Coupling Sustainable Production Analysis to Field Trial Data Dave Muth, Idaho National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manure is a Resource Ron Wiederholt Nutrient Management Specialist NDSU Extension Livestock Manure Nutrient Management Series March, 2006.
Advertisements

Soil Erosion Estimation TSM 352 Land and Water Management Systems.
Livestock/Perennial grass/Row crops-a solution? University of Florida, Auburn University, UGA, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, National Peanut Laboratory,
Tim Reinbott University of Missouri Bradford Research and Extension Center.
Scenario Analysis costs per acre for various practices estimate each fully applied practice for N or P then combine for N or P to reach 20 or 45% finally,
Soil C change with management Balancing Crop Biomass for Bioenergy and Conservation REAP - Renewable Energy Assessment Project Jane M-F Johnson 1, Ronald.
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
Livestock Manure Management – The Basics on Why and How Coordinating Manure Utilization Plans With Crop Rotations Jon Stika, Area Agronomist USDA-NRCS,
Crop Residue Yield Variability in North Central Region Rajesh Chintala.
FIELD CROPS Top graphic from
Evaluation Nitrogen and Phosphorus Placement With Strip Tillage for Irrigated Pacific Northwest Corn Production David Tarkalson and Dave Bjorneberg Agricultural.
Environmental Sustainability of Biofuel Crops Bill Chism David Widawsky Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation.
Biofuel Crop Production
Regional Feedstock Partnership: 2009 Switchgrass Report Vance Owens South Dakota State University San Antonio, TX February 2010 Field trial PIs:
1 Soil Carbon Sequestration: Long-term Effect of Tillage and Rotations Charles W. Rice and Karina Fabrizzi October 28-30, 2008 Kansas State University.
Kalundborg, Denmark Crop Residues: Potential, Problems and Solutions EPAC Biofuel Summit Larry Johnson; Inbicon A/S June 7, 2011.
CORN STOVER APPROACHING ITS REAL WORTH CTIC Meeting David Glassner National Renewable Energy Lab Jim Hettenhaus c.e.a.Chief Executive Assistance October.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
Economics of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Marie Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Richard Nelson SAEA Annual Meeting Mobile,
Sustainability Overview Laura McCann, on behalf of Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February 23, 2010.
Managing Cover Crops for More Profitable Corn Production Brian Jones Agronomy Extension Agent (540)
Corn Insurance Coverage (2013) Revenue Protection = 92% to 96% of Insured Acres (IA, NE, SD) Source: USDA Risk Management Agency, October 2013 IANESD GRIP/GRP1%0%
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
Acknowledgements: This research was supported by the USDA-ARS Specific Cooperative Agreement Biologically Based Weed Management for Organic Farming Systems.
Matt Ruark Dept. Soil Sci. CORN STOVER REMOVAL AND SOIL FERTILITY.
Soil Conservation. Erosion Two billion tons of U.S. soil lost annually Improved from Five billion tons in 1982 Conservation programs and voluntary conservation.
Cover crop economics: estimating a return on investment Liz Juchems and Jamie Benning.
Background Deriving fuel from biological sources is an idea that has become popular as fossil fuel supplies are diminished, atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Using the Soil Conditioning Index to Assess Management Effects on Soil Carbon USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Quality National Technology.
THE SUPPLY OF CORN STOVER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES Richard G. Nelson 1, Marie E. Walsh 2, and John Sheehan 3 1 Kansas State University 2 University.
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Results of Long-Term Experiments With Conservation Tillage in Austria Introduction On-site and off-site damages of soil erosion cause serious problems.
Technical milestones (Joules Targets): A second set of targets should be set and agreed on for energy crops (not just stover and corn cobs) and possibly.
Agricultural Biomass Resources, Opportunities, and Constraints Presentation to the Western Governors’ Association Clean and Diversified Energy Advisory.
Soil and Environmental Implications of Land Rolling Corn Logan Ahlers and Paul Kivlin College of Agriculture, Food, and Environmental Science University.
SOIL SUITABILITY AND MANAGEMENT FOR POTATO PRODUCTION NextEnd.
Precision Ag in Hay Production Brian Sheffield SOIL 4213.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
An Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Corn Grain Ethanol Industry on the Agricultural Sector Western Agricultural Economics Association.
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics The Potential Values and Cost of Corn Stover Corn Stover Harvest & Transport Seminar Omaha, Nebraska Sept.
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Corn Stover: Economic Considerations Iowa Corn Stover Harvest Meeting Dubuque, Iowa March 6, 2013 Chad Hart.
Soil Fertility Impacting Soil Health Ray Ward Ward Laboratories Inc. Kearney, NE “Guiding Producers.
“Stocklage Plus” Turning roughage into high quality feed By: Rosendahl Farms Seed and Feed – Columbus, NE.
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
Regional Feedstock Partnership: Agricultural Residues & Stover Removal Tool PI’s: Doug Karlen and David J. Muth April 7, OBP Peer Review.
Figure 1. Rodale Farming Systems Trial with rotations. Note the presence of cover crops and amendment in organic systems. Synthetic fertilizer herbicide.
Farmed Smart Sustainable Ag Certification Ty Meyer, Production Ag Manager, Spokane CD March 23, 2015.
Cooperation Needs and Opportunities
Reduced tillage and crop rotation systems with winter wheat, grain sorghum, corn and soybean. Mark M. Claassen and Kraig L. Roozeboom Kansas State University.
Vermont Farmers In 2015 – 16,259 acres of cover crops planted on 1,299 fields throughout Vermont. In 2016 – 25,227 acres of cover crop planted on.
Meeting the Realities of Corn Stover Supply Chain Operation
Economics of Cover Crops
IDENTIFYING FARM EQUIPMENT
John Kovar & Doug Karlen USDA-ARS
Soil Erodibility Prof. Dr. EHSANULLAH. Soil Erodibility Prof. Dr. EHSANULLAH.
Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases
2009 Ag Leader Technology Scholarship
Chad Hart & Bruce Babcock
Maintaining Profitability January 2008
Figure 1. Long term annual precipitation received at Bird City, Kansas
Ribbon Test.
Drainage Water Management
Cover Crops.
Applying an agroecosystem model to inform integrated assessments of climate change mitigation opportunities AM Thomson, RC Izaurralde, GP Kyle, X Zhang,
Carbon Budget of Mature No-till Corn/Soybean Ecosystem in the North Central Region of the United States Carl J. Bernacchi Steven E. Hollinger Illinois.
Using RUSLE2 and the SCI in the Conservation Security Program
Organic Management Systems to Enhance Ecosystem Services
2009 Ag Leader Technology Scholarship
Presentation transcript:

Coupling Sustainable Production Analysis to Field Trial Data Dave Muth, Idaho National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February 23, 2010

Sustainable Resource Access

Limiting factor models exist, We’re building a framework where models can plug together. Technical Approach

Analysis Framework Architecture

Case Study: Ames, IA 25 Acre Experiment Current Analysis Approach: Erosion alone indicates that full removal is sustainable Erosion (T=5.0) (t/acre/yr) Removal RateConv TillNo Till 0% % % Analysis with SOC: Conventional tillage does not provide sustainable resource, limited availability through no till SOC (lbs/acre/yr) Removal RateConv TillNo Till 0% % % Implementing Innovative Management Strategies: Consistent sustainable resource available SOC (lbs/acre/yr) Removal Rate NT w/Rye Cover NT w/Legume + Clover Cover 0% % % Potential value added through other ecosystem services: Carbon sequestration Reduced nutrient runoff Reduced erosion

Utilizing Field Trial Data Through the Residue Removal Tool Sustainable ag residue removal for national resource assessment Implemented in a highly efficient iterative schema

CMZ 4 Rotations managements\CMZ 04\c.Other Local Mgt Records\Biomass Harvest\Continuous corn grain; NT managements\CMZ 04\c.Other Local Mgt Records\Biomass Harvest\Corn, grain; NT, SB NT, WW NT CMZ4 managements\CMZ 04\c.Other Local Mgt Records\Biomass Harvest\corn grain;NT, corn grain;NT, Soybean, wr managements\CMZ 04\c.Other Local Mgt Records\Biomass Harvest\corn grain;NT,anhyd, Soybean, nr, NT Single disk z4 flail shredder/windrower bar rake wheel rake

Modeled Removal Rates - Corn Stover 1)No Stover Removal 2)Grain and Cobs: CCM on combine mix 3)Moderate Removal: Combine residue spreader disengaged, bale windrow left behind 4)Moderately High Removal: Bar rake run over standing stubble, bale windrow 5)High Residue Harvest: Flail shredder cutting standing stubble and collecting flat residue, bale windrow

Adair County, Iowa 212 Kennebec Silt Loam 0% to 2% Slope

Adair County, Iowa Example 212 Kennebec Silt Loam 0% to 2% Slope 10 Year Average Yield: Management + Removal Rate Calculated Erosion SCI OM Subfactor Annual Average Residue (lbs) Corn Grain Yield Continuous corn grain; NT, Harvest grain and cobs Continuous corn grain; NT, High residue Harvest Continuous corn grain; NT, Moderate Residue Harvest Continuous corn grain; NT, Moderately High residue Harvest Continuous corn grain; NT no stover harvest USDA 10 Year Baseline Projection: USDA 10 Year Baseline Projection plus 10%: Continuous corn grain; NT, Harvest grain and cobs Continuous corn grain; NT, High residue Harvest Continuous corn grain; NT, Moderate Residue Harvest Continuous corn grain; NT, Moderately High residue Harvest Continuous corn grain; NT no stover harvest Continuous corn grain; NT, Harvest grain and cobs Continuous corn grain; NT, High residue Harvest Continuous corn grain; NT, Moderate Residue Harvest Continuous corn grain; NT,Moderately High residue Harvest Continuous corn grain;NT no stover harvest

Results For RP Field Trial Counties FIPSCountyState Acres in Rotation Annual Residue (lbs) Annual Residue (tons) Annual Residue (tons/acre) Corn Yield Ret. Coeff IA015Boone CountyIowa ,351,500, , MN149Stevens CountyMinnesota ,155, , NE155 Saunders CountyNebraska ,977, , PA081 Lycoming CountyPennsylvania ,504,500 7, SC041Florence County South Carolina ,318,600 30, SD011 Brookings CountySouth Dakota ,366, ,

Other Notes and Future Plans National Assessment capabilities will be part of the core tool over the next few months Quantitative carbon will brought online and used to revise the national runs over the next year DAYCENT developers joining the team for quantitative carbon modeling Significant I-Farm enhancements will be utilized within the tool over the next 6-9 months Discussions and planning on moving sub-field will ramp up over the next year