Summary and feedback on trigger AODs Introduction Overview of trigger data in the AODs Trigger-aware analyses and feedback Outlook Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.
Advertisements

Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
Jet Slice Status Report Ricardo Gonçalo (LIP) and David Miller (Chicago) For the Jet Trigger Group Trigger General Meeting – 9 July 2014.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
The ATLAS High Level Trigger Steering Journée de réflexion – Sept. 14 th 2007 Till Eifert DPNC – ATLAS group.
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Status and outlook of HLT software High Level Trigger algorithms for e/  How to analyse HLT data? Trigger information in ESD/AOD Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL)
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Trigger-aware analysis Current status Under development What’s missing Conclusions & Outlook Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL)
What’s in the ATLAS data : Trigger Decision ATLAS Offline Software Tutorial CERN, August 2008 Ricardo Gonçalo - RHUL.
Trigger Menus Invisible Higgs input to trigger menus for initial running 4/9/2007 Invisible Higgs CSC Note meeting Ricardo Goncalo, RHUL.
Analysis of BS, ESD and AOD data What trigger data is available offline and what data should be available? How are we going to analyse HLT data?
Trigger ESD/AOD Simon George (RHUL) Ricardo Goncalo (RHUL) Monika Wielers (RAL) Contributions from many people.
Ricardo GoncaloPESA Algorithms - 18/7/061 Level 2 e/  menu.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
Overview of trigger EDM and persistency Focusing on the e/  slice Referring to the work of several people Ricardo Gonçalo.
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
LVL2 ID ESD/AOD classes Status and plans. PESA L2 ID Algorithms Review - RAL 25 July Ricardo Goncalo ESD/AOD More and more interest from physics.
DPDs and Trigger Plans for Derived Physics Data Follow up and trigger specific issues Ricardo Gonçalo and Fabrizio Salvatore RHUL.
Trigger ESD/AOD Simon George (RHUL) Ricardo Goncalo (RHUL) Monika Wielers (RAL) Reporting on the work of many people. ATLAS software week September.
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Status of trigger software and EDM Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL – on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ.
Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
Vertex finding and B-Tagging for the ATLAS Inner Detector A.H. Wildauer Universität Innsbruck CERN ATLAS Computing Group on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Trigger Software Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) TAPM Open Meeting – April 12, 2007 Outline: Reminder of plans Status of infrastructure.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
AOD/ESD plans Status and plans focusing on LVL2 e/  and some items for discussion On behalf of: J.Baines, P.Casado, G.Comune, A.DiMattia, S.George, R.Goncalo,
A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing.
Trigger validation for Many thanks to Long Zhao, Chihiro Omachi, Julie Kirk, Giovanni Siragusa, Patricia Conde Muiño, Andreas Reinsch, Olya Igonkina,
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
Trigger Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) on behalf of trigger community Physics Validation Meeting – Feb. 13, 2007.
ATLAS Trigger Development
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
M. Pilar Casado 1 Optimization of Tau Menus: L1 & L2 Trigger & Physics week (19-22 March 2007) M. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) on behalf of the Tau Trigger.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
The PESAsim analysis framework What it is How it works What it can do How to get it and use it Mark Sutton Tania McMahon Ricardo Gonçalo.
Hadronic Jet Energy Scale Hadronic t-t bar selection and Jet Energy Scale calibration Part I : Accessing the trigger information 09/02 - Menelaos Tsiakiris.
E/gamma report Ricardo Gonçalo for the e/γ slice.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
Status report for LVL2 e/  ESD/AOD Aims and constraints Tracking status Calorimetry status (Monika) Monika Wielers Ricardo Gonçalo.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Points from DPD task force First meeting last Tuesday (29 th July) – Need to have concrete proposal in 1 month – Still some confusion and nothing very.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
Samples and MC Selection
CHEP La Jolla San Diego 24-28/3/2003
Presentation transcript:

Summary and feedback on trigger AODs Introduction Overview of trigger data in the AODs Trigger-aware analyses and feedback Outlook Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL)

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/062 match? Introduction EMROI L2 calorim. pass? L2 tracking cluster? E.F.calorim. track? E.F.tracking cluster? E.F. pass? Level 2 seeded by Level 1 Fast reconstruction algorithms Full granularity Reconstruction within RoI Level1 Region of Interest is found with coarse granularity and position in EM calorimeter is passed to Level 2 Ev.Filter seeded by Level 2 Offline reconstruction algorithms Refined alignment and calibration Chain can be abandoned at each step Electromagnetic clusters

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/063 Concrete example: L2 electron chain Level 1: Level 1, emulated by software, produces EM region of interest HLT: Feature Extraction (FEX) algorithms interspersed with Hypothesis (Hypo) algorithms,to achieve early hypothesis rejection Steering also produces L2/EFResult which is attached to event Algorithm sequence Data Steering TrigEMClusterContainer TrigL2CaloHypo LVL2 tracking algo. L2Result T2CaloEgamma TrigInDetTrackCollection TrigElectronContainer TrigL2IDCaloHypo L1 conversion RecEMTauRoI L2 decision

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/064 TriggerDecision for physics analysis Typical application for ‘physicists’ –Find out if event was trigger/not triggered –Find out if signature was in trigger menu –Note: trigger decision is event decision, not object decision Signatures passed/failed/prescaled encoded in a bit pattern for each reconstructed event: must be interpreted through a MenuTable This is the purpose of the TriggerDecision object

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/065 Advanced analysis for experts Using additional trigger information: –Compare with offline object and figure out e.g. why electron didn’t trigger e25i whereas offline electron is ‘good’ electron –Needs some navigation from signature to particles, e.g. TrigElectron Re-run the hypothesis algorithms e.g. to do Optimisation of given trigger item Test new optimisations on physics channels Develop new triggers Debug trigger menu –Need to re-run trigger steering in AOD/ESD analysis

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/066 cluster POOL cluster FEX Steering track Hypo FEX track cluster Trigger Yes/No Hypo cluster FEX Steering track FEX Real data Monte Carlo cluster Steering track Hypo cluster track cluster Trigger Hypo Online running/debugging/monitoring Trigger menu optimization

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/067 More information See Monika’s tutorial in Japan for more information More on HLT persistency List of available information in AOD/ESD PESA Wiki page tion_Arch e/gamma analysis Wiki for example analysis job

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/068 Overview of trigger-aware analyses

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/069 In , possible for the first time to produce TriggerDecision and re-run L2 hypothesis on ESD/AOD In 12.0.x same will be possible for EF Trigger-aware analyses presented this week: –Trigger-aware analysis for Z to ee with – T.Martin – –Trigger on GMSB – O.Jinnouchi – –Trigger information in – A. Krasznahorkay – –Trigger -aware analysis for the H->4leptons channel, using CSC samples – S.Rosati –

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0610 Photon trigger for GMSB O. Jinnouchi Signature (G1a): m  + n Leptons + Jets + E T miss Preselection: Meff>400 GeV; ETmiss>0.1 Meff; 2 leptons in |  |<2.5 Investigated trigger efficiency wrt the TDR offline cuts: 2 photons with P T >20 GeV and |  | 20 GeV and |  |<2.5 Implemented photon signatures  60 and 2  20i in Replay hypothesis (cuts optimized on Rome data) leading photon fully reconstructed photon Pt (GeV) efficiency TDR cut after L1 after L2 after EF crack 1.37<  <1.52 not used Event Filter / TDR  60 1  602  20i OR after L after L after EF Tested the machinery and produced feedback on L1 isolation

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0611 Electron efficiency from data T.Fonseca Martín Determine the single-electron trigger efficiency without relying on Monte Carlo Reconstructed control sample: “Good” Z  e + e - + single- electron signature Efficiency determined from fraction of events in which the second electron passed the trigger Analysis done in rel k Z  ee events from CSC validation sample Level 1: EM01 (E T > 9 GeV) Level 2: default e25i (cuts optimised on Rome data) (~42 hours) (~10min)  e + control sample e - control sample

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0612 Trigger Menus for H  ZZ (*)  4l S.Rosati Trigger Menu4e 44 2e2  1  (0.0) 98.8 (99.8) 88.3 (90.2) 1e25i98.5 (100) 2.9 (1.6) 77.3 (77.7) 1  20 or 1e25i 98.5 (100) 98.8 (99.8) 98.7 (99.4) 1  10 and 1e15i or 2  10 or 2e15i 97.7 (100) 98.0 (99.5) 98.1 (99.7) 1  20 and 1e25i or 2  20 or 2e25i 86.2 (97.4) 89.8 (94.5) 87.1 (93.1) LVL1 Efficiencies (in %) for: - all events in the sample (filter: 4-leptons with pT>5 GeV and |  |<2.7) - events after all H  4l offline selection cuts (kinematic cuts + Isolation + Impact parameter cuts) Errors are ~0.3% (~0.5%) Signal M H =130 GeV Adding trigger selection to the H  ZZ*  4l analysis (described in detail in previous talk and in previous meetings)

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0613 LVL2 single muon trigger efficiency A. Krasznahorkay Selection efficiency of a LVL2 single muon trigger as a function of the LVL2 p T cut, if there was a MU20 object at LVL1. Absolute trigger efficiency with respect to full sample AOD files produced with default trigger configurations for release with LVL1 and LVL2 muon triggers

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0614 Feedback Had to do some things by hand in From user feedback, the need for a map between offline objects and RoIs became obvious (although it was already in our plans) Usefulness of running hypothesis algorithms on ESD was demonstrated (e.g. gains in speed) Demontration of muon slice running in level 2 TriggerDecision was used intensively; will be filled automatically from

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0615 Trigger data in POOL

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0616 All slices are running at L2 in –e/gamma –muon –tau –Jet/Etmiss Lots of progress in newer slices This generated lots of new data in AOD/ESD

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0617 LevelClass/Algorithm x L1L1EtmissObject L1L1EMTauObjectContainer L1L1JetObjectContainer L1LVL1::JetElement L1LVL1::TriggerTower L1LVL1_ROI L1CTP_Decision ? List of trigger data classes available in AOD/ESD

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0618 LevelClass/Algorithm x EFEDM classes (Offline) EFTrack-truth association AllTriggerDecisionNot filled LevelClass/Algorithm x L2TrigTauCluster L2TrigEMCluster L2TrigInDetTrack L2TrigInDetTrackTruth  L2TrigElectron L2TrigPhoton  L2TrigTau L2TrigBjet L2TrigJet L2MuonFeature

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0619 Conclusions and outlook

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0620 Much was achieved in the last few months (even since the first T&P week) Release has a lot more information available for analysis than With release 12 (most likely ) there will be a significant amount of trigger information in the AODs and we will have a first partial menu This together with the possibility of re-running the trigger will generate enough information to tune signatures With several slices in good shape, we will have first baseline menu in time for third Trigger & Physics week

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0621 Backup slides

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0622 Size of AOD/ESD L1/L2 objects (DS 4022: top) L1EMTauObjectContainer0.09 kB L1JetObjectContainer0.05 kB L1EtmissObject~0 kB LVL1_ROI0.12 kB CTP_Decision0.004 kB LVL1::JetElement1.91 kB LVL1::TriggerTower6.18 kB L2Result1.44 kB TrigElectron4.32 kB TrigEMCluster0.16 kB TrigInDetTrackCollection5.33 kB TrigTauClusterContainer1.05 kB TrigT2JetClusterContainer0.09 kB MuonFeature~0 kB <10% of AOD contents few% of ESD contents

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0623 What do we have at present? Steering objects Accessible from both BS and POOL Algorithm to fill it in From:

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0624 New Calo EDM from

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0625 Only electron and tau for now… From Offline EDM: not serial. What’s missing? Truth-association classes New functionality in Serializer (STL container serialization) Having all objects in L2/EFResult (EF “persistent” EDM? Review started.) Some steering functionality: “accept all” mode What else?

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0626 Data objects (tracks, clusters, etc) are stored in L2/EFResult (some by reference, but this is a detail) L2/EFResult goes in AOD/ESD together with TriggerDecision object At L1/L2, the same objects stored in ESD as in AOD –No need to convert between ESD-type and AOD-type, they are all trigger objects –Same analyses runs on ESD and AOD At EF, re-use offline classes (needs to be reviewed) But most of the data classes are not accessible to physics user! –Interaction mostly through TriggerDecision (see below)

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0627 How to analyse ESD/AOD To produce ESD/AOD: 1.Just set doTrigger = True 2.The Steering serializes all relevant data objects into L2/EFResult 3.TriggerDecision object filled if Hypo algorithms run and put in ESD/AOD To analyse ESD/AOD: A.Either: 1.Set doTrigger = False 2.Retrieve TriggerDecision and find result B.Or (for debugging/optimsation/) 1.Set doTrigger = True (& etc) 2.The Steering de-serializes all data objects 3.Run hypothesis algorithms only on reconstructed features 4.Retrieve new TriggerDecision at the end Athena::Reconstruct. L2/EFResult (ESD/AOD/bytestream) Athena::Steering Ntuple/histos… Hits (Data/MC)

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0628 Level 2: T2CaloEgamma Full granularity but short time and perhaps incomplete calibration & alignment Extends T2CaloCommon Data access factorized from algorithmic part T2CaloEgamma calls AlgTools: 1.EgammaSamp2Fex: LAr sample 2; cluster position and size 2.EgammaSamp1Fex: LAr sample 1; look for second maxima in strips 3.EgammaEmEnFex: total cluster energy; include calibration 4.EgammaHadEnFex: longitudinal isolation (leakage) Each calculates shower-shape variables with discrimination power Produced TrigEMCluster (since ) Well developed code; important progress in time performance Review started last TDAQ week 00 

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0629 Level 2 tracking: SiTrack SiTrack: 1.Sorting: retrieve SpacePoints in ROI and sort them to speed up algorithm 2.Seeding: look for pairs (seeds) of SpacePoints with one in b-layer 3.Extension: extend outwards to find third point 4.Merging triplets according to common hits 5.Track fit: linear fit (analytic least squares) in r-Z; circle in r-  Heavy use of lookup tables to achieve fast algorithm

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0630 Level 2 tracking: IDScan IDScan: 1.ZFinder: form pairs of hits in thin  slices; extrapolate inwards to find Z vtx at beamline from histogram 2.HitFilter: using Z vtx, make 2D histogram of hits in  -  plane; remove bins with hits from few layers 3.GroupCleaner: do 2D histogram using SpacePoint triplets in 1/p T -  plane; tracks from bins with hits in 4/7 layers 4.Fitter: use Kalman technique on selected SpacePoints starting from already estimated Z vtx, 1/p T, , 

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0631 Level 2 tracking: TRT TRTxK –Wrapper for offline xKalman to be used in seeded mode –May be used to do standalone TRT tracking or using all ID detectors TRT extension tool –Extends tracks outwards to TRT by associating hits to the track according to the Probabilistic Data Association Filter (PDAF, com-daq ) –Tracking algorithms may be configured to use TRT extension

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0632 Trigger operation debugging Statistical: monitoring histograms –No need to store any data offline –Probably not useful if we’re looking for small effects or unusual occurrences Event by event: –Only way to make HLT event data available is through L2/EFResult  Serializer –Regression-type test, running on bytestream data and comparing to ESD: in both cases, retrieve data from L2/EFResult and run hypothesis algorithms on it –MC truth information also available in ESD/AOD: compare reconstruction and truth Simul./Digit. BytestreamTrans.Bytestr. Trigger Simul./Digit. Generator Trigger One-step rec. Testbed ESD/AODBytestream L2Result EFResult L2Result EFResult MC truth AthenaMT Athena Compare log files/results

Ricardo GoncaloTrigger & Physics Week 1/6/0633 Global single electron Efficiency N 1 : counts in control sample B 1 : background below Z mass region in control sample N 2 : counts 2e trigger B 2 : bg. below Z mass for 2e trigger. N 0 : total number of Z  e + e - decays  rec : Z reconstruction efficiency  trig : global single electron trigger efficiency