Winni Decking XFEL Beam Collimation and Switchyard Review Introduction FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group 3.12.2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

FLASH Simulations SASE Killer Igor Zagorodnov S2E Meeting DESY 24 June 2014.
1 Optimal focusing lattice for XFEL undulators: Numerical simulations Vitali Khachatryan, Artur Tarloyan CANDLE, DESY/MPY
W. Decking, B. Faatz, C. Gruen, M. Hϋning, J. Kahl, J. Klute, K. Mϋller, F. Obier, J. Wortmann FEL Beam Dynamics Meeting, Flat Top Pulser for.
Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics for Diagnostic Section BC1 in the European XFEL.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
IWBS 2004 Winni DeckingWinni Decking Beam Stability Challenges at the European XFEL Winfried Decking DESY, Hamburg, Germany IWBS 2004.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Linear Collider Machine Protection Issues M. Palmer Injection System Injector Damping Rings Bunch Compressor and Transfer Sections Main LINAC Beam Delivery.
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
9/22/04J. Welch, LCLS Commissioning Worskhop, SLAC LCLS Commissioning Schedule and Startup Plan LCLS Commissioning Schedule and Startup Plan.
Gamma Beam Systems a simple introduction. Purpose of the machine Deliver a high performance photon beam: Variable energy Highly polarized High intensity.
Salzau M. Körfer, DESY 1 Layout and Functionality of Collimator System Purpose of the Collimator System Layout Sub-Systems Transversal/ Energy.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
TTF2 Start-to-End Simulations Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Zeuthen, 22 Jan 2004.
XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics Layout of the Diagnostic Sections.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Acceleration Overview J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory January 8, 2014.
Resistive Effects in XFEL Kicker Andranik Tsakanian XFEL Beam Dynamic Meeting 17 Dec 2007.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
Parameter [units]Tune-up beam"low" chargehigh currenthigh charge Kin. injection energy [MeV]2.0 – Maximum beam energy [MeV]16 –
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Beam losses in the CLIC drive beam: specification of acceptable level and how to handle them ACE Michael Jonker.
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
E-XFEL Status and First Beam Results
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Paul Scherrer Institut
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
Accelerator Layout and Parameters
Revised Commissioning Strategy
LCLS Linac Update Brief Overview L1 & BC1 Progress LTU & E-Dump Status Continuing Resolution Impact.
XFEL Beam Collimation and Switchyard Review Beam Switchyard
Injector Beam Line Optics
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
Simulation Calculations
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
LCLS Linac Overview E. Bong Lehman Review August 10, 2004
Linac (WBS 1.2.2) Vinod Bharadwaj April 23, 2002
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
European XFEL Status Winni Decking, DESY
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Coupler Effects in High Energy Part of XFEL Linac
Review of the European XFEL Bunch Compression System: Introduction and Concept Torsten Limberg.
XFEL Beam Dynamics Activity at CANDLE
XFEL Component Database
Specifications for the XFEL Beam Switchyard Kickers
Proposal for quadrupole families
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Laser Und XFEL.EU Experiment
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Presentation transcript:

Winni Decking XFEL Beam Collimation and Switchyard Review Introduction FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group

Winni Decking Review Charge Review status of various involved work-packages Find (and resolve) misunderstandings and misinformation Openly discuss unresolved topics, specifications, etc. Agree on time line

Winni Decking Collimation and Switchyard Collimation Distribution Septa Diagnostics and Feedback Distribution Kickers Undulators SASE 1 SASE 2

Winni Decking XS1 Top View

Winni Decking Boundary Conditions Power and cooling infrastructure located in building/shaft XS1 (Osdorfer Born site) Start point of section after linac, 1650 m from gun If only 84 modules in main linac, warm section of 200 m before Energies: –6 GeV far future CW option –17.5 GeV nominal operation –25 GeVmaximum envisioned energy range Energy bandwith: –± 1.5 % top quality acceptance –± 2.5 % transport acceptance

Winni Decking Functionality Beam Collimation –emergency beam stop –halo collimation Transverse and energy feedback –fix launch conditions within bunch train Beam Switchyard –distribute bunches within train to beam dump, SASE2, SASE1 and (far future) additional FELs

Winni Decking Basic Parameters for Beam Line Layout Energy range 6 – 25 GeV Operating range for magnets, diagnostics Emittance at end of linac –Nominal:   = 1.4e-6 m (projected) –Smallest:   = 0.8e-6 m (projected) Apertures, machine protection, … Energy spread –Bunch train : 0% - ± 1.5% –Single bunch uncorrelated: 2.5 MeV RMS (= % at 20 GeV) –Single bunch correlated: 0% % Apertures, beam sizes, chromatic correction, … Bunch charge –?? nC to 1 nC Machine protection, diagnostics

Winni Decking Agenda 14:00-15:30 Section Overview – Winni Decking Collimation Section – Nina Golubeva, Vladimir Balandin Beam Switchyard – Winni Decking Installation, Tunnel Layout – Norbert Meyners Beam Distribution Kicker – Frank Obier Septum Magnets – Bernie Krause, Sasha Petrov 15:45-16:45 Vacuum System – Torsten Wohlenberg Impedance Budget – Igor Zagorodnov Diagnostics, Fast Transverse Feedback - Winni Decking