Not clear what impact the research will have (“so what…?”) “Worthy” “solid” (but dull) More of the same, duplicative, unambitious No clear hypothesis or.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Next? MRC Opportunities Mark Pitman Theme Leader, Methodology, MRC MRC/NIHR Methodology Fellows Workshop – 9 th February 2011.
Advertisements

ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
What makes a good NIHR application? 9 February 2012 Professor Jonathan Michaels.
Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
How to write a Research Grant? or How to get a grant rejected? Spencer Gibson Provincial Director, Research CancerCare Manitoba.
Project Managing a PH D And surviving the process Paul Hyland.
AuthorAID Post-PACN-Congress Workshop on Research Writing Accra, Ghana November 2011.
MRC Funded Research Opportunities
Association Of Women Surgeons VA Chapter
Preparing a Grant Proposal: Some Basics
How to write a successful grant application Dr Paul Colville-Nash Programme Manager, Infections and Immunity Board Medical Research Council October 2010.
Page 1 Improving Research Grant Quality at GCU Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.
Top 10 Tips for Effective Grant Writing Karen Kidd, Canada Research Chair & Professor, Biology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John Presented at the.
Evaluation Criteria 1.Challenge—The aim and importance of the endeavour (40%) 2.Feasibility—The plan to achieve excellence (20%) 3.Capability—The expertise.
ESF Funding & The Big Lottery Opt-In Partnership Working Event Thursday 16 th April 2015.
Developing ESRC Centre and Programme Bids Professor Andrew Pollard and Professor Teresa Rees.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
RGC Grant Applications in Biology & Medicine Formulating and Writing winning proposals Kathy Cheah, 2003.
Training & Career Development: MRC Clinical Fellowships and Awards Dr Paul Colville-Nash Programme Manager, Medical Research Council Academic Opportunities.
Speaker: Associate Professor Janet Keast RESEARCH GRANTS FORUM 23 RD November 2005 NH&MRC PROJECT GRANTS.
How to get that first NIH grant
HRB Webinar Health Research Awards Content Objective of the call Scope and Panels Principal Investigator Response to peer-reviewers (rebuttal) Some.
Min Du Department of Animal Science How to develop a successful grant proposal.
What do reviewers look for in a research proposal? Research Councils’ review criteria Dimitra Koutsantoni Research & Knowledge Transfer Manager.
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Grants Factory GRANTS FACTORY WRITING GROUPS Essential Elements of a Good Grant Application Mick Tuite School of Biosciences
WCHRI Innovation Grants The Art & Science of Grant Writing Dr. Kathy Hegadoren Dr. Jason Dyck.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Michael A. Sesma, Ph.D.; NIMH What Is A Strong Grant Application? What Is A Strong Grant Application? Simple steps to a successful grant application Michael.
Prof Wong Tien Yin Group Director, Research SingHealth Preparing the CSA Application.
Preparing Grant Proposals: A Session for INASP Country Coordinators Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH AuthorAID Knowledge Community Editor Bangladesh May 2009.
Why Do Funded Research?. We want/need to understand our world.
The Academic Scientist Kenneth Ruud Prorector for research and development.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
BSc Final Year Projects in Computing Computer Science, Creative Computing, Games Programming, Business Computing Dr Rodger Kibble.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
GRANT WRITING Find the right grant and win the funding!!
Writing the Proposal: Scientific and technological objectives PHOENIX Training Course Laulasmaa, Estonia
Working with Allies and Networks © 2014 Public Health Institute.
National Institutes of Health AREA PROGRAM (R15) Thomas J. Wenzel Bates College, Lewiston, Maine.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
Working with the NIHR Research Design Service to maximize successful grant applications Dr. Steven Blackburn NIHR Research Design Service West Midlands.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
Programme Grants for Applied Research and Programme Development Grants Programmes Supporting a successful application September 2014.
Approach Section: The “Meat” of the Proposal INBRE Grant Writing Workshops 2015 Helen Beneš, Ph.D. Director, AR INBRE Developmental Research Project Program.
Research Fellowships. Overview Introduction Why apply for a fellowship Finding the right fellowship The application process Assessment criteria for funding.
IRCHSS Postdoctoral Awards Michael Breen October
Project Proposals Problems? Broad reasons of proposal failures – Ambiguity of aim, lack of clarity of content – Inappropriate approach, technology or methodology.
Research for Patient Benefit Preparing a research proposal What makes a good proposal? Professor Scott Weich, Panel Chair.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.
“Preparing competitive grant proposals that match policy objectives - project proposal evaluators' viewpoint ” Despina Sanoudou, PhD FACMG Assistant Professor.
Reviewers Expectations Peter Donkor. Outline Definitions The review process Common mistakes to avoid Conclusion.
Grant Writing for Success
Applying for funding: Tips fom the trenches
MRC’s Translational Research Funding
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
MSc in Social Research Methods
Connecting the Sections and Incorporating Feedback
COFUND Proposal th March 2017 EUSC.
The NSF Grant Review Process: Some Practical Tips
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
BU Career Development Grant Writing Course- Session 3, Approach
REFERENCES AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
NIHR Research Design Service East Midlands
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
NEUROLOGY FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES:
Wednesday 13 September UKCF Conference Cardiff
Presentation transcript:

Not clear what impact the research will have (“so what…?”) “Worthy” “solid” (but dull) More of the same, duplicative, unambitious No clear hypothesis or important question Unfocused. Overambitious – too much, no clear plan Methodology insufficiently detailed, limitations not appreciated Lack of preliminary data / appropriate experience Modest publication record (for experienced researchers) Inadequate knowledge and expertise Lack of collaborators, supervision & mentorship Common reasons why proposals fail

Being successful Understand the funder –Science: remit and opportunities –Administrative: Forms; CV; page length & number; finance & signatures… Be bold –Ambitious, original… and NOT boring Plan well & be realistic –You will be over-optimistic ! A complex study will roll out slower than you think. –Agreements and authorisations will take time. –Not everything will work. Clarify dependencies, risks and plan contingencies

Being successful Discuss and learn –Draw on experienced colleagues, mentors, research Board members, funding officials & patient groups –Learn from “failure” and feedback (<25% of proposals may be funded) Present clearly: person, project, ‘place’ –Be specific: what you aim to achieve, why and how –You will need to inform and persuade a diverse audience –Explain and justify research question / hypothesis design / strategy delivery (methods, collaborations, management); ethics resources

Remember… Your application will only be as strong as its weakest link Deliverability Resources Design Need & Potential for Impact Ethics