1 Ground-level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite-borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument Lok Lamsal and Randall Martin with contributions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lok Lamsal, Randall Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar Folkert Boersma, Ruud Dirksen (KNMI) Edward Celarier, Eric Bucsela, James Gleason (NASA) E.S.
Advertisements

Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Simulation of Absorbing Aerosol Index & Understanding the Relation of NO 2 Column Retrievals with Ground-based Monitors Randall Martin (Dalhousie, Harvard-Smithsonian)
Quantifying uncertainties of OMI NO 2 data Implications for air quality applications Bryan Duncan, Yasuko Yoshida, Lok Lamsal, NASA OMI Retrieval Team.
Junwei Xu 1 Randall V. Martin 1,2, Jhoon Kim 3, Myungje Choi 3, Qiang Zhang 4, Guannan Geng 4, Yang Liu 5, Zongwei Ma 5,6, Lei Huang 6, Yuxuan Wang 4,7.
Time Series Analysis of Satellite-Derived PM 2.5 Brian Boys, Randall V. Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Ryan MacDonell, Nai-Yung C. Hsu * NASA/Goddard Space.
Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed Aerosol Optical Depth Aaron van Donkelaar 1, Randall Martin 1,2,
Satellite Remote Sensing of a Multipollutant Air Quality Health Index Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok Lamsal,
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1.
1 Surface nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) rd GEOS-Chem USERS ` MEETING, Harvard University.
OMI NO 2 observations of boreal forest fires Nicolas Bousserez, Randall V. Martin, Lok Lamsal, and the ARCTAS team Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia.
1 Global Observations of Sulfur Dioxide from GOME Xiong Liu 1, Kelly Chance 1, Neil Moore 2, Randall V. Martin 1,2, and Dylan Jones 3 1 Harvard-Smithsonian.
Estimating global climatological PM 2.5 from MODIS and MISR AOD Aaron van Donkelaar and Randall Martin April 2009.
Satellite Remote Sensing of Global Air Pollution
Indirect Validation of Tropospheric Nitrogen Dioxide Retrieved from the OMI Satellite Instrument: Insight into the Seasonal Variation of Nitrogen Oxides.
Cloud algorithms and applications for TEMPO Joanna Joiner, Alexander Vasilkov, Nick Krotkov, Sergey Marchenko, Eun-Su Yang, Sunny Choi (NASA GSFC)
Assessing the impact of the 2008 economic recession on NOx emissions in US megacities 10/2/2015Air Resources Laboratory1 Daniel Tong 1,2,3*, Lok Lamsal.
Intercomparison methods for satellite sensors: application to tropospheric ozone and CO measurements from Aura Daniel J. Jacob, Lin Zhang, Monika Kopacz.
Insight from the A-Train into Global Air Quality Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok Lamsal, Akhila Padmanabhan,
Surface Reflectivity from OMI: Effects of snow on OMI NO 2 retrievals Gray O’Byrne 1, Randall Martin 1,2, Joanna Joiner 3, Edward A. Celarier 3 1 Dalhousie.
1 NO x emissions from power plants in China: bottom-up estimates and satellite constraints Siwen Wang, 1,3 Qiang Zhang, 2 David G. Streets, 3 Kebin He,
Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing to Inform Air Quality Management Randall Martin with contributions from Aaron van Donkelaar, Brian Boys, Matthew.
Surface Reflectivity from OMI: Effects of Snow on OMI NO 2 Gray O’Byrne 1, Randall Martin 1,2, Aaron van Donkelaar 1, Joanna Joiner 3, Edward A. Celarier.
Advances in Applying Satellite Remote Sensing to the AQHI Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar, Akhila Padmanabhan, Dalhousie.
Air Resources Laboratory CMAS meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina Yunsoo Choi 1,2, Hyuncheol Kim 1,2, Daniel Tong 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Rick Saylor 3, Ariel.
Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing to Estimate Global Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian.
The Sensitivity of U.S. Surface Ozone Formation to NO x and VOCs as Viewed from Space: the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Bryan Duncan 1, Yasuko Yoshida.
Estimating anthropogenic NOx emissions over the US using OMI satellite observations and WRF-Chem Anne Boynard Gabriele Pfister David Edwards AQAST June.
Using Satellite Remote Sensing to Estimate Global Outdoor Air Pollution Exposure Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar,
Validation, Day of Week and Seasonal Perspectives on Satellite NO 2 Ronald C. Cohen UC Berkeley.
Southeast US air chemistry: directions for future SEAC 4 RS analyses Tropospheric Chemistry Breakout Group DRIVING QUESTION: How do biogenic and anthropogenic.
1 Inferring Ground-level Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations from OMI Martin Steinbacher, Empa Edward Celarier, SGT Inc. Eric Bucsela, NASA GSFC.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
OMI Validation Needs Mark Kroon – KNMI (on behalf of the OMI validation team) Aura Science Team Meeting Aura Validation Working Group Pasadena, CA,
SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY Daniel J. Jacob.
Constraints on the Production of Nitric Oxide by Lightning as Inferred from Satellite Observations Randall Martin Dalhousie University With contributions.
Chemical Condition and Surface Ozone in Urban Cities of Texas During the Last Decade: Observational Evidence from OMI, CAMS, and Model Analysis Yunsoo.
NO 2 and SO 2 Over the eastern USA: Policy relevant science Presented at the OMI Science Team Meeting by Russell R. Dickerson T. Canty, J. Hains, H. He,
Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.
Satellite Remote Sensing of NO 2 as an Indicator of Aerosol Pollution: Opportunities from GEMS (and GOCI) Observations Randall Martin with contributions.
Improving Retrievals of Tropospheric NO 2 Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Lok Lamsal, Gray O’Byrne, Aaron van Donkelaar, Dalhousie Ed.
Estimating PM 2.5 from MODIS and MISR AOD Aaron van Donkelaar and Randall Martin March 2009.
1 Examining Seasonal Variation of Space-based Tropospheric NO 2 Columns Lok Lamsal.
Two New Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing: Timely Updates to Emission Inventories and Constraints on Ozone Production Randall Martin, Dalhousie.
Some Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing for Air Quality: Implications for a Geostationary Constellation Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian.
Evaluation of model simulations with satellite observed NO 2 columns and surface observations & Some new results from OMI N. Blond, LISA/KNMI P. van Velthoven,
1 Relationship between ground-level NO 2 concentrations and OMI tropospheric NO 2 columns Martin Steinbacher, Empa; Edward Celarier, SGT Inc.
Geostationary satellite mission for air quality and coastal ecosystems One of 15 missions recommended to NASA for the next decade by the U.S. National.
Validation of OMI and SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO 2 columns using DANDELIONS ground-based data J. Hains 1, H. Volten 2, F. Boersma 1, F. Wittrock 3, A. Richter.
Ground-level NO 2 Concentrations Inferred from OMI Lok Lamsal, Dalhousie University Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar,
Folkert Boersma Collaborators: Daniel J. Jacob, Miri Trainic, Yinon Rudich, Ruud Dirksen, and Ronald van der A Comparison of NO 2 air pollution in Israeli.
Observing Air Quality from Space Randall Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok Lamsal, Chulkyu Lee, Carolyn Verduzco Undergraduate Science Conference 25 September.
Satellite Remote Sensing of the Air Quality Health Index Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Aaron van Donkelaar, Lok Lamsal, Dalhousie University.
Global Air Pollution Inferred from Satellite Remote Sensing Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian with contributions from Aaron van Donkelaar,
Analysis of Satellite Observations to Estimate Production of Nitrogen Oxides from Lightning Randall Martin Bastien Sauvage Ian Folkins Chris Sioris Chris.
Xiaomeng Jin and Arlene Fiore
Quantifying uncertainties of OMI NO2 data
N. Bousserez, R. V. Martin, L. N. Lamsal, J. Mao, R. Cohen, and B. R
Randall Martin Dalhousie University
Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian
Satellite Remote Sensing of a Multipollutant Air Quality Health Index
Randall Martin Aaron Van Donkelaar Daniel Jacob Dorian Abbot
Estimating Ground-level NO2 Concentrations from OMI Observations
Satellite Remote Sensing of Ozone-NOx-VOC Sensitivity
Space-based Diagnosis of Surface Ozone Sensitivity to Anthropogenic Emissions Randall Martin Aaron Van Donkelaar Arlene Fiore.
Satellite Remote Sensing of Ground-Level NO2 for New Brunswick
Diurnal Variation of Nitrogen Dioxide
Retrieval of SO2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development and Validation Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne:
Presentation transcript:

1 Ground-level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite-borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument Lok Lamsal and Randall Martin with contributions from Martin Steinbacher, Empa Edward Celarier, SGT Inc. Eric Bucsela, NASA GSFC Edward Dunlea, CIRES Joseph Pinto, U.S. EPA

2 Nitrogen dioxide  Is a reddish-brown gas and has a sharp biting odor  Is a prominant toxic air pollutant  Current WHO guideline: 200 µg/m 3 (hourly average), 40 µg/m 3 (annual average)

3 NO x sources Surface sources: 85%

4 NO x : Impacts on public health and the environment Acid deposition Toxic products Visibility impairment Eutrophication Health effects

5 Ambient NO 2 as indicator of toxic air pollution  Strong association between between NO 2 and mortality.  NO 2 strongly correlated with other air pollutants  NO 2 can serve as an indicator of level of toxicity in air VOC PAH Brook et al., 2007 Correlation of NO 2 and PM 2.5 with certain PAH and VOC

6 Ground-based NO 2 measurements  NO 2 measuring instruments:CLNO x (molybdenum, photolytic), DOAS, LIF, TILDAS  Sparse fixed sites  Surface NO 2 shows a large gradient  Don‘t reflect personal exposure to NO 2  Satellite-derived NO 2 would be very useful  Not possible to retrieve surface NO 2 from satellite

7 Tropospheric column as a proxy for surface NO2  Tropospheric column retrieval from satellite  Strong relation between tropospheric columns and surface NO x emissions  NO 2 in the lower mixed layer makes 70-90% contribution to tropospheric column  Aim: derive ground-level NO 2 from OMI San Francisco Los AngelesPhoenix Houston Dallas Chicago Toronto

8 NO 2 from OMI  Launch 15 th July 2004 onboard EOS-Aura  OMI instrument is from the contribution from NIVR and FMI  Spectral coverage: nm  Ozone, NO 2, SO 2, HCHO, BrO, OClO, cloud and aerosol properties  Horizontal resolution ≥ 13 x 24 km 2  Daily global coverage

9 GEOS-Chem GEOS-CHEM In situ  Need of information on NO 2 profile from a 3D model  GEOS-Chem at 2x2.5, version , 12:00-14:00 local time  GEOS-Chem NO 2 profile shape consistent with in situ measurements

10 Approach to derive surface NO 2 GEOS-CHEM In situ GEOS-Chem NO 2 [ppbv] SAT

11 Sensitivity studies: Effect of model profile OMI grids GEOS-Chem grids Error < 10% in polluted areas polluted unpolluted

12 In situ NO 2 measurements: Chemiluminescent NO x analyzer Chemiluminescent NO x analyzer does not provide true NO 2 NO + O 3 → NO 2 * + O 2 NO 2 * → NO 2 + h NO mode NO x mode NO 2 → NO NO 2 = NO x - NO

13 Comparison with DOAS measurements OMI over pass time (12.00 to 14:00 local time) Interference~50% HNO 3 ~60% ∑AN~10-30% Mexico City Apr 2003 Dunlea et al. 2007

14 Comparison with photolytic analyzers Taenikon/Switzerland Jan-Dec 2000 Steinbacher et al Interference:20-60% PAN:30-50% HNO 3, particulate nitrates

15 Interference in chemiluminescent analyzers with molybdenum converter CompoundsConversion efficiencyExperiments NO, NO 2, ethyl nitrate~ 100%Winer et al., 1974 PAN92%Winer et al., 1974 HNO 3, PAN, n-propyl nitrate, n-butyl nitrate ≥98% Grosjean and Harrison, 1985 Ammonia, gas phase olefins, particulate nitrate No significant interference Dunlea et al., 2007 Difficult issue: Loss of HNO 3 on stainless steel of inlet Difficult to quantify the conversion efficiency

16 Correction of interference Bias = 40% Bias = 8% Taenikon, Switzerland

17 Correction for interference for USA and Canada

18 Comparison between OMI and in situ measurements  Selected 214 stations  201 US and 13 Canada  Collocation criteria  Radius 10 km, time = 12:00 to 14:00 local time ► Mean correlation 0.51, maximum 0.86 ► Stronger correlation in polluted areas Correlation map

19 Comparison between OMI and in situ measurements ► Uncorrected > corrected by up to a factor of 3 ►OMI and corrected in situ measurements consistent ►summer minima ►OMI<corrected in situ measurements DJF MAM JJA SON

20 Comparison between OMI and in situ measurements J F M A M J J A S O N D

21 Comparison between OMI and in situ measurements according to land type  Urban, suburban, rural  Mean bias -21 to -48%  Underestimation of tropospheric column by OMI  Seasonal bias in OMI retrievals

22 Seasonal bias in OMI retrievals 33%-20%-58%-15% DJF MAM JJA SON

23 Conclusions  We derived ground-level NO 2 from OMI using information from the GEOS-Chem model.  OMI-derived surface NO 2 is robust to model profile in polluted areas.  In situ measurements have significant interference from PAN, alkyl nitrates, and HNO 3  Following laboratory studies and field measurements, we developed a correction algorithm to the in situ measurements.  We compared OMI-derived surface NO 2 with the corrected in situ measurements from US and Canadian stations to validate our approach  OMI derived surface NO 2 agrees to 21 to 48% with the corrected in situ measurements. The remaining discrepancy is associated with the OMI retrievals. Submitted to JGR atmospheres