Highways and Transit We Need Each Other! Examples of Successful Coordination in Pima County 2012 AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference – Flagstaff, AZ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pathway to Victory REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION REFERENDUM.
Advertisements

EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Meeting Name Date. Agenda Introductions Transportation Funding 101 Program Development Process Program Projects Strategic Funding Tax Rate Implications.
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION August 2012 The Honorable Larry Phillips Chairman, House Committee on Transportation.
Meeting Name Date. Agenda Introductions Transportation Funding 101 Program Development Process Program Projects Strategic Funding Tax Rate Implications.
1 PRINCETON FUTURE January 11, 2011 PRINCETON BRANCH TRANSPORTATION ISSUES Jack May.
December 13, 2010 Developing Bicycle Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho.
CFTE Transit Initiatives Conference: What We Can Learn From Recent Campaigns Tempe, AZ December 8, 2003.
SB 360 and Multi-Modal Impact Fees & Efficiently Managing a Street Lightning System.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
National Transportation || || 1 Lei Zhang, Ph.D. Associate Professor Director,
Transportation Planning and Design in Practice
Results of a Hedonic Regression Model That Estimates the Impact of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stations on Surrounding Residential Property Values Along the.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM A SURVEY OF LIKELY VOTERS IN DENVER What Is the Public Telling Us? Ben Kelly.
UNDERSTANDING ISSUES, EXPLORING OPTIONS & MAKING CHOICES.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
MOBILITY FEES, SMART GROWTH AND FUNDING July 11, 2012.
Getting the Green Light on Transportation Initiatives Drafting Successful Ballot Measures Center for Transportation Excellence Conference June 12, 2007.
Developing A Short Range Transit Plan AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference April 2014 John Andoh, Transit Director, Yuma County Intergovernmental Public Transportation.
Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
EFFECTS OF RISING GAS PRICES ON BUS RIDERSHIP FOR SMALL URBAN AND RURAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS Jeremy Mattson 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Special STP Application Cycle for SFY 2016 Projects ICC and Executive Committee Meetings September 2015.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
Northeast Florida Regional Transportation Commission 1.
1. New Starts Program Debate Preserving the American Dream Conference Washington, DC October 27, 2013 Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public.
MOBILITY 2030: THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPOLITAN AREA North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Greater Minnesota Transit. Greater MN Transit Service (2010) 59 transit agencies –6 Large Urban (more than 50,000 population) –13 Small Urban –40 Rural.
“People should have transportation options.” TRANSPORTATION MOVING PEOPLE AND COMMERCE WHERE THEY WANT AND NEED TO GO.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
Prop 1B: Infrastructure Bonds 2007 Bay Area Vendor Fair Oakland, CA May 24,2007 Bay Area Transportation:
Regional Transit Study Final Recommendations March 15, 2010.
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Job Creation transportation By Gyasi Edwards. Introduction: Have you ever wonder how bad the unemployment in Cincinnati is? Ever wanted to know how to.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
1 Destination 2030 Kern Regional Transportation Needs * Information provided by Kern Council of Governments.
WE NEED EACH OTHER PRESENTER MARCUS P HOFFMAN, CCTM-CSSM-VMMI.
1 December 12, 2007 I-35W Bridge Response Plan Update.
Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE 2040 LRTP Update – Needs Plan Development October 6, 2015 City of Lynn Haven.
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB)
North Carolina Transportation Issues David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E. Emeritus Professor of Transportation Studies UNC Charlotte Remarks at the Shaftesbury.
MADISON AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Update of the Regional Transportation Plan A Presentation to Dane County’s Transportation, Utilities.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
Meeting Name Date. Agenda Introductions Transportation Funding 101 Program Development Process Program Projects Strategic Funding Tax Rate Implications.
Transit is Smart Growth Matt Ryan Coconino County Supervisor Chair, NAIPTA April 24, 2012 Arizona Transit Association Annual Conference.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Financial Plan Planning Council 2040 RTP June 4, 2015.
Regional Transportation Plan Draft Hybrid Scenario Transportation Policy Committee 7/22/03.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Regional Roads Committee
Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets Multimodal Cities: Addressing Issues in Transit Corridors March 24, 2016.
Meeting Name Date.
Meeting Name Date.
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

Highways and Transit We Need Each Other! Examples of Successful Coordination in Pima County 2012 AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference – Flagstaff, AZ

Transit Needs Roadways

Roadways Need Transit - Congestion

Estimated $8.2 million in annual savings (time +fuel) for Tucson

Roadways Need Transit – It’s for Everybody Transit is for everyone - an affordable mobility option for people of all ages and ability

We Need Each Other – Choices

APTA reports 2011 we saw 2 nd highest amount of ridership since 1957

Roadways Need Transit – Choices Phillip Cyr, a recent convert and full- time choice commuter

We Need Each Other – Funding 1.In 1986 a county-wide loop freeway system voted down 43% to 57% 2.In 1989 a county-wide general road improvement plan failed 39% to 61% 3.In 2002 a City of Tucson initiative road improvement main plan failed 31% to 69% 4.In 2003, City of Tucson initiative with a heavy transit focus failed 37% to 63% 4 FAILED FUNDING INITIATIVES

We Need Each Other – Funding 5 th Times a Charm? 2006 RTA countywide multimodal transportation plan passed 60% - 40% Roadways58% Transit27% Safety9% Environment6%

We Need Each Other – Funding 2040 RTP

Successful Coordination - Intersections Bus pullouts/shelters and intersection improvements

Successful Coordination – Multimodal Brdg. Cushing St. bridge spearheaded by transit project

Successful Coordination – Shared ROW Modern streetcar operation in share right-of-way

Future Coordination Are there common interests?

Thank You! 2012 AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference Jeremy Papuga Transit Planning and Operations Manager