Progress Update 1. Achievement Trends Change in % Proficient/Advanced.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Advisory Group Members Montina Jones, Director of Urban Schools Sandy Roach, Magnet Supervisor Donna Howard, Principal Coach Brenda Reliford, Maynard.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
New DC OSSE ESEA Accountability. DC OSSE ESEA Accountability Classification Overview I. DC OSSE Accountability System II. Classification of Schools III.
OCTOBER Accountability Updates. Annual Measurable Objectives Achievement AMOs Achievement Gap Closure AMOs Subgroup Improvement All AMOs are.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Grape Creek Report Card Grape Creek Intermediate School Robin Graham Erica Crawford Dee Ann Shelton Carol Anderson.
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
Data Analysis & Disproportionality Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
KCS Achievement Data. District-wide Achievement District Achievement  Achievement plots will be included for the following subjects  Algebra I  Algebra.
Welcome and Introductions H.O.B. – Helping Our students “BE” successful!
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
December 15, 2014 ESEA Flexibility Analysis. The flex analysis was designed to examine the characteristics of schools identified by each SEA’s differentiated.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education October 11, 2011.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Accountability Scorecards Top to Bottom Ranking February 2016.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Every Student Succeeds Act in Tennessee May 21, 2016 Dr. Candice McQueen | Commissioner.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
2015 Data and AMO Presentation
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
State and Federal Accountability Overview
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Presentation transcript:

Progress Update 1

Achievement Trends

Change in % Proficient/Advanced

2015 TVAAS Grades 4 to 8

2015 TVAAS English I

2015 TVAAS English II

2015 TVAAS English III

2015 TVAAS Algebra I

2015 TVAAS Algebra II

2015 TVAAS Biology I

2015 TVAAS Chemistry I

Accountability

Four Major Tests for Accountability Under Two Major Categories Achievement Category – Achievement AMO Test – Must meet the majority of Achievement AMOs (outright or via a safe harbor) – Subject Improvement Test – Improvement in the percent Proficient or Advanced in at least half of the subjects Gap Closure Category – Gap Closure AMO Test – Must meet the majority of Gap Closure AMOs (outright or via a safe harbor) – Subgroup Improvement Test - Improvement in the percent Proficient or Advanced in at least half of the subjects for every demographic category

Achievement AMO Test 11/11 = Met

Subject Aggregate Improvement Test 9/11 = Met

Achievement Status

Gap Closure AMO Test 9/16 = MET

Subgroup Improvement Test 9/9 = Met

Gap Status

Final Determination SY1415

EXEMPLARY!

Reward Schools Performance Farragut High School Gap Creek Elementary Sequoyah Elementary Progress Carter High School Carter Middle School Copper Ridge Elementary

Priority School Status Priority Schools cannot be taken over into the Achievement School District (ASD) if they achieve a composite 4 or 5 on TVAAS – Green Academy (TVAAS = 4) – Lonsdale (TVAAS = 4)(Priority-Improving) – Sarah Moore Greene (TVAAS = 4) – Vine Middle School (TVAAS = 5)

Focus School Update 9 Focus Schools: – Bonny Kate Elementary – Central High School – Chilhowee Intermediate – South Doyle High School – Improving Gap Closure – South Doyle Middle School – Fountain City Elementary – Improving Gap Closure – Hardin Valley Elementary - Exit – Mooreland Heights Elementary – West Hills Elementary

Year End Discipline Data 28

Count of High School ISS and OSS Disciplinary Infractions Reports the count of all disciplinary infractions by high school students that resulted in either an in school (ISS) or out of school (OSS) suspension. 29

Count of Middle School ISS and OSS Disciplinary Infractions Represents the count of all disciplinary infractions by middle school students that resulted in either an in school (ISS) or out of school (OSS) suspension. 30

Count of High School OSS Discipline Infractions by Length of Suspension The count of all high school discipline infractions resulting in out of school suspensions, disaggregated into suspensions of from 0 – 3 days, days, 11 – 30 days, or more than 30 days in length. 31

Count of Middle School OSS Discipline Infractions by Length of Suspension The count of all middle school discipline infractions resulting in out of school suspensions, disaggregated into suspensions of from 0 – 3 days, days, 11 – 30 days, or more than 30 days in length. 32

Count of Middle and High School OSS Infractions by the Range of Suspension Days Per Infraction This chart displays the number of suspensions of varying lengths received by Black/African American, Hispanic, and White students in middle and high school combined. These are counts of individual infractions that resulted in suspension and do not represent counts of unique students. The colored sections of the bars are labeled with the count of infractions in each category. The size of the colored sections also indicate the % of the total that type of suspension makes up. 33

Count of Middle and High School OSS Infractions for Students with Disabilities by Range of Suspension Days Per Infraction This chart displays the number of suspensions of varying lengths received by middle and high school students with (SWD) and without (SWOD) disabilities. These are counts of individual infractions that resulted in suspension and do not represent counts of unique students. The colored sections of the bars are labeled with the count of infractions in each category. The size of the colored sections also indicate the % of the total that type of suspension makes up. 34

Percentage of High School Students Suspended Out of School This chart displays the percentage of high school students of a given ethnicity who were suspended out of school one or more days during the school year. These percentages represent unique students who were suspended and not counts of all infractions that resulted in suspension. 35

High School Percentage of Students at Each School Suspended Out of School The percentage of high school students of a given ethnicity at each high school who received at least one out of school suspension for the school year. 36

Percentage Middle School Students Suspended Out of School This chart displays the percentage of middle school students of a given ethnicity who were suspended out of school one or more days during the school year. These percentages represent unique students who were suspended and not counts of all infractions that resulted in suspension. 37

Percentage of Middle School Students Suspended Out of School The percentage of middle school students of a given ethnicity at each high school suspended out of school one or more days for the school year. 38

Percentage of High School Students with Disabilities Suspended Out of School The percentage of all high school students with disabilities (SWD) and without disabilities (SWOD) suspended out of school one or more days. 39

Percentage of Middle School Students with Disabilities Suspended Out of School The percentage of all middle school students with disabilities (SWD) and without disabilities (SWOD) suspended out of school one or more days. 40

Percentage of Middle School Students with Disabilities Suspended Out of School The percentage of middle school students with disabilities (SWD) and without disabilities (SWOD) suspended out of school one or more days for the school year. 41

Percentage of Economically Disadvantaged High School Students Suspended Out of School The percentage of all economically disadvantaged (ED) and non-economically disadvantaged (Non-ED) students suspended out of school for one or more days during the school year. ED status is determined by eligibility for free or reduced lunch. 42

Percentage of Economically Disadvantaged High School Students Suspended Out of School The percentage of all economically disadvantaged (ED) and non-economically disadvantaged (Non-ED) students suspended out of school for one or more days during the school year. ED status is determined by eligibility for free or reduced lunch. 43

Percentage of Economically Disadvantaged Middle School Students Suspended Out of School The percentage of all economically disadvantaged (ED) and non-economically disadvantaged (Non-ED) middle school students suspended out of school for one or more days during the school year. ED status is determined by eligibility for free or reduced lunch. 44

Percentage of Economically Disadvantaged Middle School Students Suspended Out of School The percentage of all economically disadvantaged (ED) and non-economically disadvantaged (Non-ED) students at each middle school suspended out of school for one or more days during the school year. ED status is determined by eligibility for free or reduced lunch. 45

Percentage of ED and Non-ED Students Suspended Out of School by Race/Ethnicity Subgroup The chart above disaggregates the percentage of economically disadvantaged and non- economically disadvantaged students for Black/African American, Hispanic, and White race/ethnicity subgroups. The bars outlined in red indicate ED status. The % indicates the percentage of each group suspended out of school for one or more days during the school year.

Percentage of High School ELL Students Suspended Out of School Percentage of high school English Language Learners (ELL) suspended out of school for one or more days during the school year. ELL is also known as Limited English Proficiency (LEP). ELL includes students who are participating in ELL programs, transitioning out of ELL programs, or who qualified but waived participation. 47

Percentage of Middle School ELL Students Suspended Out of School Percentage of middle school English Language Learners (ELL) suspended out of school for one or more days during the school year. ELL is also known as Limited English Proficiency (LEP). ELL includes students who are participating in ELL programs, transitioning out of ELL programs, or who qualified but waived participation. 48

Percentage ELL Students Suspend Out of School* *School level suspension % only reported for school with 30 or more ELL students. Percentage of English Language Learners (ELL) suspended out of school for one or more days during the school year. ELL is also known as Limited English Proficiency (LEP). ELL includes students who are participating in ELL programs, transitioning out of ELL programs, or who qualified but waived participation. 49

Percentage of Middle and High School Students Suspended Out of School by Gender The percentage of students of each gender who have been suspended out of school for one or more days during the school year. 50

Percentage of Middle and High School Students Suspended Out of School by Gender and Race/Ethnicity The percentage of middle and high school students suspended out of school for one or more days disaggregated by gender and race/ethnicity. 51

Percentage of Middle and High School Students Suspended Out of School by Gender and ED Status The percentage of middle and high school students suspended out of school for one or more days disaggregated by gender and economically disadvantaged status. 52

Most Frequently Cited OSS Discipline Infractions The chart above displays the ten most frequently cited discipline infractions which resulted in out of school suspensions and the number of each infraction for Black/African American, Hispanic, and White students. 53

Most Frequently Cited ISS Discipline Infractions The chart above displays the ten most frequently cited discipline infractions which resulted in in school suspensions and the number of each infraction for Black/African American, Hispanic, and White students. 54