Chappell and Cucinotta, Non-Targeted Effects... Non-Targeted Effects and the Dose Response for Heavy Ion Tumorigenesis L.J. Chappell and F.A. Cucinotta.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
7. RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
Advertisements

Brief introduction on Logistic Regression
Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National University
Response Optimization in Oncology In Vivo Studies: a Multiobjective Modeling Approach Maksim Pashkevich, PhD (Early Phase Oncology Statistics) Joint work.
Chapter 10 Curve Fitting and Regression Analysis
Model Assessment and Selection
Model Assessment, Selection and Averaging
Modifiers of Cell Survival: Oxygen Effect
Statistics II: An Overview of Statistics. Outline for Statistics II Lecture: SPSS Syntax – Some examples. Normal Distribution Curve. Sampling Distribution.
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
Space radiation dosimetry and the fluorescent nuclear track detector Nakahiro Yasuda National Institute of Radiological Sciences.
Midterm Review Goodness of Fit and Predictive Accuracy
What are the Forms of Hazardous Radiation? Stanley B. Curtis Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, ret. & Dept. of Environmental Health University of.
The Number and Reaction Multiplicities of GCR Nuclei and Delta-rays Passing through a Cell Nucleus on a Mars Mission Xiaodong Hu 1, Premkumar Saganti 2,
Chapter 11 Multiple Regression.
Lecture 17 Today: Start Chapter 9 Next day: More of Chapter 9.
Modeling Gene Interactions in Disease CS 686 Bioinformatics.
1 Issues in Harmonizing Methods for Risk Assessment Kenny S. Crump Louisiana Tech University
Bystander Effects.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
1 Prediction of Software Reliability Using Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic Professor David Rine Seminar Notes.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Data Mining to Aid Beam Angle Selection for IMRT Stuart Price-University of Maryland Bruce Golden- University of Maryland Edward Wasil- American University.
Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC) Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens David H. Phillips* COC Chairman Descriptive vs. Quantitative.
Radiation challenges for human exploration Marco Durante Fourth European Space Weather Week, Bruxelles, Belgium, November the 9th, 2007.
4/27 Radiation Effects in Active Optical Components Robert A. Reed, Ken LaBel, Janet Barth, Henning Leidecker, Allan Johnston, Paul Marshall and Cheryl.
Applied Statistics for Biological Dosimetry Part 1
3/2003 Rev 1 I – slide 1 of 33 Session I Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 2Basic Physics and Mathematics Used in Radiation Protection.
Adaptive Response to Low Dose Radiation
Copyright © 2014, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Chapter 22 Regression Diagnostics.
Deconstructing Linearity Kenneth L. Mossman Professor of Health Physics Director, Office of Radiation Safety Arizona State University Tempe, AZ.
The Increased Biological Effectiveness of Heavy Charged Particle Radiation: From Cell Culture Experiments to Biophysical Modelling Michael Scholz GSI Darmstadt.
Various topics Petter Mostad Overview Epidemiology Study types / data types Econometrics Time series data More about sampling –Estimation.
Ming T Tan, PhD University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center D.O.E. Presentation 7/11/2006 Optimized Experimental.
Analysis of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network.
Solar and Space Physics and the Vision for Space Exploration Understanding and Mitigating the Radiation Hazards of Space Travel: Progress and Future Needs.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
INTRODUCTION TO Machine Learning 3rd Edition
Basic Biologic Interactions of Radiation IONIZATION.
AP STATISTICS Section 3.2 Least Squares Regression.
Chap 6 Further Inference in the Multiple Regression Model
Roger B. Hammer Assistant Professor Department of Sociology Oregon State University Conducting Social Research Specification: Choosing the Independent.
Heavy Quark Production in 920GeV Proton Nucleus Interactions Michael Danilov ITEP, Moscow Representing HERA-B Collaboration Outline 1.Detector and data.
Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences In Defense of a Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 26 July 2005 Regression Model.
Dimension reduction (2) EDR space Sliced inverse regression Multi-dimensional LDA Partial Least Squares Network Component analysis.
Rad T 110 Sherer Biologic Effects of Radiation Exposure.
RBE: open issues and next challenges Francesco Tommasino Workshop: la radiobiologia in INFN Trento, Maggio 2016.
DEMONSTRATION OF USING SPSS Logistic Regression Models for Prediction 2016/11/71.
Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness
Selecting the Best Measure for Your Study
The Law of Bergonie & Tribondeau
INTERACTION OF PARTICLES WITH MATTER
Part 5 - Chapter 17.
Further Inference in the Multiple Regression Model
Forward Selection The Forward selection procedure looks to add variables to the model. Once added, those variables stay in the model even if they become.
RTMR 284 Chapter 30 : Fundamental Principles of Radiobiology
Biologically-Based Risk Estimation for Radiation-Induced Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Radiation Carcinogenesis: Applying Basic Science to Epidemiological Estimates.
Biologically-Based Risk Estimation for Radiation-Induced Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Radiation Carcinogenesis: Applying Basic Science to Epidemiological Estimates.
Bystander Effects.
Parametric and non parametric tests
Adaptive Response to Low Dose Radiation
Part 5 - Chapter 17.
Systematic Analysis Reveals that Cancer Mutations Converge on Deregulated Metabolism of Arachidonate and Xenobiotics  Francesco Gatto, Almut Schulze,
Statistics II: An Overview of Statistics
Determinants of Maximal Force Transmission in a Motor-Clutch Model of Cell Traction in a Compliant Microenvironment  Benjamin L. Bangasser, Steven S.
Validation of some ePTL candidates.
Using Mode of Action to Reduce Uncertainty in Risk Estimates
Ch 3. Linear Models for Regression (2/2) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, C. M. Bishop, Previously summarized by Yung-Kyun Noh Updated.
Chapter 14.1 Goodness of Fit Test.
Drug sensitivity predictions from CCLE data.
Presentation transcript:

Chappell and Cucinotta, Non-Targeted Effects... Non-Targeted Effects and the Dose Response for Heavy Ion Tumorigenesis L.J. Chappell and F.A. Cucinotta USRA and NASA JSC Hypothesis: The heavy ion dose-response for Harderian gland tumors in mice reveals linear and non-linear components representative of targeted DNA damage and non-targeted effects (NTE). Statistical analysis can be used to design new studies of the optimal number of mice and dose level to validate the NTE model. Methods: The Harderian Gland data of Alpen et al. was re-analyzed using non- linear least square regression to simultaneously fit dose response curves for 7 ions with LET’s ranging from 0.4 to 950 keV/micron. Model ranking was performed using the adjusted R 2 ratio, the Akaike information criteria (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) (Schwarz). Power analysis was then used to consider the design of new experiments to detect NTE at low dose for a variety of radiation qualities and different background tumor incidences. Research Description: – Uncertainty Reduction – Discovery/Description

Chappell and Cucinotta, Non-Targeted Effects... Results Experimental design to detect a NTE was optimal with 4 doses equally spaced below a maximal dose where “bending” due to cell sterilization was < 2%. Ex. at 100 keV/micron (0.03, 0.065, 0.13, 0.26 Gy) The NTE model provides an improved fit over the TE model suggesting NTE dominate at low Fluence (<one ion traverses a cell nucleus) and large RBE at low dose Table: Sensitivity to detect NTE with 80% power to the background %-Prevalence (P 0 ). **Sample sizes needed are smaller when results from several ions combined

Chappell and Cucinotta, Non-Targeted Effects... Blue Bullets (Progress) Applying a NTE model motivated by the dose response observed for bystander effects and genomic instability in cell culture, we show that the NTE model provides a superior fit to the dose response for tumors in mice based on several model ranking tests. These results add important empirical evidence in support of the NTE model based on in vivo data for tumor responses. We were able to fit models for the LET dependence of tumors over a broad range from protons to heavy ions and describe a dose dependent RBE applicable to low dose exposures. Power analysis based on the Harderian gland data suggest the optimal number of mice to be studied for future dose response experiments and suggest sample size reductions will occur when results for several radiation qualities are combined into a single model.

Chappell and Cucinotta, Non-Targeted Effects... Red Bullets (Gaps in Progress and Knowledge) The relative contribution to cancer risks from targeted effects and non- targeted effects remains elusive with too few experiments designed to test the shape of the dose response at low doses (<0.3 Gy) applicable to space missions. Only a few murine model tumors have been studied with only a few ion types. The paucity of data limits the building and testing of models of cancer risk from space radiation. The usage of human cell culture models in 2D or 3D is needed to support the applicability of murine models to human risk prediction, however much work remains in making the necessary connections. Of importance is the need for more expansive data set on radiation quality at a variety of low doses to understand the shape of the dose response for cancer processes induced by heavy ions.