Open Educational Resources Ted Sicker & Karen Cariani WGBH Educational Foundation NSDL Annual Meeting, November 7, 2007
Benefits of OER Encourages creativity and student involvement in learning process Allows you to share and tailor resources toward different learning needs or teaching environments Lets you build on the work of others to make a resource better
Obstacles/challenges to overcome Rights issues Editorial issues Attribution Licenses Interface design Technical issues
Rights challenges If building resources from older programs or making derivative works, may need to obtain new clearances to be able to offer the right to download, share, remix It may be difficult to identify underlying rights ownership
Clearance needs Materials from 3rd party owners (stock footage, stills, text, music, etc.) Co-owned materials Talent (actors, narrators,writers, composers, photographers, artists) Interviewees Locations
Solution: openness is a continuum Level 0: streaming only Level 1: download for local use, not shareable in another context Level 2: download, share, but keep intact Level 3: download, share, remix
Attribution challenge Need to credit other’s work Need to source materials For validity For ownership How to present a sourced list of elements clearly
Open resources interface design Need symbols to clearly depict meaning Clear, simple navigation Deed and license agreement Terms of use Download package Attribution text file
Open resources technical issues Easy download of files packaged into one bundle: Media files Attribution file User instructions Different packages with varied content for different levels of openness Reuse scenarios: Interactive format — use of Flash vs. Java or DHTML Video format — MPEG 4, licensing questions Ability to embed resource into PowerPoint
Discussion: weighing benefits and costs Creativity and experimentation Tailoring to individual or local needs Building on work of others Limiting what you can offer if open rights can’t be cleared Adding costs for clearance and packaging