고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering 1. Introduction  Divide-and-conquer strategy  Allen Newell (1973) – unified theory, production system  ACT-R,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MODELING PARAGIGMS IN ACT-R -Adhineth Mahanama.V.
Advertisements

Pat Langley Computational Learning Laboratory Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University, Stanford, California USA
Pat Langley Computational Learning Laboratory Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University, Stanford, California USA
Pat Langley School of Computing and Informatics Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona A Cognitive Architecture for Integrated.
Rulebase Expert System and Uncertainty. Rule-based ES Rules as a knowledge representation technique Type of rules :- relation, recommendation, directive,
Long-Term Memory: Encoding and Retrieval
Other Analysis of Variance Designs Chapter 15. Chapter Topics Basic Experimental Design Concepts  Defining Experimental Design  Controlling Nuisance.
Dr. Neil H. Schwartz Psy 353 Fall 2011 Sensory Register Purpose Capacity ~On ave. about 500 msec (1/2 second). ~No difference between 5 year olds &
SAL: A Hybrid Cognitive Architecture Y. Vinokurov 1, C. Lebiere 1, D. Wyatte 2, S. Herd 2, R. O’Reilly 2 1. Carnegie Mellon University, 2. University of.
Cognition Alie Fulton. Memory Can be divided into three separate storage areas: a sensory store, a short-term store, and a long-term store.
Threaded Cognition: An Integrated Theory of Concurrent Multitasking
Language, Mind, and Brain by Ewa Dabrowska Chapter 10: The cognitive enterprise.
Unit 7: Base-Level Activation February 25, February 26, 2002Unit 72 Activation Revisited  Both latency and probability of recall depend on activation.
1 Soar Semantic Memory Yongjia Wang University of Michigan.
Unit 5: Activation and Latency February 11, 2003.
A Soar’s Eye View of ACT-R John Laird 24 th Soar Workshop June 11, 2004.
ACT-R.
The Information-Processing Approach
Polyscheme John Laird February 21, Major Observations Polyscheme is a FRAMEWORK not an architecture – Explicitly does not commit to specific primitives.
Models of Human Performance Dr. Chris Baber. 2 Objectives Introduce theory-based models for predicting human performance Introduce competence-based models.
Psychology of Music Learning Miksza Memory Processes.
Abstraction and ACT-R. Outline Motivations for the Theory –Architecture –Abstraction Production Rules ACT-R Architecture of Cognition.
Chapter 11 Multiple Regression.
Memory Chapter 6.
Cognitive Psychology, 2 nd Ed. Chapter 1. Defining Cognitive Psychology The study of human mental processes and their role in thinking, feeling, and behaving.
고려대학교 산업공학과 IND561 Engineering Psychology Chapter 7. Memory and Training  OVERVIEW  Working memory – temporary, attention-demanding store examine, evaluate,
Introduction to Psychology Human Memory. Lecture Outline 1)Encoding 2)Storage 3)Retrieval and Forgetting 4)Multiple memory systems.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [INTELLIGENT AGENTS PARADIGM] Professor Janis Grundspenkis Riga Technical University Faculty of Computer Science and Information.
Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Using Expectations to Drive Cognitive Behavior Unmesh Kurup, Christian Lebiere,
MODELING HUMAN PERFORMANCE Anderson et al. Article and Taatgen, Lebeire, & Anderson Article Presented by : Kelsey Baldree.
Introducing Piaget Read the information on Piaget and answer the following questions (on a word document or in your green books): Outline Piaget’s main.
노홍찬.  ACT-R 5.0: An Integrated Theory of the Mind  J.R. Anderson et al., Psychological Review, 2004, 633 ◦ ACT-R architecture overview ◦ The.
Introduction to ACT-R Tutorial 21st Annual Conference
Memory. Interesting Video  Color Changing Card Trick Color Changing Card Trick.
SLA Seminar, NSYSU 11/17/2006 Ch. 9 Cognitive accounts of SLA OUTLINE Cognitive theory of language acquisition Models of cognitive accounts Implicit vs.
C Pearson Allyn & Bacon Encoding and Retrieval Processes in Long-Term Memory Chapter 6.
Understanding PML Paulo Pinheiro da Silva. PML PML is a provenance language (a language used to encode provenance knowledge) that has been proudly derived.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 8 The Information-Processing Approach.
SOFTWARE DESIGN.
Cognitive Architectures: A Way Forward for the Psychology of Programming Michael Hansen Ph.D Student in Comp/Cog Sci CREST / Percepts & Concepts Lab Indiana.
Information Processing Systems A Cognitive Learning Model.
Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice Chapter 6
Korea Univ. Division Information Management Engineering UI Lab. Korea Univ. Division Information Management Engineering UI Lab. IMS 802 Cognitive Modeling.
Brunning – Chapter 2 Sensory, Short Term and Working Memory.
The Volcano Optimizer Generator Extensibility and Efficient Search.
Cognitive Theories of Learning Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos.
Human Abilities 2 How do people think? 1. Agenda Memory Cognitive Processes – Implications Recap 2.
AP Statistics Semester One Review Part 2 Chapters 4-6 Semester One Review Part 2 Chapters 4-6.
DO LOCAL MODIFICATION RULES ALLOW EFFICIENT LEARNING ABOUT DISTRIBUTED REPRESENTATIONS ? A. R. Gardner-Medwin THE PRINCIPLE OF LOCAL COMPUTABILITY Neural.
Functional encoding in memory for goals ACT-R workshop August 1999 Erik M. Altmann J. Gregory Trafton
U i Modleing SGOMS in ACT-R: Linking Macro- and Microcognition Lee Yong Ho.
Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory Carnegie Mellon University 1 Social and Decision Sciences Department ACT-R models of training Cleotilde Gonzalez and.
Cognitive information processing. A result of several influences Especially: –Learning theory S-R; S-O-R –Computer science/Information processing Turing.
RULES Patty Nordstrom Hien Nguyen. "Cognitive Skills are Realized by Production Rules"
CHAPTER 6 COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVES: 1. THE PROCESSING OF INFORMATION EPSY DR. SANDRA RODRIGUEZ PRESENTATION BY: RUTH GARZA Gredler, M. E. (2009).
Information Processing and Memory Chapter 6 Ergle.
Associative Theories of Long- Term Memory. Network Theory The basic notion that we need to explore is that memory consists of a large number of associations.
Cognitive Architectures and General Intelligent Systems Pay Langley 2006 Presentation : Suwang Jang.
CognitiveViews of Learning Chapter 7. Overview n n The Cognitive Perspective n n Information Processing n n Metacognition n n Becoming Knowledgeable.
ACT-R 5.0 Architecture Christian Lebiere Human-Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University
Chapter 6 Memory. Copyright © 1999 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2 The Nature of Memory Memory –the retention of information over time –Psychologists.
Multitasking Computational Neuroscience NSCI 492 Spring 2008.
Chapter 6 Selecting a Design. Research Design The overall approach to the study that details all the major components describing how the research will.
Typical Person :^) Fall 2002 CS/PSY 6750.
Knowledge Representation
Memory and Thought Chapter 3.
Bryan Stearns University of Michigan Soar Workshop - May 2018
An Integrated Theory of the Mind
Typical Person :^) Fall 2002 CS/PSY 6750.
Psycholinguistics Psychology Linguistics Cognitive science
Presentation transcript:

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering 1. Introduction  Divide-and-conquer strategy  Allen Newell (1973) – unified theory, production system  ACT-R, 3CAPS, EPIC, Soar

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering A Brief Sketch of ACT-R  declarative knowledge  chunks followed by slots and values  procedural knowledge  production rules – condition-action pairs  each production as a basic step of cognition  display the significance of goal structures

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering No-Magic Doctrine in ACT-R 1. Experimentally Grounded 2.Detailed and Precise Accounting of Data 3.Learnable Through Experience 4.Capable of Dealing with Complex Cognitive Phenomena 5.Principled Parameters 6.Neurally Plausible

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering 2. knowledge Presentation

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Procedural-Declarative Distinction  long-term repository of procedural knowledge in the form of production rules  parallel, long-term, declarative repository  hippocampal for declarative knowledge  basal ganglia for procedural knowledge

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Structure of Chunks  independent patterns of info as the sets of slots with associated values  types of pattern – isa slot  two chunks origins – goals & objects  two styles of slot structures but syntactically identical and identically processed

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Production Rules  General Features  basic structure of a production goal condition + chunk retrieval --> goal transformations  Conflict Resolution

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Production Rules  Four claims with the use of Production Rules 1. Modularity 2. Abstraction 3.Goal Factoring 4.Conditional Asymmetry

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Production Rules  Production Syntax  the condition  a goal chunk followed by other chunk patterns for retrievals from memory  action for creating and modifying goal chunks  =, >

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Production Rules  Restrictions on Production Rules  chunk retrieval not in the initial selection of production rules  goal modifications on the right-hand side of a production  drastic reduction in the size of production conditions

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Goal Structures/ Production Rules  Goal Structures in ACT-R  creates a natural seriality to cognition  parallelism at the subsymbolic level 1.how to be any interrupt-driven cognition 2.how to pursue multiple goals in parallel 3.perfect-memory assumptions

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Types of Production Rules  goal match, declarative retrieval, goal transformation  6 production types 1. No Change (No Stack Change, No Goal Modification) 2. Goal Elaboration (No Stack Change, Goal Modification)

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Types of Production Rules 3. Side Effect (Push on Stack, No Goal Modification) 4. Return Result (Push on Stack, Goal Modification) 5. Pop Unchanged (Pop Stack, No Goal Modification) 6. Pop Changed (Pop Stack, Goal Modification)

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering 3. Performance

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Conflict Resolution  deciding which production to fire  productions in conflict set are ordered by expected gain  Expected Gain = E = PG – C  No production with positive expected utility, the goal is popped with failure

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Conflict Resolution  Role of P, G, and C  P = qr  C= a + b  a = sum of the match time = 0.05 sec  Little to say about the initial value of G  However, once the value of a goal is set, ACT-R does have something to say

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Conflict Resolution  Stochasticity  noise from a logistic distribution introduce some stochasticity  probability of selecting a production

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Conflict Resolution  Evidence: “Probability Matching”  probability-learning paradigm  choice probability – undermatching

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Retrieval  Activation-Based Retrieval   Base-Level Activation B i  how recently and frequently accessed  Source Activations W j  attention given to elements of the goal

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Retrieval  Strengths of Association S ji  how often the chunk i was needed when j was an element of the goal  Changes in Base-Level Activation  B(t) = β- d ln(t) + ε 1 + ε 2

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Retrieval  Relationship to Response Probability  Probability of a successful retrieval  Odds of recall decreases as a power function of time  odds of recall = Prob/(1-prob) 

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Retrieval  Partial Matching  M ip = A i – D ip  Relationship to Latency 

고려대학교 산업공학과 IND 643 Cognitive Engineering Retrieval  The Fan Experiment  fan – the number of facts studied about a concept  foil – recombinations of persons and locations  latency increases with number of facts about persons and locations  decrease in associative strength with fan  subjects generally slower to reject foils