Rice SCAMP1 Defines Clathrin-Coated, trans- Golgi–Located Tubular- Vesicular Structures as an Early Endosome in Tobacco BY-2 Cells.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4.Dynamics( 动态 ) of YFP-SCAMP–Labeled Organelles in the Cytoplasm The cytoplasmic organelles labeled by the SCAMP1-YFP or YFP-SCAMP1 were highly mobile.
Advertisements

Figure S1. Effects of AVG, DIECA, DPI, NMMA, STA, and OKA on IbRPK expression in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas cv. Tainung 57). Leaves with petiole cuts.
Recent advances in understanding gene –for – gene interactions.
B c ratio (N/C) 5 15 d Fig. S1 Nuclear localization of NtE2F is assumed by its N terminal NLS. (a) Various constructs were transitory.
Supporting Fig. S1 OsRHR-GFP GFP ChlorophyllMerge GC Hoechst Merge GH Supporting Figure S1. The OsPHR-GFP fusion protein localizes to nuclei, chloroplasts,
Supporting Figure S1A. Supporting Figure S1B: AtNCL 0.1 Supporting Figure S1. (a): Sequence alignment of AtNCL. Alignment of Arabidopsis AtNCL with proteins.
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Pericentrosomal Localization of the TIG3 Tumor Suppressor Requires an N-Terminal Hydrophilic Region Motif  Tiffany M. Scharadin, Gautam Adhikary, Kristin.
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Silke Kloppholz, Hannah Kuhn, Natalia Requena  Current Biology 
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Identification of Paracaspases and Metacaspases
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Xianfeng Morgan Xu, Tea Meulia, Iris Meier  Current Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Functional Analysis of the Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Protein by Means of Disease- Causing Point Mutations  Renee P. Stokowski, David R. Cox  The American.
Christopher R Cowles, Greg Odorizzi, Gregory S Payne, Scott D Emr  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Organelle pH in the Arabidopsis Endomembrane System
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Yuji Chikashige, Yasushi Hiraoka  Current Biology 
lin-35 and lin-53, Two Genes that Antagonize a C
Jasper S. Weinberg, David G. Drubin  Current Biology 
Rodríguez-Milla Miguel A. , Salinas Julio   Molecular Plant 
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Greg Odorizzi, Markus Babst, Scott D Emr  Cell 
A Novel Class of MYB Factors Controls Sperm-Cell Formation in Plants
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Elizabeth S. Haswell, Elliot M. Meyerowitz  Current Biology 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Localization of the Iff8 extended protein.
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Silke Kloppholz, Hannah Kuhn, Natalia Requena  Current Biology 
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Targeting Plant Ethylene Responses by Controlling Essential Protein–Protein Interactions in the Ethylene Pathway  Melanie M.A. Bisson, Georg Groth  Molecular.
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
A Conserved Interaction between SKIP and SMP1/2 Aids in Recruiting the Second-Step Splicing Factors to the Spliceosome in Arabidopsis  Lei Liu, Fangming.
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
The bacterial actin nucleator protein ActA of Listeria monocytogenes contains multiple binding sites for host microfilament proteins  Susanne Pistor,
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
WW domain of Rsp5p blocks TBSV RNA replication in yeast.
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 4-14 (January 2008)
Yuji Chikashige, Yasushi Hiraoka  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Rice SCAMP1 Defines Clathrin-Coated, trans- Golgi–Located Tubular- Vesicular Structures as an Early Endosome in Tobacco BY-2 Cells

Abstract We recently identified multivesicular bodies (MVBs) as prevacuolar compartments (PVCs) in the secretory 分泌 and endocytic 内吞 pathways to the lytic 细胞溶解酶 vacuole in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 cells. We recently identified multivesicular bodies (MVBs) as prevacuolar compartments (PVCs) in the secretory 分泌 and endocytic 内吞 pathways to the lytic 细胞溶解酶 vacuole in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 cells. Secretory carrier membrane proteins (SCAMPs) 分泌载体膜蛋白 are post-Golgi, integral membrane proteins 整合蛋白 mediating endocytosis in animal cells. Secretory carrier membrane proteins (SCAMPs) 分泌载体膜蛋白 are post-Golgi, integral membrane proteins 整合蛋白 mediating endocytosis in animal cells.

To define the endocytic pathway in plants, we cloned the rice (Oryza sativa) homolog of animal SCAMP1 and generated transgenic tobacco BY-2 cells expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)–SCAMP1 or SCAMP1-YFP fusions. To define the endocytic pathway in plants, we cloned the rice (Oryza sativa) homolog of animal SCAMP1 and generated transgenic tobacco BY-2 cells expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)–SCAMP1 or SCAMP1-YFP fusions. Confocal 共焦的 immunofluorescence 免疫荧 光 and immunogold electron microscopy studies demonstrated that YFP-SCAMP1 fusions and native SCAMP1 localize to the plasma membrane and mobile structures in the cytoplasm of transgenic BY-2 cells. Confocal 共焦的 immunofluorescence 免疫荧 光 and immunogold electron microscopy studies demonstrated that YFP-SCAMP1 fusions and native SCAMP1 localize to the plasma membrane and mobile structures in the cytoplasm of transgenic BY-2 cells.

RESULTS

1.Highly Conserved Plant SCAMPs (A) Alignment of amino acid sequences of SCAMPs from the rice (Oryza sativa) cDNA clone used in this study (SCAMP cDNA); a pea (Pisum sativum) cDNA (Ps ), an Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA (At ), and an animal (Rattus norvegicus) SCAMP1 cDNA (Rn ). (A) Alignment of amino acid sequences of SCAMPs from the rice (Oryza sativa) cDNA clone used in this study (SCAMP cDNA); a pea (Pisum sativum) cDNA (Ps ), an Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA (At ), and an animal (Rattus norvegicus) SCAMP1 cDNA (Rn ).Oryza sativaPisum sativum Arabidopsis thalianaRattus norvegicusOryza sativaPisum sativum Arabidopsis thalianaRattus norvegicus

Gray areas indicate conserved amino acids among the four SCAMPs. Two synthetic peptides, corresponding to the N- terminal NPF motifs and the middle cytosolic loop, used in this study to generate antibodies are highlighted in boxes. The four transmembrane domain regions are underlined. The overall similarity among all known plant SCAMPs is >80% at the amino acid level. Gray areas indicate conserved amino acids among the four SCAMPs. Two synthetic peptides, corresponding to the N- terminal NPF motifs and the middle cytosolic loop, used in this study to generate antibodies are highlighted in boxes. The four transmembrane domain regions are underlined. The overall similarity among all known plant SCAMPs is >80% at the amino acid level.

(B) Predicted structure of the rice SCAMP1 used in this study. The predicted topology of this plant SCAMP1 consists of two NPF (Asn-Pro-Phe) repeats at its N-terminal region in the cytosol, four transmembrane domains (TMD), and a short cytosolic C- terminal region. (B) Predicted structure of the rice SCAMP1 used in this study. The predicted topology of this plant SCAMP1 consists of two NPF (Asn-Pro-Phe) repeats at its N-terminal region in the cytosol, four transmembrane domains (TMD), and a short cytosolic C- terminal region.

2. Generation of Transgenic SCAMP1-YFP BY-2 Cells and Characterization of SCAMP1 Antibodies (A) Top panel, chimeric DNA constructs. YFP was fused at either the N terminus of SCAMP1 (YFP-SCAMP) or the C terminus of SCAMP1 (SCAMP- YFP). The fusions were expressed under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and the 3′ NOS terminator. (A) Top panel, chimeric DNA constructs. YFP was fused at either the N terminus of SCAMP1 (YFP-SCAMP) or the C terminus of SCAMP1 (SCAMP- YFP). The fusions were expressed under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and the 3′ NOS terminator.

Bottom panel, protein gel blot analysis of transgenic tobacco BY-2 cell lines. Soluble protein (CS) and membrane protein (CM) were isolated from both wild-type and transgenic BY-2 cells, followed by protein separation via SDS- PAGE and protein detection using GFP antibodies. The asterisk indicates the position of the expressed full-length YFP fusion protein. Bottom panel, protein gel blot analysis of transgenic tobacco BY-2 cell lines. Soluble protein (CS) and membrane protein (CM) were isolated from both wild-type and transgenic BY-2 cells, followed by protein separation via SDS- PAGE and protein detection using GFP antibodies. The asterisk indicates the position of the expressed full-length YFP fusion protein.

(B) Characterization of SCAMP1a antibodies. Soluble (CS) and membrane (CM) proteins were isolated from wild- type BY-2 cells, followed by SDS-PAGE and protein gel blot detection with anti-SCAMP1a. The asterisk indicates the position of SCAMP1. M, molecular mass in kilodaltons. (B) Characterization of SCAMP1a antibodies. Soluble (CS) and membrane (CM) proteins were isolated from wild- type BY-2 cells, followed by SDS-PAGE and protein gel blot detection with anti-SCAMP1a. The asterisk indicates the position of SCAMP1. M, molecular mass in kilodaltons.

(C) Protein gel blot analysis of transgenic tobacco BY-2 cell lines overexpressing SCAMP1. Proteins were extracted from the wild type (lane 1) and several transgenic BY-2 cell lines overexpressing SCAMP1 (lanes 2 to 7), followed by SDS-PAGE and protein gel blot detection with anti- SCAMP1b. The asterisk indicates the position of SCAMP1. M, molecular mass in kilodaltons. (C) Protein gel blot analysis of transgenic tobacco BY-2 cell lines overexpressing SCAMP1. Proteins were extracted from the wild type (lane 1) and several transgenic BY-2 cell lines overexpressing SCAMP1 (lanes 2 to 7), followed by SDS-PAGE and protein gel blot detection with anti- SCAMP1b. The asterisk indicates the position of SCAMP1. M, molecular mass in kilodaltons.

(D) Subcellular localization of SCAMP1 in wild-type cells (panels 1 and 3) and transgenic BY-2 cells overexpressing SCAMP1 (panels 2 and 4) via confocal immunofluorescence with SCAMP1 antibodies as indicated. Arrowheads indicate examples of PM localization of punctate signals. (D) Subcellular localization of SCAMP1 in wild-type cells (panels 1 and 3) and transgenic BY-2 cells overexpressing SCAMP1 (panels 2 and 4) via confocal immunofluorescence with SCAMP1 antibodies as indicated. Arrowheads indicate examples of PM localization of punctate signals.

3.Subcellular Localization of the SCAMP1-YFP Fusion Construct and SCAMP1 in BY-2 Cells Subcellular Localization of YFP-SCAMP1 Fusion Constructs in Transgenic Tobacco BY-2 Cells. Subcellular Localization of YFP-SCAMP1 Fusion Constructs in Transgenic Tobacco BY-2 Cells. Confocal images of YFP signals in cells expressing either YFP-SCAMP1 fusion construct were collected from untreated cells (panel 1), protoplasts (panel 2), and cells treated with 1.5 M NaCl 2 (panel 3). Confocal images of YFP signals in cells expressing either YFP-SCAMP1 fusion construct were collected from untreated cells (panel 1), protoplasts (panel 2), and cells treated with 1.5 M NaCl 2 (panel 3).

Subcellular Localization of SCAMP1 in Tobacco BY-2 Cells Panel 1, colocalization of SCAMP1a and SCAMP1b antibodies in wild-type BY-2 cells; Panel 1, colocalization of SCAMP1a and SCAMP1b antibodies in wild-type BY-2 cells; panel 2, colocalization of SCAMP1-YFP with anti-SCAMP1 in transgenic BY-2 cells; panel 2, colocalization of SCAMP1-YFP with anti-SCAMP1 in transgenic BY-2 cells; panel 3, colocalization of YFP-SCAMP with anti-SCAMP1 in transgenic BY-2 cells; panel 3, colocalization of YFP-SCAMP with anti-SCAMP1 in transgenic BY-2 cells;