Sources of Knowledge Dr. Syed Rifaat Hussain Professor and Chairman, DSS Department, QAU, Islamabad.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WORLD VIEWS: WHAT IS TRUE?
Advertisements

Theories of Knowledge Knowledge is Justified-True-Belief Person, S, knows a proposition, y, iff: Y is true; S believes y; Y is justified for S. (Note:
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
What we’re about—NOT!.
“The Fixation of Belief” Philosophy 1 Spring, 2002 G. J. Mattey.
Best Practice Precepts [... next] Arguments Arguments Possibility of the Impossible Possibility of the Impossible Belief, Truth, and Reality Belief, Truth,
Meditations on First Philosophy
Popper On Science Economics Lawlor. What is and inductive inference? Example: “All Swans are white” Needs an observation to confirm it’s truth.
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Hassan Ismail.
Discussion on SA-500 – AUDIT EVIDENCE
Kant, Transcendental Aesthetic
Teaching Research Methods: Resources for HE Social Sciences Practitioners What is knowledge?
The Saber-Tooth Curriculum
Inquiry and Critical Thinking 1.Analyze problems, articulate questions or hypotheses, and determine the need for information 2. Access and collect the.
How Claims of Knowledge Are Justified Foundationalism: knowledge claims are based on indubitable foundations –I can doubt whether there is a world, whether.
Ways of Knowing Augsburg College NUR 306 Week One.
THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE. Assumptions  Nature is real, understandable, knowable through observation  Nature is orderly and uniform  Measurements yield.
Questioning and Understanding the World: Natural Science Raymond J. Giguere September 8/9, 2003.
© Michael Lacewing Plato and Hume on Human Understanding Michael Lacewing
CHAPTER FIVE: THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings ELEVENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
More categories for our mental maps  How we understand knowledge has repercussions for how we understand our place in the world.  How we understand.
Is goodness without God good enough?
Morality and Religion. Big Question Big Answer NO!
Ross Arnold, Winter 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology The Existence of God II February 20, 2015.
Sociological Research
1 Foundations of American Education, Fifth Edition L. Dean Webb, Arlene Metha, & K. Forbis Jordan L. Dean Webb, Arlene Metha, & K. Forbis Jordan. Foundations.
Definitions of Reality (ref . Wiki Discussions)
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
Introduction Philosophy of Science – critical analysis of various sciences and their methodology Scientism – blind faith in the power of science to determine.
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
Reality, knowledge, truth and objectivity HEM4112 – Lecture 2 Mari Elken.
1/54 The Relation Between Christian Faith and the Natural Sciences Steve Badger and Mike Tenneson Evangel University.
Comparative Reasoning: Using Analogies
Formal Models in AGI Research Pei Wang Temple University Philadelphia, USA.
Can you learn this? You have 2 minutes. Then you will try and write it down word for word “if you can conceive it to be possible for any mixture or combination.
Chapter 1.2 The Process of Thinking and the Rules Involved.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
Nature of Science. Science is a Tentative Enterprise  The product of the judgment of individuals  Requires individuals to defend their conclusions by.
Mormons do not feel threatened by science. They are not enemies of the rational world. They are not creationist. On human conduct, they tend to stress.
Philosophy.
Review of the Scientific Method Chapter 1. Scientific Method – –Organized, logical approach to scientific research. Not a list of rules, but a general.
What is a “Worldview”? A worldview is the set of beliefs about fundamental aspects of reality that ground and influence all one's perceiving,
KANT ON THE SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
Social Research and the Internet Welcome to the Second Part of this Course! My name is Maria Bakardjieva.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
Understanding Science 14. Skepticism © Colin Frayn,
Epistemology: Theory of Knowledge Question to consider: What is the most reliable method of knowing?
© 2001 Laura Snodgrass, Ph.D.1 Experimental Psychology Introduction.
The Copleston, Russell Debate Copleston’s Cosmological argument (1948 BBC radio debate)
Introduction to Philosophy Descartes’ First Meditation
Seeing the Father John 14:5-11.
What is a Worldview?.
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
PHILOSOPHY OF HUMAN PERSON
“Do you really believe that what you believe is REALLY real?”
INVITED PAPER PRESENTATION
Theory of Knowledge Review
Rationalism.
Jez Echevarría 6th September 2013
Plato and Hume on Human Understanding
Question 1: INSTRUCTIONS Each person will answer the questions. If you get it right, you get the points. If you get it wrong, you get a strike.
Christianity, Belief & Science
Introduction to Epistemology
Nature of Science Dr. Charles Ophardt EDU 370.
Science Process and Product.
Definitions: Evidence-Based Claims- 1.) the ability to take detailed
Presentation transcript:

Sources of Knowledge Dr. Syed Rifaat Hussain Professor and Chairman, DSS Department, QAU, Islamabad

Some basic distinctions Ontology – The science of being; deals with the nature of reality. Epistemology. Deals with the nature of knowledge; studies grounds and modes of knowledge acquisition.

Sources of knowledge Common sense: Every one knows that it is so Intuition: I just know it Beliefs: it is based on personal conviction Tenacity: verification over the years Tradition: practice through generations Personal Experience: personal testing and experience Authority: the word of experts Divine and supernatural powers: the revelations of God and of other powers Reason and logic: the intellect can capture truth and knowledge directly Scientific methods: knowledge is derived through empirical procedures

Four methods of :fixing belief The quest for knowledge stems from human desire to settle the irritation of doubt by moving into a state of belief. According to Charles Peirce, there are four general ways of knowing or of “fixing belief.”

Four Methods of knowing 1. The first is the method of tenacity. According to this method, human hold firmly to the truth because they have always known it to be true. Frequent repetition of such truths seems to enhance their validity. Modern version of this method is “cognitive consistency” and human desire to avoid “cognitive dissonance.”

Four Methods of knowing 2. A second method of fixing belief, according to Pierce, is the method of authority. This is the method of established belief. This method is superior to the method of tenacity as this method is widely used to disseminate facts and information on the basis of authority. Life could not go on without the method of authority.

Four methods of knowing The third way of knowing is a priori method. We come to accept certain ideas to be true as they appear to be self-evident and tend to agree with reason. We accept certain knowledge claims as true because they “stand to reason.”

Four ways of knowing The fourth method is that of science: “to satisfy our doubts….therefore, it is necessary that a method should be found by which our beliefs may be determined by nothing human, but by some external permanency – by something upon which our thinking has no effect….The method must be such that the ultimate conclusion of every man shall be the same. Such is the method of science. Its fundamental hypothesis….is this: there are real things, whose characters are entirely independent of our opinions about them.”