 kV m( 14 N 5+ ) =

Central trajectory

Radial amplitude

Phases and energy

Emittance at the inflector exit

Beam parameters Parameters Coordinates αβ mm/mrad γ mrad/mm ε π∙mm∙mrad R Z φ RF °RF/keV0.2 keV/°RF273 π °RF ∙keV Parameters Coordinates Average- position mm 2σ- deviation mm Average- angle mrad 2σ-angle mrad R Z φ RF -65 °RF38.8 °RF55.1 keV7.2 keV Twiss Statistics

Flat-Top off/on

Axial motion (Flat-Top off/on)

Emittances (Flat-Top off) Dee 1 center – azimuth bunch position

Emittances (Flat-Top on) Dee 1 center – azimuth bunch position

Beam parameters (Flat-Top off) Parameters Coordinates αβ mm/mrad γ mrad/mm ε π∙mm∙mrad R Z φ RF °RF/keV96 keV/°RF130 π °RF ∙MeV Parameters Coordinates Average- position mm 2σ- deviation mm Average- angle mrad 2σ-angle mrad R Z φ RF °RF62.7 MeV3.5 MeV Twiss Statistics

Beam parameters (Flat-Top on) Parameters Coordinates αβ mm/mrad γ mrad/mm ε π∙mm∙mrad R Z φ RF 0.10 °RF/keV43 keV/°RF31.6 π °RF ∙MeV Parameters Coordinates Average- position mm 2σ- deviation mm Average- angle mrad 2σ-angle mrad R Z φ RF -27 °RF62.9 MeV1.17 MeV Twiss Statistics

Flat-Top effect

Extraction

Analytical ESD E=71 kV/cm

Comparison By Goto-san This calculation

Optimization

Main result Losses from the inflector ground to the ESD mouth is 35% instead of 60%. And this result can be improved.

Modification of buncher parameters Initial beam energy 45 keV (ECRIS potential 9 kV, instead of 10.4 kV) V max = 80 Volt (instead of 150 kV)

Modification inflector parameters Electrode potential ±3.14 kV or ±3.2 kV

Central trajectories Starting position (x,y,z) = (0,0,36) mm Injection - strongly axial direction Energy 45 keV ParametersTheoryCalculated Radius, mm Θ - azimuth, deg Z C - axial position, mm02.3 Pr C, deg Pz C, deg Energy, keV At the inflector exit

Cyclotron

B map modification First trim coil We added the magnetic field to the measurement B-map

Electric field parameters Dee voltage 40 kV instead of operational 46.7 kV RF frequency MHz instead of operational 16.3 MHz No flat-top

RF phase at the Dee’s centre For the central trajectory

Emittance at the inflector entrance

Beam parameters Parameters Coordinates αβ mm/mrad γ mrad/mm ε π∙mm∙mrad X Y Z 02.1 mm/keV1 keV/mm1.5 π mm ∙keV Parameters Coordinates Average- position mm 2σ- deviation mm Average- angle mrad 2σ-angle mrad X Y Z keV1 keV Twiss Statistics

Cyclotron animation

Central region losses 2.7% 4.4% 1.8% 7.6% Total axial 15.8% Total losses 34.7%

Axial motion

3D view

Emittance at the radius ~66 cm Center Dee 1 – position, not final radius

Beam parameters Parameters Coordinates αβ mm/mrad γ mrad/mm ε π∙mm∙mrad R Z φ RF deg/MeV0.1 MeV/deg4.3 π mm ∙MeV Parameters Coordinates Average- position mm 2σ- deviation mm Average- angle mrad 2σ-angle mrad R Z φ RF MeV0.7 MeV Twiss Statistics

Future activities Decrease axial losses by the inflector axial shift on 2.3 mm Optimization of the inflector cutting Implementation of the beam centering procedure Assessment of the modified central electrode structure Extraction study for the completed deflector model Last but not the least: It would be advisable to performer an experimental checking of simulation results obtained so far.