LHCb Upgrade Quick reminder of our strategy New developments New simulation results on occupancies Reduced material beampipe support New progress in the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sci-Fi tracker for IT replacement 1 Lausanne 9. December 2010.
Advertisements

LHCb Upgrade 09/09/091 Paula Collins (CERN) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration LHCb on the eve of the LHC LHCb upgrade The physics programme NP opportunities.
Burkhard Schmidt for the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb upgrade Outline: Present LHCb detector and trigger LHCb upgrade – main drivers Overview of the sub-detector.
LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics Lorenzo Bonechi on behalf of the LHCf Collaboration * University.
LHC Experiments at Liverpool E2V Visit – Nov 2005 Introduction Si Technology Upgrade/Maintenance Summary.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Recent RD50 studies have shown that silicon irradiated at these levels still delivers a signal of ~ 8ke - / MIP LHCb upgrade rationale. After collecting.
VELO Upgrade Critical Issues Two step upgrade with installation around 2013/2017 Implies a detector which can sustain 5/20/120 fb -1 Very tight schedule.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Martin van Beuzekom, STD6 14 th September Outline: Introduction to LHCb and VErtex LOcator (VELO) Status of VELO Beamtests Upgrades Summary LHCb.
RICH detectors for LHCb Tito Bellunato INFN Milano-Bicocca On behalf of the LHCb RICH collaboration 10th International Conference on Instrumentation for.
Roger Rusack – The University of Minnesota 1.
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Status of the MaPMT o Status quo o Ongoing work o Issues – mechanics – electronics – schedule o Conclusions LHCb meeting Milano Franz Muheim.
Project Update: A Possible New RF FOIL for the VELO UPGRADE Ray Mountain, Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.
The calibration and alignment of the LHCb RICH system Antonis Papanestis STFC - RAL for the LHCb Collaboration.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Russian groups in LHCb: Status report V. Egorychev CERN-Russia JWG, October 2009.
The LHCb VELO Upgrade Jianchun Wang Syracuse University For the LHCb VELO Group VERTEX 2009 Workshop,Veluwe, Netherlands, Sept 13-18, 2009.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
1 1 The LHCb Upgrade Outline LHCb Detector LHCb Detector Selected Physics Results Selected Physics Results Upgrade Plans Upgrade Plans Summary Summary.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
Pixel power R&D in Spain F. Arteche Phase II days Phase 2 pixel electronics meeting CERN - May 2015.
1 Marina Artuso Syracuse University For the LHCb VELO Group 7/29/2008 Marina Artuso Vertex 2008 LHCb Vertex Detector Upgrade Plans.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
BASIC SKETCH OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE CERN LHCB-RICH TEAM (2012 – 2017) Team composition Present activities and consolidation plans RICH – CERN R&D and Upgrade.
31/08/09 LHCb Upgrade – Paula Collins 7 th International Hiroshima Symposium 1 1 Paula Collins (CERN) On behalf of the LHCb and Medipix/Timepix collaborations.
Tracking at the Fermilab Test Beam Facility Matthew Jones, Lorenzo Uplegger April 29 th Infieri Workshop.
Muon Upgrade Meeting ( ) – P. Campana Since our last discussion : - CB decision to prepare a LOI for an Upgrade of LHCb (approx 100 pages, 10 for.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
23/02/07G. Vidal-Sitjes, VCI2007 Vienna Conference on Instrumentation1 The LHCb RICH detector G. Vidal-Sitjes on behalf of the LHCb RICH team Outline:
Technological advances for the LHCb upgrade Marina Artuso Syracuse University.
The LHCb Upgrade 1 U. Marconi, I.N.F.N. Bologna, CSN1 May 28 th, 2012.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
The Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors for LHCb Antonis Papanestis CCLRC – RAL On behalf of the LHCb RICH group.
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
Detector building Notes of our discussion
Overview and update of LHCb Upgrade
The LHCb Upgrade LHCb now Upgrade motivation New trigger and DAQ
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Simulated vertex precision
Strawman module design
TIMEPIX TESTBEAM TELESCOPE FOR AIDA
LHCb Upgrade – P Collins Beauty 09, Heidelberg
The LHC collider in Geneva
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
SVT detector electronics
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

LHCb Upgrade Quick reminder of our strategy New developments New simulation results on occupancies Reduced material beampipe support New progress in the VELO Developments for RICH Calorimeter irradiation tests Readout architecture Conclusions 22/09/091 Paula Collins (CERN) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09

Reminder of LHCb upgrade Strategy 22/09/092 The consequence: Read out all sub-systems at 40 MHz Replace all FE-electronics; all silicon modules, RICH-HPDs, FE boards of Calorimeter, Outer Tracker FE LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09 The idea The consequence Aim to operate at L = Perform entire trigger on CPU farm with input rate 30 MHz Goal is to double trigger efficiency for hadronic channels and make it scale with luminosity Trigger uses ALL event information, reconstructs all primary vertices, and can cut on p T and i.p. simultaneously A very flexible solution to adapt to physics landscape in the next decade All subsystems must be fully read out at 40 MHz Replace most FE electronics, silicon modules, RICH HPDs, FE boards of calorimeter and outer tracker

Why the choice of 2x10 33 ? Up until this luminosity, our yield improves enormously, while the underlying event characteristics remain reasonable Crossings with ≥ 1 interaction 10 MHz → 30 MHz Average number of interactions per crossing 1.2 → 4 BUT: spillover increases linearly with L We make the assumption that a luminosity range of x is compatible with LHC and SLHC running scenarios, (and everything in between…) May need dedicated study on machine side? 22/09/09 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09 3

LHCb Upgrade TimeLine First upgrade workshop Jan ‘07 Edinburgh EOI submitted April ‘08 Upgrade task force formed Sheldon Stone, Hans Dijkstra TDR planned for 2010 Plan to: Accumulate 10fb LHCb in 5 years Install substantial upgrade in (in synch with machine shut downs and long GPD interventions) Accumulate 100 fb-1 in a further 5 years operation 22/09/09 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09 4

Detector Upgrade Radiation: Current detector designed to withstand only 20 fb -1 Affects mainly large  (trackers, inner part of calorimeter) Running experience needed Note that VELO in any case will be replaced 22/09/09 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09 5 Tracking and Occupancy: Silicon can be operated without spillover: giving occupancy increase of ~2 Outer tracker straws: occupancy too high: Increase area coverage of IT and use faster gas Or Move to scintillating fibres Material Budget an important issue (occupancy, momentum resolution) HLT B yield from tracking efficiency and ghost rate (no spillover) with current detector Luminosity (10 32 cm -2 s-1) Efficiency [%] Ghost Rate [%]

Controlling Occupancies (I) Within OT, 77% of occupancy does not come from primary interaction envelope  Move IT behind OT  Reduce beam pipe support material  Remove aerogel and improve foil Result: 11% improvement in average occupancy (but better in inner regions) for a factor 2 improvement in beam pipe support (T. Skwarnicki, Upgrade Meeting 9 September 2009) In fact, much better than this can be achieved (factor 3-4? see presentation of R. Veness) Hans Dijkstra, Upgrade Meeting 19 March 2009 New optimized beampipe support collar 22/09/096 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09

7 R. Mountain, Syracuse University VELO Upgrade Meeting, 7 Apr Controlling Occupancies (II) RF FOIL & RF BOX cross section ~1mm REQUIREMENTS Separates accelerator and detector vacua (must be ultra-high vacuum compatible) Should minimise material before first and second measured points Shield against RF EMI pick-up effects Carry beam image charge Accommodate sensor geometry Withstand heating, cooling, and radiation levels CURRENT DESIGN Foil is 300 um AlMg3, coated with insulator and getter Foil shape set by overlapping sensors and beam clearance and beam effects Large area: 200 x 1000 mm 2 Maximum allowed pressure differential: 5 mbar Contributes significant material to VELO Was a huge engineering effort (NIKHEF) UPGRADE DESIGN Carbon Fiber composite Large modulus fibers (stiff, low density) Resin with high rad tolerance, low outgassing (space qualified), micro-crack and delamination resistant Produce foil+box+flange as single integrated unit Avoids sealing problems Aim for ~50% of current mass thickness In development with industrial partner CMA (Composite Mirror Applications Inc.) Prototyping planned to start by end 2009, testing early 2010 FOIL

Controlling Occupancies (III) Spillover suppression for silicon detectors Highly effective Can be applied given knowledge of previous/next event e.g. 31% reduction of TT clusters OT geometry modifications Occupancy of worst region at 2x10 33 can be brought down to 21% Reducing the readout gate (75→50 ns) gives another factor ~1.6 21% 26% 32% 43% 22/09/098 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09

Upgrade Upgrading the VELO to 40 MHz implies complete replacement of all modules and FE electronics. Two major challenges Data rate of ~1300 GBit/s Radiation levels and hence thermal management of modules Important to maintain current performance by keeping material low Small modules with low power Thinning of sensor and electronics Use of CVD diamond planes for cooling and/or sensor Removal/rework of RF foil 22/09/09 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/ Dose after 100 fb -1 n eq cm -2 x TID (MRad) tip of current VELO Impact parameter resolutions for varying foil thicknesses

Lots of activity over the summer Timepix (derivative of Medipix) is a contender for the VELO pixel electronics readout Square pixel and 3 side buttable design opens up possibility of single sided module Testbeam carried out to investigate suitability of chip for charged particle tracking Test sensor position and angle controlled remotely by stepper motors 6 plane Timepix Telescope + Test Sensor Pixel X/Y VELO Pixel Y FPIX telescope also in action at Fermilab Main purpose: to investigate VELO sensor performance (resolution, efficiency, radiation hardness) 22/09/0910 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09

Testbeam highlights 2.5  m Estimated track contribution to residual PRELIMINARY: UNCALIBRATED DATA!! Timepix shows clean landaus and excellent resolution Timepix resolution as a function of angle pitch=55  m Track residual (  m) Landau peak, Timepix at 0 o 22/09/0911 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09 First look at irradiated VELO strip sensors Fermilab testbeam

Future developments for VELO Group will concentrate pixel electronics efforts in Timepix, which looks promising Many issues to be solved: architecture modifications, high speed links, on-chip processing, fast column readout, timewalk.... MPW runs planned for next year, followed by full chip submission Module and Sensor R&D is also going ahead Rad hard n-in-p silicon Diamond as a sensing element 3D Module thermal, mechanical and hybridisation issues Upgraded strip design Construction of LHCb telescope facility at CERN for R&D Institutes are moving fast to secure resources. Already some grants approved 22/09/0912 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09

Particle ID in the RICH system Need to replace front end electronics AND photon detectors to cope with 40 MHz readout Baseline approach; keep current geometrical layout RICH1 (aerogel+C 4 F 10 ) + RICH2 (CF 4 ) OR, replace aerogel with new TOF system (TORCH) located after RICH2 Photon sensors together with their new (independent) chip are the critical item: Front runners are flat panel and MaPMTs 0.3M channels R&D needed (x talk, spillover, B field, lens...) or upgraded HPDs study ion feedback rate many new components: production time an issue Non-baseline idea: MCPs B tolerance, timing, new idea... Next generation MaPMTs 22/09/0913 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09 HPDs under study by several RICH groups

New concept for RICH: the TORCH Time of flight detector based on a quartz plate, for the identification of p<10 GeV hadrons (replacing aerogel) reconstruct photon flight time and direction in specially designed standoff box Clock arrival time to ~20 ps Deduce photon emission time → track ToF R&D on hardware needed: Microchannel plate PM with multianode readout MCP-PM achieved in testbeam ps time resolution with p.e. mechanics, electronics (Timepix?), aging etc. possible synergy with PANDA and VELO E.Ramberg /TIPP09 22/09/0914 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09 New simulation results for TORCH with full pattern recognition

HLT seeds already provided at 40 MHz Modifications to electronics needed: Upgraded FE boards Lower PM gain (÷5) and increase preamp sensitivity and lower noise accordingly No showstopper forseen Radiation tolerance currently an open issue Affects inner part of ECAL (would need replacement) Tested up to 2.5 Mrad (1 upgrade year) R&D underway to collect more comprehensive data Pile-up (~4 at upgrade) will affect resolution: watch carefully for low p T,  physics 15 Energy Resolution  varying 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 Calorimeters September 2009: calorimeter modules placed in LHC tunnel to accumulate dose 2x10 33 cm -2 s -1 22/09/0915 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09

 Full simulation framework has been built based on the new Readout/S-TFC architecture 1. synthesizable “clock level-fidel” simulation of S-TFC component and links (Based on the proven GBT simulation) 2. clock level emulation of FE+ROB model with variable parameters  In parallel, investigation planned of latency, phase control and stability of common Altera GX links  Based on mature ideas on new S-TFC architecture presented at IEEE Real Time Conference 2009 in Beijing, China New results for RO architecture 16 22/09/09 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09 Example test case: = 30% #channels / GBT link = 21  ~ 6.3 channels / GBT after ZS Derandomizer depth = 24 Channel size = 12 (e.g. ADDR = 5bits + ADC_DATA = 7bits)  Size of truncated events follows occupancy PDF, no bias!

Outlook LHCb upgrade on track Upgrade strategy SLHC independent: Goal: 100 fb -1 in 5 years at L =2x10 33 x20 statistics in hadron channels x10 statistics in leptonic channels Maintain tracking and PID performance Much progress in hardware and software (simulation studies not shown today) Experience with LHC running CRITICAL for fixing design parameters. After first data, can aim for upgrade TDR (~2010) 22/09/09 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09 17

18 A fiber tracker with mixed fiber dimensions (250 mm for inner part, mm for outer) to be readout with SiPM and/or conventional MaPMT Simplified services configuration: no cables, no cooling, frames thinning, FEE outside  gives less X/X 0 Good timing performances Increased granularity in x – spatial resolution enough 32 channels Si PM: 0.25 x 1 mm 2 OTIT Preliminary: 80  m residuals Lausanne Problems to be addressed: - SiPM readout and its optimisation - radiation hardness - mechanics Alternative Solutions for Tracking 22/09/0918 LHCb Upgrade – P Collins LHCC 22/09/09