Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesotas Congestion Pricing Program Road User Charging Conference January, 2009 By Bernie Arseneau Minnesota (USA) Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Bus Lane with Intermittent Priority Graham Carey PE., AICP BRT Project Engineer, Lane Transit District, Eugene, Oregon QUALITY TRANSIT -- NOW.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary Metropolitan Council Meeting September 12, 2007.
Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
Managed Lanes in Washington State
SCHOOL BUS TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Traffic Controls Lesson 1 Understanding Traffic Signs and Signals
TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS: GETTING THE MOST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK! GPA Fall Conference 2013 Garth Lynch, PE, AICP HNTB Corporation October 10, 2013.
INTERSTATE DRIVING Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
Caltrans IRIS – T3 Webinar T3 Webinars are brought to you by the ITS Professional Capacity Building Program (ITS PCB) at the U.S. Department of Transportation’s.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Driver Theory Traffic Signs Work Zone Signs. Work Zone Work Zone Signs are usually diamond shaped, like warning signs, but they are orange instead of.
Virginia Learner’s Permit
ICM Minnesota – Interstate 394 Brian Kary, Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Advanced Lane Management Assist (ALMA) for Partially and Fully Automated Vehicles Robert L. Gordon, P.E. 1.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
October 9 th COMPLETE pg. 26 #2-4 Have Rules of the Road book out on desk BE PREPARED TO TAKE NOTES in 5 min.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
Definition - CommuterLink CommuterLink is an interagency transportation management system. What does that mean? Put another way, it is the use of computer.
2 Background Lake County –24 x 20 mi area –Population 690,000 –52 municipalities Congestion –No freeways –Limited 4-lane arterials –Transportation controversies.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
Transpo 2012 The Future of Traffic Incident Management, October 30, 2012 Javier Rodriguez, P.E., ITS Operations Engineer Joe Snyder, TMC Manager FDOT District.
Keeping Wisconsin Moving: An Overview of WisDOT’s DMS Travel Times Kelly Langer, WisDOT, Freeway Operations Supervisor.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Minnesota I-394 ICM Corridor. What is Integrated Corridor Management? Independent Network of Transportation Systems –Freeways, including managed lanes.
WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 Tolling Study Committee.
July 29, 2009 George Saylor, PE ODOT Senior ITS Engineer.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Preliminary Findings March 23, 2006 Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
The Transit “T” Craig Lamothe UPA Transit Project Manager City of Minneapolis City of Lakes Innovative Choices for Congestion Relief.
Roles of TMCs in Incident Management on Managed Lanes INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW MICHAEL TANTILLO VHB.
1 Arterial AMS Deployment Case Study By Joseph Brahm (847)
ITS PCB T3 Webinar October 21, 2008 Montgomery County, Maryland Advanced Transportation Management System Automated Parking Information System Operational.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Corridor Congestion Management Innovation for better mobility sm.
Understanding Work Zones
I-394 MnPASS Express Lanes Project Update Guidestar Board Meeting September 7th, 2005.
Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.
Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.
Regional Transportation Management Center Shared Operations Center – Mn/DOT Traffic Operations – Mn/DOT Maintenance Dispatch – State Patrol Dispatch 400.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Travel Reliability – Reliable traffic flow is more important than reducing congestion – traffic congestion is often a sign of an area’s economic vitality.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Brian Kary – Freeway Operations Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Work Zone & Incident Management Strategies Denise Markow, PE, TSMO Administrator Susan Soucie, PE ITS Project Manager ACEC/NHDOT 2016 Technical Exchange.
TMCs – The Next Generation ITS Tennessee Annual Meeting / October 8, 2009 Dr. Robert Edelstein, PE, PTOE.
Brian Kary Freeway Operations Engineer. Active Traffic Management.
Drive Right Chapter 2 Unit 1
Safe Driving Rules and Regulations
Using iPeMS Performance Management Data
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
HERO UNIT Training Module
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation

Regional Transportation Management Center Shared Operations Center – MnDOT Traffic Operations – MnDOT Maintenance Dispatch – State Patrol Dispatch 400 miles of freeway management system – Cameras – Changeable Message Signs – Freeway Service Patrol 10-year Anniversary

MnPASS System High Occupancy Toll Lanes Provide for faster, safer and more reliable travel options Travel benefits for transit, carpoolers, motorcycles and MnPASS customers

I-35W: The 21 ST Century Highway –Expanded MnPASS System –Smart Lanes –Priced Dynamic Shoulder Lane –Bus Rapid Transit and Stations –Integrated Park and Rides –Low cost/high benefit capacity

I-35W Smart Lanes

Intelligent Lane Control Signals (ILCS) located every ½ mile over every lane. A total of 297 ILCS. – 187 ILCS on I-35W – 110 ILCS on I-94 ILCS are a 4ft x 5ft full color matrix signs. Use of the ILCS is for incident management, variable speeds and priced dynamic shoulder lane. I-35W and I-94 Smart Lanes

ILCS Sign Options Blank – default Green – Lane Open Flashing Yellow – Caution Red X – Closed Lane Closed Ahead Merge Left Merge Right Merge Both Speed Limit White Diamond

Variable Speed Limits Advisory Only Detection measures traffic speeds downstream Speeds are posted up to 1 ½ miles upstream

Human Factors Study Driving simulation study to test the effectiveness of the ILCS messages. Compared diagonal arrow, merge arrow, and basic text messages. 160 participants from multiple age groups; – years old – years old – years old – 70 years old or more.

Human Factors Study Results Study found the diagonal arrow was most effective in getting people to move over. Results showed that overall, the messages were well understood. Further study needed to determine how motorists use this information in the real world with other factors at play – Gap acceptance in traffic – Queue jumping – Disbelief in sign message

I-35W Early Results Lane Control Messages – Human factors study and surveys has shown understanding of ILCS messages – Message compliance still an issue Variable Speed Limits – Minimal improvements to mobility – Improvements in speed differential approaching congestion – Reduced shockwaves – Too early for crash data results but preliminary results are not showing improvements

Priced Dynamic Shoulder Lane (PDSL) 3 Mile Segment on NB 35W Maintains existing 4 lanes with an added PDSL Lane Effectively extends the MnPASS lane to downtown Minneapolis using existing road space Total Cost = $17 M 4 Lanes plus PDSL 5 Lanes

I-35W PDSL Operations Monday – Friday – 6:00 AM to 7:00 PM – Expanded Mid-day hours due to high violation rates Can be open on weekends or evenings for special events, weather or incidents. – Regular Saturday hours from 11:00 AM to 7:00 PM

I-35W MnPASS: Regulatory Signing

I-35W MnPASS: PDSL Closed

I-35W MnPASS: In Pavement Lighting PDSL Closed

I-35W MnPASS: In Pavement Lighting PDSL Open

I-35W MnPASS: In Pavement Lighting Corrosion and Failure No distinguishable difference in violation rates of the PDSL with or without the in pavement lighting.

Emergency Pull-Offs Why we have them: Refuge for disabled vehicles and crashesRefuge for disabled vehicles and crashes Enforcement areasEnforcement areas Co-located with Maintenance pull-offsCo-located with Maintenance pull-offs Design considerations: Goal to locate every ½ mileGoal to locate every ½ mile 14 ft width, min 200 ft long14 ft width, min 200 ft long

Operations and Maintenance

Operations Challenges ILCS requires more precision to deploy than overhead CMS. – Distance to incident is closer – Lane specific – Need precise location of incident – Requires more operator actions Multiple ILCS to deploy for a single incident Every changing incident scene Requires highly skilled and detail oriented staff

Freeway Operations Staffing No funding for additional staffing Gradual shift to full-time operator staff – At the expense of losing traffic analyst staff Freeway Operations Staff not 24/7 – Responsibility for ILCS given to State Patrol afterhours.

Operations Software IRIS Software Developed In-house controls all FMS equipment including the ATM equipment Developed recommended deployment plans for ILCS – Operator enters in incident location and what lanes are blocked – IRIS auto-deploys signs based on these inputs Streamlined other operations software to ease workload for operators – Example – State Patrol CAD data automatically deployed to 511 system

Maintenance Staffing MnPASS Revenues on I-35W paid for one FTE to maintain ILCS. – No additional funding for I-94 Maintenance Agreements for ILCS – I-35W - approximately $280,000 a year – I-94 - approximately $200,000 a year Utilities Costs – I-35W - approximately $60,000 a year – I-94 – approximately $40,000 a year

Design for Maintenance

I-94 between I-35W and I-35E Active Traffic Management – Advisory Variable Speed Limits – Intelligent Lane Control Signals 4 th lane between Hwy 280 and 5 th St/6 th St ramps – Maintain 4 th lane added after I-35W bridge collapse – Adds some shoulder width and emergency pull-offs where feasible I-94 Managed Lanes Project

I-94 Managed Auxiliary Lane Normal Operations

I-94 Managed Auxiliary Lane PM Peak Period Operations

Dynamic MnPASS Sign on I-35E

I-494 Dynamic Shoulder Right hand dynamic shoulder Open during peak hours to general purpose traffic Project limits from Hwy 55 to I construction season Lane control signals over shoulder Supplemental CMS

I-494 Dynamic Shoulder Signing Over Shoulder Lane Only

I-494 Dynamic Shoulder Advanced Signing - 1 Mile

I-494 Dynamic Shoulder Advanced Signing – 1/2 Mile

I-494 Dynamic Shoulder Advanced Signing – 0.2 Mile

I-494 Dynamic Shoulder Ramp Signing Use of the term “WHEN FLASHING”

Future of ATM in MnDOT Dynamic Shoulders – Nothing planned, but still in the toolbox I-35W ATM – Some remove as part of future construction projects – Replace with more frequent DMS rather than ILCS – PDSL will be a permanent lane I-94 ATM – No changes planned

Brian Kary Freeway Operations Engineer