Strategic Planning Process Aug-Sep 2005 – Pre-retreat teams with assignments Sep 2005 – System-wide retreat with President, Vice Presidents, Chancellors & senior staff Oct-Nov 2005 – First draft based planning retreat Nov-Dec 2005 – Initial benchmarks drafted (long list) Jan-Mar 2006 – Iterative refinement through feedback Mar 2006 – Full draft presented to Board of Trustees for review Apr-May 2006 – Final edits completed and scorecard developed June 2006 – Plan approved by Board of Trustees Aug 2006 – Campus visits to present plan Aug 2006 – Scorecard retreat to set specific 5-year targets

Mission  Outreach  Globalization Organizational  Effective and Efficient Use of Resources

Outreach Goals  Increase awareness of outreach activities among all elected officials Engaged assistance and solutions for our communities, state and beyond Engaged assistance and solutions for our communities, state and beyond Assessment in collaboration with Michigan State -- survey instrument Assessment in collaboration with Michigan State -- survey instrument  Increase impact from outreach activities to $1 billion annually Document and promote financial impacts of programs  Emphasize and reward outstanding outreach activities Scholarship of outreach instruction, research and service

Outreach Benchmarks  Patients or clients served through our units Serving every citizen every day” “Serving every citizen every day”  Percentage of faculty engaged in externally funded outreach projects Utilize MSU survey instrument to collect and document  Annual expenditures for outreach Assesses mission-oriented effort in terms of resources allocated

Globalization Goals  Develop system-wide priorities for globalization activities Collaboration and coordination among campuses and institutes Collaboration and coordination among campuses and institutes Strong programs engaged in education, research and outreach Strong programs engaged in education, research and outreach  Expand international staff/faculty/student exchange programs Share opportunities among campuses and institutes  Demonstrate the benefits of globalization activities to key stakeholders Beneficiaries of the global marketplace for ideas, products, solutions

Globalization Benchmarks  Percentage of students with UT-sponsored international study experience The expectation rather than the exception  Number of active formal international collaboration agreements Formal and currently active  Percentage of faculty engaged in sponsored international projects Educational, research or outreach

Organizational Resources Benchmarks  Faculty salaries relative to peers  Staff salaries relative to market  Percentage of budget expended for administration relative to peers  Diversity of faculty and staff  Ratings on employee satisfaction surveys  Increase in awareness of emphasis components  Capital-campaign dollars raised