1 Acceleration and Deceleration of Flare/Coronal Mass Ejection Induced Shocks S.T. Wu 1, C.-C. Wu 2, Aihua Wang 1, and K. Liou 3 1 CSPAR, University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
Advertisements

Lecture 9 Prominences and Filaments Filaments are formed in magnetic loops that hold relatively cool, dense gas suspended above the surface of the Sun,"
Heliospheric Propagation of ICMEs: The Drag-Based Model B. Vršnak 1, T. Žic 1, M. Dumbović 1, J. Čalogović 1, A. Veronig 2, M. Temmer 2, C. Moestl 2, T.
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
MHD Shocks and Collisionless Shocks Manfred Scholer Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik Garching, Germany The Solar/Space MHD International.
Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum Dave McComas Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX With input from and thanks to Heather Elliott,
Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.
M. J. Reiner, 1 st STEREO Workshop, March, 2002, Paris.
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
Construction of 3D Active Region Fields and Plasma Properties using Measurements (Magnetic Fields & Others) S. T. Wu, A. H. Wang & Yang Liu 1 Center for.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
In both cases we want something like this:
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
Waves and Currents in Coronal Active Regions Leon Ofman* Catholic University of America NASA Goddard Space Flight Center *Visiting, Tel Aviv University.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.
Interplanetary Scintillations and the Acceleration of the Solar Wind Steven R. Spangler …. University of Iowa.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
J. M. Forbes, E. K. Sutton, R. S. Nerem Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA Sean Bruinsma, CNES.
Boundaries, shocks, and discontinuities. How discontinuities form Often due to “wave steepening” Example in ordinary fluid: –V s 2 = dP/d  m –P/  
Relation between Type II Bursts and CMEs Inferred from STEREO Observations N. Gopalswamy, W. Thompson, J. Davila, M. Kaiser NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
How does the Sun drive the dynamics of Earth’s thermosphere and ionosphere Wenbin Wang, Alan Burns, Liying Qian and Stan Solomon High Altitude Observatory.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.
Lecture 16 Simulating from the Sun to the Mud. Space Weather Modeling Framework – 1 [Tóth et al., 2007] The SWMF allows developers to combine models without.
On the February 14-15, 2011 CME-CME interaction event and consequences for Space Weather Manuela Temmer(1), Astrid Veronig(1), Vanessa Peinhart(1), Bojan.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Multi-fluid MHD Study on Ion Loss from Titan’s Atmosphere Y. J. Ma, C. T. Russell, A. F. Nagy, G. Toth, M. K. Dougherty, A. Wellbrock, A. J. Coates, P.
Global Simulation of Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth's Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Tatsuki Ogino Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory.
Extremely Fast Coronal Mass Ejection on 23 July Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland,20723, USA 2 NOAA Space Weather.
1 Non-neutral Plasma Shock HU Xiwei (胡希伟) 工 HU Xiwei (胡希伟) HE Yong (何勇) HE Yong (何勇) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Huazhong University of Science and.
3D Reconnection Simulations of Descending Coronal Voids Mark Linton in collaboration with Dana Longcope (MSU)
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
Interplanetary Shocks in the Inner Solar System: Observations with STEREO and MESSENGER During the Deep Solar Minimum of 2008 H.R. Lai, C.T. Russell, L.K.
1 University of California, San Diego, U.S.A., 2 NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center, U.S.A., 3 George Mason University, U.S.A., 4 Naval Research Laboratory,
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
Energy Budgets of Flare/CME Events John Raymond, J.-Y. Li, A. Ciaravella, G. Holman, J. Lin Jiong Qiu will discuss the Magnetic Field Fundamental, but.
Modeling of CME-driven Shock propagation with ENLIL simulations using flux-rope and cone-model inputs Using observations from STEREO/SECCHI and SOHO/LASCO,
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Shock heating by Fast/Slow MHD waves along plasma loops
Substorms: Ionospheric Manifestation of Magnetospheric Disturbances P. Song, V. M. Vasyliūnas, and J. Tu University of Massachusetts Lowell Substorms:
Solar Origins of the October November 2003 Extreme Events N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC SHINE 2004 WG3 Thursday, June 1 Big Sky, Montana Photo.
Chapter 12 Compressible Flow
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations Verónica Ontiveros National University of Mexico, MEXICO George Mason University,USA Angelos Vourlidas Naval.
An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
Y. C.-M. Liu, M. Opher, O. Cohen P.C.Liewer and T.I.Gombosi
Solar Wind and CMEs with the Space Weather Modeling Framework
Xuepu Zhao Oct. 19, 2011 The Base of the Heliosphere: The Outer (Inner) Boundary Conditions of Coronal (Heliospheric) models.
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Modeling the SEP/ESP Event of December 13, 2006
Solar Flare Energy Partition into Energetic Particle Acceleration
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
The Bow Shock and Magnetosheath
Introduction to Space Weather
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
Presentation transcript:

1 Acceleration and Deceleration of Flare/Coronal Mass Ejection Induced Shocks S.T. Wu 1, C.-C. Wu 2, Aihua Wang 1, and K. Liou 3 1 CSPAR, University of Alabama, Huntsville, USA 2 Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA 3 Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, USA STEREO-SWG21, Dublin, Ireland, March 22-26, 2010

2 Motivation To investigate flare/coronal mass ejection induced shock acceleration and decelleration from the corona/surface of the Sun to the inner heliosphere (2 AU) using a 1.5D MHD simulation with drag force. The simulation results have compared with observation of ACE data. Drag force has compared with Cargill drag force.

3 Governing Equations Conservation of mass Conservation of energy* Conservation of momentum Induction equation In the equations, D/Dt denotes the total derivative, ρ is the mass density, V is the velocity of the flow, p is the gas pressure, B is the magnetic field, e is the internal energy per unit mass (e = p/( γ -1)ρ), GM(r) is solar gravitational force, and γ is the specific heat ratio. For this research, we applied an adiabatic gas assumption (i.e., γ =5/3). F and F are a dissipative force and Rayleigh dissipation function, respectively. The former as a “frictional force which is proportional to the velocity of the particle”, and the latter as one- half “the rate of energy dissipation due to friction”.

4 LDE M1.7/SF flare at N00W UT, October 25, 2003 LDE X1.2/3N flare at S18E UT, October 26, 2003 X17/4B flare at S15E44 with a Halo CME 1102 UT, October 28, 2003 X10/2B flare at S15W02 with a Halo CME 2042 UT, October 29, 2003 Shock /10/2003 Shock /10/2003 Shock /10/2003 DD Halloween 2003 Event Observations

5 Simulation Procedure A one-dimensional MHD simulation model with adaptive grids was employed to study this event in Sun-Earth direction. We construct the back ground solar wind structure from the “surface of Sun” to the heliospher for study the propagation of the shock events during the Halloween epoch. To initiate the simulation, we introduce four pressure pulses corresponding to 4 observed flares. These four pressure pulses were introduced at the lower boundary (1 solar radius, Rs) at the time = 0, 24, 77, 110 hours which correspond to time = (DOY), , , of year 2003 according to observations, respectively. Six simulated parameters (i.e., density (Np), T, Vr, V Φ, Br and B Φ ) are presented.

6 Simulation Inputs at lower boundary (1 Rs) LDE M1.7/SF X17/4B LDE X1.2/3N X10/2B DOY 2003

7 Steady state solar wind condition 1 AU

8 Simulation Results ………. ACE ______Simulation Np VφVφ Br T Vr BφBφ 1 AU

9 COMPARISON: Simulation Results vs. Observation COMPARISON: Simulation Results vs. Observation ….. ACE ___Simulation Vφ = Vy -Vr = Vx Vp = V total =sqrt(Vx 2 +Vy 2 +Vz 2 ) =sqrt(Vr 2 +Vφ 2 )

10 Histogram of grids and waves location FFS1+FFS2 SFF2 FFS3 Oct Nov DD FFS1 RS FFS4 RS

11 DISCUSSION Drag force (Cargill, 2004) a Friction force (Wu et al.,1975) b REFERENCE: a Cargill, Solar Physics, 221, , b Wu et al., Solar Physics, 44, , F = ½ ku 2 du/dt = u/(2 F ) d F /dt dV i /dt = F D /M * = -γC D (V i – V e )/|V i – V e | F = ½ ku 2 k = 3 x (R ☼ /r) 6 k: a constant depend on the physical process.

12 Conclusion Acceleration and Deceleration of Flare/Coronal Mass Ejection induced shocks have been simulated by 1.5D MHD model. Cause of deceleration due to drag force can be estimated from the numerical simulation. Our drag force deduced from simulation are similar to the Cargill results (2005). We plan to use this simple model to track the STEREO observed shocks.

13 The End

14 Characteristic wave speeds, magnetosonic Mach Number solar wind speeds, and locations of forward and reverse shock waves as a function of time after the first flare-generating CME and shock. (a) Cf (fast wave speed), Cs (sound wave speed), and CA (Alfven wave speed) for fat reverse shocks (for example, Cf1R is the fast wave speed on the sunward side of RFS1); (b) Cf, Cs, and CA for the fast forward shocks (for example, Cf1 is the fast wave speed on the anti-sunward side of FFS1); (c) magnetosonic Mach Number of both forward and reverse fast shocks; (d) solar wind plasma speed; and (e) locations (or trajectories) of various forward and reverse shocks as well as the reverse fast compression wave, RFW1, that becomes RFS1 after it is overtaken by FFS2 at t ≈ 40 hours. The solid vertical lines (orange/red, black, blue, and yellow) are the points of two shocks collision (Wu et al., JGR, 2006) Time (Hours) Location of Shocks(Rs) Solar wind speed (km/s) Mach no. C S,C A,C f C S,C A,C f (km/s) Reverse Wave Speed Forward Wave Speed

15 Simulation (solid line) and observed (dotted line) solar wind plasma speed. Excellent agreement with the observations is shown for the simulated shock times of arrival at ACE as well as the “V spike”, following Shock 4, is a reverse shock. (Wu et al., JGR, 111, A09S17, 2005) V spike Velocity profile from 1.5D MHD model with adaptive grids (Wu et al., JGR, 2005)

16

17

18

19

20 Oct Nov No Wind/WAVES Type II or III available for LDE M1.7/SF on October 25, 2003 The X10/2B flare caused a geomagnetic storm With Dst min = -401 nT The X17/4B flare caused a geomagnetic storm with Dst min = -363 nT The M1.7/SF and X1.2/3N flares caused a geomagnetic storm with Dst min = -48 nT

21 First pressure pulse launched Third pressure pulse launched Fourth pressure pulse launched Second pressure pulse launched Heliocentric, Radius (R/Rs) Vr (km/s) 1 st PP 2 nd PP 3 rd PP 4 th PP Time (Hours)