Fisheries Protection Program: An overview November 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department for Environment Role in Implementing Bush Forever Bush Forever Stakeholder Meeting June 2006.
Advertisements

Introduction of the new Canada Consumer Product Safety Act Technical Briefing January 29, 2009.
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Fisheries Act Renewal Developing a Modern Tool to Support New Directions Fall 2005 (FOR DISTRIBUTION)
Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
Chris Dandurand, P.Eng Kiewit Infrastructure Group Large Hydro Perspective on the Permitting Process & Environmental Approvals.
Infrastructure Planning Commission Workshop 2b Working with the IPC: Guidance and issues for promoters.
Proposed Regulatory Framework for Wastewater Presented by Claude Fortin Winnipeg, Manitoba December 6, 2007.
1 Proposed Riparian Areas Regulation Local Government Briefing May 12, 2004.
Riparian Areas Regulation Implementation Guidebook January, 2006 Presented by Michael Roth Ministry of Environment, Ecosystems Branch.
Geology Matters 2013 Presenter: Robert Federico, Principal November 14, 2013 Donkin Coal Mine Environmental Assessment Case Study.
Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Baker Lake, NU March 2-14,
2. Fisheries management and the Ecosystem approach
Hamlet of Rankin Inlet Type A Water Licence Application Role of Fish Habitat Management Fisheries and Oceans Canada Eastern Arctic Region Rankin Inlet.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
ISO 9001 Interpretation : Exclusions
© 2007 Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), all rights reserved. Use without permission is prohibited. The Canadian.
EOH 3101 PRINCIPLES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS AND RULES REGARDING POLLUTION AND HEALTH.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
Lancashire Assessment and Planning Framework Victoria Gent.
Environmental Management Services
1. 2  Strategic – BC Hydro Long Term Planning  Project level  Environmental Assessment ▪ Federal - Canadian  Integration 3.
Reforms to Victoria’s native vegetation permitted clearing regulations.
Environmental Assessment in Newfoundland & Labrador Environmental Assessment in Federations: Current Dynamics and Emerging Issues Conference Current Dynamics.
1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment.
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
1 Risk Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation. “Consideration of Design and Construction of Culverts for Fish Passage: A Risk Assessment Approach” 2.
1 Human Pathogens and Toxins Act: Bill C Gaps of the Current Regulatory Regime The Human Pathogens Importation Regulations (HPIR) were established.
3-MINUTE READ Draft SEN Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years.
DECISION-MAKING, FOLLOW-UP AND ENFORCEMENT OCTOBER 15, 2012.
Bill C-45 Deficiencies Concerns from Canadian Environmental Organizations Susanna D. Fuller, Marine Coordinator, Ecology Action Centre February 26 th,
How Are Marine Protected Areas Created? A Guide for the Lay Person.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Intervention to the Nunavut Water Board on the Type A Water License Renewal for the Nanisivik Mine Project Fisheries and Oceans.
Newmont Mining Corporation Mineral Development Advisory Group Meeting Fisheries and Oceans Canada October 26 th to 28 th, 2010 Cambridge Bay, Nunavut.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fish Habitat Management Program Intervention to the Nunavut Water Board on the Doris North Gold Project Cambridge Bay August.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
SUERF Annual Lecture Risk Management – A supervisor’s approach Gabriel Bernardino EIOPA Chairman Helsinki, 22 September 2011.
Disaster Recover Planning & Federal Information Systems Management Act Requirements December 2007 Central Maryland ISACA Chapter.
Environmental Management System Definitions
COMPLIANCE WITH THE SIGNING AND FILING OF PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTS BY HEADS OF DEPARTMENT BRIEFING TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION.
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
Environmental Assessment Act – Overview Environmental Media Group.
REVERSING ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION TRENDS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA AND GULF OF THAILAND THE REGIONAL SYSTEM OF FISHERIES REFUGIA: MULTIPLE.
The draft Marine Bill A New Framework for UK Seas 20 May 2008.
Lake Management in Alberta. Lake Issues ~2500 lakes in total with 800 fish-bearing lakes in Alberta Many lakes have changed due to Watershed alteration.
Health and Social Care Act 2008 Registration and Compliance Monitoring Maggie Hannelly Compliance Manager Bedfordshire 6 December 2010.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting Cambridge Bay, NU January 28-29,
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 12-14,
Back River Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 25-30,
REVIEW OF THE FISHERIES ACT Major changes & preliminary issues
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Sara Eddy Fisheries Protection Program Fisheries and Oceans Canada
GMD Data Request NERC Rules of Procedure Section 1600
Canadian Navigable Waters Act
Overview of the Proposed Changes to the Fisheries Act
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Overview of the Office of Health Standards Compliance
Overview of the Office of Health Standards Compliance
Overview of the Office of Health Standards Compliance
Overview of the Office of Health Standards Compliance
Environment Safeguards
Environment Safeguards
5/1/2019 3:12 AM SHARED STEWARDSHIP STABILITY, TRANSPARENCY AND PREDICTABILITY IN ALLOCATION November 26, 2010 Vancouver.
Overview of the Office of Health Standards Compliance
Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.
Overview of the Office of Health Standards Compliance
Overview of the Office of Health Standards Compliance
Presentation transcript:

Fisheries Protection Program: An overview November

Overview Amendments to the Fisheries Act: –A new focus Fisheries Protection Policy Statement: –Key points Fisheries Protection Program: –DFO’s new structure Complying with the Fisheries Protection Provisions: – Authorization process and transitional authorizations 2

Amendments to the Fisheries Act 3 Amendments to the Fisheries Act passed through Parliament and received Royal Assent on June 29 and December 14, 2012 All amendments will be in effect as of November 25, 2013 Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is transforming its approach to fisheries protection in order to: –Focus the Act’s regulatory regime on managing threats to the sustainability and ongoing productivity of Canada’s commercial, recreational and Aboriginal fisheries; –Provide enhanced compliance and protection tools for these fisheries

Amendments to the Fisheries Act (cont’d) –Provide clarity, certainty and consistency of regulatory requirements through the use of tools such as standards and regulations; and –Enable enhanced partnerships with agencies and organizations that are best placed to provide fisheries protection services to Canadians. 4

Fisheries Protection Policy Statement ( 5 Replaces the Policy for the Management of Fish Habitat Focuses on DFO’s regulatory role in managing threats related to habitat degradation and loss, and flow alteration Explains the fisheries protection provisions and outlines how DFO will implement these provisions, with emphasis on: –Serious harm to fish (Section 35 prohibition) –Scope of application of the prohibition –Framework for decision-making (Sections 6 and 6.1) Will be supported by more detailed policy and operational guidance

Serious harm to fish 6 The Subsection 35(1) prohibition is against causing serious harm to fish that are part of a commercial recreational or Aboriginal fishery, or to fish that support such a fishery Authorization is required when projects are likely to result in a localized effect to fish populations or fish habitat in the vicinity of the project

Serious harm to fish (cont’d) DFO interprets serious harm to fish as: –the death of fish ; –a permanent alteration of fish habitat of a spatial scale, duration and intensity that limits or diminishes the ability of fish to use such habitats as spawning grounds, or as nursery, rearing, or food supply areas, or as a migration corridor, or any other area in order to carry out one or more of their life processes; –the destruction of fish habitat of a spatial scale, duration, and intensity that fish can no longer rely upon such habitats for use as spawning grounds, or as nursery, rearing, or food supply areas, or as a migration corridor, or any other area in order to carry out one or more of their life processes. 7

Scope of application 8 Most water bodies in Canada contain fish, or fish habitat, that are part of, or support, a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery, and thus are subject to the prohibition against causing serious harm to fish Notwithstanding the above, some water bodies may be specifically excluded from the application of federal or provincial regulations Some water bodies may not contain fish or provide fish habitat that are part of or support commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fisheries. Such water bodies may not require authorization

Purpose and Section 6 Factors 9 The purpose of decision-making is to provide for the sustainability and ongoing productivity of commercial, recreational and Aboriginal fisheries A new section 6 guides decision-making related to the Fisheries Protection Provisions Four factors must be considered by the Minister before making decisions: a)the contribution of the relevant fish to the ongoing productivity of commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fisheries; b)fisheries management objectives; c)measures and standards to avoid, mitigate or offset serious harm to fish that are part of or support a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery; and d)the public interest.

Fisheries Protection Program DFO’s Fisheries Protection Program has replaced the former Habitat Management Program Services have been consolidated in 16 regional Fisheries Protection Units across Canada to review project submissions and monitor DFO- approved projects DFO will continue to review projects that pose risk of serious harm to fish and the habitat that supports them, while allowing low risk projects to proceed without a time-consuming and costly departmental review or intervention 10

Authorization process Authorizations are required for projects that are likely to result in serious harm to fish A formal process for applying for authorizations follows information requirements and defined time limits set under Fisheries Act regulations – An information guide for proponents is available on the DFO website Authorizations will include conditions to avoid, mitigate and offset the serious harm to fish Failure to abide by these conditions will be a contravention of the Fisheries Act. 11

Transitional authorizations 12 Transitional clauses provide a process to assess existing authorizations against the new prohibition Existing authorizations will remain in effect under the new Fisheries Act Proponents can request that DFO review their authorizations to confirm, amend or cancel them during a 90 day request period beginning on November 25, 2013 Conditions of existing authorizations will not be enforceable until after the 90 day request period expires or until a review is conducted

DFO will apply a risk-based approach to manage threats to fish and fish habitat that contribute to the sustainability and productivity of commercial, recreational and Aboriginal fisheries Amendments to Fisheries Act and the new Policy framework support this approach Fisheries Protection Provisions will continue to prohibit works, undertakings or activities (projects) which could result in “serious harm to fish” (i.e. death of fish, permanent alteration or destruction of fish habitat) Operational Approach

Proponents encouraged to avoid and mitigate to the extent possible. Tools in the Fisheries Act to promote and compel compliance Approach recognizes existing tools and technical resources to avoid impacts to fish and fish habitat –Provincial guides and Best Practices –Industry-based guidelines –Qualified Professionals Operational Approach

For low-risk projects, proponents required to self-assess using web tools and to seek advice from external-to-DFO sources DFO will continue to provide site specific advice where self assessment tools cannot help proponents avoid or mitigate effects Operational Approach