CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS ECAL Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INFN Milano, Universita` degli Studi Milano Bicocca Siena IPRD May Testbeam results of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter Alessio Ghezzi.
Advertisements

PPRP September 2002 UK CMS 1 CMS Endcap Electromagnetic Calorimeter and Global Calorimeter Trigger, Physics & Computing Presented by Peter Hobson, Brunel.
2002 LHC Days at Split, Split, October 2002 D J A Cockerill - RAL 1 The ECAL Endcap Calorimeter for CMS D J A Cockerill RAL - UK 2002 LHC Days at Split.
The Lead Tungstate Calorimeter for CMS
Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Endcap
CMS ECAL Annual Review - CERN Sept 2001 R M Brown - RAL 1 Test results from 500 preproduction VPTs R M Brown RAL - UK CERN 19 September 2001.
CMS-UK Oversight Committee 17/5/04 D.J.A. Cockerill - RAL 1 The CMS ECAL Endcaps Crystal ECAL Endcap Calorimeter (EE) Preshower EE EE crystals.
STFC RAL Graduate lectures 2007/8 R M Brown - RAL 1 An introduction to calorimeters for particle physics Bob Brown STFC/PPD.
Il Calorimetro Elettromagnetico di CMS Riccardo Paramatti CERN & INFN – Roma1 IFAE 2005 Catania 31/03/2005.
The CMS Detector Paoti Chang National Taiwan University
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
ECAL TIMING. 20/04/092 Ratios’ Method Basics Position of pulse maximum parameterized using the ratio of two consecutive samples, i.e., R = A(t)/A(t+1)
Cosmic Rays Data Analysis with CMS-ECAL Mattia Fumagalli (Università di Milano Bicocca) CIAO!
B W Kennedy, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory VPTs for the CMS experiment B W Kennedy CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory St Petersburg, 26 April.
CMS ECAL End Cap EDR Meeting CERN 28 Nov. to 29 Nov 2000 A.B.Lodge - RAL 1 ECAL End Cap CMS ECAL End Cap Engineering Design Review. EDR meeting held 28.
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, May 19, PWO Crystal ECAL Ren-yuan Zhu California Institute of Technology May 19 th 2001.
PPARC forum on developments in scintillator technology R M Brown - RAL 1 Scintillating Crystals for Particle Physics Outline  Performance considerations.
CMS Week, CERN, 2002 R M Brown - RAL 1 Performance Characteristics of Production VPTs R M Brown, B W Kennedy, P R Hobson (with crucial input from D J A.
Roger Rusack – The University of Minnesota 1.
Status of Projectile Spectator Detector A.Kurepin (Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow) I. Introduction to PSD. II. Conception and design. III. Development.
PSD8 September 2008, Glasgow.P R Hobson, Brunel University 1 Avalanche Photodiodes and Vacuum Phototriodes for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory CMS ECAL Split 08/09/04 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS.
Panic 05, 27 th Oct 2005Q. Ingram, PSI1 The Lead Tungstate Electromagnetic Calorimeter of CMS Q. Ingram on behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
CMS ECAL End Cap Meeting CERN 18 Oct to 22 Oct ECAL End Cap High Voltage and Fibre Optic Monitoring Systems Progress. Progress on High Voltage and.
CMS ECAL performance and upgrade Anton Karneyeu (INR, Moscow) CMS Collaboration INSTR14, Novosibirsk, Russia, 27 February 2014.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter US CMS JTERM III 12 January 2009 Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter at the LHC
Coseners House Forum on LHC Startup 13th April 2007 David Futyan Imperial College 1 David Futyan Imperial College Calibration of the CMS ECAL Using Vector.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
B W Kennedy, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Endcaps K.W.Bell, R.M.Brown, D.J.A.Cockerill,
1 US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, WBS 4.0 The Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota US-CMS L2 ECAL Manager.
Sept. 17th, 2008 Nicolo Cartiglia, INFN, Turin, Italy 1 Installation, Commissioning and Performance of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) Electronics.
The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter: status, performance with cosmic and first LHC data Cristina Biino* - INFN Torino 11th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter
Concept of NA62 IRC based on PWO scintillation crystals A.Fedorov, M. Korjik, A. Lobko Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk, Belarus A. Kourilin JINR,
Paolo Rumerio, CERN On behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Group CALOR 2006 Chicago, June 5 th – 9 th, 2006 Commissioning of the CMS Electromagnetic.
SLHC Working Group - Nadia Pastrone1 CMS ECAL Detector at SLHC SLHC high radiation environment  consequences on ECAL Bunch crossing period:
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
ECAL Plenary 27/2/07 D.J.A. Cockerill - RAL 1 Status of the CMS ECAL Endcaps ECAL Plenary, 27 Feb 2007 D Cockerill  VPTs  Electronics and Integration.
CMS-UK Oversight Committee 17/11/06 D.J.A. Cockerill - RAL 1 The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter UK Responsibilities Procurement and testing of VPTs Design.
CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER Jean-Pierre Ernenwein OVERVIEW 6th international conference on advanced technology and particle physics Villa Olmo, Como,
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
HEP2001, Budapest, July 2001 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter P R Hobson, D C Imrie, O Sharif Brunel University,
2004 LHC DAYS IN SPLIT- October 8 th 2004 L. Dobrzynski - LLR CMS - ECAL Test beam results Ludwik Dobrzynski On behalf of ECAL CMS LLR- Ecole polytechnique.
Electromangetic calorimeter of CMS: status and performances
Ilhan TAPAN* and Fatma KOCAK
The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR
Calibration of the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS detector
Electromangetic calorimeter
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
Overview Detector details Crystals Photo-detectors
CMS-ECAL Front-End monitoring Matteo Marone
The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
A study on stochastic term of calorimetric energy resolution
CMS ECAL Endcaps: Fluence/Dose (500 fb-1)
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER
CMS ECAL Cosmic Calibration
Presentation transcript:

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS ECAL Group

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 2 Overview  Introduction  Design objectives and technology choices  Description and status:  Crystals  Photo-detectors  On-detector electronics  Off-detector electronics  Laser monitoring system  Mechanical construction and assembly  Pre-shower  Intercalibration with cosmic muons  Construction and installation schedule  Summary

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 3 Compact Muon Solenoid ECAL Tracker 4T solenoid Muon chambers HCAL Iron yoke Total weight: 12,500 t Overall diameter: 15 m Overall length: 21.6 m Magnetic field: 4 T

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 4 Coloured histograms are separate contributing backgrounds for 1fb -1 ECAL design objectives (electronic, pile-up) High resolution electromagnetic calorimetry is central to the CMS design Benchmark process: H    m / m = 0.5 [  E 1 / E 1   E 2 / E 2    / tan(  / 2 ) ] Where:  E / E = a /  E  b  c/ E Aim (TDR):Barrel End cap Stochastic term: a = 2.7% 5.7% (p.e. stat, shower fluct, photo-detector, lateral leakage) Constant term: b = 0.55% 0.55% (non-uniformities, inter-calibration, longitudinal leakage) Noise: Low L c = 155 MeV 770 MeV High L 210 MeV 915 MeV (   relies on interaction vertex measurement) Optimised analysis

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 5 Challenges & Choices Challenges: Fast response (25ns between bunch crossings) High radiation doses and neutron fluences (10 year doses: n/cm 2, 1kGy at  =0 2x10 14 n/cm 2, 50kGy at  =2.6) Strong magnetic field (4 Tesla) On-detector signal processing  0 /  discrimination Long term reproducibility Choices: Lead tungstate crystals Avalanche photodiodes (Barrel), Vacuum phototriodes (Endcaps) Electronics in 0.25  m CMOS Pb/Si Preshower detector in Endcap region Laser light monitoring system

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 6 Lead tungstate properties Temperature dependence ~2.2%/ O C  Stabilise to  0.1 O C Formation and decay of colour centres in dynamic equilibrium under irradiation  Precise light monitoring system Low light yield (1.3% NaI)  Photodetectors with gain in mag field But: Fast light emission: ~80% in 25 ns Peak emission ~425 nm (visible region) Short radiation length: X 0 = 0.89 cm Small Molière radius: R M = 2.10 cm Radiation resistant to very high doses

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 7 ECAL Layout Barrel: 36 Supermodules (18 per half-barrel) Crystals (34 types) – total mass 67.4 t Dimensions: ~ 25 x 25 x 230 mm 3 (25.8 X 0 )   x  = x Tapered crystals Pointing ~ 3 o from vertex Pb/Si Preshowers : 4 Dees (2/endcap) 4300 Si strips (~ 63 x 1.9 mm 2 ) Endcaps: 4 Dees (2 per endcap) Crystals (1 type) – total mass 22.9 t Dimensions: ~ 30 x 30 x 220 mm 3 (24.7 X 0 )   x  = x ↔ 0.05 x 0.05

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 8 Crystal production Crystal delivery determines ECAL Critical Path Suppliers: BTCP (Bogoroditsk, Russia)~ 1100/month SIC (Shanghai, China)~ 130/month ~ 80% of Barrel crystals already delivered (48 950/61 200) Preseries of Endcap crystals: 100 BTCP, 300 SIC  Last Barrel crystal delivery Feb 2007  Last Endcap crystal delivery Jan 2008

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 9 Crystal Quality Assurance BTCP SIC Light Yield Automatic control of: Dimensions Optical Transmission Light yield Longitudinal uniformity CERN INFN/ENEA Rome BTCP Transmission at 420 nm

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 10 Crystal Radiation Resistance Light loss is characterised by an ‘induced absorption’ Under irradiation at room temperature, a dynamic equilibrium forms between formation and annealing of colour centres.  Light loss saturates at a value that depends on dose-rate CMS specification requires: μ Gy/hr) Under LHC-like conditions for the Barrel (~0.15 Gy/hr)  Light yield loss ≾ 6% initial after irradiation wavelength (nm ) T(%) Verification: BTCP:Use correlation between sharpness of absorption edge and radiation hardness (Check with sample irradiations) SIC: All crystals irradiated by producer 0 5 Light Yield Loss (%)

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 11 Photodetectors Barrel - Avalanche photodiodes (APD) Two 5x5 mm 2 APDs/crystal - Gain: 50 QE: ~75% - Temperature dependence: -2.4%/ O C - Delivery complete 40  m Endcaps: - Vacuum phototriodes (VPT) More radiation resistant than Si diodes (with UV glass window) - Active area ~ 280 mm 2 /crystal - Gain (B=4T) Q.E.~20% at 420nm - Delivery ~80%  = 26.5 mm MESH ANODE VPT Delivery & Test status

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 12 On-detector electronics Trigger primitives computed on the detector Command & control via token ring Modularity: Trigger Tower (25 channels in Barrel) - 1 Low Voltage Regulation Board (LVR) - 5 VFE Boards (5 channels each) - 1 FE Board - 1 Fibre sending trig primitives (every bunch Xing) - 1 Fibre sending data (on Level1 accept) Trigger Tower (TT) Very Front End card (VFE) Front End card (FE) Trigger Sums Data x12 x6 x1 MGPA Logic 12 bit ADC bits 2 bits HV APD/VPT VFE architecture for single channel VFE x 5 MB FE LVR

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 13 On-detector electronics: status ASICs in 0.25  m IBM CMOS Technology Very high yield (typically >85%) ADC MGPA FENIX Status: All ASICS procured and tested All systems for 30 SMs are tested & burned-in Full Barrel set available for most components Endcap components following close behind 30 MeV 45 MeV View of a SuperModule (SM) showing on-detector electronics Noise distribution for 1700 channels of SM13

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 14 Off-Detector electronics Clock & Control System (CCS) Data Concentrator Card (DCC) Trigger Concentrator Card (TCC) Status: CCS finished for whole ECAL DCC in production for Barrel TCC for Barrel: Production started TCC For Endcaps: Schematic finished First board by September LV Power supplies: ~60% of Barrel ordered (rest soon) Order for Endcaps in 2007

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 15  at APD when electronics is powered-up (Worst case: Bottom Supermodule) Cooling &Temperature Stability  Power dissipation of Barrel on-detector electronics ~160 kW  Combined temperature sensitivity of (crystal + APD):  Stabilise temperature to better than ± 0.05 O C  Chilled water at 50l/s Water manifold and pipes on SM Cooling bars in direct contact with electronic cards

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 16 Laser light monitoring (1) The Solution: Damage and recovery during LHC cycles tracked with a laser monitoring system 2 wavelengths are used: 440 nm and 796 nm Light is injected into each crystal Normalisation given by PN diodes (0.1%) 0.95 Correlation between transmission losses for scintillation light and laser light The Problem: Colour centres form in PWO under irrad n Transparency loss depends on dose rate Equilibrium is reached after a low dose Partial recovery occurs in a few hours Simulation of crystal transparency evolution at LHC ( L =2x10 33 cm -2 s -1 ) - based on test beam irradiation results

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 17 Laser light monitoring (2) APD Light is injected through fibres into the front (Barrel) or rear (Endcap) of each crystal 440 nm 796 nm An optical switch directs light to one half-supermodule or one quarter Dee at a time Resolution before irrad n / after irrad n and correction

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 18 Construction: Barrel Sub-module: 10 crystals Super-module: 1700 crystals 2 Regional Centres: CERN and Rome Module: 400/500 crystals Assembly status: 26/36 bare SMs assembled 15/36 SMs completed Production rate 4/month Bare SMSM with cooling

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 19 Construction: Endcaps Production status All mechanical parts delivered Endcap crystal production starts in summer 2006 Backplates successfully test mounted on HCAL Dee (½ endcap): 3662 crystalsSupercrystal: 25 crystals

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 20 Preshower detector Rapidity coverage: 1.65 < |  | < 2.6 (End caps) Motivation: Improved  0 /  discrimination 2 orthogonal planes of Si strip detectors behind 2 X 0 and 1 X 0 Pb respectively Strip pitch: 1.9 mm (63 mm long) Area: 16.5 m 2 (4300 detectors, 1.4 x10 5 channels) High radiation levels - Dose after 10 yrs: ~ 2 x10 14 n/cm 2 ~ 60 kGy  Operate at -10 o C

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 21 Status of Preshower Detector Micromodules Ladders System motherboards - production finished by end 2006 System Tests Ongoing - 8 ladders shown here Mechanics All ES “complete disc” elements ready for installation at end 2006 (before the beam pipe) Off-Detector Readout Electronics First module already prototyped – 12-channel optical receiver (optoRx) Production completed ~September 07 D.Barney Pre-series underway Production by mid 2007 Preshower on schedule for installation at end of 2007

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 22 Mip deposits ~250MeV (increase APD gain from 50 to 200) Cosmic Muon Test & Calibration Cosmic muons  Each SM operated with cosmic rays for ~1 week  Intercalibration: 1-3% (stat) depending on η Muons through full crystal Event: 4161 Cry: 168 Status: 10 SM Calibrated

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 23 During assembly, all detector components are characterised Thus the relative calibration c i of each channel may be estimated: Where:LY is crystal light yield, M and  Q are gain and quantum efficiency of the photo-detectors c ele is the calibration of the electronics chain Intercalibration from Laboratory Measurements  = 4.2% Test beam vs Lab Intercalibration Ratio: Test beam/Lab

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 24 Barrel construction schedule Reduced time 3→2months EB+ Surface Installation EB- Surface Installation (12/18) EB- U’ground Installation (6/18) EB+ EB-

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 25 Supermodule Installation Insertion at point 5 2 SMs inserted 27 April for magnet test SM Rails on HB+ Gap HB+/HB- ~ 1mm ECAL Barrel installation

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 26 Endcap Construction Schedule  Assembly plan assumes last EE crystal delivered end Jan 08.  Aim is to have Endcaps installed for 2008 Physics Run  All cables and services are already installed  Goal: D1 Sept07, D2 Nov07, D3 Jan08, D4 Apr08 ECAL Endcap installation

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 27 Summary  High resolution electromagnetic calorimetry is a central feature of CMS  The construction of the Barrel ECAL is in the final phase  All mechanical components are delivered for the Endcap ECAL  Crystal delivery sets the schedule for both Barrel and Endcap  The Pre-shower detector is on course for completion as planned  Supermodules are being commissioned and calibrated with cosmic rays  The CMS ECAL will meet its design goals – see next talk!

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 28 Spares

CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 29 Calibration strategy Lab measurements Pre-calibration GeV Reference pre-calibration of few SM with 50/120 GeV electrons in test beam (<2%) Finally: calibration to < 0.5% with W  + e in ~2 months Test Beam LY Lab LY Test Beam LY – Lab LY  = 4.0% Initial pre-calibration by ‘dead reckoning’ based on lab measurements (~4%) In-situ calibration Precision with 11M events Limit on precision  Inter-calibration precision %  -symmetry w/jet trigger (E T > 120 GeV) Fast in-situ calibration based on principle that mean energy deposited by jet triggers is independent of  at fixed  (after correction for Tracker material) (~2-3% in few hours) Z  e + e Barrel  -ring inter-calibration and Z  e + e cross-calibration (~1% in 1 day)