CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-08.txt Authors & Contributors GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCAMP WG, IETF 80th, Prague, Czech Republic draft-gonzalezdedios-subwavelength-framework-00 Framework for GMPLS and path computation support of sub-wavelength.
Advertisements

Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for OTN and SONET/SDH OAM Configuration draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext-00.
RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
ITU-T/OIF Report IETF 76 – Hiroshima – Nov09 L. Ong (Ciena) Thanks to Malcolm Betts & Kam Lam for ITU- T slides.
Information model for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-bccg-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-04 CCAMP WG, IETF 80 th Prague.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-02/03 CCAMP WG, IETF 78 th Maastricht.
Information model for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-bccg-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-03 CCAMP WG, IETF 79 th Beijing.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolutive G.709 OTN
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3-00 CCAMP WG, IETF 82 nd Taipei.
CCAMP Working Group Milestone Discussion IETF 84 84th IETF CCAMP Working Group 1.
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for G.709-v3 (draft-khuzema-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g txt ) Rajan Rao ( Khuzema Pithewan.
Presented by: Dmitri Perelman Nadav Chachmon. Agenda Overview MPLS evolution to GMPLS Switching issues –GMPLS label and its distribution –LSP creation.
Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN) BoF
CCAMP - 70th IETF1 Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Support For Metro Ethernet Forum and G.8011 User-Network Interface (UNI) draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-mef-uni-01.txt.
CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-00.txt Fatai Zhang Dan Li Jianrui.
OSPF-TE extensions for OTN (draft-ashok-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-03) CCAMP IETF-80 (Mar-2011) Rajan Rao Ashok Kunjidhapatham.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
IETF 68, MPLS WG, Prague P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal.
64th IETF Vancouver November 2005 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at:
Information model for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-bccg-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-01 CCAMP WG, IETF 78 th Maastricht.
Draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath Authors: Nobo Akiya (presenter) George Swallow Stephane Litkowski Bruno Decraene John E. Drake IETF 90, Toronto,
Operating VCAT and LCAS with GMPLS draft-bernstein-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-01 Greg Bernstein: Diego.
Page th IETF Vancouver, B.C., Canada Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with GMPLS Greg Bernstein.
P2MP MPLS-TE FRR with P2MP Bypass Tunnel draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-00.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal (Juniper) IETF 67, MPLS WG,
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3-03 CCAMP WG, IETF 84 th Vancouver.
Draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming-00 74th IETF San Francisco March Advice on When It is Safe to Start Sending Data on Label Switched Paths.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g CCAMP WG, IETF 79 th Beijing.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g CCAMP WG, IETF 81 th Quebec City.
CCAMP WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control Fatai Zhang.
1 Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-02 CCAMP WG, IETF 86 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
1 Requirements for MPLS Over a Composite Link draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-02 Authors: C. Villamizar, Ed.D. McDysan, Ed. S. Ning A. Malis L. Yong Contributors:
WG Document Status 192nd IETF TEAS Working Group.
67th IETF San Diego November 2006 Requirement for Inter-Domain LSP Recovery Wataru Imajuku: Tomohiro.
MPLS-TP INTER-OP: WHAT, WHY, AND HOW? General Objectives for MPLS-TP Inter-Op Test Program at UNH-IOL.
Application of PWE3 to MPLS Transport Networks
Framework for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-05 CCAMP WG, IETF 82 nd Taipei.
CCAMP WG, IETF 80th, Prague, Czech Republic draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-04.txt Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of G.709 Optical Transport.
CCAMP WG, IETF 75th, Stockholm, Sweden draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt Fatai Zhang Guoying
Kireeti Kompella draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-01
LDP extension for Inter-Area LSP draft-decraene-mpls-ldp-interarea-04 Bruno DecraeneFrance Telecom / Orange Jean-Louis Le RouxFrance Telecom / Orange Ina.
CCAMP - 71th IETF1 Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Support For Metro Ethernet Forum and G.8011 Ethernet Service Switching draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-ether-svcs-01.txt.
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-03 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
66th IETF, Montreal, July 2006 PCE Working Group Meeting IETF-66, July 2006, Montreal A Backward Recursive PCE-based Computation (BRPC) procedure to compute.
Page th IETF Vancouver, B.C., Canada Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with GMPLS Greg Bernstein.
Multi layer implications in GMPLS controlled networks draft-bcg-ccamp-gmpls-ml-implications-05 D.Papadimitriou (Alcatel-Lucent) D.Ceccarelli (Ericsson)
OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Express Path Updates draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-01.txt Spencer Giacalone, Alia Atlas, John Drake, Stefano Previdi,
1 RSVP-TE Recovery Extension Extension for Additional Signal Types in G.709 OTN draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-02.txt 89th IETF, CCAMP WG,
RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary in MRN/MLN draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt.
1 RSVP-TE Recovery Extension Extension for Additional Signal Types in G.709 OTN draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-03.txt 90th IETF, CCAMP WG,
Technology agnostic OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS draft-bccgd-ccamp-gmpls-opsf-agnostic-00 CCAMP WG, IETF 79 th Beijing.
61st IETF Washington DC, Nov GMPLS Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Requirements GMPLS Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Requirements draft-otani-ccamp-interas-gmpls-te-01.txt.
CCAMP WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-03.txt Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of G.709 Optical Transport Networks.
ITU Liaison on T-MPLS Stewart Bryant
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi - Presenter Zafar.
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for G
FlexE - Channel Control Work in the IETF
RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary in MRN/MLN draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-02.txt Xihua Fu Qilei Wang.
Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with GMPLS draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-02.txt Greg Bernstein.
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control
FlexE - Channel Control Work in the IETF
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control
OSPF Extensions for ASON Routing draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-03.txt IETF67 - Prague - Mar’07 Dimitri.
PLR Designation in RSVP-TE FRR
Qilei Wang & Yuanbin Zhang Huub van Helvoort (New co-author)
Iftekhar Hussain (Presenter),
draft-merge-ccamp-otn-b100g-fwk-01
GMPLS Routing and Signaling Framework for Flexible Ethernet (FlexE) draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-03 Authors Iftekhar Hussain Radha.
PW Control Word Stitching
E. Bellagamba, Ericsson P. Sköldström, Acreo D. Ward, Juniper
Presentation transcript:

CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt Authors & Contributors GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control

Authors & Contributors Fatai Guoying Sergio Daniele Khuzema Yi Yunbin Pietro Diego Mohit Rajan Ashok Biao Lyndon Igor Thanks Jonathan Sadler, John E Drake and other active experts for their useful comments to the document.

Changes from Version 07 Merged and introducing the multi-stage label solution Section 5.1 Definition of Generalized Label Description of H-LSP using Generalized Label Introducing optional multi-stage label object (New) Description of multi-stage label solution using Generalized Label + multi-stage label (New) Section 5.2 From Definition of multi-stage Generalized Label Description of multi-stage label solution using multi-stage Generalized Label Section 3.1 Requirements of ODU multiplexing (the reqs would be moved to after agreement) New Development: Authors agreed to have Generalized Label Format as specified in Section 5.2

Requirements of ODU Multiplexing [R2.1]: Pre-provisioned of intermediate ODU2[R2.2]: Dynamic creation of intermediate ODU2 [R1]: Single-stage multiplexing (e.g., ODUj->ODUk, or ODUj->OTUj) [R2]: Multi-hops multi-stage multiplexing [R3]: One-hop multi-stage multiplexing [R4]: Control & management of intermediate ODU layer [R5]: Creating ODUj service involving various mux hierarchies on each hop [R6]: Egress control of OTN interface [R3.1]: Pre-provisioned of intermediate ODU2[R3.2]: Dynamic creation of intermediate ODU2 OTU3 ODU0 ODU2 ODU0->ODU2->ODU3 Section 3.1

Multi-stage Labels Multi-stage multiplexing Multi-hop Multi- stage multiplexing One-hop Multi- stage multiplexing H-LSP ODU multiplexing One-stage multiplexing No multi-stage muxing. Don't need H-LSP or multi-stage label Pre-provisioned of intermediate ODU Dynamic creation of intermediate ODU Pre-provisioned of intermediate ODU Dynamic creation of intermediate ODU H-LSP multi- stage label H-LSP ODU multiplexing scenarios Potential Solutions Only need "service ODUj -> intermediate ODUk "label; Multi-stage label is not necessary Generalized Label = all stage muxing Label format (Section 5.2) Section 5.1 & 5.2

Need Clarification w.r.t. RFC3471/3945  RFC 3471/3945 states  “A Generalized Label only carries a single level of label, i.e., it is non-hierarchical. When multiple levels of label (LSPs within LSPs) are required, each LSP must be established separately, see [MPLS- HIERARCHY].”  OTN Label can essentially contain multiple stages, as described in section 5.2. Should we call it hierarchical Label or something different (OTN Composite Label?)?  If it is hierarchical Label, then we might need a new draft to get this clarified w.r.t. RFC3471/3945

Next Steps WG document adoption?

Backup slides for discussion

Discussion Item#1 : Applicability of Multi-stage Label Multi-stage label replaces single hop H- LSP(s). – Multiplexing hierarchy needs to be same on the both ends of the link for multi-stage label to work. If Multiplexing hierarchy on the 2 ends of the link is not same, then it calls for multi-hop H-LSP. – Multi-stage label is not meant to replace multi-hop H-LSP

Discussion Item#2: Restoration of single hop H-LSP Single Hop H-LSP is a direct connection between 2 interfaces. There is no switch fabric configuration involved in single hop H-LSP. Since there is no mesh here, restoration is not applicable. Only Link protection 1+1 or 1:n is applicable

Discussion Item #3: Multi-stage Label and OAM Ref: RFC 4783, draft-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration- fwk-06 Both of these documents talk about end-to-end OAM of service layer. It doesn’t address server layer(s) involved in supporting service layer. If Multi-stage Label is used, OAM is applicable only to client signal that is mentioned in traffic specs. – All the other layers, that are created to support service layer, doesn’t come in the purview of end-to-end OAM.

Discussion Item#4: Egress Control through signaling In the absence of multi-stage label as “egress label”, manual steps are needed to – create the multiplexing hierarchy on lsp egress interface – assign the interface indexes to each layer of the hierarchy – This index and corresponding time slot information needs to be configured as part of LSP configuration. Multi-stage label automates these manual steps through signaling (Ref: RFC4003)