Yours, Mine, Ours: Leadership Through Collaboration Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 21 September, 2010 How Do We Create and Maintain Standards? Eric Miller
Common Themes (a) Wrong place and the wrong time
Common Themes (a) Wrong place and the wrong time (b) Horrible acronyms
Common Themes (a) Wrong place and the wrong time (b) Horrible acronyms (c) Art of the Possible
Solutions Group Solutions—Common Values “Things work at scale because the community subscribes to the same values.”
Creative Tension
Diversity
Common Values?
Value continuum Move beyond self interest for the greater good What’s in it for me / my company?
Abstracted Strategies Define standards only to the point necessary under-specificity can be a good thing
Abstracted Strategies Provide as clear of scope as possible set expectations up front clear process for extending scope if needed
Abstracted Strategies Define process for governance and social engineering find the middle ground between yahoo groups to robert’s rules level the playing field - everyone gets (the option) to have a voice be clear about your participation model
Abstracted Strategies Define use cases up front use this to reflect scope use this to articulate (societal) benefit
Abstracted Strategies Reference implementation (if applicable) grounds utility of standards accelerates deployment use this to articulate (technical) benefit
Abstracted Strategies Establish a clear position on your IP up front e.g. royalty free vs RAND e.g. OSI approved Open Source License for code e.g. Creative Commons for document deliverables
Abstracted Strategies Record your decisions / preserve your discourse archive discussion referenceable meeting minutes link resolutions to discourse
Abstracted Strategies Identify the intersection of common goals representative of participants complementary commercial and societal impact coopetition provide clear benefit for participants (institutions)
Abstracted Strategies Create an environment that empowers participants / acknowledges effort high-light work share the wealth / credit / spotlight
Abstracted Strategies Benevolent dictator / chair / leader model for escalation hope to never use defined process comes in handy here
Abstracted Strategies Maintain a clear Feedback loop During the process After the standard is “complete”
Why extend beyond LAM? Data management, selection, aggregation, preservation, curation, delivery, etc. are no longer the domain of just LAM LAM has a huge opportunity to share knowledge and shape deliverables (that then benefit LAM) Trust transfers Extraordinarily effective means to move beyond self interest for the greater good
One quick example W3C Provenance Group Why not more LAM?
Creative Tension
Expand comfort zone
Thank you Eric Eric