Space Transportation Operations Working Group (STOWG) Report to COMSTAC October 7, 2010 Debra Facktor Lepore Acting Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NASA Commercial Crew Program COMSTAC May 2011 Page 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM COMSTAC May 2011 E. Mango Commercial.
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration On-Orbit Debris Mitigation Methods for Upper Stages COMSTAC: Space Transportation Operations Working Group and Risk Management.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 7 – Medical Guidance for Crew & Spaceflight.
Overview Historical Database Tasking Status Findings to date
Page 0 COMSTAC RLV Task Force on Training RLV TASK FORCE ON TRAINING May 15, 2008 Maurice Kennedy.
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council January 30, 2012 Washington D.C
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Debra Facktor Lepore, STOWG Chair Date: October 14, 2011 Report.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Debra Facktor Lepore, STOWG Chair Date: May 11, 2011 Report to.
International Strategy FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Overview August 16, 2011 Introduction to the FAA Center of Excellence for Commercial Space Transportation August.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Orbital Debris 10 June, 2015 Symposium for the Small.
RLV Working Group Reusable Launch Vehicles Working Group Presentation to the COMSTAC 11 October 2007 Michael S. Kelly, Chairman.
The Draft SADC Annex on Trade in Services UNCTAD Secretariat Sub-regional Conference on Improving Industrial Performance and Promoting Employment in SADC.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 5 – Aborts and Abort Systems. December.
Joanna Fiedler Enlargement and Neighbouring Countries Unit DG Environment European Commission REReP → RENA Vision of the European Commission PEIP Regional.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 8 – Communications and Commanding Best.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Office of Commercial Space Transportation FAA/AST NASA Insurance Task Report Pam Underwood Technical Advisor Kennedy Space Center Operations Office May.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 6 – Fault Tolerance, Margin and Reliability.
Federal Aviation Administration May 10-11, 2012 AST / COMSTAC Issue Coordination COMSTAC Meetings Dr. George Nield Associate Administrator FAA Office of.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
AST Research and Development Activities COMSTAC Launch Operations and Support Working Group Chuck Larsen October 24, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Debra Facktor Lepore, OWG Chair Date: May 11, 2012 Report to.
CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.
1 Federal Aviation Administration COE CST Research Road Mapping Workshop #2 August 16, 2011 Research 1 Hierarchy 1 Space Traffic Management and Operations.
1 COMSTAC RLV Working Group Meeting Report Presentation to the COMSTAC Michael S. Kelly Chairman 20 May 2004.
2006 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2006 Lisa Hague COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group Cover art by John Sloan/FAA.
Presented to: COMSTAC RLV Working Group By: Ken Wong, Licensing and Safety Division Manager Date: May 15, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Federal.
SVDM ConOps 18 May 2010 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Space Vehicle Debris Threat Management ConOps Presentation to COMSTAC Space Transportation.
State EE/RE Policy Best Practices & Next-Generation Innovations: September Meeting Feedback on overall work plan and phasing of policies September 25,
Presented to: COMSTAC By: George Whitesides, RLV Working Group Chair Date: October 30, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration.
5/9/02 1 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Federal Government DoD DoC DoT NASA State Government NCSS Industry University Detailed.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Jim Muncy on behalf of Jeff Greason, RLV Working Group Deputy.
Industry Comments to Commercial Space Transportation Reusable Launch Vehicle Operations & Maintenance Guidelines Presented to the COMSTAC RLV Working Group.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon #3 – Types of Requirements and Guidance.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
COMSTAC STOWG Commercial Aerospaceports Licensing and Development.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Overview May 11, 2011 Introduction to the FAA Center of Excellence for Commercial Space Transportation May 11,
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
2006 Commercial GSO Forecast Introduction Lisa Hague COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group October 26, 2005.
Commercial Space Transportation Research and Development Program COMSTAC RLV Working Group Chuck Larsen October 10, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Overview Presentation Federal Aviation Administration Introduction to the FAA Center of Excellence for Commercial.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA AST Overview Presentation Federal Aviation Administration Overview of the Federal Aviation Administration.
COMSTAC Launch Operations Support Working Group May 17, 2007 Jim Ball Spaceport Development Manager NASA Kennedy Space Center Kennedy Space Center Spaceport.
Reusable Launch Vehicle Working Group Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee Presented to COMSTAC Meeting George Whitesides, RLVWG Chairman.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Human Spaceflight Guidelines Update COMSTAC, Systems.
Lessons Learned Update Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Michael S. Kelly, Chief Engineer Date: May 3013.
Guide to the Identification of Safety-Critical Hardware Items for RLV Developers COMSTAC RLV Working Group Meeting Washington D.C. 25 May 2005.
COMSTAC Systems Working Group Summary 10 October 2012.
COMSTAC STOWG Commercial Spaceport Licensing Review: Survey Results, White Paper Summary, and Recommendations May 10, 2012.
Safety & Health Considerations in Accommodating Commercial Activties David Loyd, JSC Safety & Test Operations 2013 NASA Safety Directors & Occupational.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA AST Presentation at ESIL-1 October 26, 2011 List of Recent Papers 2011 Overview of the FAA Center of Excellence for.
© 2013 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. The Value Review.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Bretton Alexander, RLV Working Group Chair Date: May 11, 2011.
Federal Aviation Administration AST International Outreach Update and UN COPUOS Long Term Sustainability of Outer Space – Expert Group B (Debris) John.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon #2 – FAA Oversight September 18th, 2012.
Space Operations and the National Airspace System 9 October 2012 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Overview of Space Operations and the National Airspace.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Debra Facktor Lepore, Acting Chair, Space Transportation Operations.
FAA AST Office of Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Update on Commercial Human Spaceflight Telecons COMSTAC Systems Working.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
20 May 2009 Bob Davis Space Transportation Operations Working Group (STOWG) Report.
Implementing SMS in Civil Aviation: the Canadian Perspective
Stakeholder consultations
Space Traffic Management
Commercial Space Transportation Development of
Introduction Fact-Finding Meeting Proposal Meeting
Wealth Management Meeting Asset Management Execution
Marketing Planning Meeting Periodic Marketing Review
Presentation transcript:

Space Transportation Operations Working Group (STOWG) Report to COMSTAC October 7, 2010 Debra Facktor Lepore Acting Chair

Actions since May 2010 Held 2 Telecons (July 21 and September 17) Gathered input on FAA/AST report “CONOPS on Global Space Vehicle Debris Threat Management” Brainstormed top issues of space transportation operations and need to develop a framework that can be used to capture integrated operations 2

3 WG Meeting Agenda – Oct 6, 2010 CONOPS Report on Global Space Debris  Continuation of Discussion & Next Steps Orbital Debris Compliance  What if voluntary standards become required? Top 5 Issues and Framework for STOWG Open Discussion

CONOPS for Global Space Vehicle Debris Threat Management Draft CONOPS report presented to STOWG in May 2010; FAA/AST requested inputs Complex and “technically dense” report, requires significant attention to read Subset of broader CONOPS for overall space vehicle operations, originally developed in 2004 (see FAA/AST website) Proposed CONOPS based on “no closure of airspace” during space vehicle launch and reentry and taking fast and appropriate action in the airspace only when a confirmed anomaly occurs 4

CONOPS Discussion How to track vehicles above the airspace How did X-37 handle reentry procedures Balance of focus on “failure and destruction” vs “normal nominal” operations (and what does that mean) STOWG needs more views from operators, especially of new operators No solution yet; ongoing dialogue still needed 5

Recommended Updates for Next Draft of CONOPS Report Clearly express the context of this CONOPS as a subset within other CONOPS Consider the following issues  Orbital vs suborbital vehicles  Launch breakup vs reentry breakup  Repeatability of operations  Frequency of operations  Requirements for special equipment onboard new vehicles  Cost and benefits of increased flexibility of not closing the airspace vs the price of that flexibility  Liability insurance 6

Action #1 Continue to reach out to various associations whose members would be interested in this report Hold quarterly STOWG telecons, with FAA/AST representatives present, to create a mechanism for open discussion between industry and government 7

Orbital Debris Compliance In October 2009, joint STOWG / Risk Management WG meeting addressed orbital debris  See presentations on FAA/AST website from Nick Johnson (NASA JSC) and Elizabeth Gonzales FAA/AST posed 5 questions to industry, broadly focused on what are the costs (economic, business, opportunity, competitive, etc) of complying with voluntary orbital debris standards and what would the costs/effect be if these standards become required  Compliance for post-mission disposal  Cost to maneuver upper stage to an orbit with 25-year lifetime  Cost to move upper stage to storage orbit  Cost to perform controlled deorbit  Impact of eliminating/minimizing debris <5mm that stays on orbit more than 25 years 8

Discussion Input received to date is anecdotal:  No cost (doesn’t apply to suborbital vehicle)  $1M (cost of adding a solid rocket motor)  Cost already included in price of a launch Conducting more on-orbit maneuvers impacts launch performance and thus customer/market share Will there be a level playing field with foreign launchers New space policy makes waivers harder to get Compliance with international treaties important, but more interesting is creating incentive for “good behavior” to stop creating more debris Challenge to get more meaningful input, without disclosing proprietary information in a public forum, and how to measure the data if it could be collected 9

Action #2 Re-pose the 5 questions with a cover sheet explaining the context of the request and the potential effect  No plan to levy a new regulation, but need to prepare for this eventuality and/or the international community moving toward more enforceable standards and regulations Query the launch vehicle operators for their reponses Consider whether this is a task for the new Center of Excellence, e.g., development of cost model and analysis of economic data, and whether launch vehicle operators would be willing to share proprietary data to make the analysis and results meaningful 10

Top 5 Issues for STOWG – From May Commonality/standards/definitions for FAA licensed operations of launch sites –Human –Space vehicle (Spacecraft, capsules, and LV) –Licensing –Spaceports 2. Airspace management –Safety –Integration into current and NextGen airspace –Situational awareness –Reentry Debris (immediate notification) –Orbital Debris (upper stages) 3. Operations –Ground operations –Launch license (to include suborbital) –In-space operations: spaceflight participant/passenger, fuel depot, etc –Return/recovery 4. Market status & capability 11

Proposed Framework for Integrated Space Operations Discussed draft approach to create a framework for the development of a systems-based, integrated operations framework for suborbital and orbital commercial spaceflight Need for a “systems of systems” approach for operations NextGen is also looking at systems of systems – how do space operations fit into that? Work in progress 12

Action #3 Distribute draft framework for review, solicit feedback, discuss in the next STOWG telecon 13

Open Discussion Social problem of orbital debris  National Park / International Park analogy  Removing debris more expensive than not creating it Next Gen  How space vehicles fit into the evolving system; space industry needs to understand this system to put future CONOPS into context  What is the cost of complying and equipping for NextGen? FAA/AST role in commercial “human rating” process at NASA 14

Wrap-Up Recommend a specialized briefing on NextGen to STOWG and full COMSTAC in May 2011  Update on CONOPS, issues for industry, etc (not a report on process) Schedule series of telecons (quarterly) to facilitate open dialogue on:  CONOPS (launch/reentry and others)  Orbital debris compliance  Framework for integrated space operations  Current events that may affect space operations Full COMSTAC members and other WG members welcome to participate Join the STOWG distribution list! 15