Extremely Fast Coronal Mass Ejection on 23 July 2012 1 Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland,20723, USA 2 NOAA Space Weather.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 9 Prominences and Filaments Filaments are formed in magnetic loops that hold relatively cool, dense gas suspended above the surface of the Sun,"
Advertisements

Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, USTC The Deflection of 2008 September 13 CME in Heliosphere Space ISEST, Hvar, Croatia,2013 June 17 Collaborators:
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Inner Source Pickup Ions Pran Mukherjee. Outline Introduction Current theories and work Addition of new velocity components Summary Questions.
Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
CISM SEP Modeling Background The major SEP events come from the CME-generated coronal and interplanetary shock(s) These “gradual”events can have a “prompt”
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
Influence of Time-dependent Processes and Background Magnetic Field on Shock Properties N. Lugaz, I. Roussev and C. Downs Institute for Astronomy Igor.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Characterization of Coronal Mass Ejection Deflection using Coronagraph Image Sequences Jenna L. Zink, GMU Undergraduate Research Scholars Program, Rebekah.
Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.
High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Modeling Coronal Acceleration of Solar Energetic Protons K. A. Kozarev, R. M. Evans, N. A. Schwadron, M. A. Dayeh, M. Opher, K. E. Korreck NESSC Meeting,
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
Solar Energetic Particle Events: An Overview Christina Cohen Caltech.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
C. J. Joyce, 1 N. A. Schwadron, 1 L. W. Townsend, 2 R. A. Mewaldt, 3 C. M. S. Cohen, 3 T. T. von Rosenvinge, 4 A. W. Case, 5 H. E. Spence, 1 J. K. Wilson,
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
1 Acceleration and Deceleration of Flare/Coronal Mass Ejection Induced Shocks S.T. Wu 1, C.-C. Wu 2, Aihua Wang 1, and K. Liou 3 1 CSPAR, University of.
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
1 SEP “Campaign Events” for SHINE 2003 Question: Can we identify solar/interplanetary factors that drive SEP spectral and compositional variability at.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
1 University of California, San Diego, U.S.A., 2 NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center, U.S.A., 3 George Mason University, U.S.A., 4 Naval Research Laboratory,
C. J. Joyce, 1 N. A. Schwadron, 1 L. W. Townsend, 2 R. A. Mewaldt, 3 C. M. S. Cohen, 3 T. T. von Rosenvinge, 4 A. W. Case, 5 H. E. Spence, 1 J. K. Wilson,
Improving Space Weather Forecasts Using Coronagraph Data S.P. Plunkett 1, A. Vourlidas 1, D.R. McMullin 2, K. Battams 3, R.C. Colaninno 4 1 Naval Research.
Modeling of CME-driven Shock propagation with ENLIL simulations using flux-rope and cone-model inputs Using observations from STEREO/SECCHI and SOHO/LASCO,
A shock is a discontinuity separating two different regimes in a continuous media. –Shocks form when velocities exceed the signal speed in the medium.
Xie – STEREO SWG – Dublin – March 2010 Low Mass Coronal Mass Ejections Missed by STEREO A/B or LASCO and Associated ICMEs H. Xie 1,2, O. C. St. Cyr 2,
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Multi-Spacecraft Observation of Compressional Mode ULF Waves Excitation and Relativistic Electron Acceleration X. Shao 1, L. C. Tan 1, A. S. Sharma 1,
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
Study of the April 20, 2007 CME-Comet interaction event with an MHD model Y. D. Jia 1, C. T. Russell 1, W. B. Manchester 2, K. C. Hansen 2, A. Vourlidas.
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
ENLIL Modeling for the interaction event: Effect of Interacting CMEs on SEP Intensity NASA/GSFC H. Xie, N. Gopalswamy, P. Makela, S. Yashiro.
Solar Wind Helium Abundance and the Minimum Speed of the Solar Wind
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
Solar Origins of the October November 2003 Extreme Events N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC SHINE 2004 WG3 Thursday, June 1 Big Sky, Montana Photo.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
Global coronal seismology and EIT waves Istvan Ballai SP 2 RC, University of Sheffield, UK.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
A 3D-MHD Model Interface Using Interplanetary Scintillation (IPS) Observations B.V. Jackson 1, H.-S. Yu 1, P.P. Hick 1, A. Buffington 1, D. Odstrcil 2,
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations Verónica Ontiveros National University of Mexico, MEXICO George Mason University,USA Angelos Vourlidas Naval.
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
Y. C.-M. Liu, M. Opher, O. Cohen P.C.Liewer and T.I.Gombosi
2014SWW - S9 3D Reconstruction of IPS Remote-sensing Data: Global Solar Wind Boundaries for Driving 3D-MHD Models Hsiu-Shan Yu1, B.V. Jackson1, P.P. Hick1,
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Solar Flare Energy Partition into Energetic Particle Acceleration
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
The Bow Shock and Magnetosheath
Introduction to Space Weather
Presentation transcript:

Extremely Fast Coronal Mass Ejection on 23 July Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland,20723, USA 2 NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (Ret.), Boulder, CO, 80305, USA 3 Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375, USA 4 CSPAR, University of Alabama, Huntsville, Alabama, 35899, USA 5 Exploration Physics International, Inc., Huntsville, Alabama,35806, USA 6 NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, USA AOGS-AGU(WPGM), Singapore, August 13-17, 2012 K. Liou 1, M. Dryer 2, C.-C. Wu 3, S. T. Wu 4, N. Rich 3, S. Plunkett 3, L. Simpson 3, C. D. Fry 5, and K. Schenk 6 ST21-A011

The July 23, 2012 CME Event: Why It's Important? 1) The Sun has been active for a few years; however, the Earth is still “quiet” geomagnetically 2) This CME Initiated on the Sun's back side: no warning sign (no flare observed at the Earth); can pose danger to spacecraft 3) Extremely fast: CME-driven shock arrived at STEREO-A in ~20 h (typical 2-3 days, ~19h for the Halloween 2003 event) 4) Extremely large magnetic cloud field

Positions of STEREO A & B on Heliographic (HEEQ) longitude Heliographic (HEEQ) latitude From NASA STEREO SCIENCE CENTER STEREO-B Earth STEREO-A

STEREO OBSERVATIONS STEREO-A COR2 Halo CME STEREO-B COR2

OBSERVATION

6 Global Three-dimensional MHD simulation Hakamada-Akasofu-Fry code (HAFv.2) [Fry et al., 2001] : simulating data from the Sun (2.5 solar radii, Rs) to 0.08 AU (18 Rs). A fully three-dimensional (3D), time-dependent magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation code [Han et al., 1988; Detman et al., 1991, 2006] : simulating data from 0.08 AU (18 Rs) to > 1 AU Simulation model: HAF+3DMHD (H3DMHD) [Wu et al., JGR, 112,A09104, 2007; Adv. Space Rev., 40, 1827, 2007]

7 Coordinates - Sun-centered spherical coordinate system (r, θ, φ) -87.5° ≤ θ ≤ 87.5° 0° ≤ ϕ ≤ 360° 2.5 R s ≤ r ≤ 18 R s (HAF) & 18 R s ≤ r ≤ 345 R s (MHD) Earth at (r, θ, ϕ ) = (215 R s, 0°, 0°) in the ecliptic plane Uniform grids and o pen boundary condition > Uniform grid step size ∆r = 3 R s, ∆θ = 5° and ∆ ϕ = 5° > θ = ±87.5° (no reflective disturbances) Simulation Domain Simulation procedure > Pre-event steady state solar wind based on solar magnetic maps > Apply a Gaussian velocity pulse at the flare site at r = 2.5 R SUN to drive the > CME (free parameters: the peak and the width of the pulse)

8 Governing Equations Conservation of mass Conservation of energy* Conservation of momentum Induction equation In conservation of energy: we ignored the Coriolis force, Joule heating, thermal conduction, and viscous items. In the equations, D/Dt denotes the total derivative, ρ is the mass density, V is the velocity of the flow, p is the gas pressure, B is the magnetic field, e is the internal energy per unit mass (e = p/(γ-1)ρ), GM(r) is solar gravitational force, and γ is the specific heat ratio. For this research, we applied an adiabatic gas assumption (i.e.,γ =5/3).

Initial speed of Shock/CME from COR2-A (STEREO-A) Bottom: 3606 km/s Center: 2964 km/s Averages: ~3285 km/s This simulation: V peak = 3100 km/s Δ τ = 3.5 hours

H3DMHD Simulation Results

Results of H3DMHD in situ solar wind at 1 AU ~2300UT on SHOCK arrived at STEREO-A ~1000UT on SHOCK arrived at STEREO-B ~2300UT on SHOCK arrived at ACE It takes ~18 hours for Shock propagating from Sun to STEREO-A It takes ~42 hours for shock propagating from the Sun to the Earth

STEREO-A in situ solar wind at 1 AU STEREO-B in situ solar wind at 1 AU H3DMHD

STEREO-B in situ solar wind at 1 AU Density

15 Discussion The CME on July is extremely fast, the fastest CME in cycle 24 so far The initial speed of the CME (at 2.5 solar radii) could exceed 3000 km/s > What would be the storm size if the CME hit the Earth head on? For this event B z min ~ -50 nT (Dst) p = ×B z min (nT) ~ -392 nT [Wu & Lepping, 2005] (Dst) p = ×B s (nT) ~ -365 nT [Bakare & Chukwuma, 2010] For the Halloween event: Dst min = -383 nT > Magnetic field at 1 AU (STEREO-A) is largest (~100 nT) |B| ~80 nT for the Halloween event.

Fe MeV/n CNO 7-10 MeV/n 07/16 07/18 07/20 07/22 07/24 07/26 ~06 UT 04 UT 00 UT

SpacecraftCNO SEP Onset hh UT dd/mm/yy Delay (hr) CNO Magnitude (1/cm2-s-sr-MeV/n.) STEREO-A04 UT 07/23/121~10 (10 4 inc.) STEREO-B00 UT 07/24/1221~10 -3 (10 inc.) ACE06 UT 07/23/122~3x10 -4 (30 inc.) Some possibilities: 1) SEP source (shock)-STEREO connection 2) Shock strength weaken away from the CME nose 3) Efficiency of shock type (parallel and perpendicular)

SEP Source Connection Assume Parker Spiral At 04 UT, the CME was inside of 20 Rs 5 hours after the onset (03 UT), the CME had expanded radially and azimuthally and covered ~120° E and W of the CME onset At 08 UT, the CME had expanded over the Earth's solar foot point, consistent with the SEP observations at ACE At 12 UT, the CME and the STEREO-B are well connected but no SEP was observed until 12 hours later

Shock Strength Shock nose 50° E of shock Fast shock Mach no. Distance from Sun (R SUN ) Fast shock Mach no. is larger at the shock nose (9-12) than at the shock flank (5-9) No information about the shock within 18 Rs because of the limitation of the HAF code (no Temperature) Beyond 18 R SUN, shock Mach number decreases with the distance from the Sun, implying that the shock reached its maximum strength with 18 R SUN. 06 UT 23/07

The July 23 CME event produced a large SEP event with MeV Helium flux 30 times larger than those associated with the Halloween 2003 epoch Comparison with the Halloween CME

21 Conclusions We have demonstrated that H3DMHD is capable of simulating extremely fast CMEs with speed > 3000 km/s > Good timing and magnitude match in total B and V but not n > Lack of solar wind density jump at STEREO-A at shock? The CME-associated magnetic field at 1 AU is the largest (|B| ~100 nT) in record Our preliminary and qualitative study of the SEP events at multiple spacecraft locations suggests: – Largest SEP fluxes are magnetically connected to the nose of the CME-driven shock – Azimuthal expansion of the CME caney to understand the SEP onset Large solar events do exist when no one is looking; Initiation location of CMEs is an important factor that determines geomagnetic activity Dst min vs. Longitude has a few source on backside. Required high model velocity input suggests the need for flare energy output evaluation for SWx objectives

THE END

45º West of source location 2º West of source location 50º East of source location Background speed is faster in the west than in the nose

C fast = Speed of Fast Wave Δt = t 2 - t 1 Δr = r 2 - r 1 V shock = Δr/Δt M fast-shock = |V shock -V solar-wind |/C fast t = t 1 t = t 2 Wave Tracing Method (Wu et al., 1996)

45º West of source location 2º West of source location 50º East of source location

Comparison with the Halloween CME The July 23 CME event produced a large SEP event with MeV helium fluxes 30 times larger than those associated with the Halloween epoch Peak ~ DOY of 2003