TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Title I, Part D Data Reporting and Evaluation: What You Need To Know Dory Seidel and Jenna Tweedie, NDTAC Karen Neilson, California Department of Education.
Advertisements

1 ND Community Call Salmon Community 21 October 2014.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk PROGRAM OVERVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ANNUAL REPORTS.
1 Gold ND Community Call October 7, Agenda “That Time of Year”: Data Team Updates A Closer Look: Subgrantee Monitoring Review of Recent TA Requests.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Strategies for Developing Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes Stephanie Lampron, DeAngela Milligan, and Marcia Calloway.
LOCAL LEVEL ALIGNMENT UNDER WIOA Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12, 2014.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
1 Introduction to State Logic Models and Related Planning Stephanie Lampron, NDTAC.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Calculating Your Per Pupil Expenditure (PPE )….. General Selection Requirements 1.An LEA must rank all of its schools (from which the LEA draws its children)
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Title I-D, Subpart 2 Neglected, Delinquent, and At- Risk Youth Program ESEA Odyssey Summer 2013 Russ Sweet Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
Title I, Part D State Plans Katie Deal, NDTAC State Liaison.
NC DPI WEBINAR APRIL 24, 2012 Title III Application
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
1 Gold ND Community Call February 3, Agenda “That Time of Year”: CSPR Data Submission Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Questions from Community Members.
Oregon Department of Education September 24,
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
1 ND Communities Meeting. 2 Agenda Activity: Planning training and technical assistance Compelling technical assistance requests NDTAC has received Activity:
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students (OELA) Presented by:Margarita.
1 Topical Call Series: Improving Data Quality and Use CSPR Data Collection Tuesday, September 15, 2015.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability N or D Application.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting (Add school name and date here)
Using Data for Program Quality Improvement Stephanie Lampron, Deputy Director.
MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Annual Counts: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
Overview of the Counting Process DeAngela Milligan.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Spring N or D Application.
Annual Count for Local Agency Programs (Subpart 2) Greta Colombi.
TITLE I, PART D Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
June 15th, 2010 U.S. Department of Education Strategic Use of Title I & IDEA: How to Maximize ARRA, FY09 & FY10 Funds.
Federal Update: Title I, Part D “Neglected or Delinquent” Education Programs John McLaughlin, Ed.D. Federal Coordinator/Program Manager Title I, Part D.
MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability September 30, :00AM(MDT)
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 1 State Agencies Neglected,
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
1 Introductions Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3x5.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community March 16, 2016.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Title 1, Part D Neglected & Delinquent Institutions
Call with the US Department of Education and Title I, Part D Coordinators October 17, 2016 Katie Deal.
N&D Community Call Salmon Community March 20, 2017.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Presentation transcript:

TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May

Overview Title I, Part D (TIPD) State plans Leading indicators Goal-setting December 16,

TIPD State Plans TIPD Statute and Nonregulatory Guidance o Plan development – Statute (Sections 1414(a)(1) and (2)) and Nonregulatory Guidance (Section F-1)Sections 1414(a)(1) and (2)Section F-1 o Plan revisions – Statute (Section 1414(a)(3)) and Nonregulatory Guidance (Section F-2)Section 1414(a)(3)Section F-2 Monitoring o Office of Safe and Healthy Students Monitoring Plan for Homeless and Neglected or Delinquent Education Programs – Dec (TIPD indicator 2.1) Leading indicators implementation 3

TIPD State Plans – Development SUBPART 1: SEC STATE PLAN AND STATE AGENCY APPLICATIONS a. STATE PLAN— 1. IN GENERAL—Each State educational agency that desires to receive a grant under this subpart shall submit, for approval by the Secretary, a plan— for meeting the educational needs of neglected, delinquent, and at- risk children and youth; for assisting in the transition of children and youth from correctional facilities to locally operated programs; and that is integrated with other programs under this Act or other Acts, as appropriate. 4 TIPD Statute (Sections 1414(a)(1) and (2))

F-1. What is required in the Subpart 1 State plan? To receive Subpart 1 funds, an SEA must submit to ED either 1) an individual plan in accordance with section 1414(a) of ESEA or 2) a consolidated plan that meets the requirements of section 9302 of ESEA. The plan must describe the program goals, objectives, and performance measures that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the program. The SEA must provide assurances that the agency will both monitor and evaluate subgrantees. 5 TIPD State Plans – Development TIPD Nonregulatory Guidance (Section F-1)

TIPD State Plans – Revisions SUBPART 1: SEC STATE PLAN AND STATE AGENCY APPLICATIONS a. STATE PLAN— 3. DURATION OF THE PLAN—Each such State plan shall— remain in effect for the duration of the State's participation under this part; and be periodically reviewed and revised by the State, as necessary, to reflect changes in the State's strategies and programs under this part. 6 TIPD Statute (Sections 1414(a)(3))

F-2. May a State plan be revised? Yes. The statute allows for plans to be reviewed and revised periodically by States. However, if substantive changes are made to a State plan, those changes must be submitted to ED for approval. ED has approval from OMB to request updates periodically but has not done so for Title I, Part D. 7 TIPD State Plans – Revisions TIPD Nonregulatory Guidance (Section F-2)

TIPD State Plans – Subpart 2 8 TIPD State plans for S2 programs Section 1401 on program purposes and authorization lists main areas that Subpart 2 plans should address: high-quality education standards; successful transitions; and dropout prevention Integration with other related programs (e.g., at-risk programming, special education, CTE) Title I, Part A coordination o Consolidated State and LEA plans should address the needs of N or D students (Section 1111 and 1112)

Leading Indicators – Overview Relationship with logic model process 11 indicators developed by ED % long-terms students served (90+ days) with pre/post-test scores in reading (Subparts 1/2) % long-terms students served (90+ days) with pre/post-test scores in mathematics (Subparts 1/2) % students who enrolled in school after exit (Subparts 1/2) % students earning high school course credits (Subparts 1/2) Attendance rates (Subparts 1/2) Calculation of your own annual targets and measures or performance on GPRA measures 9

Leading Indicators – Implementation Baseline: FY14 baseline data calculated by NDTAC (Sept. 2014) and shared with OESE (Oct. 2014) Next steps: Eight academic transition indicators (State/local) to be discussed during monitoring/calls with States Begin preparing with NDTAC from FY16 to develop annual targets, workplans to achieve them, and evaluation processes to adjust targets and workplans 10

Goal-Setting On an annual basis: o Review the past year’s goals and data o Reconcile previous goals attained or not o Establish goals that are a grounded stretch for the next performance year, including your own State-specific goals as needed 11

Thank You John McLaughlin Federal Program Manager December 16,